SOSYAL BİLGİLER DERSİNDE SORGULAYICI-ARAŞTIRMA TABANLI ÖĞRENME MODELİ: BAŞARI VE ÖĞRENMEDE KALICILIĞIN İNCELENMESİ

Bu araştırmanın amacı, Sosyal Bilgiler Dersi öğretiminde sorgulayıcı-araştırma tabanlı öğrenme modelinin öğrencilerin akademik başarı ve öğrenmede kalıcılıkları üzerine etkilerini incelemektir. Çalışmada Sosyal Bilgiler Dersinde sorgulayıcı-araştırma tabanlı öğrenme modelinin öğretimi ile öğrencilerin üst düzey düşünme becerilerini kullanmaları, bilgilerini genişletmeleri ve sınıf dışındaki dünyayla zengin bağlantılar kurmaları hedeflenmiştir. Araştırmada ön test ve son test kontrol gruplu yarı deneysel desen kullanılmıştır. Deneysel uygulama, Sosyal Bilgiler Dersi "Üretim, Dağıtım ve Tüketim" öğrenme gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırma 2012-2013 eğitim-öğretim yılı bahar yarıyılı döneminde Bayburt İli, Mahmut Kemal Yanbeğ Ortaokulu 5. sınıf öğrencileri ile yürütülmüştür. Beş hafta (15 saat) boyunca "Ürettiklerimiz" ünitesi konuları, deney grubunda Stripling SorgulayıcıAraştırma Tabanlı Öğrenme Modeli'nin aşamalarına uygun olarak geliştirilen etkinlikler; kontrol grubunda ise aynı ünite 5. sınıf Sosyal Bilgiler Dersi Öğretmen Kılavuz Kitabı'ndaki etkinlik ve yöntemlerle işlenmiştir. Araştırmada elde edilen sonuçlara göre, sorgulayıcıaraştırma tabanlı öğrenme modelinin 5.sınıf Sosyal Bilgiler Dersini "Öğretmen Kılavuz Kitabı"ndaki etkinlik ve yöntemlere göre işlemenin, öğrencilerin akademik başarı ve öğrenmede kalıcılık düzeyleri üzerinde yüksek derecede anlamlı bir etkisinin olduğu ve önemli katkılar sağladığı görülmüştür. Bu noktada yapılandırmacı Sosyal bilgiler dersi sınıflarında sorgulayıcı-araştırma tabanlı öğrenme modelinin kullanımı; öğrencileri çevrelerindeki dünya hakkında sorular sormaya, kendi sorularını cevaplamak için bilgiler toplamaya, sahip olduğu ön bilgi ve becerilerle topladığı bu bilgileri yorumlamaya ve kendi bulguları hakkında çıkarımda bulunmaya teşvik edebilir

INQUIRY-BASED LEARNING MODEL IN THE SOCIAL STUDIES COURSE: EXAMINING OF SUCCESSES AND RETENTION IN LEARNING

The purpose of this research is to determine the effects of inquirybased learning model on students’ academic achievement and learning retention on teaching Social Studies course. The research has been aimed to provide students with rich connections with real-world scenarios outside of the classroom, that extend their knowledge and use of their high-level thinking skills through the teaching of an inquirybased learning model on Social Studies courses. Pretest/posttest control group quasi-experimental research design was used in the research. The experimental application of the study has been carried out with unit of “Our Product” within the theme “Production, Distribution and Consumption” of Social Studies Course. The research was carried out the 5th grade students at Mahmut Kemal Yanbeğ Middle School in Bayburt, Turkey during the spring semester of 2012-2013 school years. During five weeks (15 hours), the subjects of the “Our Products” unit have been thought with the experimental group through activities in parallel with the Stripling inquiry-based learning model; in the control group, it was used as required by the current 5th grade Social Studies Teacher Guide Textbook with methods and activities in the same unit. According to the results; it has been seen that Stripling inquiry-based learning model, when compared with the control group to whom the teaching activities and methods mentioned in the 5th grade Social Studies Teacher Guide Textbook have been applied, not only has a high-level meaningful effect on academic achievement and the retention of learning; but also contributes considerably to these dependent variables. At this point, the use of inquiry-based learning model in the constructivist Social Studies course classrooms encourages students to ask more questions about the world in their own environment, collect information to answer their own questions, interpret them using their prior knowledge and skills, and make an inference the results of about their findings

PDF

___

AAMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCEE [AAA]. (1990). Science for all Americans: Project 2061.New York.
BABADOĞAN, C. ve GÜRKAN, T.(2002). Sorgulayıcı öğretim stratejisinin akademik baĢarıya etkisi. Eğitim Bilimleri ve Uygulama 1(2), 147-160
BARBER, J. (2007). Seeds of Science /Roots of Reading. Program Overview. Berkeley, CA: Delta Education
BAYIR, E. ve KÖSEOĞLU, F.(2013).Sorgulayıcı-AraĢtırma Odaklı Mesleki GeliĢim ÇalıĢtayına Katılım Sonrası Kimya Öğretmen Adaylarının Öğretmen Rolüne ĠliĢkin AnlayıĢlarının Ġncelenmesi. International Journal of New Trends in Arts, Sports & Science Education, Volume 2, Issue 3
BESHEARS, M.C.(2012).Inquiry-Based Instruction in the Social Studies: Successes and Challenges. The Doctoral dissertation, (ProQuest Digital), University of Arkansas.
BILLINGS, R.L.(2001). Assessment of the Learning Cycle and Inquiry Based Learning in High School Physics Education. The Master of Reserch,(ProQuest Digital), Michigan State University
BROPHY, J. and ALLEMAN, J. (2007). Powerful Social Studies for Elementary Students. (2th Edition). Thomson Wadworth.
BSCS. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness a report for the office of science education national institutes of Health, Web:http: //www.bscs.org adresinden 10 Eylül 2013‟te alınmıĢtır.
CHANG, Y.J. (2013). The Effect of Agent-Based Lectures on Student Learning and Conceptual Change in an Online Inquiry-Based Learning Environment. The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, (ProQuest Digital),Indiana University.
CRESWELL, J. W. (2005). Educational Research. Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. (2th Edition). Newjersey: Pearson Ed.Inc
DEGENHART, H.S. (2007).Relationship of Inquiry-Based Learning Elements on Changes in Middle School Students’ Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (Stem) Beliefs and Interests.The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. (ProQuest Digital). Texas A&M University.
DIPASQUALE, D., MASON, C. and KOLKHORST, F. (2003). Exercise in inquiry: Critical thinking in an inquiry-based exercise physiology laboratory course. Journal of College Science Teaching, 32(6), 388-393
DRAGON, T. (2013). The Impact of Integrated Coaching and Collaboration within an Inquiry Learning Environment.The Doctoral dissertation,(ProQuest Digital), University of Massachusetts Amherst,
FRAENKEL, J. R and WALLEN, E. N. (2005). How to design and emulated research in education. (6th Edition). McGraw Hill,
FRAGNOLI, K. (2005). Historical inquiry in a methods classroom: Examining our beliefs and shedding our old ways. The Social Studies, 96 (6), 247-51.
GEIER, R., BLUMENFELD, P. C., MARX, R. W., KRAJCIK, J. S., FISHMAN, B., SOLOWAY, E., and CLAY‐CHAMBERS, J. (2008). Standardized test outcomes for students engaged in inquiry‐based science curricula in the context of urban reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(8), 922-939
GOODING, J. and METZ, B. (2013). National standards connect disciplines through the process skills of inquiry. Journal of Virginia Science Education Volume 4, (2). (p.52-80).
HANSEN, M.L.(2002). Defining inquiry. The Science Teacher, 69, 34-37
HESSBERG, K.(2012). PBL? A Case Study of Inquiry Learning in a Secondary Civics Course.The Dissertation (ProQuest Digital) University of Virginia,
IKPEZE, C. (2004). Connecting The Bits: Inquiry-Based Learning, The World Wide Web And Literacy Acquisition in An Urban Fifth Grade Classroom. Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, (ProQuest Digital), the State University of New York At Buffalo
ĠLTER, Ġ.(2013). Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretiminde 5E Öğrenme Döngüsü Modelinin Öğrenci Başarısına, Bilimsel Sorgulayıcı-Araştırma Becerilerine, Akademik Motivasyona ve Öğrenme Sürecine Etkileri. YayınlanmamıĢ Doktora Tezi, Atatürk Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Erzurum.
JOHNSON, B. and CHRISTENSEN, L. (2004). Educational Research Quantitative Qualitative and Mixed Approaches. ( 2th Edition). Pearson Education Research Navigator
KÖKSAL, E.Y.(2011). Fen ve teknoloji dersinde sorgulayıcı araĢtırma yönteminin öğrenciler tarafından değerlendirilmesi. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi Cilt:19 No:3 s.819-848
KUHN, D., BLACK, J., KESLEMAN, A.and, KAPLAN, D. (2000). The development of cognitive skills to support inquiry learning. Cognition and Instruction, 18(4), 495-523.
LLEWELLYN, D. (2005). Teaching high school science through inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
LUERA, G.R., KILLU, K. and O‟ HAGAN, J. (2003). Linking Math Science And Inquiry Based Learning Examples From A Mini Unit On Volume. School Science and Mathematics Vol. 103(4).
MAREK, E. A. and CAVALLO, A. M. (2008). The Learning Cycle: Elementary School Science and Beyond. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann,
MARONEY, A. S. FINSON, D.K, BEAVER, and J. JENSEN, M.M. (2003). Preparing For Successful Inquiry in Inclusive Science Classroom. Teaching Exceptional Children Vol. 36 No E.p. 8-25,
MINNER, D., LEVY, A. and CENTURY, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction-What is it and does it matter? Results from research synthesis from years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474-496
NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIAL STUDIES. [NCSS]. (1994). Curriculum Standard for the Social Studies: Expectations of Excellence. Bulletin 89 Washington, DC: - (1994b). Expectations of excellence: curriculum standards for Social studies. Washington DC. National Academy Press
NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL[NRC], (2000). Inquiry and National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
NATIONAL SCIENCE EDUCATION STANDARDS [NSES]. (2012). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A Guide for Teaching and Learning. National Academy Press, Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC
NEWBY, D. E. and HIGGS, P. (2005).Using inquiry to teach social studies. The Charter Schools Resource Journal, 1, p.20-31.
NEWBY, D. E. (2004). Using Inquiry to Connect Young Learns to Science. National Charter Schools Institute Learning Resources. Web:www.Nationalcharterschools. Org /Uploads /Pdf /Resource_2 0040617125804_Using %20 Inquiry. Pdf adresinden 10 ġubat 2013‟te alınmıĢtır.
ORNSTEIN, A. and HUNKINS, F. (2004). Curriculum foundations, principles and issues. Boston, MA:Pearson Education, Inc.
SMITH T., COCHRAN, R., WARE, D., and SHORES, M., (2009). Mathematical investigations in inquiry-based courses for pre-service teachers. Web:http: /mathed.asu.edu/crume2009 /Smith_LONG.pdf adresinden 8 Ocak 2013‟te alınmıĢtır.
STEEVES, K. (2005). History: Uncovering the past through inquiry. In R. AUDET and K. JORDAN (eds). Integrating Inquiry Across the Curriculum. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. p.65-84.
STEWART, K.S.S.(2008). Students' Perceptions of the Important Outcomes of Inquiry-Based Teaching and Learning. A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. (ProQuest Digital). McGill University Montreal, Canada
STRIPLING, B. (2008). Inquiry: Inquiring minds want to know. School Library Media Activities Vol. XXV No.1 pp.50-52, Web:www.teachingbooks.net/content/InquiringMindsWantToKnow-Stripling.pdf adresinden 9 Ocak 2013‟te alınmıĢtır. - (2009).Teaching with Primary Sources Quarterly. Library of Congress Vol.2.No.3.
SUCHMAN, R.(1962). The elementary school training program in scientific inquiry. On cover: Title VII, project number 216. A project of the Illinois studies in inquiry Urbana University of Illinois
SUNAL, C. S. and HAAS, M. E. (2005). Social studies for elementary and middle grades a constructivist approach (2th Edition). Pearson Education.
TAFT, T. (2008). Scientific inquiry as a learning strategy across disciplines in middle school. A Master Thesis in Education,(ProQuest Digital),Pacific Lutheran University
TATAR, N. (2006). İlköğretim Fen Eğitiminde Araştırmaya Dayalı Öğrenme yaklaşımının Bilimsel Süreç Becerilerine, Akademik Başarıya ve Tutuma Etkisi. YayınlanmamıĢ Doktora Tezi. Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara
TAYLOR, J.A. (2008). Social Competence and Collaborative Guıded Inquiry Science Activities: Experiences of Students Wait Learning Disabilities. The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. (ProQuest Digital). Queen‟s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
THOMAS, J. W. (2000). A Review of Research on Project-Based Learning. This Research Review and the Executive Summary are available on the Web athttp://www.bie.org/research/study /review_of_project_based_learning_2000adresinden 5 Nisan 2013‟te alınmıĢtır.
TRETTER, T. R., and JONES, M. G. (2003). Relationships between inquiry-based teaching and physical science standardized test scores. School Science and Mathematics, 103(7), 345.
WADDEN, S.L.(2003). Inquiring Minds Inquiry-Based Learning in Primary Classrooms.Research Master of Ats in Education, (ProQuest Digital),Mount Saint Vincent University
WELLS, A. (2011). Inquiry-Based Learning: Fact Or Fallacy?Resercah of Education,(ProQuest Digital),University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba
WELLS, G. (1992). Language and The Inquiry-oriented curriculum. Curriculum Inquiry, Vol.23. No.3 pp.233-269
WOELDERS, A. (2007). Using film to conduct historical inquiry with middle school students. The History Teacher, 40(3), 363-386.
WOYSHNER, C. (2010). Inquiry teaching with primary source document an iterative approach. Social Studies Research and Practice. Vol. 5. No:3
ZARRILO, J. J. (2000). Teaching elementary social studies principles and applications. Library of Congress in Publications Data. Pearson Merrril Prentice Hall