Üniversite Yaşamına Uyum ile İyi Oluş Arasında Kişilik Özelliklerinin Aracı Rolü

Bu araştırma kapsamında üniversite öğrencilerinin üniversite yaşamına uyumları ile iyi oluşları arasındaki ilişkide kişilik özelliklerinin aracı rolü incelenmiştir. Araştırmanın örneklem grubunu toplam 437 üniversite öğrencisi (307 kadın, %70.3 ve 130 erkek, %29.7) oluşmaktadır. Araştırmanın örneklem büyüklüğü hesaplanırken %95 güven aralığı referans alınmış ve uygun örnekleme yöntemi kullanılarak katılımcılardan veri elde edilmiştir. Veri toplama sürecinde Üniversite Yaşamına Uyum Ölçeği, Beş Faktörlü Kişilik Ölçeği, PERMA Ölçeği ve bir kişisel bilgi formu kullanılmıştır. Aracılık modellerinin analizinde ise geçerli ve güvenilir sonuçlar elde edilmesini sağlayan Hayes (2018) tarafından önerilen çağdaş aracılık yaklaşım kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sürecinde elde edilen bulgular doğrultusunda kişisel uyum, akademik uyum, sosyal uyum, iyi oluş ve kişilik özelliklerinden olan dışadönüklük, uzlaşılabilirlik, özdisiplin ve deneyime açıklık arasında pozitif yönlü ve anlamlı nevrotiklik ile arasında negatif yönlü ve anlamlı ilişkilerin olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Ayrıca kişisel uyum, akademik uyum ve sosyal uyum ile iyi oluş arasındaki ilişkide kişilik özelliklerinin aracı role sahip oldukları ve bu ilişkide dolaylı etkilerin anlamlı olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Bulgulardan hareketle iyilik halinin ortaya çıkmasında üniversite yaşamına uyumun önemli bir yordayıcı değişken olduğu dahası bu ilişkide kişilik özelliklerinin üniversite yaşamına uyum sürecinde karşılaşılacak problemlerin etkisini azaltarak bireylerin iyi oluşlarının destekleyen, böylece koruyuşu rol oynayan önemli bir aracı bir değişken olduğu söylenebilir.

The Mediating role of Personality Traits in the Correlation between Adjustment to University Life and Well-Being

In the present study, the mediating role of personality traits in the correlation between the level of adjustment to university life and well-being of university students, was examined. The sample group of the research is comprised of 437 university students in total (307 females, 70.3%, and 130 males, 29.7%). The sample size of the research was based on a confidence interval of 95% and data were obtained from participants using appropriate sampling methods. The Adjustment to University Life Scale, the Five-Factor Personality Inventory, PERMA scale and a personal information form were used as data collection tools. The contemporary approach suggested by Hayes (2018) was used in order to obtain valid and reliable results in the analysis of mediation models. The findings of the research suggest that there was a positive and significant correlation between personal, academic and social adjustment, well-being and personality traits such as extroversion, agreeableness, self-discipline and openness to experience, while there was a negative and significant correlation between the aforementioned and neuroticism. Moreover, it was concluded that personality traits such as extraversion, agreeableness, self-discipline, neuroticism, and openness to experience had a mediating role in the academic, social adjustment and well-being and that the indirect impacts of these personality traits were significant in this correlation. Based on these findings, it could be said that adjustment to university life is an important causal variable in well-being and that personality traits are also an important mediating variable in this correlation by playing a supportive and therefore protective role on students' well-being in terms of reducing the impact of problems they will face during the adjustment process to university life.

___

  • Abdel-Khalek, A. M. (2004). Happiness among Kuwaiti college students. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5(1), 93-97. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:johs.0000021715.45981.40
  • Aladağ-Bayrak, Ö. ve Bülbül, T. (2013). Meslek Yüksekokulu öğrencilerinin yükseköğretim yaşamına uyum düzeylerinin çeşitli değişkenlere göre incelenmesi. Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi, 3 (2), 6-20.
  • Alexandrova, A. (2005). Subjective well-being and Kahneman’s ‘objective happiness’. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6(3), 301-324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-005-7694-x
  • Alkan, N. (2006). Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Big Five Inventory. Yayınlanmamış çalışma.
  • Aslan, S. (2015). Üniversite Yaşamına Uyum Ölçeği’ nin geliştirilmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(04), 132-145.
  • Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personel, 25(4), 297-308.
  • Backhaus, A. L. (2009). The college experience: Exploring the relationships among student socioeconomic background, experiences of classism, and adjustment to college. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global (3389644).
  • Baker, R. W., & Siryk, B. (1984). Measuring adjustment to college. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31 (2), 179-189.
  • Baker, R. W., & Siryk, B. (1986). Exploratory intervention with a scale measuring adjustment to college. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 33(1), 31-38.
  • Baker, R. W., McNeil, O. V., & Siryk, B. (1985). Expectation and reality in freshman adjustment to college. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 32(1), 94-103.
  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173.
  • Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., Breugelmans, S. M., Chasiotis, A., ve Sam, D. L. (2015). Kültürlerarası psikoloji: Araştırma ve uygulamalar (çev. ed.: Leman Pınar Tosun). Ankara: Nobel
  • Brooks, J. H., & DuBois, D. L. (1995). Individual and environmental predictors of adjustment during the first year of college. Journal of College Student Development, 36(4), 347–360.
  • Bui, K.V.T. (2002). First-generation college students at a four-year university: Background characteristics, reasons for pursuing higher education, and first-year experiences. College Student Journal, 36, 3-11.
  • Burger, J. M. (2016). Kişilik (5.Baskı). İnan Deniz Erguvan Sarıoğlu (Çev.). İstanbul: Kaknüs
  • Butler, J., & Kern, M. L. (2016). The PERMA-Profiler: A brief multidimensional measure of flourishing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 6(3), 1-45. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v6i3.526
  • Bülbül, T. (2012). Yükseköğretimde okul terki: Nedenler ve çözümler. Eğitim ve Bilim, 37 (166), 219-235.
  • Cheng, H., & Furnham, A. (2004). Perceived parental rearing style, self-esteem and self-criticism as predictors of happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOHS.0000021704.35267.05
  • Chickering, A., & Reisser, L. (1993). Education and Identity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Routledge Academic.
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2013). Research methods in education. London: Rutledge.
  • Costa J, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1995). Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64(1), 21- 50.
  • Cruwys, T., & Gunaseelan, S. (2016). “Depression is who I am”: Mental illness identity, stigma and wellbeing. Journal of Affective Disorders, 189, 36-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2015.09.012
  • Demirci, İ., Ekşi, H., Dinçer, D. ve Kardaş, S. (2017). Beş boyutlu iyi oluş modeli: PERMA Ölçeği’nin Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirliği. The Journal of Happiness & WellBeing, 5(1), 60-77.
  • Diener, E. (1994). Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and oppurtunities. Social Indicators Research, 31, 103-157.
  • Duchesne, S., Ratelle, C., Larose, S., & Guay, F. (2007). Adjustment trajectories in college science programs: perceptions of qualities of parents’ and college teachers’ relationships. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54(1), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.54.1.62
  • Elliot, A. J., Thrash, T. M., & Murayama, K. (2011). A longitudinal analysis of self‐ regulation and well‐being: Avoidance personal goals, avoidance coping, stress generation, and subjective well‐being. Journal of Personality, 79(3), 643-674. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 6494.2011.00694.x
  • Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York: Guilford press.
  • Enochs, W. K., & Rolland, C. B. (2006). Social adjustment of college freshmen: The importance of gender and living enviroment. College Student Journal, 1, 63-73.
  • Erdoğan, S., Bekir, H. Ş. ve Şanlı, H. S. (2005). Gazi üniversitesi eğitim fakültesi öğrencilerinin ekonomik, sosyal, kültürel uyum sorunlarını etkileyen bazı etmenler. Gazi Üniversitesi Endüstriyel Sanatlar Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16, 1-13
  • Estrada, L., Dupoux, E., & Wolman, C. (2005). The personal-emotional social adjustment of englishlanguage learners to a community college. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 29 (7), 557-568.
  • Finney, S. J. ve DiStefano, C. G. (2006). Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. G. R. Hancock ve R. O. Mueller (Ed.), Sructural equation modeling: A second course içinde (s. 269-314). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
  • Fritz, M. S., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2007). Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological Science, 18(3), 233-239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 9280.2007.01882.x
  • Furr, R. M., & Funder, D. C. (1998). A multimodal analysis of personal negativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1580.
  • Grant, F., Guille, C., & Sen, S. (2013). Well-being and the risk of depression under stress. PLoS one, 8(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067395
  • Halamandaris, K. F., & Power, K. G. (1999). Individual differences, social support and coping with the examination stress: A study of the psychosocial and academic adjustment of first year home students. Personality and Individual Differences, 26(4), 665-685.
  • Harrington, R., & Clark, A. (1998). Prevention and early intervention for depression in adolescence and early adult life. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 248(1), 32- 45.
  • Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Izawa, N. (2004). An exploration of subjective well being: A review of empirical factors and paths fort he future. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global (3125126).
  • John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory--Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.
  • Karahan, T. F., Sardoğan, M. E., Özkamalı, E. ve Dicle, A. N. (2005). Üniversite 1. sınıf öğrencilerinin üniversiteye uyum düzeylerinin sosyokültürel etkinlikler açısından incelenmesi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2 (30), 63-72.
  • Khaw, D., & Kern, M. (2014). A cross-cultural comparison of the PERMA model of wellbeing. Undergraduate Journal of Psychology at Berkeley, University of California, 8(1), 10- 23.
  • King, A. M. (2011). Stereotype threat and self-perceptions: The impact on college students. Journal of Student Affairs at New York University, 7, 27-39.
  • Kross, E., Verduyn, P., Demiralp, E., Park, J., Lee, D. S., Lin, N., ... & Ybarra, O. (2013). Facebook use predicts declines in subjective well-being in young adults. Plos One, 8(8), e69841. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069841
  • Lapoint, S. O., & Soysa, C. K. (2014). Great expectations: Perfectionism and residence status predict college adjustment. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 19 (3), 98-107. https://doi.org/10.24839/2164-8204.jn19.3.98
  • Lopez, F. G., & Gormley, B. (2002). Stability and change in adult attachment style over the firstyear college transition: relations to self-confidence, coping, and distress patterns. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49 (3), 355–364.
  • Lovett, N. & Lovett, T. (2016). Wellbeing in education: Staff matter. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 6(2), 107-112. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijssh.2016.v6.628
  • MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99-128.
  • McCrae R.R., Costa P.T. (2003). Personality in adulthood. New York: The Guilford Press
  • McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 175-215.
  • McCrae, R. R., ve Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 81.
  • McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: Evidence based inquiry (7th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
  • McShane, S. L., Von Glinow, M. A. (2005), Organizational behavior: Emerging realites for the workplace revolution, New York: McGraw Hill Companies
  • Mercan, Ç. S. ve Yıldız, S. A. (2011). Eğitim fakültesi birinci sınıf öğrencilerinin üniversiteye uyum düzeylerinin farklı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Hasan Ali Yücel Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16 (2), 135-154.
  • Morsünbül, Ü. (2014). Hızlı büyük beşli kişilik testi türkçe versiyonu geçerlilik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Düşünen Adam: Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi, 27(4), 316-322
  • Morton, S., Mergler, A., & Boman, P. (2014). Managing the transition: The role of optimism and self-efficacy for first-year australian university students. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 24 (1), 90-108. https://doi.org/10.1017/jgc.2013.29
  • Park, N. (2004). The role of subjective well-being in positive youth development. The Annals of American Academy, 591, 25-39.
  • Pascarella, E., Pierson, C., Wolniak, G., & Terenzini, P. (2004). First-generation college students: Additional evidence on college experiences and outcomes. Journal of Higher Education, 75, 249-284.
  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891. https://doi.org/10.3758/brm.40.3.879
  • Preacher, K. J., & Kelley, K. (2011). Effect size measures for mediation models: Quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 93. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022658
  • Pritchard, M. E., Wilson, G. S., & Yamnitz, B. (2007). What predicts adjustment among college students? A longitudinal panel study. Journal of American College Health, 56 (1), 15-21.
  • Rahat, E. (2014). Benlik kurgusu, sosyal destek, başa çıkma stilleri ve yılmazlığın üniversite yaşamına uyumu yordama güçlerinin incelenmesi. (Yüksek lisans tezi). Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi’nden edinilmiştir. (Tez No. 361653).
  • Rice, K. G., Leever, B. A., Christopher, J., & Porter, J. D. (2006). Perfectionism, stress, and social (dis)connection: a short-term study of hopelessness, depression, and academic adjustment among honors students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 524-534.
  • Romera, E. M., Gómez-Ortiz, O., & Ortega-Ruiz, R. (2016). The mediating role of psychological adjustment between peer victimization and social adjustment in adolescence. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1749. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01749
  • Rueger, S., Malecki, C., & Demaray, M. (2010). Relationship between multiple sources of perceived social support and psychological and academic adjustment in early adolescence: Comparisons across gender. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39 (1), 47-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-008-9368-6
  • Ruthig, J. C., Haynes, T. L., Stupnisky, R. H., & Perry, R. P. (2009). Perceived academic control: Mediating the effects of optimism and social support on college students’ psychological health. Social Psychology of Education, 12 (2), 233-249. https://doi.org/10.1037/e644232007-001
  • Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review Of Psychology, 52(1), 141- 166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
  • Ryff, C. D. ve Singer, B. H. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 13-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5702-8_6
  • Salmela-Aro, K., Kiuru, N., Leskinen, I.E. and Nurmi, E. (2009). School-burnout ınventory: Reliability and validity. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 25(1), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.25.1.48
  • Sax, L. J., Bryant, A. N., & Harper, C. E. (2005). The differential effects of student-faculty interaction on college outcomes for women and men. Journal of College Student Development, 46 (6), 642-657.
  • Sax, L. J., Bryant, A., & Gilmartin, S. (2004). A longitudinal ınvestigation of emotional health among male and female first-year college students. Journal of The First-Year Experience and Students in Transition, 2 (27), 39-65.
  • Seligman, M. E. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York: Free.
  • Steinmayr, R., Crede, J., McElvany, N., & Wirthwein, L. (2015). Subjective well-being, test anxiety, academic achievement: testing for reciprocal effects. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01994
  • Sürücü, M., ve Bacanlı, F. (2010). Üniversiteye uyumun psikolojik dayanıklılık ve demografik değişkenlere göre incelenmesi. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2, 375 – 396.
  • Terenzini, P. T., Springer, L., Yaeger, P. M., Pascarella, E. T., & Nora, A. (1996). First generation college students: characteristics, experiences, and cognitive development. Research in Higher Education, 37, 1-22.
  • Tinto, V. (1988). Stages of student departure: Reflections on the longitudinal character of student leaving. Journal of Higher Education, 59 (4), 438-455
  • Tu, Y., & Zhang, S. (2015). Loneliness and subjective well-being among Chinese undergraduates: The mediating role of self-efficacy. Social Indicators Research, 124(3), 963-980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0809-1
  • Videbeck, S. (2011). Psychiatric mental health nursing. Philedelphia: Macmillian Company.
  • Walpole, M. (2003). Socioeconomic status and college: How SES affects college experiences and outcomes. The Review of Higher Education, 27, 45-73.
  • Wintre, M. G., & Yaffe, M. (2000). First-year students’ adjustment to university life as a function of relationships with parents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 15(1), 9-37.
  • Yalım, D. (2007). First year college adjustment: The role of coping, ego resiliency, optimism and gender. (Yüksek lisans tezi). Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi’nden edinilmiştir. (Tez No. 217797).
  • Yau, H. K., & Cheng, A. L. F. (2012). An empirical study into gender differences in the relationships among academic, social and psychological adjustments of university support. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 38(2), 268-282. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877x.2012.722197
  • Ye, Y., & Lin, L. (2015). Exmining relations between locus of control, loneliness, subjective wellbeing, and preference for online social interaction. Psychological Reports, 116(1), 164-175. https://doi.org/10.2466/07.09.pr0.116k14w3
  • Yuan, H., & Golpelwar, M. (2013). Testing subjective well-being from the perspective of social quality: Quantile regression evidence from Shanghai, China. Social Indicators Research, 113(1), 257-276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0091-z
Turkish Studies - Educational Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 2667-5609
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2006
  • Yayıncı: ASOS Eğitim Bilişim Danışmanlık Otomasyon Yayıncılık Reklam Sanayi ve Ticaret LTD ŞTİ