THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE SEXUAL SELF-CONSCIOUSNESS SCALE

Araştırmanın amacı Cinsel Öz-bilinç Ölçeğini Türkçeye uyarlamaktır. Araştırma 336 evli birey üzerinde yapılmıştır. Ölçeğin uyarlama çalışmasında ölçeğin yapı geçerliği incelemek için açımlayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizi kullanılmıştır. Ölçeğin güvenirliğini belirlemek için Cronbach Alpha formülü kullanılmıştır. Ayrıca ölçeğin madde analizi için t-testi ve düzeltilmiş madde-toplam korelasyonu kullanılmıştır. Yapılan Açımlayıcı Faktör Analizi sonucu toplam varyansın %53.58'ini açıklayan ölçeğin original factor yapısına uygun iki faktörlü bir yapı elde edilmiştir. Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi sonucu Ki-kare değerinin anlamlı (x²= 108,13 sd= 53, p= 0.00) diğer uyum indeklerinin (RMSEA =0.080; AGFI= 0.85; CFI= 0.92; NNFI= 0.90; GFI= 0.90 ve SRMR= 0.079) de kabul edilebilir düzeyde olduğu bulunmuştur. Ölçeğin bütünü için içtutarlılık katsayısının 0.84, cinsel utangaçlık alt boyutu için 0.83, cinsel öz-odaklanma alt boyutu için 0.79 olduğu bulunmuştur. Bu bağlamda, ölçeğin iç tutarlılık güvenirlik katsayılarının yeterli düzeyde olduğu düşünülebilir. Madde analizi için yapılan t-testi (sd= 174) sonuçlarının 6.49 (p

CİNSEL ÖZ-BİLİNÇ ÖLÇEĞİ’NİN TÜRKÇE VERSİYONUNUN GEÇERLİK VE GÜVENİRLİĞİ

The purpose of this study was adapted Sexual Self-consciousness Scale. This study involved 336 married individuals. In scale adaptation study, structure validity was used for examine the validity of the scale. For structure validity, explanatory and confirmatory factor analyze were used. Cronbach’s Alpha formula was used for determine the reliability of the scale. Furthermore, t-test and corrected item-total correlation were used for item analysis. The original two factor structure of the scale was reproduced which showed that the Turkish form is close to the original, explaining 53.58% of the total variance using factor analysis. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed a significant chi-square result (x²= 108,13 df= 53, p= 0.00); RMSEA fit indices=0.080; AGFI= 0.85; CFI= 0.92; NNFI= 0.90; GFI= 0.90; and SRMR= 0.079. The internal consistency coefficient for the complete scale is 0.84; for the Sexual Embarrassment subscale 0.83; and for the Sexual Self-focus subscale 0.79. T-test results are significant, which results are related to the difference of lower 27% and upper 27% groups, that established in accordance to the total points of test. In the result of the item analysis, corrected item-total correlations are ranged from a low of 0.46 to a high of 0.70; and T –test values are ranged from a low of 6.49 (p

PDF

___

BARLOW, D. H. (1986). Causes of Sexual Dysfunction: The Role of Anxiety and Cognitive Interference. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54 (1), 140–148.
BECK, J. G., & BARLOW, D. H. (1986). The Effects of Anxiety and Attentional Focus on Sexual Responding—I: Physio-Logical Patterns in Erectile Dysfunction. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 24, 9–17.
Baumeister, R. F., & Trice, D. M. (1988). Metatraits. Journal of Personality, 56, 571-598.
BAY, F., BAHRAMI, F., FATEHIZADEH, M., AHMADI, S. A., & ETEMADI, O. (2012). Attachment Orientations and Female Sexual Function: Themediation Role of Sexual Assertiveness and Self-Consciousness. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 4 (5), 50-63.
BURGIO, K. L., MERLUZZI, T. V., & PRYOR, J. B. (1986). Effects of Performance Expectancy and Self-Focused Attention on social Interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1216–1221.
BÜYÜKÖZTÜRK, Ş. (2010). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı (12. Baskı). Ankara: PegemA Akademi Yayınevi.
CARVER, C. S., & SCHEIER, M. F. (1978). Self-focusing Effects of Dispositional SelfConsciousness, Mirror Presence, and Audience Presence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36 (1), 324–332.
CYRANOWSKI, J. M., & ANDERSEN, B. L. (2000). Evidence of Self-schematic Cognitive Processing in Women with Alternative Sexual Self-views. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 19, 519-543.
ÇOKLUK, Ö., ŞEKERCİOĞLU, G., & BÜYÜKÖZTÜRK, Ş. (2010). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Çok Değişkenli İstatistik SPSS Ve LISREL Uygulamaları (1. Baskı). Ankara: PegemA Akademi Yayınevi.
FENIGSTEİN, A., SCHEIER, M. F., & BUSS, A. H. (1975). Public and Private Selfconsciousness: Assessment and Theory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 522–527.
GOLDMAN, J. A., & HARLOW, L. L. (1993). Self-perception Variables That Mediate AIDSpreventive Behavior in College Students. Health Psychology, 12 (6), 489–498.
GORRAIZ, M. L. (2011). A Model of Sexual Functioning Across Gender: Self-objectification, Body Shame, Body Self-consciousness and Sexual Self-esteem (Master's Theses). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No: 1497500).
HU, L., & BENTLER, P. M. (1999). Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes In Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1−55.
INGRAM, R. E. (1990). Self-focused Attention in Clinical Disorders: Review and A Conceptual Model. Psychological Review, 107, 156–176.
JANSSEN, E., EVERAERD, W., SPIERING, M., & JANSSEN, J. (2000). Automatic Processes and The Appraisal of Sexual Stimuli: Toward an Information Processing Model of Sexual Arousal. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 8–23.
LINDWALL, M. (2004). Factorial Structure and Invariance Across Gender of The Swedish Selfconsciousness Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 82 (2), 233-240.
MESTON, C. M. (2006). The Effects of State and Trait Self-Focused Attention on Sexual Arousal in Sexually Functional and Dysfunctional Women. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44, 515–532.
MC DONAGH, L. K., MORRISON, T. G., & MCGUIRE, B. E. (2008). The Naked Truth: Development of A Scale Designed to Measure Male Body Image Self-consciousness During Physical Intimacy. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 16, 3, 253-265.
PANAYIOTOU, G., & VRANA, S. R. (1998). Effect of Self-focused Attention on The Startle Reflex, Heart Rate, And Memory Performance Among Socially Anxious and Nonanxious Individuals. Psychophysiology, 35 (3), 328–336.
SANCHEZ, D. T., & KIEFER, A. K. (2007). Body Concerns in and Out of The Bedroom: Implications for Sexual Pleasure and Problems. Arch Sex Behav, 36, 808–820.
SCHERMELLEH-ENGEL, K., MOOSBRUGGER, H., & MULLER, H. (2003). Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8, 23-74.
SCHICK, V. R., CALABRESE, S. K., RIMA, B. N., & ZUCKER, A. N. (2010). Genital Appearance Dissatisfaction: Implications for Women’s Genital Image Self-consciousness, Sexual Esteem, Sexual Satisfaction, and Sexual Risk. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 394–404.
SCHIEMAN, S. (1998). Gender and AIDS Related Psychosocial Processes: A Study of Perceived Susceptibility, Social Distance and Homophobia. AIDS Education and Prevention, 10 (3), 264–277.
SPAHİ, B. YURTKORU, E. S., & ÇİNKO, M. (2008). Sosyal Bilimlerde SPSS’le Veri Analizi (2. Baskı). İstanbul: Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım.
VAN DEN HOUT, M. A., & BARLOW, D. (2000). Attention, Arousal and Expectancies in Anxiety and Sexual Disorders. Journal of Affective Disorders, 61, 241–256.
VAN LANKVELD, J. J. D. M., VAN DEN HOUT, M. A., & SCHOUTEN, E. G.(2004). The Effects of Self-focused Attention, Performance Demand, and Dispositional Sexual Selfconsciousness on Sexual Arousal of Sexually Functional and Dysfunctional Men. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 915–935.
VAN LANKVELD, J. J. D. M., GEIJEN, W. E. H., & SYKORA, H. (2008). The Sexual Selfconsciousness Scale: Psychometric Properties. Archives Sexual Behavior, 37, 925–933.
VAN LANKVELD, J., & BERGH, S. (2008). The Interaction of State and Trait Aspects of Selffocused Attention Affects Genital, But Not Subjective, Sexual Arousal in Sexually Functional Women. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46, 514–528.
VAN OSS, B. M., GOMEZ, C. A., & HEARST, N. (1993). Multiple Heterosexual Partners and Condom Use Among Hispanics and Non-Hispanic Whites. Family Planning Perspectives, 25 (4), 170–174