ORGANİZASYON TERMİNOLOJİSİNİ KULLANARAK SOSYAL DEĞİŞİM DİNAMİKLERİNİ ANLAMAK: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ

Tüm bireyler, gruplar, organizasyonlar veya toplumlar çevrelerinde meydana gelen değişim ile başa çıkmayı ve değişime uyum sağlamayı öğrenmek zorundadırlar. Her ne kadar söz konusu değişimi engellemek mümkün olmasa dahi, genel olarak değişime maruz kalan tüm bu aktörler değişime direnç gösterirler. Değişim sürecini yönetebilmek ve değişime direnci engelleyebilmek özellikle liderler ve değişimi talep eden takipçileri için önemli bir husustur. Liderler ve takipçileri değişimin ve değişime direncin ana unsurlarıdır. Bu çalışmada, Türkiye'deki sosyal değişim, yönetim ve organizasyon terminolojisi kullanılarak tartışılmaya çalışılmıştır. Liderler ve takipçileri ekseninde ortaya konulan bir tipoloji kullanılarak değişim ve değişime direnç konusu modellenmeye çalışılmıştır. Tipoloji, lider ve takipçilerin değişimi zorlama veya değişime direnç gösterme özellikleri bağlamında; ideal, yok olucu, zorlayıcı ve devrimsel olmak üzere dört gerçekleşebileceğini ortaya koymaktadır. farklı modelde değişimin gerçekleştiği veya gerçekleşebileceğini ortaya koymaktadır.

UNDERSTANDING THE DYNAMICS OF SOCIAL CHANGE BY USING ORGANIZATIONAL TERMINOLOGY: THE CASE OF TURKEY

Any individual, group, organization or society must cope with and adapt itself to the change going around its environment. Even though it is impossible to prevent change, generally these actors may try to resist it. Managing the change by preventing the resistance to it is an important success factor that the leaders and the followers should cope with. The leaders and the followers are the main characters of the change and resistance. In this study we discuss the main dynamics of social change in Turkey by using organizational change terminology. A typology proposal is discussed in the study in which the roles of the leaders and followers on change and resistances are underlined on this model. In the typology, the outside actors on the change proses were ignored and only the leaders and the followers were discussed. The function of the leadership and followers’ behaviors are the main factors of the type of change described as ideal, entropic, coercive, and revolutionary within the model

PDF

___

ARGYRIS, C. (2002). Double-Loop Learning, Teaching, and Research. Academy of Management Learning, 1 (2), 206-218.
BASS, B. M. (1998). Transformational leadership: Industrial, military, and educational impact. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
BASS, B.M. and AVOLIO, B.J. (1996). Organizational Description Questionnaire, Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.
BAULCOMB, J.S. (2003). Management of change through force field analysis. Journal of Nursing Management, 11, 275–280.
BECKARD, R. and HARRIS, R. (1987). Organizational Transitions, 2nd Ed., Reading, Massachusetts, Addison Wesley.
BENNIS, W.G. (1973). The leaning ivory tower, Jossey-Bass Publishers.
BURNS, J.M. (1978). Leadership, New York: Harper & Row CARNALL, C.A. (1990). Managing Change in Organization, Prentice Hall, London, UK.
CONNOR, D.R. (1995). Managing at the speed of change: How resilient managers succeed and prosper where others fail. New York: Villard Books.
DAVIDSON, J.O‟C. (1994). The Sources and limits of resistance in a privatized utility. in J.M.Jermier, D.Kniggths, & W.R. Nord (Eds.) Resistance and Power in Organizations, 69- 101, New York
DEAL, T.E. (1985). Culture change: Opportunity, silent killer, or metamorphosis? In R.H.KILMANN, M.J.SAXTON, & R. SERPA, (Eds.), Gaining control of the corporate culture. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
DENIS, J.L., LAMOTHE, L., & LANGLEY, A. (2001). The Dynamics of collective leadership and strategic change in pluralistic organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 44 (4), 809-837.
DENT, E.B. and GOLDBERG, S.G. (1999) Challenging „resistance to change`, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35, 25–41.
DIBELLA, A.J. (2001). Learning practices: Assessment and Action for Organizational Improvement, Reprinted by permission of Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ.
DIJK,R.V. &DICK,R.V. (2009). Navigating Organizational Change: Change Leaders, Employee Resistance and Work-based Identities, Journal of Change Management, 9 (2), 143–163.
FOLGER, R., &SKARLICKI, D. (1999). Unfairness and resistance to change: Hardship as mistreatment, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 12, (1), 35-50.
FORD, J.D., FORD, L.W. & MCNAMARA, R.T. (2002). Resistance and the background conversations of change. Journal of Organizational Change Management. 15, (2), 105- 121.
FORD, J.D., FORD, L.W. (2009). Decoding resistance to change. Harvard Business Review. (3), 1- 7.
GARVIN, D.A. (1993). Building a learning organization. Harvard Business Review 71, (4), 78– 91.
HUGHES, R., GINNETT R. and CURPHY, G. (1999). Leadership: Enhancing the Lessons of Experience, Irwin McGraw-Hill, Singapore.
KAHN, C. (1979). The Art and Thought of Heraclitus: Fragments with Translation and Commentary. London: Cambridge University Press, 1–23. KLEIN, J.A. (1984). Why supervisors resist employee involvement, Harvard Business Review, (62), 87–95.
KUMAR, S.S. (2012). Challenges of Managing an Organizational Change, Advances in Management, 5(4).
LEWIN, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper and Row.
MANGO, A. (2010). Introduction: Atatürk and Kemalism throughout the Twentieth Century, in Turkey‟s Engagement with Modernity Conflict and Change in the Twentieth Century, (Eds.), KERSLAKE, C, ÖKTEM K., &ROBINS P., CPI Antony Rowe, Chippenham and Eastbourne, Great Britain.
MAURER, R. (1996). Beyond the wall of resistance, Austin, TX, Bard Press.
MAURER, R. (1997). Transforming resistance. HR Focus, (74), (10), 9-10.
MAURER, R. (1998). Is it resistance, or isn‟t it?. Management. 50, (1), 28-29.
MAURER, R. (2006). Resistance and change in organizations, in The NTL Handbook of Organization Development and Change: Principles, Practices, and Perspectives, (Eds.)
B.B.JONES & M.BRAZZEL. 508 Ümit ERCAN – Ünsal SIĞRI Turkish Studies International Periodical For the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic Volume 8/12 Fall 2013
MAYHEW,E. (2006).Organizational Change Processes, in The NTL Handbook of Organization Development and Change: Principles, Practices, and Perspectives, (Eds.) B.B.JONES & M.BRAZZEL.
NORTHOUSE, P.G. (1978). A descriptive study of intimacy, status difference and trust as predictors of empathic ability, (Doctoral dissertation, University of Denver.)
PIDERIT, S.K. (2000). Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence, Academy of Management Review, 25, (4), 783-795.
SMITH, P.B., PETERSON, M.F., and SCHWARTZ, S.H. (2002). Cultural values, sources of guidance, and their relevance to managerial behavior: A 47-nation study. Journal of CrossCultural Psychology, 33, (2), 188–208.
TUGAL, C. (2013). “Resistance everywhere” The Gezi revolt in global perspective, New Perspectives on Turkey, 49, 157-172.
WATSON, T.J. (1982). Group ideologies and organizational change, Journal of Management Studies, 19, 259-275.
YUE, W. (2008).Resistance, the Echo of Change, International Journal of Business and Management, 3, (2), 84-89.
YUKL, G. (1999). An Evaluative Essay on Current Conceptions of Effective Leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8, (1), 33–48.
YUKL, G. (2008). Leadership in Organizations, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 7th Edition.