Güneş Enerjisi Santrali Yatırımlarının Ekonomik Analizi

Yenilenebilir enerji kaynakları küresel ısınma ve ülkelerin enerji güvenliği sorunlarının çözümünde önemli bir role sahiptir. Bu nedenle ülkeler enerji üretimlerinde yenilenebilir enerji kaynaklarına yönelmekte ve enerji kaynağı çeşitliliğini artırmaktadır. Yenilenebilir enerji kaynaklarından güneş enerjisi diğer enerji kaynaklarına göre hem daha erişilebilir hem de daha az kirliliğe neden olmaktadır. Bu bağlamda güneş enerjisi yatırımlarının ekonomik açıdan değerlendirilmesi oldukça önemlidir. Bu çalışmada Türkiye’de hipotetik bir fotovoltaik enerji santrali yatırımının ekonomik bağlamda yapılabilirliğinin değerlendirilmesi için indirgenmiş nakit akımı yöntemi kullanılmıştır. İndirgenmiş nakit akımı yöntemi sonucunda hesaplanan yapılabilirlik göstergeleri yatırımın politika mekanizmalarıyla desteklendiği durumda yapılabilir olduğunu gösterirken, yatırımların desteklenmemesi durumunda ekonomik açıdan fotovoltaik yatırımların yapılamayacağı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Monte Carlo simülasyonu sonucunda yatırımın net bugünkü değerinin pozitif olma olasılığı yatırımın desteklendiği durumda %64,1, destek olmaması durumunda ise %30,1 olarak tespit edilmiştir.

Economic Analysis of Solar Power Plant Investment

Renewable energy sources have an important role in dealing global warming and energy security problems of countries. Therefore, the countries support renewable energy sources in their energy production and increase the diversity of energy sources. Solar energy, one of the renewable energy sources, is more accessible and causes less pollution compared to other energy sources. In this context, it is very important to evaluate solar energy investments economically. In this study, the method of discounted cash flow has been used to evaluate economic viability of a hypothetical large scale photovoltaic investment in Turkey. The results of the discounted cash flows method demonstrate that the investment is economically viable when it is supported by the government incentive, but is not viable when it is not supported by any policy mechanism of government. As a result of the Monte Carlo simulation, the probability of the net present value of the investment being positive was determined as 64.1% in case of incentive, and 30.1% in the lack of incentive.

___

  • Adaramola, M. (2015). Feasibility of grid-connected solar pv energy system: A case study in Nigeria. In M. Adaramola (Ed.), Solar energy: Application, economics, and public perception (pp. 123-139). Canada: Apple Academic Press, Inc.
  • Adjaoud, F., Charfi, D., & Chourou, L. (2011). Corporate governance and investment decisions. In H. Kent Baker, & P. English (Eds.), Capital budgeting valuation financial analysis for today’s investment projects (pp. 37-55). Canada: JohnWiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Aguilar, L. (2015). Feasibility study of developing large scale solar PV project in Ghana: An economical analysis. Master’s Thesis. Sweden: Chalmers University Of Technology, Sustainable Energy Systems,
  • Aldali, Y., & Ahwide, F. (2013). Evaluation of A 50MW Two-Axis Tracking Photovoltaic Power Plant for AL-Jagbob, Libya: energetic, economic, and environmental impact analysis. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 7(12), 811-815.
  • Arnold, T., & Nixon, T. (2011). Alternative methods of evaluating capital investments. In H. Kent Baker, & P. English (Eds.), Capital budgeting valuation financial analysis for today’s investment projects (pp. 79-94). Canada: JohnWiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Awerbuch, S. (2000). Investing in photovoltaics: risk, accounting and the value of new technology. Energy Policy, 28, 1023-1035.
  • Batı, O. (2014). Türkiye’de yenilenebilir enerji kaynaklarının sürdürülebilir kalkınmaya etkisi konusunda bir alan araştırması. Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 16(2), 27-38.
  • Beninga, S. (2008). Financial modelling. 3rd ed. The MIT Press. Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England.
  • Bigoni, G. (2018). Impact of risks on investment in solar photovoltaic: A power plant investment analysis. Doctoral Dissertation, Reykjavík: University of Iceland, School of Social Sciences.
  • Bustos, F., Toledo, A., Contreras, J.& Fuentes, A. (2016). Sensitivity analysis of a photovoltaic solar plant in Chile. Renewable Energy, 87, 145-153.
  • Cebeci, S. (2017). Türkiye’de güneş enerjisinden elektrik üretim potansiyelinin değerlendirilmesi. Ankara: T.C. Kalkınma Bakanlığı Uzmanlık Tezi.
  • Damodaran Online, http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/datacurrent.html (Erişim Tarihi: 10.01.2021).
  • Darling, S. B., You, F., Veselka, T. & Velosa, A. (2011). Assumptions and the levelized cost of energy for photovoltaics. Energy & Environmental Science 4(9), 3133–3139.
  • Dünya Bankası, Sindh Solar Energy Project (P159712). http://pubdocs.worldbank.org/en/115591526379293210/PAD-Annex-P159712- Economic-Financial-Analysis.pdf. (Erişim Tarihi: 10.01.2021).
  • EL-Shimy M., Abdelraheem M.A., and Said M. (2017). detailed techno-economic analysis of solar-pv projects – Egypt case studies. In: EL-Shimy M. (Ed.) Economics of variable renewable sources for electric power production. Germany: Lambert Academic Publishing.
  • El-Shimy, M. (2009). Viability analysis of PV power plants in Egypt. Renewable Energy, 34(10), 2187-2196.
  • EPIA (2010). Unlocking the Sunbelt potential of photovoltaics. October, 2010.
  • Ernst&Young (2013). Renewable energy country attractiveness index, Issue 37, May 2013.
  • Ernst&Young (2013). Renewable energy country attractiveness index, Issue 38, August 2013.
  • Ernst&Young (2013). Renewable energy country attractiveness index, Issue 39, November 2013.
  • Ernst&Young (2014). Renewable energy country attractiveness index, Issue 40, February 2014.
  • Ernst&Young (2014). Renewable energy country attractiveness index, Issue 41, June 2014.
  • Ernst&Young (2014). Renewable energy country attractiveness index, Issue 42, September 2014.
  • Ernst&Young (2015). Renewable energy country attractiveness index, Issue 43, March 2015.
  • Ernst&Young (2015). Renewable energy country attractiveness index, Issue 44, June 2015.
  • Ernst&Young (2018). Renewable energy country attractiveness index, Issue 51, May 2018.
  • Ernst&Young (2018). Renewable energy country attractiveness index, Issue 52, November 2018.
  • Ernst&Young (2019). Renewable energy country attractiveness index, Issue 53, May 2019.
  • Ernst&Young (2019). Renewable energy country attractiveness index, Issue 54, November 2019.
  • Ernst&Young (2020). Renewable energy country attractiveness index, Issue 55, May 2020.
  • Ernst&Young (2020). Renewable energy country attractiveness index, Issue 56, November 2020.
  • Ertuğrul, M., & Saldı, M.H. (2020). Return on investment analysis of unlicensed solar energy projects in Turkey, Business&Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(1), 903- 923.
  • Ertürk, M. (2011). Economic analysis of wind and solar energy sources of Turkey. Master of Arts. Austin: The University of Texas at Austin, Faculty of the Graduate School.
  • Eurostat, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/t2020_rd320/default/table?lang=en (Erişim Tarihi: 10.01.2021).
  • EXIST Şeffaflık Platformu, https://seffaflik.epias.com.tr/transparency/uretim/yekdem/kuruluguc. xhtml (Erişim Tarihi: 10.01.2021).
  • GİB (2020).https://www.gib.gov.tr/sites/default/files/fileadmin/user_upload/Yararli_Bilgiler/amortis man_oranlari.pdf. (Erişim Tarihi: 13.12.2020)
  • Hacıbebekoğlu, M., Oğuz Yiğitbaşı, G. ve Çetinel, S. (2011). Güneş enerjisi santrali yatırım fizibilitesi. https://www.karacadag.gov.tr/Dokuman/Dosya/www.karacadag.org.tr_266_DU1X25D N_gunes_enerjisi_santrali.pdf. (Erişim tarihi: 10.05.2021).
  • Harris, T. R. (2017). Incorporating risk in analysis of tax policies for solar power investments. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 7(6), 112-118.
  • IEA (2017). Technical assumptions used in pv financial models review of current practices and recommendations. Report IEA-PVPS T13-08:2017. May, 2017.
  • IEA (2020). IEA PVPS 2020 Trends in photovoltaic applications report IEA PVPS T1-38:2020.
  • IMF (2020). World Economic Outlook Database. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/weo-database/2020/October. (Erişim Tarihi: 13.12.2020).
  • IRENA (2019), Renewable Energy Statistics 2019, The International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi.
  • IRENA (2020). Renewable power generation costs in 2019, International Renewable Energy Agency.
  • Kodukula, P., & Papudesu, C. (2006). Project valuation using real options a practitioner’s guide. J. Ross Publishing.
  • NREL, (2015). Best practices in pv system operations and maintenance, Version 1.0.
  • Okka, O. (2015). Finansal Yönetim. 6. Basım. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
  • Orta Karadeniz Kalkınma Ajansı Çorum Yatırım Destek Ofisi (2018). http://www.investcorum.com/Documents/yenilenebilir-enerji-yatirimlari-16.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 10.01.2021).
  • Pan, J., Tian, L., & Shan, H. (2016). The valuation of photovoltaic power generation based on real options. International Journal of Nonlinear Science, 21(1), 31-36.
  • RENAC (Renewables Academy), IET (International Energy Transition) & IRENA (International Renewable Energy Agency) (2014). Economic assessment of pv and wind for energy planning.
  • Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R. W., & Jaffe, J. (2003). Corporate finance. Sixth Edition. McGraw- Hill Companies
  • Sipahi, B., Yanık, S., & Aytürk, Y. (2016). Şirket değerleme yaklaşımları ilkeler-yöntemleruygulamalar. Seçkin Yayıncılık. İkinci Baskı. Mart 2016, Ankara.
  • SOLARGIS Prospect. apps.solargis.com/prospect.
  • Şen, D., Tunç, M., & Özilhan, T. (2013). Investment analysis of a new solar power plant. International Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 2(6), 229-241.
  • TCMB (2020). Elektronik Veri Dağıtım Sistemi. Ankara: Türkiye Cumhuriyet Merkez Bankası. https://evds2.tcmb.gov.tr/index.php?/evds/serieMarket (Erişim Tarihi: 13.12.2020).
  • Weaver, J. F. (2020). https://commercialsolarguy.com/2020/03/20/what-to-do-with-old-solarpanels/. (Erişim tarihi: 10.01.2021).
  • Yamamoto, Y. (2018). Feed-in tariffs and the economics of renewable energy. Springer International Publishing AG, Switzerland.
  • Yanıktepe, B., Kara, O., & Özalp, C. (2017). The global solar radiation estimation and analysis of solar energy: Case study for Osmaniye, Turkey. International Journal of Green Energy, 14(9), 765-773.
  • Yenilenebilir Enerji Genel Müdürlüğü, https://enerji.gov.tr/eigm-yenilenebilir-enerji-kaynaklargunes (Erişim Tarihi: 10.12.2020).
  • Yıldırım, U., & Kaya, M. V. (2020). Yenilenebilir enerji: Tarihsel ve teorik bir bakış. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi Dergisi, 55(4). 2420-2433.
  • http-1, http://www.konyadayatirim.gov.tr/sektor.asp?SayfaID=1. (Erişim Tarihi: 28.01.2021).
Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-1237
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1941
  • Yayıncı: Türk Kooperatifçilik Kurumu