Sosyal Sermaye ve İhracat Performansı: Türkiye Ekonomisi İçin Ampirik Bir Analiz Örneği

Sosyal sermayenin ekonomiler üzerindeki etkisi son dönemlerde tartışılan konular arasında yer almaktadır. Literatürde sosyal sermayenin toplumun verimliliğini artırdığı ve ekonomik gelişmeler üzerinde pozitif etkiler yarattığı kabul edilmektedir. Sosyal sermaye ayrıca fiziki ve beşerî sermayenin bir tamamlayıcı unsuru olarak kabul edilmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı 2006-2014 dönemi aylık veriler ile sosyal sermayenin ihracat performansı üzerindeki etkisini Türkiye için analiz etmektir. Araştırmanın ilk aşamasında temel bileşenler analizi (TBA) ile sosyal sermaye endeksi geliştirilmiştir. Sosyal sermaye endeksinin hesaplanmasında yedi temel gösterge kullanılmıştır. İlgili göstergelere ait veriler Uluslararası Ülke Risk Rehberinden (ICRG) elde edilmiştir. Sosyal sermayeyi temsil edecek göstergeler demokratik hesap verilebilirlik (DA), sözleşme uygulanabilirliği (CONT), kanun ve düzen (LO), ekonomik risk değerlendirmesi (ER), finansal risk değerlendirmesi (FR), politik risk değerlendirmesi (PR) ve hükûmet istikrarına (GOV) ait reytinglerdir. Araştırmanın ikinci aşamasında ise sosyal sermayenin ihracat üzerindeki etkisi eşbütünleşme testi ile incelenmiştir. Test sonuçları sosyal sermayenin ihracat performansını pozitif yönde etkilediğini ve bu ilişkinin sosyal sermayeden ihracata doğru tek yönlü olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu sonuçlar sosyal sermayenin ihracat performansı üzerinde anlamlı bir etkisi olduğunu işaret etmektedir. Çalışmanın temel önerisi toplumsal iletişim ve toplumsal güveni geliştirecek uygulamaların ekonomi politikaları kapsamında dikkate alınmasıdır. Sosyal sermayenin firmalara uluslararası piyasalarda rekabet etme imkânı sağlayan önemli bir stratejik kaynak olduğu düşünülmektedir.

Social Capital and Export Performance: An Empirical Analysis Example for Turkish Economy

The impact of social capital on economies has been one of the topics discussed recently. It is accepted that in literature social capital increases the productivity of society and creates positive effects on economic developments. Social capital is also considered as a complementary element of physical and human capital. The aim of this study is to analyze the impact of social capital on export performance with monthly data for Turkey for 2006-2014 period. In the first stage of the research, social capital index is developed with principal component analysis (PCA). Seven basic indicators are used in the calculation of the social capital index. The data set on the relevant indicators have been obtained from the International Country Risk Guide (ICRG). Indicators’ ratings which representing social capital include democratic accountability (DA), contract enforceability (CONT), law and order (LO), economic risk assessment (ER), financial risk assessment (FR), political risk assessment (PR), and government stability (GOV). In the second stage of the research, the effect of social capital on exports examined by using the cointegration test. Test results show that social capital positively affects export performance and this is one-way relationship from social capital to export. These results indicate that social capital has a significant effect on export performance. The main recommendation of the study is to consider practices that will improve social communication and social trust within the scope of economic policies. Social capital is considered as an important strategic resource that enables companies to compete in international markets.

___

  • Almond, G. A. & Sidney, V. (1963). The civic culture: political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Sage.
  • Annen, K. (2003). Social capital, inclusive networks, and economic performance. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 50(4), 449-463.
  • Barro, R. J. (1991). Economic growth in a cross section of countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 407-443.
  • Baumol, W. J. (1986). Productivity growth, convergence, and welfare: what the long-run data show. The American Economic Review, 1072-1085.
  • Berggren, N., Elinder, M. & Jordahl, H. (2008). Trust and growth: a shaky relationship. Empirical Economics, 35(2), 251-274.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. Greenwood, 241–258.
  • Casey, T. & Christ, K. (2005). Social capital and economic performance in the american states. Social Science Quarterly, 86(4), 826-845.
  • Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94 Supplement, University of Chicago. 95-120.
  • Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Harvard University Press.
  • Dickey, D. A. & Fuller, W. A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1057-1072.
  • Djinar, I. G. W. A. N., Budhi, S. M. K. S. & Budiasa, I. G. S. (2016). The role of government, social capital and entrepreneurial orientation to export performance of craft sme at bali province. European Journal of Business and Management, 8(27), 105-114.
  • Easmon, R. B., Kastner, A. N. A., Blankson, C. & Mahmoud, M. A. (2019). Social capital and export performance of smes in Ghana: the role of firm capabilities. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies. http://dx.doi/10.1108/AJEMS-11-2018-0361
  • Easterly, W. & Levine, R. (1997). Africa's growth tragedy: policies and ethnic divisions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1203-1250.
  • Engle, R. F. & Granger, C. W. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 251-276.
  • Fukuyama, F. (1995a). Trust: the social virtues and the creation of prosperity. The Free Press.
  • Fukuyama, F. (1995b). Social capital and the global economy. Foreign Affairs 74, 89– 103.
  • Fukuyama, F. (1999). The great disruption. Profile Books.
  • Fukuyama, F. (2000). Social capital and civil society. IMF Working Paper, No: 00/74.
  • Fukuyama, F. (2000). The creation of trust, social virtues and welfare. (Translator: Ahmet Buğdaycı). Turkey Iş Bank Cultural Publications.
  • Fukuyama, F. (2002). Social capital and development: The coming agenda. SAIS Review 22:23-37.
  • Granger, C. W. & Newbold, P. (1974). Spurious regressions in econometrics. Journal of Econometrics, 2(2), 111-120.
  • Grier, K. B. & Tullock, G. (1989). An empirical analysis of cross-national economic growth, 1951– 1980. Journal of Monetary Economics, 24(2), 259-276.
  • Hanifan, L. J. (1916). The rural school community center. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 67, 130-138.
  • Johansen, S. & Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration with applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52(2), 169-210.
  • Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2), 231-254.
  • Knack, S. & Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic pay off?. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1251-1288.
  • Knack, S. (1999). Social capital, growth, and poverty: a survey of cross-country evidence. Social Capital Initiative Working Paper 7. World Bank, Social Development Department.
  • Kormendi, R. C. & Meguire, P. G. (1985). Macroeconomic determinants of growth: Cross-country evidence. Journal Of Monetary Economics, 16(2), 141-163.
  • Mankiw, N. G., Romer, D. & Weil, D. N. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 407-437.
  • Michael, M. S., Saban, G. & Abdurahman, A. Z. A. (2016). Factors affecting non-exporting small and medium enterprises' intention to export: Resource based approach. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 224, 199-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.441
  • OECD (2001). The well-being of nations: The Role of Human and Social Capital. Phillips, P. C. & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335-346.
  • Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy, Princeton University Press.
  • Putnam, R., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R.Y. (1993). Making democracy work. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  • Putnam, R. (1995). Bowling alone: Americans’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65-78.
  • Putnam, R. (2001). Third world quarterly, social capital, civil society and development, Routledge Informa Ltd Registered.
  • Temple, J. & Johnson, P. A. (1998). Social capability and economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 965-990.
  • Whiteley, P. F. (2000). Economic growth and social capital. Political Studies, 48, 443-466.
  • World Bank. (1997). World development report: The state in a changing world, Oxford University Press.
  • Zak, P. J. & Knack, S. (2001). Trust and growth. The Economic Journal, 111(470), 295-321
Turkish Studies - Economics, Finance, Politics-Cover
  • ISSN: 2667-5625
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2006
  • Yayıncı: ASOS Eğitim Bilişim Danışmanlık Otomasyon Yayıncılık Reklam Sanayi ve Ticaret LTD ŞTİ