Türk Dünyası Ortak Kimliği İnşasında Söylem Stratejileri

Milli kimlikler sosyal algı kalıplarının birer ürünüdür. Toplumların verili özelliklerininbelirli bir biçimde yorumlanmasıyla oluşturulan söylemsel egemenlik, bu sosyal algıkalıplarını tasavvur edilebilir hale getirir. Ulus-devletlerin kültürel ve sembolik sermayesiolan milli kimliklerin inşasında dil ve söylem çok önemli bir yer tutmaktadır. Türktopluluklarının ulusal düzeyde gerçekleştiği gibi, ortak sosyal algı kalıplarına sahip olması,ileri seviyede bir entegrasyonun temini için elzemdir. Sosyal entegrasyonun güçlendirilmesiiçin ortak bir kimliğin söylemsel inşası kaçınılmaz bir gerekliliktir. Bu inşanın,bir merkezden yönlendirilen bütüncül bir proje olarak ortaya çıkması güçtür.Çünkü farklı sosyal aktörler değişik alanlarda söylemsel armoninin parçası olmaya zorlanamazlar.Fakat bu sosyal ve algısal entegrasyonu sağlamak noktasında gayret gösterenkişi ve kurumlar, söylemsel strateji müktesebatına sahip olmalıdırlar. Bu çalışmada,Ruth Wodak’ın Milli Kimliğin Söylemsel İnşası adlı eserinden yola çıkarak, TürkDünyası için ortak kimlik tasavvuruna katkıda bulunacak söylem stratejileri ele alınacaktır.Kelime seçiminden, zamir kullanımına, metaforlardan, ad aktarmalarına, dilselvasıtaların ortak kimlik inşası hedefi dâhilinde nasıl istihdam edilebileceği ortaya konacaktır

Discursive Strategies of Common Identity Construction in The Turkic World

National identities are products of social cognitive structures. Discursive hegemony established through a specific interpretation of a society’s features makes these social cognitive structures conceivable. Language and discourse play very significant role in the construction of national identities which are the cultural and symbolic capital of nation-states. Fostering common social cognitive structures among Turkic communities, as it occurs at the national level politics, is a necessity for an advanced integration. Discursive construction of a common identity is a must to develop highlevel integration, This construction cannot emerge as a total project led by one political centre since different social actors cannot be forced to be part of a discursive harmony. Nevertheless, people and institutions which put effort to advance the social and perceptual integration need to have discursive strategies. This work, in this context, investigates and assesses the discursive strategies for the construction of a common identity within the Turkic World by focusing on the Ruth Wodak and her colleagues’ study of “the Discursive Construction of National Identity”. How linguistic tools such as vocabulary, word choice, pronouns, metaphors, metonymies, and synecdoche can be employed for the goal of regional common identity construction will also be demonstrated.

PDF

___

ZİMMERMANN-STEİNHART P. [2005]. Creating regional identities? Theoretical considerations. ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Granada 14-19 April 2005 Societal Regionalism in Western and Eastern Europe.
WODAK R.; DE CİLLİA, R.; REİSİGL, M. and LİEBHART K. [2009]. The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
WEİSS W.; WODAK, R. [2003]. Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
SMİTH A. D. [1988]. The Ethnic Origins of Nations. Gloucester England: Blackwell Publishing.
SLOCUM-BRADLEY N. [2010]. Identity Construction in Europe: A Discursive Approach. UNU-CRIS Working Paper W-2010/2.
SHAPİRO M. [1984]. Language and Politics (Ed.). New York: New York University Press.
SCHNEEBERGER A. I. [2009]. Constructing European Identity Through Mediated Difference: A Content Analysis of Turkey’s EU Accession Process in the British Press. Platform: Journal of Media and Communication Vol.1: 83-102.
ROSAMOND B. [1999]. Discourses of globalization and the social construction of European identities. Journal of European Public Policy, 6: 4, 652-668.
RİSSE T. [1997]. Cooperation among Democracies: The European Influence on U.S. Foreign Policy. Princeton University Press.
POLONSKA-KİMUNGUYİ E.; KİMUNGUYİ P. [2011]. The making of the Europeans: Media in the construction of pan-national identity. International Communication Gazette. 73: 507.
LUSTİCK I. S. [2002]. “The Riddle of Nationalism: The Dialectic of Religion and Nationalism in the Middle East”. Logos. 1 (3).
LACLAU E. & MOUFFE, C. [2014]. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
LACLAU E. [1990]. New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time. London: Verso.
KRİSTEVA J. [1993]. Nations Without Nationalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
KOLAKOWSKİ L. [1995]. Über kollektive Identität. In Michalski, Krzysztof (ed.). Identität im Wandel: Castelgandolfo-Gespräche. Institut für die Wissenschaften vom Menschen. Stuttgart, pp. 47–60.
JORGENSEN M. & PHİLLİPS L. J. [2002]. Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: Sage Publications.
HOGG M. A.; ABRAMS D. [1988]. Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. London: Routledge.
HALL S. [1996]. “The Question of Cultural Identity”. In S. Hall, D. Held, D. Hubert and K. Thompson (eds.). Modernity: An Introduction to Modern Societies (pp. 595–634). Cambridge, Mass. and Oxford.
HALL S.; HELD D.; HUBERT D. and THOMPSON K. [1996]. Modernity: An Introduction to Modern Societies. Cambridge, Mass. and Oxford.
HABERMAS J. [1989]. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
GELLNER E [1987]. Culture, Identity, and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
FOUCAULT M. [2010]. The Archeology of knowledge. New York: Vintage Books
FOUCAULT M. [1984]. The Order of Discourse. In M. Shapiro (Ed.). Language and Politics (pp. 108-138). New York: New York University Press.
CASTELLS M. [2004]. The Construction of European Identity. Statement prepared for the European Presidency of the European Union
CALHOUN C. J. [1997]. Nationalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
BUTLER J. [1994] “Gender as Performance: an interview with Judith Butler”, Radical Philosophy, 67, Summer, 32-37.
BUTLER J. [1993] Bodies That Matter. London and New York: Routledge.
BRUBAKER R. [2009]. Nationalism reframed: Nationhood and the national question in the New Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
BEE C. [2008]. “The ‘Institutionally Constructed’ European Identity: Citizenship and Public Sphere Narrated by the Commission”. Perspectives on European Politics and Society. Vol. 9, No. 4, 431–450.
BİNGÖL Y. [2009]. Language, Identity and Politics in Turkey: Nationalist Discourse on Creating a Common Turkic Language. Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations, Vol. 8, No. 2, Summer 2009, 40-52.
BALİBAR E. [1991]. The Nation Form: History and Ideology. In E. Balibar and I. Wallestein (Eds.). Race, Nation, Class: Ambiguous Identities (pp. 86-106). London: Verso.
BALİBAR E.; WALLERSTEİN I. [1991]. Race, Nation, Class: Ambiguous Identities. London: Verso.
ARCHİLÉS F.; MARTÍ M. [2001]. “Ethnicity, Region and Nation: Valencian Identity and the Spanish Nation-state”. Ethnic and Racial Studies, Vol. 24 (5), pp. 779-797.
ANDERSON B. [2006]. Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.