Türkçe adıl bağımlılıkları üzerine bazı notlar

Bu makalede Türkçedeki adılların tümce içerisinde kurduğu bağımlılıklar Chomsky (1980, 1982, 1986) tarafından ortaya atılan ve Üretici dilbilgisi çerçevesinde geliştirilen Bağlama kuramı ışığında tartışılmaktadır. Makalede Bağlama kuramı koşullarının Türkçenin kimi yapılarını açıklayamayacağı iki neden etrafında savunulmaktadır: (i) Türkçede Bağlama kuramının öngördüğü kişi adılı-dönüşlü adıl ayrımı yerine üçlü bir ayrım göze çarpmaktadır. (ii) Türkçede dönüşlü adılın işleneceği bir en küçük alan oluşturmak olanaksızdır. Makale bu anlamda sadece bağlı değişken okumasına sahip olan kendi ve sadece gösterici okumaya sahip olan kişi adılları arasında bir ayrım önermekte, kendisi adılının özel bir dağılıma sahip olup bu iki okumayı birleştirdiğini ve tümce içerisindeki bir işleyici tarafından işlendiğini savunmaktadır.

Some notes on Turkish pronominal anaphora

This article discusses the distributional properties of the pronominal expressions in Turkish in light of the Binding theory proposed by Chomsky (1980, 1982, 1986) and developed in various dimensions throughout the Generative enterprise. The following questions are raised: (i) How are the anaphoric relations reflected in syntax? (ii) How does anaphora appear in Turkish? (iii) Can Binding theory explain the Turkish facts? I propose that the Binding theory Conditions A and B seem to be inadequate in explaining the anaphoric system of Turkish given that (i) Turkish seems to have a three-partite system instead of pronoun-anaphor complementarity, and (ii) the idea that Turkish has a specifiable minimal domain where the binding operation applies is problematic in a number of respects. I propose that Turkish distinguishes between forms which have only variable interpretation (kendi) and forms which have only deictic interpretation (personal pronouns). kendisi is a special form which combines these interpretations and licensed in accordance with the presence/absence of an A’- operator.

PDF

___

ARSLAN, Ceyda (2006) Case as an Uninterpretable Feature, Boğaziçi University, Ph.D. Dissertation.
AYGEN, Gülşat (2002) Finiteness, Case and Clausal Architecture, Harvard University, Ph.D. Dissertation, 2002.
BOECKX, Cedric (2003) Islands and Chains: Resumption as Stranding, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam and Philadelphia.
BOECKX, Cedric (2008) Bare Syntax, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008.
CHOMSKY, Noam (1980) “On Binding”, Linguistic Inquiry, 11, 1- 46.
CHOMSKY, Noam (1982) Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding, The MIT Press, Cambridge and Mass.
CHOMSKY, Noam (1986) Barriers, The MIT Press, Cambridge and Mass.
CSATÓ, Éva Ágnes, & JOHANSON, Lars (1998) “Turkish”, (Ed.) Lars Johanson & Éva Ágnes Csató, The Turkic languages, Routledge, London & New York, 202-235.
DECHAINE, R-M. & MANFREDI, V. (1994) “Binding Domains in Haitian”, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 12, 203-257.
DECHAINE, R-M. & WILTSCHKO, M. (2002) “Decomposing Pronouns”, Linguistic Inquiry, 33, 409-442.
DECHAINE, R-M. & WILTSCHKO, M. (2004) “Dissolving Condition A”, GLOW, April 2004. Thessaloniki.
ENÇ, Mürvet (1986) “Topic Switching and Pronominal Subjects in Turkish”. (Ed.) D. I. Slobin, and Karl Zimmer, Studies in Turkish Linguistics, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam and Philadelphia, 195-208.
ERGUVANLI-TAYLAN, Eser (1986) “Pronominal versus Zero Representation of Anaphora in Turkish”, (Ed.) D. I. Slobin, and Karl Zimmer, Studies in Turkish Linguistics, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam and Philadelphia, 209-231.
GÖKSEL, Aslı & KERSLAKE, Celia (2005) Turkish: A Comprehensive Grammar, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
HORNSTEIN, Norbert (2001) “Control in GB and Minimalism”, Ms., University of Maryland.
HORNSTEIN, Norbert (2006) “Pronouns in a Minimalist Setting”, University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics, 14, 47-80.
HUANG, Yan (2000) Anaphora: A Cross-linguistic Study, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
İNCE, Atakan (2007) “Direct complement clauses as Object Control Structures in Turkish”, (Ed.) Erin Bainbridge & Brian Agbayani, Proceedings of the thirty-fourth Western Conference On Linguistics, Los Angeles, 208-221.
KAYNE, Richard (2002) “Pronouns and their Antecedents”, (Ed.) Samuel D. Epstein & T. D. Seely, Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, 133-166.
KORNFILT, Jaklin (1984) Case Marking, Agreement and Empty Categories in Turkish, Harvard University, Ph.D. Dissertation.
KORNFILT, Jaklin (1997) Turkish, Routledge, London.
KORNFILT, Jaklin (2004) “Agr in Turkish as an Expression of Categorial Features”, (Ed.) Meltem Kelepir and Balkız Öztürk, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 52, Proceedings of the Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics II, The MIT Press, Cambridge and Mass.
KORNFILT, Jaklin (2007) “Verbal and Nominalized Finite Clauses in Turkish”, (Ed.) I. Nikoloeva, Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 305-332.
KURAL, Murat (1992) “V-to-I-to-C in Turkish”, (Ed.) F. Beghelli and Murat Kural, UCLA Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 1-37.
MERAL, Hasan Mesut (2005) “On Some ECM Constructions in Turkish”, Ms. Boğaziçi University.
MERAL, Hasan Mesut (2010) Resumption, A’- Dependencies and Implications on Clausal Architecture, Boğaziçi University, Ph.D. Dissertation.
ODED, Ilknur (2006) Control in Turkish, Boğaziçi University, M.A. Thesis.
ÖZSOY, A. Sumru (1983) Reflexivization in Turkish: A Syntactic, Semantic and Discourse Analysis, University of Michigan, Ph.D. Dissertation.
ÖZSOY, A. Sumru (1984) “On the Syntactic Properties of Empty Categories”, (Ed.) Ayhan Aksu-Koç, and Eser, Erguvanlı- Taylan, Proceedings of the Turkish Linguistics Conference, Boğaziçi Univeristy Press, Istanbul, 101-111.
ÖZSOY, A. Sumru (2001) “On „Small‟ Clauses, other „Bare‟ Verbal Complements and Feature Checking in Turkish”, (Ed.) Eser Erguvanlı-Taylan, The Verb in Turkish, John Benjamins Amsterdam and Philadelphia, 213-237.
ÖZSOY, A. Sumru (to appear) “Birbirleri as an (un)-anaphor”, (Ed.) Éva Ágnes Csato, Birsel Karakoç and Astrid Menz), Turcologica, The Uppsala Meeting: The Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Turkish Linguistics. Harrassowitz Publishing House, Wiesbaden.
ÖZTÜRK, Balkız (2005) Case, Referentiality and Phrase Structure, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam and Philadelphia.
REULAND, Eric (2001) “Primitives of Binding”, Linguistic Inquiry, 32, 439-492.
REULAND, Eric (2005) “Binding Conditions: How are they Derived?” (Ed.) Stefan Müller, Proceedings of the HPSG05 Conference. University of Lisbon.
SAFIR, Ken (2004) The Syntax of Anaphora, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
SAFIR, Ken (2008) “Coconstrual and Narrow Syntax”, Syntax, 11/3, 330-355.
Tarama Sözlüğü, Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları, Ankara 1996.
ZIDANI-EROGLU, Leyla (1997) “Exceptionally Case-Marked NPs as Matrix Objects”, Linguistic Inquiry, 28/2, 219-230.