KIBRIS ADASINDA GÜVENLİK ÇİTLERİ: SİYASİ GÜVENLİK VE ANNAN PLANI

Kıbrıs meselesi 1968'den beri Birleşmiş Milletler'in gündemindedir. En son BM planı olarak bilinen Kapsamlı Çözüm Planı 2002'de adanın her iki tarafında sunulmuş ve beş kez revize edildikten sonra 24 Nisan 2004'te eşzamanlı referandumla sonuçlanmıştır. Kıbrıs Türkleri anılan planı % 65 evet oranında desteklerken, Kıbrıs Rumları % 76'ı oranında ezici çoğunluk ile planı ret etmiştir. Esasen Annan planı öncesi, dönemi ve sonrasında Rumlar ile bir anlaşmaya varılamamasının tek sebebi Helenizm ideolojilerine dayanmaktadır. Helenizm sadece tek hedef değil, aynı zamanda Kıbrıslı Rum halkının tek ideolojisidir. Nitekim bütün adanın kendilerine ait olduğu ideolojisi Annan planı döneminde görülmüştür. Kıbrıslı Rumlarının, adanın eşit ortağı Kıbrıs Türkleri ile eşit egemenlik paylaşımı üzerine isteksizliği devam emesinden ötürü, tüm süreçler başarısızlıkla sonuçlanmaktadır, çünkü sözde “Kıbrıs Cumhuriyetini koruma” söylemi başarılı bir şekilde siyasi güvenlik sektöründe güvenlikleştirilmiştir. Bu makale, Uluslararası İlişkilerde Konstruktivizm Teorisiyle, Kopenhag Okulu’nun Güvenlikleştirme Teorisi katkısında 2004 referandum sonuçlarını siyasi güvenlik bağlamında analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Sonuç, her iki tarafın politik güvenlik anlayışının derinden farklı olmasıdır. Bu çalışma Annan planının avantaj veya dezavantajlarını değerlendirmemektedir, sadece iki tarafın, özellikle de Kıbrıs Rumlarının politik perspektifine odaklanmaktadır. Sonuçta, Kıbrıs Rumları iki ülke arasındaki siyasi eşitlik ve idari ortaklığa hazır değildir. Özetle, işlevsel federatif sistem Kıbrıs Rumları tarafından desteklenmemektedir, çünkü “1960 Kıbrıs Cumhuriyeti” nin egemenliğini kaybetmekten korkmaktadırlar. Bu durum “iyi çitler(sınırlar), iyi komşuluk ilişkisi sağlar” deyimini artık düşünmeyi zorunlu kılmaktadır.

SECURITY FENCES IN THE CYPRUS ISLAND: POLITICAL SECURITY AND THE ANNAN PLAN

Cyprus imbroglio has always been on the agenda of UN, on andoff, since 1968. Latest UN plan was offered in 2002 namedComprehensive Settlement Plan which seperate simultaneous referandawere held on 24 April 2004.The plan was approved in the TurkishCypriot referandum by 65% of the votes whereas 76% of the GreekCypriot people rejected the plan. The only reason for the irreconcilabilityof Greek Cypriots is based on the ideology of Hellenism. Helenism is notonly the sole target but also the sole ideology of the Greek Cypriotpeople. As a mattaer of fact that the ideology to get the whole island asbelonged to them come up during the Annan plan. All processes fail,due to the continued reluctance of Greek Cypriots to share equalsovereignty with the Turkish Cypriots of the island, because of, thespeech act over protection of so called “Republic of Cyprus” successfullysecuritized in political security. This paper seeks to analyse thecontribution of the Constructivist theory of International Relations withCopenhag School’s Securitization theory to analyse 2004’s referandaresults in the context of political security. The result is political securityunderstanding of both sides deeply differ. In the event, this study doesnot evaluate the Annan plan’s advantages or disadvantages, only focusthe political perspective of both sides, but particularly Greek Cypriots.In sum, Greek Cypriots were not ready to the political equality andadministrative partnership between the two nation. Although,functional federative system was not supportive by the Greek Cypriotsbecause they afraid to loose their “sole sovereignty” in the name of“Cyprus Republic of 1960”. This makes to think an idiom of the “goodfences(borders) make good neighbour” as necessarily.

PDF

___

Anastasiades: We are ready for peace,29 March 2017, Greek Observer, https://thegreekobserver.com/cyprus/article/6213/anastasiades-ready-peace/ (Accessed: 3.01.2019).
Anastasiades condemns Turkish Cypriot reaction to Enosis vote , 13 February 2017, Cyprus Mail, https://cyprus-mail.com/2017/02/13/turkish-cypriot-antifascist-party-pullsbicommunal-greens-event-enosis-vote/ (Accessed:4.01.2019).
Annan,K.,(2004), A More Secure World:Our Share Responsibilitiy,UN,ss.1- 130,http://providus.lv/article_files/931/original/HLP_report_en.pdf?1326375616 (Accessed:2.01.2019).
Buzan, B.,(1991), New Patterns of Global Security in the Twenty-First Century, International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-), Vol. 67, No. 3(Jul., 1991), pp. 431-451 http://www.jstor.org/stable/2621945(Accessed:2.12.2018).
Buzan,B., Wæver, O.,and Wilde,D.,J., (1998), Security: A New Framework for Analysis,(Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers).
Buzan, B. (2009), People, states, and fear: an agenda for international security studies in the post-cold war era. Colchester: ECPR Press.
Chadjipadelis,T., and Andreadis I., (2007),Analysis of the Cyprus referandum on the Annan plan, PSA Puplishers,pp.1-16,http://www.polres.gr/en/sites/default/files/PSA2007.pdf (Accessed:5.03.2019).
Coufoudakis, V., (2004),Cyprus – The Referendum And Its Aftermath, the Cyprus Review, pp.67-82
Cyprus PIO: Turkish Cypriot and Turkish Media Review, 17-02-28,HRI News, http://www.hri.org/news/cyprus/tcpr/2017/17-02-28.tcpr.html (Accessed: 05.02.2019).
Denktaş: Bu plana ‘hayır’ derim, Hurriyet Newspaper, 4. 04.2004: http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/denktas-bu-plana-hayir-derim-38588347 (Accessed: 21.01.2018).
Dolinec,V., (2010), The Role of Mass Media In the Securitization Process of International Terrorism,Politicke vedy Studies, pp.1-32, http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:zAZJ3o0bHkAJ:www.politickevedy.f pvmv.umb.sk/app/cmsFile.php%3Fdisposition%3Da%26ID%3D18586+&cd=1&hl=tr&ct=cln k&gl=cy (Accessed: 2.12.2018).
Enosisi Başardık, Yeni Mesaj Newspaper, 21.04.2003, http://www.yenimesaj.com.tr/enosisibasardik-H1083256.htm (Accessed: 22.04.2019
Ertekün, N.,M.,(1981), In Search of a Negotiated Cyprus Settlement, Ulus Puplishing,Nicosia.
Faustmann,H.,(2004), The Role of Security Concerns in the Failure of the Annan Plan and in the PostAnnan Plan Period, ECPR, 2004,pp.1-23: https://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/59de89bebd0a-404d-87c9-ab5296857ac0.pdf (Accessed:22.02.2018).
Gözügüzelli ,E.,(2007), Vurun “Kahpe Kıbrıs’a, Togan yayıncılık, İstanbul.
Kotzias: Greece and Cyprus will continue united their struggle for Cyprus’ rights,20 July 2017, Greek Observer: https://thegreekobserver.com/politics/article/15424/fm-kotzias-hellenic-republicrepublic-cyprus-will-continue-united-struggle-cyprus-rights/ (Accessed : 2.09.2019).
Jennings,C.,(2005), Cyprus: The Way Forward report on Wilton Park Conference WPS05/24,Larnaca,Cyprus.
Kaya,S.,(2008),Uluslararası İilişkilerde Konstruktivist Yaklaşımlar,Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Dergisi, 63-3, http://www.politics.ankara.edu.tr/dergi/pdf/63/3/6-KayaSezgin.pdf(Accessed:15.01.2019).
Klokkaris,P.,2009, The Security Problem Of Cyprus, ERPIC Report, p.1-19: https://erpic.org/wpcontent/uploads/2017/02/the-security-problem-of-cyprus-2009.pdf(Accessed on 3 June 2019)
Lordos,A.,( 2004), Can the Cyprus Problem be Solved?Understanding the Greek Cypriot response to the UN Peace Plan for Cyprus, Cyber Market Research.
Malik,S., (2015), Constructing Security, International Security Studies, Theory and Practice (ed. Hough P., Malik, S., Moran, A., and Pilbeam B.,), Routledge. McDonald,M.,(2008), Securitisation and the Construction of Security, University of Warvick, Volume: 14 issue: 4, pp. 563-587. McCarthy,L.,(2008),The Security of Ideas;SEcuritization,Regime Change and Political Opposition, PSA Puplishers.
President Denktaş’ letter of 4 August 1980 to the United Nations General Secretary, Presidential Office Archives,1980. Report of the UN Secretary-General on his mission of good offices in Cyprus, 28 May 2004 (S/2004/437), Paragraph 61.
Reddaway, J., 2001, Burden With Cyprus: The British Connection, puplished by Rustem Bookstore,Nicosia.
Sach,S. (2004), Greek Cypriots Reject a U.N. Peace Plan, New York Times, 25.04.2004: https://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/25/world/greek-cypriots-reject-a-un-peaceplan.html (Accessed:2 May 2019)
Stivachitis,Y.,A., (2008) International Migration and the Politics of Identitiy and Security, Journal of Humanities&Social Sciences,Vol.2.Issue 1 Stone, M.(2009),Security According to Buzan:A Comprehensive Security Analysis.Sciences Po.p.5-6: http://geest.msh-paris.fr/IMG/pdf/Security_for_Buzan.mp3.pdf(Accessed:3 June 2019)
Tsakatika, M., ( 2018), Involuntary Securitisation: The process of securitisation and social constructivism in Cyprus, MA Thesis, Charles University, pp.1-63: file:///C:/Users/user1/Desktop/DPTX_2017_1_11230_0_528405_0_198198.pdf(Access ed 3 June 2019)
The Annan Plan and the Greek Cypriot “NO”: False Reasons and Claims, Turkish Foreign Affairs: http://www.mfa.gov.tr/the-annan-plan-and-the-greek-cypriot- _no__-false-reasonsand-claims.en.mfa (Accessed on 1 May 2019)
Waever,O.,(1995), “Securitization and Desecuritization”, Ronnie D. Lipschutz (ed.), On Security, New York: Columbia University Press.
Webster,C., and Lordos,A., 2006, Who Supported the Annan Plan? An Exploratory Statistical Analysis of the Demographic, Political, and Attitudinal Correlates, The Cyprus Review, A Journal of Social,Political and Economic Journal, Vol.18,Number 1, pp.13-35: http://unic.ac.cy/wp-content/uploads/cyreview_2006_-_vol_18_no_1.pdf(Accessed: 3 June 2019)
Wright,G.,(2004), Greek Cypriot Leaders Reject Annan Plan, the Guardian,22 April 2004 http://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/apr/22/eu.cyprus (Accessed:12.12.2019)
Williams,M.,C.,(2003), Words, Images, Enemies: Securitization and International Politics, International Studies Quarterly (2003) 47, pp.511–531 http://www.ikf.pwsz.krosno.pl/gfx/pwszkrosno/pl/defaultaktualnosci/675/5/1/s08b_r m_williams.pdf (Accessed:26.02.2019).
UNSG’Report to Security Council No.S/5950,10.09.1964

Turkish Studies - Economics, Finance, Politics-Cover

ISSN: 2667-5625
Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
Başlangıç: 2006
Yayıncı: ASOS Eğitim Bilişim Danışmanlık Otomasyon Yayıncılık Reklam Sanayi ve Ticaret LTD ŞTİ