HATA YÖNETİM ANLAYIŞI, İÇ DENETİM ETKİNLİĞİ VE ÖZ YETKİNLİĞİN MUHASEBECİLERİN HATA İŞLEME DAVRANIŞINA ETKİLERİ ÜZERİNE KEŞİFSEL BİR İNCELEME

Bu çalışmada hata yönetim anlayışı, iç denetim etkinliği ve öz yetkinlik düzeyinin muhasebecilerin mesleki hata yapma davranışına etkilerinin keşifsel bir perspektifde değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Muhasebe çalışanlarından alan araştırması yöntemi ile derlenen verilerin çok değişkenli istatistiki analiz teknikleri uygulanarak değerlendirilmesi sonucunda esnek ve önleyici hata yönetim anlayışının, mesleki hataların yapılma olasılığını azalttığı belirlenmiştir. Ancak hata işleme davranışı işletmenin genel strateji ve kurumsal yapısından da etkilenmektedir. Öz yetkinlik düzeyi, hata yönetimin anlayışının, muhasebe hatası yapma davranışı üzerindeki etkisini moderatör değişken olarak değiştirirken, iç denetimin mesleki hatalar üzerindeki etkisini anlamlı olarak etkilememektedir. Tespit edilen bağıntılar ve bulgular doğrultusunda uygulamacılara ve araştırmacılara yönelik değerlendirmeler ve öneriler yapılmıştır.

AN EXPLORATORY STUDY ON THE EFFECTS OF ERROR MANAGEMENT, INTERNAL AUDİT EFFECTİVENESS AND SELF-EFFİCACY ON ERROR HANDLİNG BEHAVİOR OF ACCOUNTANTS

In this study, it is aimed to evaluate the effects of error management approach, internal audit efficiency and self-efficacy level on the professional error-handling behavior of accountants in an exploratory perspective. It has been determined that resilience and preventive error management approach decreases the probability of making professional errors as a result of evaluating the data compiled by the field survey method with the application of multivariate statistical analysis techniques. However, the error handling behavior is affected by the overall strategy and organizational structure of the business. While the level of self-efficacy changes the effect of the error management on the behavior of accounting errors, it does not significantly affect the effectiveness of the internal audit on professional errors. Evaluations and recommendations were made for the practitioners and researchers in accordance with the determined correlations and findings.

___

  • Awasthi, Vidya; Pratt, James (1990). “The Effects Of Monetary Incentives On Effort And Decision Performance: The Role Of Cognitive Characteristics”. The Accounting Review, V:65, I:4, p:797- 811.
  • Bandura, Albert (2012). “On The Functional Properties Of Perceived Self-Efficacy Revisited”, Journal of Management, V:38, I:1, p: 9-44.
  • Barrett, M., Cooper, D. J., and Jamal, K. (2005). “Globalization And The Coordinating Of Work In Multinational Audits”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, V:30, I:1, p. 1-24.
  • Bowrin, Anthony. R. (1998). “Review And Synthesis Of Audit Structure Literature”, Journal of Accounting Literature, V:17, p:40-71.
  • Cannon, Mark, D.; Edmondson, Amy,C. (2005). “Failing To Learn And Learning To Fail (İntelligently): How Great Organizations Put Failure To Work To İnnovate And İmprove”, Long Range Planning, V:38, I:3, p:299-319.
  • Chen, G., Gully, S. M.and Eden, D.,(2001).”Validation Of A New General Self-Efficacy Scale”, Organizational Research Methods,V: 4, I:1, p:62-83.
  • Corama, P., Fergusona, C, ve Moroney, R. (2006). “The Value Of Internal Audit In Fraud Detection”, Journal of Accounting and Finance, V:48, I:4, p:543-59.
  • Çapa-Aydın,Y., Uzuntiryaki-Kondakcı, E., Temli, Y. ve Tarkın, A. (2013). “Adaptation Of Sources Of Self-Efficacy Inventory Into Turkish”, Elementary Education Online, V:12, I:3, p:749-758.
  • Davies, Marlene (2009). “Effective Working Relationships Between Audit Committees And Internal Audit, The Cornerstone Of Corporate Governance In Local Authorities, A Welsh Perspective”, Journal of Management&Governance, I:13, p:41-73.
  • Dittenhofer, Mort (2001). “Internal Auditing Effectiveness: An Expansion Of Present Methods”, Managerial Auditing Journal, V:16, I:8, p:443-450.
  • Edmondson, Amy (1999). “Psychological Safety And Learning Behavior In Work Teams”, Administrative Science Quarterly, I:44, p:350-383.
  • Frese, Micheal; Keith, Nina. (2015). “Action Errors, Error Management And Learning In Organizations”. Annual Review of Psychology, I:66, p:661-687.
  • Fowzia, Rehana. (2010). “Co-Operation Between Internal And External Auditors: A Comparative Study On Nationalized And Foreign Banks In Bangladesh”, World Journal of Management, V:2, I:2, p:22-35.
  • Gilbert, C., Amalberti, R., Laroche, H., and Paries, J. (2007). “Errors And Failures: Towards A New Safety Paradigm”, Journal of Risk Research, V:10, I:7, p:959-975.
  • Gist, Marilyn, E.;.Mitchell,Terence, R.(1992).”Self-Effıcacy: A Theoretıcal Analysıs Of Its Determinants And Malleability”, Academy Of Management Review, V:17, I:2, P:183-211.
  • Gold, A., Gronewold, U., and Salterio, S. E. (2014).” Error Management In Audit Firms: Error Climate, Type, And Originator”, The Accounting Review, V:89, I:1, p:303-330.
  • Goodman, P. S., Ramanujam, R., Carroll, J. S., Edmondson, A. C., Hofmann, D. A., and Sutcliffe, K. M. (2011). “Organizational errors: Directions for future research”, Research in Organizational Behavior, I:31, p:151-176.
  • Gronewold, Ulfert; Donle. Micheala. (2011). “Organizational Error Climate And Auditors' Predispositions Toward Handling Errors”, Behavioral Research in Accounting, V:23, I:2, p:69-92.
  • Gronewold, U., Gold, A. and Salterio, S.E. (2013). “Reporting Self-Made Errors: The Impact Of Organizational Error-Management Climate And Error Type”, Journal of Business Ethics, V:117, I:1, p:189-208 .
  • Hofmann, David, A.; Frese, Micheal (2011). “Errors, Error Taxonomies, Error Prevention, And Error Management: Laying The Groundwork For Discussing Errors In Organizations”. In Hofmann, D. A., Frese, M. (Eds.), Errors in Organizations, New York: Routledge, p:1-44.
  • Intakhan, Phaithun; Ussahawanitchakit, Phapruke. (2010). “Roles Of Audit Experience And Ethical Reasoning In Audit Professionalism And Audit Effectiveness Through A Moderator Of Stakeholder Pressure: An Empirical Study Of Tax Auditors In Thailand”, Journal of Academy of Business and Economics, V:10, I:5, p:1-15.
  • Jokipii, Annukka (2010). “Determinants And Consequences Of Internal Control In Firms: A Contingency Theory Based Analysis”, Journal of Management&Governance, V:14, p:115-144.
  • Keith, Nina; Frese, Micheal (2005). “Self-Regulation In Error Management Training: Emotion Control And Metacognition As Mediators Of Performance Effects”, Journal Of Applied Psychology, I:90, P:677-691.
  • Malone, Charles. F.; Roberts, Robin. W. (1996). “Factors Associated With The Incidence Of Reduced Audit Quality Behaviors”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, V:15, I:2, p:49-63.
  • Mihret, Dessalegn Getie; Admassu, Mengistu Amare. (2011). “Reliance Of External Auditors On Internal Audit Work: A Corporate Governance Perspective”, International Business Research, V:4, I:2, p:67-79.
  • Munroa, Lois; Stewart, Jenny. (2011). “External Auditors' Reliance On Internal Auditing: Further Evidence”, Managerial Auditing Journal, V:26, I:6, p:464-481.
  • Omar, Normah; Abu Bakar, K. M . (2012). “Fraud Prevention Mechanisms Of Malaysian Government-Linked Companies: An Assessment Of Existence And Effectiveness”, Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, V:8, I:1, p:15-31.
  • Owhoso, V. E., W. F. Messier, Jr. and J. G. Lynch, Jr. (2002). “Error Detection By Industry Specialized Teams During Sequential Audit Review”, Journal of Accounting Research, V:40, I:3, p:883-900.
  • Owolabi, Sunday, A, & Dada, Samuel. O. (2011). “Audit Committee: An Instrument Of Effective Corporate Governance”, European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, I:35, p:173-183.
  • Pajares, Frank (1996).”Self-Efficacy Beliefs İn Academic Settings”, Review of Educational Research, V:66, I:4, 543-578.
  • Radu, Maria (2012). “Corporate Governance, İnternal Audit And Environmental Audit – The Performance Tools İn Romanian Companies”, Accounting and Management Information Systems, V:11, I:1, p:112-130.
  • Ramsay, Robert, J. (1994). “Senior/manager Differences In Audit Workpaper Review Performance”, Journal Of Accounting Research, V:32, I:1, p:127-135.
  • Reason, James (1997). “Managing the risks of organizational accidents”, Hampshire,England: Ashgate Publishing.
  • Shea, Christine. M.; Howell, Jane M. (2000). “Efficacy-Performance Spirals: An Empirical Test”, Journal of Management, I:26, p:791.-812
  • Schulman, P.R., , Roe E, Van Eeten M. and De Bruijne, M. (2004). “High Reliability And The Management Of Critical İnfrastructures”, Journal of Crisis and Contingency Management, I:12, p:14-28.
  • Stajkovic, Alexander. D.; Luthans, Fred (1998).”Self-Efficacy And Work-Related Performance: A Meta-Analysis”, Psychological Bulletin, V:124, I:2, p:240-261.
  • Sutcliffe, Kathleen.M.; Vogus, Timothy. (2003). “Organizing For Resilience”. In Cameron KS, Dutton JE, & Quinn RE (Eds.), Positive Organizational Scholarship, San Francisco: BerrettKoehler, p:94-110.
  • Suyono, Eko; Hariyanto, Eko (2012). “Relationship Between İnternal Control, İnternal Audit, And Organization Commitment With Good Governance: Indonesian”, China-USA Business Review, V:11, I:9, p:1237-1245.
  • Van Dyck, C., M. Frese, Baer, M. and Sonnentag,S. (2005). “Organizational Error Management Culture And Its Impact On Performance: A Two-Study Replication”, Journal of Applied Psychology. V:90, I:6, p:1228-1240.
  • Weick Karl, E., & Roberts Karlene,H. (1993). “Collective Mind İn Organizations: Heedful İnterrelating On Flight Decks”, Administrative Science Quarterly, I:38, p:357-381.
  • Weick, Karl, E., & Sutcliffe, Kathleen. M. (2006). “Mindfulness And The Quality Of Organizational Attention”, Organization Science, I:16, p.409-421.
  • Weick K.E., Sutcliffe K.M., and Obstfeld D. (1999). “Organizing For High Reliability: Processes Of Collective Mindfulness”. In Staw, B.M., & Cummings, L.L. (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, p:81-123.
  • Wood, Robert; Bandura, Albert. (1989). “Social Cognitive Theory Of Organizational Management”, Academy of Management Review, V:14, No:3, p:361-384.