Zafer ADIGÜZEL, İrem KÜÇÜKOĞLU, Omar Khalid BHATTİ, Rimsha FAİSAL

4234

Örgütler ve Çalışanlar Üzerinde Psikolojik Güçlendirme ve Katılımcı Liderliğin Etkilerinin İncelenmesi

Şirketler hangi sektörde olursa olsun sürekli değişen ve gelişen rekabet ortamında sürdürülebilirliklerini sağlayabilmeleri için örgüt yapılarının etkililiğini ve çalışanlarının yenilikçi davranışlarını desteklemeleri gerekmektedir. Şirketlerin yenilikçi faaliyetlerde başarılı olması çalışanların yenilikçi davranışlar içinde olmasına bağlıdır. Çalışanların psikolojik açıdan güçlü olmalarıyla birlikte aynı zamanda düşüncelerini ve fikirlerini paylaşabilecekleri katılımcı bir ortamında sağlanabilmesi gerekmektedir. Bu nedenle şirketler insan kaynaklarını iyi kullanabilmelidirler. Çünkü rekabet de başarılı olabilmenin ölçütlerinden biride rakiplerden farklı yenilikçi ürünleri/hizmetleri bulundukları pazarda sunabilmelerine bağlıdır. Örgütlerin sahip oldukları insan kaynakları, örgütlerin farklılaşabilmesinde en önemli faktörlerden biridir. Dolayısıyla insan kaynakları faktörü birçok örgütsel araştırma alanında temel nokta olmaktadır. İnsan kaynağından en verimli bir şekilde yararlanabilmek, çalışanların motivasyonlarının iyi olmasını sağlayabilmek için çalışanların psikolojik açıdan güçlendirilmeleri ve örgüte katılımlarının sağlanabilmesi gerekmektedir. Araştırmanın amacı kapsamında insanların gıda ihtiyacını karşılamak amacıyla gıda sektöründe yer alan firmalarda çalışmakta olan beyaz yakalı çalışanların psikolojik güçlendirme ve katılımcı liderliğin etkisiyle yenilikçi davranışlarının ve örgütsel etkililiğin ne yönde etkilendiğini analiz etmek amaçlanmıştır. Araştırma kapsamında 2019 yılında İstanbul'da üretim sektöründe faaliyet gösteren gıda firmalarında görev yapan 365 personelden anketler toplandı. Verilerin analizinde IBM SPSS 25 ve AMOS programları kullanılmıştır. Sırasıyla korelasyon analizi, regresyon analizi, Sobel testi ve Hayes process yapılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda hem psikolojik güçlendirmenin hem de katılımcı liderliğin yenilikçi davranışı ve örgütsel etkinliği olumlu etkilediği sonucuna varılmıştır.

Examining Psychological Empowerment and Participative Leadership Effects on Employees and Organizations

Regardless of the sector, companies need to be effective in their organizational structures and support the innovative behavior of their employees in order to ensure their sustainability in a constantly changing and developing competitive environment. The success of companies in innovative activities depends on the innovative behavior of the employees. For this reason, employees should be psychologically strong and at the same time share their thoughts and ideas in a participatory environment. Therefore, companies within the organizational structure should be able to use their human resources well because one of the criteria of being successful in competition depends on the ability to offer innovative products/services different from their competitors in the market where they are located. The human resources department is one of the most important factors in differentiating organizations. In order to benefit from human resources in the most efficient way and to ensure their motivation, it is necessary to psychologically strengthen the employees and ensure their participation within an organization. The aim of the study is to analyze the reactions of white-collar employees who work in food companies that have to make continuous production in order to meet the food needs of people, all while working against the leadership’s attitude in the busy pace of work. Within the scope of the research, surveys were collected from 365 personnel working in food companies in Istanbul operating in the production sector in 2019. Analyzes were made by using IBM SPSS 25 and AMOS. Correlation analysis, regression analysis, Sobel test, and Hayes process were performed respectively in order to examine variables and test hypotheses in the research model. As a result of the research, it was concluded that both psychological empowerment and participative leadership positively affect innovative behavior and organizational effectiveness.
PDF

___

  • Ali, M., Sheikh, A. Z., Ali, I., Jinji, P., & Sumbal, M. S. (2020). The moderating effect of supervisor–subordinate guanxi on the relationship between transformational leadership and organizational effectiveness. Journal of East-West Business, 26(2), 161-192.
  • Amundsen, S., & Martinsen, Ø. L. (2015). Linking empowering leadership to job satisfaction, work effort, and creativity: The role of self-leadership and psychological empowerment. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 22(3), 304-323.
  • Aroian, L. A. (1944/1947). The probability function of the product of two normally distributed variables. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18, 265-271.
  • Bell, C., & Mjoli, T. (2014). The effects of participative leadership on organisational commitment: Comparing its effects on two gender groups among bank clerks. African Journal of Business Management, 8(12), 451-459.
  • Benoliel, P., & Barth, A. (2017). The implications of the school’s cultural attributes in the relationships between participative leadership and teacher job satisfaction and burnout. Journal of Educational Administration. 55(6), 640-656. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-10- 2016-0116
  • Berraies, S., Chaher, M., & Yahia, K. B. (2014). Employee empowerment and its importance for trust, innovation and organizational performance. Business Management and Strategy, 5(2), 82-103.
  • Bordin, C., Bartram, T., & Casimir, G. (2007). The antecedents and consequences of psychological empowerment among Singaporean IT employees. Management Research News, 30(1), 34- 46. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170710724287
  • Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford publications.
  • Budhiraja, S., & Malhotra, M. (2013). Leadership style & organizational effectiveness in Indian it & banking industry. The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 49(2), 270-285.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2018). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Pegem Atıf İndeksi, pp.001-214.
  • Carmeli, A., & Spreitzer, G. M. (2009). Trust, connectivity, and thriving: Implications for innovative behaviors at work. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 43(3), 169-191.
  • Chan, S. C. (2019). Participative leadership and job satisfaction. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. 40(3), 319-333. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-06-2018-0215
  • Colbert, A. E., Barrick, M. R., & Bradley, B. H. (2014). Personality and leadership composition in top management teams: Implications for organizational effectiveness. Personnel Psychology, 67(2), 351-387.
  • Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of management review, 13(3), 471-482.
  • Connors, J. F. (1979). Management Continuity-Key to Organizational-Effectiveness, Training and Development Journal, 33, 92-95.
  • Deem, J. W., DeLotell, P. J., & Kelly, K. (2015). The relationship of employee status to organizational culture and organizational effectiveness. International Journal of Educational Management. 29(5), 563-581. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-02-2014-0018
  • Dust, S. B., Resick, C. J., Margolis, J. A., Mawritz, M. B., & Greenbaum, R. L. (2018). Ethical leadership and employee success: Examining the roles of psychological empowerment and emotional exhaustion. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(5), 570-583.
  • Garg, S., & Dhar, R. (2017). Employee service innovative behavior. International Journal of Manpower, 30(3), 1601-1620. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-02-2017-0079
  • Ghani, N. A. A., & Hussin, T. A. B. S. B. (2009). Antecedents of Psychological Empowerment in the Malaysian Private Higher Education Institutions. International Education Studies, 2(3), 161-165.
  • Goodman, L. A. (1960). On the exact variance of products. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 55, 708-713.
  • Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford publications.
  • Huang, X., Iun, J., Liu, A., & Gong, Y. (2010). Does participative leadership enhance work performance by inducing empowerment or trust? The differential effects on managerial and non‐managerial subordinates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(1), 122-143.
  • Hwang, J. M., & Kim, S. J. (2016). Effects of Supervisor Trust on the Organizational Effectiveness: Focused on the Mediating Effects of Psychological Empowerment. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 16(3), 617-629.
  • Jain, R. K. (1997). Metrics of organization effectiveness. Journal of Management in Engineering, 13(2), 40-45.
  • Jose, G., & Mampilly, S. R. (2014). Psychological empowerment as a predictor of employee engagement: An empirical attestation. Global Business Review, 15(1), 93-104.
  • Kalaycı, Ş. (2010). SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri (Vol. 5). Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Kanter, R. M. (1983). The change masters: Innovation for productivity in the American corporation. Simon and schuster.
  • Kareem, M. A., & Hussein, I. J. (2019). The Impact of Human Resource Development on Employee Performance and Organizational Effectiveness. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 7(3), 307-322.
  • Khan, M. J., Aslam, N., & Riaz, M. N. (2012). Leadership styles as predictors of innovative work behavior. Pakistan Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9(2), 17-22.
  • Kieffer, C. H. (1984). Citizen empowerment: A developmental perspective. Prevention in Human Services, 3(2-3), 9-36.
  • Kim, C., & Schachter, H. L. (2015). Exploring followership in a public setting: Is it a missing link between participative leadership and organizational performance?. The American Review of Public Administration, 45(4), 436-457.
  • Kong, H., Sun, N., & Yan, Q. (2016). New generation, psychological empowerment. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. 28(11), 2553-2569. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-05-2014-0222
  • Kraimer, M. L., Seibert, S. E., & Liden, R. C. (1999). Psychological empowerment as a multidimensional construct: A test of construct validity. Educational and psychological Measurement, 59(1), 127-142.
  • Kundu, S. C., Kumar, S., & Gahlawat, N. (2019). Empowering leadership and job performance: mediating role of psychological empowerment. Management Research Review. 42(5), 605- 624. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-04-2018-0183
  • Lee, C. S. (2018). Authentic leadership and organizational effectiveness: The roles of hope, grit, and growth mindset. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 118(19), 383-401.
  • Li, M., & Hsu, C. H. (2018). Customer participation in services and employee innovative behavior. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(4), 2112-2131. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-08-2016-0465
  • Lin, H. C., & Lee, Y. D. (2017). A study of the influence of organizational learning on employees’ innovative behavior and work engagement by a cross-level examination. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3463-3478.
  • MacKinnon, D. P., Warsi, G., & Dwyer, J. H. (1995). A simulation study of mediated effect measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 41-62.
  • Mehdipour, Y., & MohebiKia, S. (2019). Participative leadership and organizational effectiveness and efficiency: teachers' opinions. Dilemas Contemporáneos: Educación, Política y Valores, 7(1), 1-13.
  • Miao, Q., Newman, A., & Huang, X. (2014). The impact of participative leadership on job performance and organizational citizenship behavior: Distinguishing between the mediating effects of affective and cognitive trust. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(20), 2796-2810.
  • Mishra, P., & Misra, R. K. (2017). Entrepreneurial leadership and organizational effectiveness: A comparative study of executives and non-executives. Procedia computer science, 122, 71- 78.
  • Mufti, M., Xiaobao, P., Shah, S. J., Sarwar, A., & Zhenqing, Y. (2020). Influence of leadership style on job satisfaction of NGO employee: The mediating role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Public Affairs, 20(1), 1-14
  • Muqadas, F., Rehman, C. A., & Aslam, U. (2017). Organizational justice and employee’s job dissatisfaction: a moderating role of psychological empowerment. Pakistan Business Review, 18(4), 848-864.
  • Naranjo‐Valencia, J. C., Jimenez‐Jimenez, D., & Sanz‐Valle, R. (2017). Organizational culture and radical innovation: Does innovative behavior mediate this relationship?. Creativity and Innovation Management, 26(4), 407-417.
  • Nica, E. (2016). Employee voluntary turnover as a negative indicator of organizational effectiveness. Psychosociological Issues in Human Resource Management, 4(2), 220-226.
  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory: 2d Ed. McGraw-Hill.
  • Odoardi, C., Battistelli, A., Montani, F., & Peiró, J. M. (2019). Affective commitment, participative leadership, and employee innovation: a multilevel investigation. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 35(2), 103-113.
  • Parke, M. R., & Seo, M. G. (2017). The role of affect climate in organizational effectiveness. Academy of Management Review, 42(2), 334-360.
  • Plaskova, N. S., Prodanova, N. A., Zatsarinnaya, E. I., Korshunova, L. N., & Chumakova, N. V. (2017). Methodological support of organizations implementing innovative activities investment attractiveness estimation. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 8(30), 2533-2539.
  • Pradhan, R. K., Panda, M., & Jena, L. K. (2017). Transformational leadership and psychological empowerment. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. 30(1), 82-95. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-01-2016-0026
  • Qing, M., Asif, M., Hussain, A., & Jameel, A. (2019). Exploring the impact of ethical leadership on job satisfaction and organizational commitment in public sector organizations: The mediating role of psychological empowerment. Review of Managerial Science, 14, 1405– 1432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-019-00340-9
  • Rana, R., Ka’ol, G., & Kirubi, M. (2019). Effect of Participative Leadership Style on Employee Performance of Coffee Trading Companies in Kenya. Journal of Human Resource and Leadership, 4(2), 29-57.
  • Robbins, S. P. (1990). Organization Theory: Structures, Designs, and Applications, 3/e. Pearson Education India.
  • Seibert, S. E., Wang, G., & Courtright, S. H. (2011). Antecedents and consequences of psychological and team empowerment in organizations: A meta-analytic review. Journal of applied psychology, 96(5), 981-1003.
  • Singh, S. K., & Singh, A. P. (2019). Interplay of organizational justice, psychological empowerment, organizational citizenship behavior, and job satisfaction in the context of circular economy. Management Decision. 57(4), 937-952. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-09- 2018-0966
  • Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology (290-312). Jossey-Bass.
  • Somech, A. (2006). The effects of leadership style and team process on performance and innovation in functionally heterogeneous teams. Journal of Management, 32(1), 132-157.
  • Spector, P. E. (1997). Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, causes, and consequences (Vol. 3). Sage publications.
  • Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465.
  • Stokes, J., & Stewart, L. (1991). IS without managers. Information Strategy. The Executive’s Journal, 8(2), 11–15.
  • Sue, S., & Zane, N. (1980). Learned helplessness theory and community psychology. Community psychology: Theoretical and empirical approaches, 121-143.
  • Tang, K. N. (2019). Leadership styles and organizational effectiveness. In Leadership and change management (pp. 11-25). Springer.
  • Thomas, J. R., Nelson, J. K., & Silverman, S. J. (2015). Research methods in physical activity. Human kinetics.
  • Tsai, C. T., Chen, H. T., & Shen, Y. R. (2015). The Relationships Among Lmx, Psychological Empowerment, Motivational Orientations and Innovative Behavior. The Journal of Developing Areas, 1059-1069.
  • Ugwu, F. O., Onyishi, I. E., & Rodríguez-Sánchez, A. M. (2014). Linking organizational trust with employee engagement: The role of psychological empowerment. Personnel Review. 43(3), 377-400. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-11-2012-0198
  • Ural, A., & Kılıç, İ. (2013). Bilimsel araştırma süreci ve spss ile veri analizi, Detay Yayıncılık.
  • Walton, E. J., & Dawson, S. (2001). Managers’ perceptions of criteria of organizational effectiveness. Journal of Management Studies, 38(2), 173-200.
  • Wang, Z., Meng, L., & Cai, S. (2019). Servant leadership and innovative behavior: a moderated mediation. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 34(8), 505-518. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-11-2018-0499
  • Wiley, D. M. (1999). Impact of locus of control and empowerment on organizational commitment (Doctoral dissertation, United States International University, San Diego Campus).
  • Woods, S., Mustafa, M., Anderson, N. R., & Sayer, B. (2018). Innovative work behavior and personality traits: Examining the moderating effects of organizational tenure. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 33(1), 29-42.
  • Yu, M. C., Mai, Q., Tsai, S. B., & Dai, Y. (2018). An empirical study on the organizational trust, employee-organization relationship and innovative behavior from the integrated perspective of social exchange and organizational sustainability. Sustainability, 10(3), 1- 14.
  • Yukl, G. (2010), Leadership in organizations, Seventh edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Zheng, J., Wu, G., Xie, H., & Li, H. (2019). Leadership, organizational culture, and innovative behavior in construction projects. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 12(4), 888-918. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-04-2018-0068
Turkish Studies - Economics, Finance, Politics-Cover
  • ISSN: 2667-5625
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2006
  • Yayıncı: ASOS Eğitim Bilişim Danışmanlık Otomasyon Yayıncılık Reklam Sanayi ve Ticaret LTD ŞTİ
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Bulanık Doğrusal Programlama ve BIMS Üretim İşletmesinde Bir Uygulama

Abdulkerim GÜLER, Hüdaverdi BİRCAN

Türkiye’de Ekip Kaynak Yönetimi Eğitimlerinin Uçuş Emniyetine Katkısını Artıracak Bir Model Önerisi

Cengiz Mesut BÜKEÇ, Mahmut Melih BAŞDEMİR

Orta Doğu’dan Gerçekleşen Zorunlu Göç Hareketleri: Suriye’den Türkiye'ye Göçü Belirleyen Faktörler

Elif YILDIRIM, Ahmet Safa YILDIRIM

Tüketici Yenilikçiliği Kapsamında Finansal Teknolojilere Uyum*

Mustafa Can SAMIRKAŞ, Uğur YILDIRIM

Hizmet İhracatı ile İstihdam Arasındaki İlişkinin Johansen Eşbütünleşme ve Toda Yamamoto Nedensellik Testi ile Analizi: Türkiye Örneği

Mücahit ÇİTİL

Finansal Gelişme ve İnovasyon, Türkiye’de Yenilenebilir Enerji Üretimini Artırıyor mu?*

Emrah DOĞAN, Başak ÖZARSLAN DOĞAN

Türkiye’de Konut Sektörünün Gelişimi ve Hukuki Düzenlemeler

Filiz TEPECİK

Türkiye’deki Afet Yönetimi Politikalarının Süreç Modeli ile Analizi

Göksel ÖZTÜRK, Filiz TUFAN EMİNİ

Heterojen Yetenekler, Eğitim Yatırımları ve Doğurganlık

Burcu Çalışkan KARA, Türkmen GÖKSEL

Etkili Turizm Diplomasisi, Aşı Turizmi ve Üçlü-Sarmal Modeli: Baltık Ülkeleri Araştırması

Armando ALİU, Dorian ALİU, Hakkı ÇILGINOĞLU