Başarılı Öğrencilerin Kullandığı İngilizce Sözcük Öğrenme Stratejileri

Alanyazında sözcük bilgisi üzerine yapılmış çalışmalarda, “iyi” (başarılı) öğrencilerin özellikleri uzun süredir araştırılmaktadır (Ellis, 1994; Naiman et al., 1996; Stern 1975). Bunun nedeni, büyük olasılıkla, diğerleriyle aynı eğitimi alan bazı öğrencilerin bir şekilde diğerlerinden daha başarılı olduğunun gözlemlenmesidir (Pavicic-Takac, 2008). Bu durum, yeni bir dil öğrenirlen kullanılan dil öğrenme stratejilerine olan ilgiyi artırmıştır. Dil öğreniminin önemli bir ögesi olan sözcük öğrenme (Moir and Nation, 2008) de artan bu ilgiden payına düşeni almıştır. “İyi” öğrencilerin kullandıkları ortak stratejilerin belirlenmesiyle sözcük öğreniminde kullanılan etkin stratejilerin tespit edilmesi mümkün olacaktır. Bu nedenle, bu çalışmanın amacı, sözcük düzeyi yüksek lisansüstü Türk öğrencilerin İngilizce sözcük öğrenme stratejilerini belirlemektir. Bu amaçla, veriler (Türkiye’de 27, İngiltere’de ise 21 farklı üniversitenin çeşitli bölümlerde) yüksek lisans ve doktora eğitimlerine devam etmekte olan 128 Türk öğrenciden Sözcük Düzeyi Testi (Schmitt et al., 2001) ve araştırmacı tarafından geliştirilen 54 maddelik Sözcük Öğrenme Stratejileri Anketi kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Veri analizi sonucunda “iyi” (sözcük düzeyleri yüksek) 53 öğrenci belirlenmiştir. Çalışmanın sonucunda, “iyi” öğrencilerin en sık kullandıkları sözcük öğrenme stratejilerinin (bir sözcükle ilk kez karşılaşıldığında anlamını belirlemek için kullanılan) Keşif-Belirleme stratejileri olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır. Çalışmanın bir diğer bulgusu da, “iyi” öğrencilerin kullandıkları sözcük öğrenme stratejilerinin öğrencilerin bulunduğu dil öğrenme bağlamından etkilendiği yönündedir.

Vocabulary Learning Strategies of the “Good” Learner

Within the existing literature of vocabulary research, there has long been a search for thecharacteristics of the good learner (Ellis, 1994, p. 546-50; Naiman et al., 1996; Stern 1975, p.316), which wasmost probably triggered with the observation that some learners somehow outperform the others receiving thesame training (Pavicic-Takac, 2008, p. 58). This boasted the interest in the strategies learners employ to learna new language. This interest also applies for vocabulary learning, which is a crucial element of languagelearning (Moir & Nation, 2008). By determining the shared pattern of strategies employed by good learners, itwill be possible to distinguish the effective strategies used in vocabulary learning. In this respect, the purposeof this research is to determine the English vocabulary learning strategies (VLSs) used by Turkish graduatestudents with high vocabulary-levels. To this end, data were collected from 128 Turkish graduate studentspursuing their master’s or doctoral education at 27 universities in Turkey and 21 universities in the UK viaVocabulary Levels Test (Schmitt et al., 2001, p. 82-88) and a 54-item Vocabulary Learning StrategiesQuestionnaire, developed by the researcher. Students’ vocabulary levels were determined by calculating theircorrect answers at each of the five word-levels. The study data were analysed and 53 good learners whoachieved 24 and above at all levels were identified. An average score of 24 and above out of 30 items meantthe student had mastered that level. The results revealed that good learners most commonly used Discovery-Determination strategies which are employed to determine the meaning of a word when one meets it for thefirst time. Another finding of the research was that language learning context affected the overall use and choiceof good learner’s VLSs. In the overall usage of VLS’s, a higher frequency of VLS’s were employed by EFLlearners than their ESL counterparts. In the overall choice of VLSs, good learners from both the ESL and EFLcontext chose to use Discovery-Determination strategies and Consolidation-Metacognitive strategies morefrequently than the other strategy groups.

___

  • Asgari, A., & Mustapha, G. B. (2011). The type of vocabulary learning strategies used by ESL students in University Putra Malaysia. English Language Teaching, 4(2), 84-90. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n2p84
  • Bialystok, E. (1979). The role of conscious strategies in second language proficiency. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 35(3), 372-394. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.35.3.372
  • Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching (4th ed.). Longman.
  • Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: an interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed.). Longman.
  • Brown, D. (2010). Building on your book: Vocabulary activities to enhance your textbook. In A. M. Stoke (Ed.), JALT2009 Conference Proceedings (pp. 254-263). JALT.
  • Catalan, R. M. J. (2003). Sex differences in L2 vocabulary learning strategies. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 54-77. https://doi.org/10.1111/1473-4192.00037
  • Diamond, L. & Gutlohn, L. (2006). Vocabulary handbook. Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. (CORE).
  • Dreyer, C. & Oxford, R. (1996). Learning strategies and other predictors of ESL proficiency among Afrikaans-speakers in South Africa. In R. L. Oxford (Ed.), Language learning strategies around the world: Cross- cultural perspectives (pp. 17-18). University of Hawaii Press.
  • Ehrman, M. E. & Oxford, R. (1989). Effects of sex differences, career choice, and psychological type on adults' language learning strategies. Modern Language Journal, 73(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1989.tb05302.x
  • Ehrman, M. E. & Oxford, R. (1995). Cognition plus: correlate of language learning success. Modern Language Journal, 79(1), 67-89. https://doi:10.1111/j.1540–4781. 1995.tb05417.x
  • Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
  • Ellis, R. & Shintani, N. (2014). Exploring language pedagogy through second language acquisition research. Routledge.
  • Fan, M. Y. (2003). Frequency of use, perceived usefulness, and actual usefulness of second language vocabulary. The Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 222- 241. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540- 4781.00187
  • Fraser, C. A. (1999). The role of consulting a dictionary in reading and vocabulary learning. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(1-2), 73-89.
  • Green, J. M., & Oxford, R. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29(2), 261-297. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3587625
  • Gu, P. Y. (2010). Learning strategies for vocabulary development. Reflections on English Language Teaching, 9(2), 105-118.
  • Hamzah, M. S. G., Kafipour, R. & Abdullah, S. K. (2009). Vocabulary learning strategies of Iranian undergraduate EFL students and its relation to their vocabulary size. European Journal of Social Sciences, 11(1), 39-50. http:// doi:10.4304/tpls.2.9.1841-1848
  • Hatch, E. & Brown, C. (1995). Vocabulary, semantics and language education. Cambridge University Press.
  • Kayacıoğlu, M. N. (2013). Poor and good learners’ language beliefs and their influence on their language learning strategy use. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 7(1), 36-54.
  • Kaylani, C. (1996). The influence of gender and motivation on EFL learning strategy use in Jordan. In R. L. Oxford (Ed.), Language learning strategies around the world: cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 75-88). University of Hawaii Press.
  • Lawson, M. J. & Hogben, D. (1996). The vocabulary learning strategies of foreign language students. Language Learning, 46(1), 101-135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb00642.x
  • Lightbown, P. M. & Spada, N. (1999). How languages are learned. Oxford University Press.
  • LoCastro, V. (1994). Learning strategies and learning environments. TESOL Quarterly, 28(2), 409- 414. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3587445
  • Mochizuki, A. (1999). Language learning strategies used by Japanese university students. RELC Journal, 30(2), 101-113. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829903000206
  • Moir, J. & Nation, P. (2008). Vocabulary learning and the good language learner. In C. Griffiths (Ed.), Lessons from good language learners. Cambridge University Press.
  • Merrifield, J. (1997). Examining the language learning strategies used by French adult learners [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Aston University.
  • Naiman, N., Fröhlich, M., Stern, H. H. & Todesco, A. (1996). The good language learner. Muttilingual Matters.
  • Nation, P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press.
  • Nazri, N. M., Yunus, M. M, & Nazri, N. D. M. (2016). Through the lens of good language learners: What are their strategies? Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7(1), 192-202. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.7n.1p.195
  • Nunan, D. (1991). Language teaching methodology: A textbook for teachers. Prentice Hall.
  • Nyikos, M. & Oxford, R. (1993). A factor analytic study of language-learning strategy use: Interpretations from information-processing theory and social psychology. The Modern Language Journal, 77(2), 11-22. https://doi.org/10.2307/329553
  • Oxford, R. L. (Ed.). (1996). Language learning strategies around the world: crosscultural perspectives. University of Hawaii Press.
  • Pavicic-Takac, V. (2008). Vocabulary learning strategies and foreign language acquisition: second language acquisition series. Multilingual Matters Ltd.
  • Putri, Z. M. & Wahyuni, E. (2019). Vocabulary learning strategy employed by high-achiever university students at Malang. CELTIC, 6(1), 78-89. https://doi.org/10.22219/celtic.v6i1.8759
  • Rashed, W. A. S. (2018). The Impact of vocabulary learning strategy instruction on libyan EFL teachers and learners [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Manchester Metropolitan University.
  • Razekh, Z. E. & Ranjbary, R. (2003). Metacognitive strategy training for vocabulary learning. TESL-EJ, 7(2), 1-15.
  • Reiss, M. (1985). The good language learner: Another look. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 41(3), 511-523. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.41.3.511
  • Rivers, W. M. (1983). Communicating naturally in a second language: Theory and practice in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
  • Rubin, J. (1975). What the “good language learner” can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9(1), 41-51. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586011
  • Rubin, J. & Thompson, I. (1994). How to be a more successful language learner. Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
  • Sadeghi, Nasrollahi, Mazandarani, & Mesgar, (2011). Teaching vocabulary through word formation strategies among Iranian intermediate EFL students. IPEDR, 26 (1), 254-263.
  • Sanaoui, R. (1995). Adult learners’ approaches to learning vocabulary in second languages. Modern Language Journal, 79(1), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05410.x
  • Schmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 199-228). Cambridge University Press.
  • Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
  • Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D. & Clapham, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behaviour of the two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test. Language Testing, 18(1), 55-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553220101800103
  • Shokouhi, H. & Askari, H. (2010). The effect of guessing vocabulary in reading authentic texts among pre-university students. Arizona Working Papers in Second Language Acquisition and Teaching, 17, 75-89.
  • Sokmen, A. (1997). Current trends in teaching second language vocabulary. In N. Schmitt, & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 237-257). Cambridge University Press
  • Stern, H. H. (1975). What can we learn from the good language learner? Canadian Modern Language Review, 31(4), 304-319. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.31.4.304
  • Wakamoto, N. (2000). Language learning strategy and personality variables: Focusing on extroversion and inversion. IRAL, 38(1), 71-81. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2000.38.1.71
  • Xinjie, L. (2011). A study of acquiring L2 vocabulary through using word part strategy [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Kristianstad University School of Teacher Education.
  • Zhao, N. (2009). Metacognitive strategy training and vocabulary learning of Chinese college students. English Language Teaching, 2(4), 123-129.