Üstün Yetenekli Çocuklarda WÇZÖ-R ve WÇZÖ-IV* Zekâ Puanlarının Karşılaştırılması

Wechsler Çocuklar için Zekâ Ölçeği Geliştirilmiş Formu (WÇZÖ-R), üstün yetenekli çocukların belirlenmesinde ya da değerlendirilmesinde yaygın olarak kullanılmaktadır. Ülkemizde, WÇZÖ-R'den sonra Wechsler zekâ ölçeklerinin dördüncü sürümü olan WÇZÖ-IV yakın zamanda kullanılmaya başlanmıştır. Bu açıdan, hem üstün yetenekli çocukları belirlemede WÇZÖ-IV'ün etkililiğini değerlendirmek hem de kullanımda olan WÇZÖ-R ile WÇZÖ-IV arasında ortaya çıkabilecek puan farklarını belirlemek önem kazanmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, üstün yetenekli çocukların WÇZÖ-R ve WÇZÖ-IV üzerinde elde ettikleri puanları karşılaştırmaktır. Daha önce WÇZÖ-R ile üstün yetenekli olduğu belirlenen 50 çocuğa WÇZÖ-IV uygulanmıştır. Çalışmanın bulguları, WÇZÖ-R Toplam Zekâ Bölümü (ZB) ile WÇZÖ-IV Tüm Ölçek Zekâ Puanı (TÖZP) arasında ve WÇZÖ-R Performans ZB ile WÇZÖ-IV Algısal Akıl Yürütme Puanı (AAYDP) puanları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark bulunduğunu göstermektedir. Buna göre, üstün yetenekli çocuklar söz konusu puanlarda, WÇZÖ-R üzerinde daha yüksek puanlar elde etmiştir. Ayrıca, karşılaştırılabilir alt test standart puanları açısından, çocukların WÇZÖ-R üzerinde, Sözcük Dağarcığı alt testi dışında, Benzerlikler, Küplerle Desen ve Şifre alt testlerinden daha yüksek puanlar aldıkları gösterilmiştir. Korelasyon analizleri, her iki sürümden elde edilen puanlar arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ilişkilerin olduğunu ve bu iki sürümün benzer yapıları ölçtüğünü ortaya koymuştur. Değerlendiriciler, WÇZÖ-IV'ü üstün yetenekli çocukları belirlemede kullanırken, eski sürüme göre, bazı alt test standart puanlar ya da dönüştürülmüş puanlar arasında farklılıkların olabileceğini göz önünde bulundurmalıdır.

Comparison of WISC-R and WISC-IV Intelligence Scores in Gifted Children

Wechsler Intelligence Scales for Children-Revised (WISC-R) has been widely used in identifying or assessing gifted children. In our country, WISC-IV, which is the fourth version of Wechsler intelligence scales, will be in use soon. In this respect, it is important to assess both efficiency of WISC-IV in identifying gifted children and to determine the possible score differences between WISC-R and WISC-IV. The purpose of the present study is to compare WISC-R and WISC-IV scores of gifted children. WISC-IV was administered to 50 children who were identified as gifted by WISC-R. The findings of the study showed that there were statistically significant differences between WISC-R Full Scale Intelligence Quotient (FSIQ)/WISC-IV FSIQ and WISC-R Performance IQ/WISC-IV Perceptual Reasoning Index (PRI). Accordingly, gifted children had higher scores on WISC-R than WISC-IV. In terms of comparable subtest scores, they had also higher scores on WISC-R Similarities, Block Design and Coding subtests compared to WISC-IV's same subtests, except for the Vocabulary subtest. The correlation analysis revealed that there were significant relationships between WISC-R and WISC-IV composite and index scores and that both of these versions tested the same constructions. Administering WISC-IV for gifted identification, practitioners should consider some subtest or composite score differences compared to its previous version.

___

  • Alvino, J., McDonnel, R. C. ve Richert, S. (1981). National survey of identification practices in gifted and talented education. Exceptional Children, 48(2), 124-132.
  • Bolen, L. M., Aichinger, K. S., Hall, C. W. ve Webster, R. E. (1995). A comparison of the performance of cognitively disabled children on the WISC-R and WISC-III. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51(1), 89-94.
  • Bryant, D. C. (1992). A comparison of WISC-R and WISC-III for gifted children. Unpublished master's thesis, West Virginia Graduate College.
  • Covin, T. M. (1977). Comparison of WISC and WISC-R Full ScaleIQs for a sample of children in special education. Psychological Reports, 41, 237-238.
  • Çelik, C., Erden, G., Özmen, S. ve Hesapçıoğlu, S. T. (2017). Dikkat eksikliği hiperaktivite bozukluğunda Wechsler Çocuklar İçin Zekâ Ölçeği'nin iki sürümünün karşılaştırılması ve okuma becerilerinin değerlendirilmesi. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi (Baskıda).
  • Çelik, C., Yiğit, İ. ve Erden, G. (2015). Wechsler Çocuklar İçin Zekâ Ölçeği Geliştirilmiş Formunun doğrulayıcı faktör analizi: Normal zihinsel gelişim gösteren çocukların oluşturduğu bir örneklem. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 18(35), 21-29.
  • Doll, B. ve Boren, R. (1993). Performance of severely language-impaired students on the WISC-III, language scales, and academic achievement measures. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, Advances in Psychological Assessment Monograph Series, 77-86.
  • Doppelt, J. E. ve Kaufman, A. S. (1977). Estimation of the differences between WISC-R and WISC IQs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37(2), 417-424.
  • Falk, R. F., Silverman, L. K. ve Moran, D. (2004). Using two WISC-IV indices to identify the gifted. In 51st Annual Convention of the National Association for Gifted Children, Salt Lake City, UT.
  • Flanagan, D. P. ve Kaufman, A. S. (2009). Essentials of WISC-IV assessment (Vol. 56). John Wiley & Sons. Flynn, J. R. (1984). The mean IQ of Americans: Massive gains 1932 to 1978. Psychological Bulletin, 95(1), 29-51.
  • Flynn, J. R. (1987). Massive IQ gains in 14 nations: What IQ tests really measure. Psychological Bulletin, 101(2), 171-191.
  • Flynn, J. R. (1999). Searching for justice: The discovery of IQ gains over time. American Psychologist, 54(1), 5-20.
  • Goh, D. S., Teslow, J. ve Fuller, G. B. (1981). The practice of psychological assessment among school psychologists. Professional Psychology, 12(6), 696.
  • Hagmann-von Arx P., Meyer, C. S. ve Grob, A. (2008). Assessing intellectual giftedness with the WISCIV and the IDS. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 216(3), 172-179.
  • Hishinuma, E. S. ve Yamakawa, R. (1993). Construct and criterion-related validity of the WISC-III for exceptional students and those who are at risk. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 94-104.
  • Hutton, J. B., Dubes, R. ve Muir, S. (1992). Assessment practices of school psychologists: Ten years later. School Psychology Review, 12(6), 696-706.
  • Kanaya, T., Scullin, M. H. ve Ceci, S. J. (2003). The Flynn effect and US policies: the impact of rising IQ scores on American society via mental retardation diagnoses. American Psychologist, 58(10), 778.
  • Kaufman, A. S. (1992). Test reviews: Evaluation of the WISC-III and WPPSI-R for gifted children. Roeper Review, 14(3), 154-158.
  • Kaufman, A. S. ve Harrison, P. L. (1986). Intelligence tests and gifted assessment: What are the positives? Roeper Review, 8(3), 154-159.
  • Kaufman, A.S. (1990). Assessing adolescent and adult intelligence. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Klausmeier, K., Mishra, S. P. ve Maker, C. J. (1987). Identification of gifted learners: A national survey of assessment practices and training needs of school psychologists. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31(3), 135-137.
  • Larrabee, G. J. ve Holroyd, R. G. (1976). Comparison of WISC and WISC-R using a sample of highly intelligent children. Psychological Reports, 38(3c), 1071-1074.
  • Lynn, R. (2009). What has caused the Flynn effect? Secular increases in the development quotients of infants. Intelligence, 37, 16-24.
  • Lyon, M. A. (1995). A comparison between WISC-III and WISC-R scores for learning disabilities reevaluations. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28(4), 253-255.
  • Mahone, E. M., Miller, T. L., Koth, C. W., Mostofsky, S. H., Goldberg, M. C. ve Denckla, M. B. (2003). Differences between WISC-R and WISC-III performance scale among children with ADHD. Psychology in the Schools, 40(4), 331-340.
  • Mark, R., Beal, A. L. ve Dumont, R. (1998). Validation of a WISC-III Short-Form for the identification of Canadian gifted students. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 14(1), 1-10.
  • Marland, S. P. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented: Report to the Congress of the United States by the U.S. Commissioner of Education and background papers submitted to the U.S. Office of Education, 2 vols. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Harkness, A. R. ve Silva, P. A. (1993). The natural history of change to intellectual performance: Who changes? How much? Is it meaningful? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 34(4), 455-506.
  • Munford, P. R. (1978). A comparison of the WISC and WISC-R on black child psychiatric outpatients. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 34(4), 938-943.
  • Munford, P. R., Meyerowitz, B. E. ve Munford, A. M. (1980). A comparison of black and white children's WISC/WISC-R differences. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 36(2), 471-475.
  • Munford, P. R. ve Munoz, A. (1980). A comparison of the WISC and WISC-R on hispanic children. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 36(2), 452-458.
  • Newby, R. F., Recht, D. R., Caldwell, J. ve Schaefer, J. (1993). Comparison of WISC-III and WISC-R IQ changes over a 2 year time span in a sample of children with dyslexia. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment Advances in Psychoeducational Assessment Monograph Series, 87-93.
  • Newman, T. M., Sparrow, S. S. ve Pfeiffer, S. I. (2008). The use of the WISC-IV in assessment and intervention planning for children who are gifted. In Prifitera A, Saklofske DH, Weiss LG (Eds.), WISCIV Clinical Assessment and Intervention. (pp. 217- 242). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Öktem, F., Gençöz. T., Erden. G., Sezgin, N. ve Uluç S. (2013). Wechsler Çocuklar İçin Zeka ÖlçeğiIV (WÇZÖ-IV) Uygulama ve Puanlama El Kitabı Türkçe Sürümü. Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları.
  • Pfeiffer, S. I. (2002). Identifying gifted and talented students: Recurring issues and promising solutions. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19(1), 31-50.
  • Pfeiffer, S. I. (2012). Current perspectives on the identification and assessment of gifted students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30(1), 3-9.
  • Prifitera, A., Saklofske, D. H. ve Weiss, L. G. (2005). WISC-IV clinical use and interpretation: Scientist practitioner perspectives. New York: Academic Press.
  • Prifitera, A., Weiss, L. G. ve Saklofske, D. H. (1998). The WISC-III in context. In A. Prifitera & D.H.
  • Saklofske (Eds.), WISC-III clinical use and interpretation: Scientist-practitioner perspectives (pp. 1-38). New York: Academic Press.
  • Reschly, D. J. ve Davis, R. A. (1977). Comparability of WISC and WISC-R scores among borderline and mildly retarded children. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 33(4), 1045-1048.
  • Roid, G. H. (1990). Historical continuity in intelligence assessment: Goals of the WISC-III standardization. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Rowe, E. W., Kingsley, J. M. ve Thompson, D. F.
  • (2010). Predictive ability of the General Ability Index (GAI) versus the Full Scale IQ among gifted referrals. School Psychology Quarterly, 25(2), 119-128.
  • Sabatino, D. A., Spangler, R. S. ve Vance, H. B. (1995). The relationship between the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-III scales and subtests with gifted children. Psychology in the Schools, 32(1), 18-23.
  • Sattler, J. M. (2002). Assessment of children. Behavioral and clinical implications (4th ed.). San Diego: Jerome M. Sattler, Publisher, Inc.
  • Savaşır, I. ve Şahin, N. (1995). Wechsler çocuklar için zekâ ölçeği uygulama kitapçığı. Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği.
  • Sevier, R. C., Bain, S. K. ve Hildman, L. K. (1994). Comparison of WISC-R and WISC-III for gifted students. Roeper Review, 17, 39-42.
  • Silverman, L. K. (2005). An overview of issues in assessing gifted children. Gifted Development Center, Colorado.
  • Silverman, L. K., Gilman, B. J. ve Falk, R. F. (2004). Who are the gifted using the new WISC-IV. In 51st annual convention of the National Association for Gifted Children, Salt Lake City, UT.
  • Slate, J. R. ve Saarnio, D. A. (1995). Differences between WISC-III and WISC-R IQs: A preliminary investigation. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 13, 340-346.
  • Smutny, J. F. ve Blocksom, R. H. (1990). Education of the Gifted: Programs and Perspectives. Bloomington: Phi Delta Kappa.
  • Solly, D. C. (1977). I. Comparison of WISC and WISC-R scores of mentally retarded and gifted children. Journal of School Psychology, 15(3), 255-258.
  • Solway, K. S., Fruge, E., Hays, J. R., Cody, J. ve Gryll, S. (1976). A comparison of the WISC and WISC-R in a juvenile delinquent population. The Journal of Psychology, 94(1), 101-106.
  • Sparrow, S. S., Pfeiffer, S. I. ve Newman, T. M. (2005). Assessment of Children Who are Gifted with the WISC-IV. In Prifitera A, Saklofske D H, Weiss LG (Eds.), WISC-IV clinical use and interpretation: Scientist-practitioner perspectives. (pp. 282-300). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Spitz, H. H. (1983). Intratest and intertest reliability and stability of the WISC, WISC-R, and WAIS Full Scale IQs in a mentally retarded population. The Journal of Special Education, 17(1), 69-80.
  • Steen, R. G. (2009). Are People Getting Smarter? In Human Intelligence and Medical Illness (pp. 1-8). New York: Springer.
  • Stinnet, T. A., Harvey, J. M. ve Oehler-Stinnet, J. (1994). Current test usage by practicing school psychologists: A national survey. Journal of PsychoeducationalAssessment, 12, 331-350.
  • Uluç, S., Korkmaz, B. ve Şahin, Ö. (2014). Flynn etkisinin Türk örnekleminde değerlendirilmesi: WÇZÖ-R ve WÇZÖ-IV Zekâ Bölümü (ZB) puanlarının karşılaştırılması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 29(73), 60-69.
  • Uluç, S., Öktem, F., Erden, G., Gençöz, T. ve Sezgin, N. (2011). Wechsler Çocuklar için Zekâ ÖlçeğiIV: Klinik bağlamda zekânın değerlendirilmesinde Türkiye için yeni bir dönem. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 14(28), 49-57.
  • Vance, H., Maddux, C. D., Fuller, G. B. ve Awadh, A. M. (1996). A longitudinal comparison of WISC-III and WISC-R scores of special education students. Psychology in the Schools, 33, 113-118.
  • Watkins, C. E., Campbell, V. L., Nieberding, R. ve Hallmark, R. (1995). Contemporary practice of psychological assessment by clinical psychologists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26(1), 54.
  • Wechsler, D. (1949). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation. Wechsler, D. (1974). Manual for the Wechsler intelligence scale for children, revised. Psychological Corporation.
  • Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition. San Antonio, Texas: The Psychological Corporation.
  • Wechsler, D. (2003). WISC-IV: Administration and scoring manual. Psychological Corporation.
  • Wechsler, D. (2014). Wechsler intelligence scale for children (5th ed.). Bloomington, MN: Pearson.
  • Weiss, L. G., Saklofske, D. H., Prifitera, A. ve Holdnack, J. A. (2006). WISC-IV advanced clinical interpretation. Academic Press.
  • Wheaton, P. J. ve Vandergriff, A. F. (1978). Comparison of WISC and WISC-R scores of highly gifted students in public schools. Psychological Reports, 43, 627-630.
  • Wheaton, P. J., Vandergriff, A. F. ve Nelson, W. H. (1980). Comparability of the WISC and WISC-R with bright elementary school students. Journal of School Psychology, 18(3), 271-275.
  • Wilson, M. S. ve Reschly, D. J. (1996). Assessment in school psychology training and practice. School Psychology Review, 25(1), 9-23.
  • Yiğit, İ. (2016). Üstün Yetenekli Çocukların Değerlendirilmesinde Wechsler Çocuklar İçin Zekâ ÖlçeğiIV (WÇZÖ-IV) Formunun Kullanımı. Türkiye Klinikleri Psikoloji Özel Dergisi, 1(1), 36-43.