Günlük Hayatta ve “Second Life” Adlı İnternet Platformunda Kendilik Sunumunun Kısa Bir İncelemesi

Günümüzde internet teknolojilerinin çok hızlı bir şekilde gelişmesi sayesinde milyonlarca insan bilgisayarlar vasıtasıyla yaratılan sanal ortamlarda önemli ölçüde zaman geçirmektedir. Bu araştırma kapsamında sanal ortamlarda zaman geçirmenin gerçek hayatta kişisel ilişkiler üstündeki etkilerinin olup olmadığı araştırılmış ve incelenmiştir. Bu araştırma kapsamında, Goffmanın kendiliğin sunumu teorisinden hareketle dünyanın en popüler sanal ortamı olan secondlife.comdaki üyeler arasındaki kişisel ilişkiler incelenmiştir. Bu çalışmanın yazarı, şahsen secondlife.com sitesine üye olmuş ve bu ortamda çok fazla zaman geçiren kişilerle hem secondlife.com üzerinden hem de ulaşabildiği avatarların gerçek hayattaki kimlikleri ile yüz yüze olmak üzere iletişime geçmiş ve görüşmeler yapmıştır.

A Brief Analysis of Presentation of Self in Everyday Life and Second Life

As a result of the rapid advancement of internet today, millions of people are spending a considerable amount of time in virtual environments created via computer technologies. This research has tried to explore, if any, the effects of spending time in virtual environments on the personal relations of the persons in real life. Interactions of the people in the virtual environment, which is Second Life, was studied based on Goffman’s Presentation of Self Theory. Within the scope of this research, the author registered in secondlife.com and contacted people who spend considerable time in this medium and conducted personal interviews with the Second Life users in real life as well as in virtual life.

___

  • Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and Simulation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Bayraktar, F., Amca, H. (2012). Interrelations between Virtual-World and Real-World Activities: Comparison of Genders, Age Groups, and Pathological and Nonpathological Internet Users. Cyberpsychology, Behaviour, and Social Networking. 15, 5, 263-269.
  • Behm-Morawitz, E. (2013). Mirrored Selves: The Influence of Self-presence in a Virtual World on Health, Appearance, and Well-being. Computers in Human Behaviour. 29, 1, 119–128.
  • Best, K., Butler, S. (2013). Second Life Avatars as Extensions of Social and Physical Bodies in People with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Continuum:Journal of Media & Cultural Studies. 27, 6, 837-849.
  • Boellstorff, T. (2008). Coming of Age in Second Life: An Anthropologist Explores the Virtually Human. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Bullingham, L., Vasconcelos, A. C. (2013). Journal of Information Science. 39, 1, 101-112.
  • Cheon, E. (2013). Springer Science + Business Media, New York.
  • Chien, C.-F., Davis, T. J., Slattery, P., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., Hammer, J. (2013). Development of a Virtual Second Life Curriculum Using Currere Model. Educational Technology & Society. 16, 3, 204-219
  • Childs, M., Schneiders, H. L., Williams, G., (2012). “This above All: To Thine own Self be True”: Ethical Considerations and Risks in Conducting Higher Education Learning Activities in the Virtual World SecondLife. Interactive Learning Environments. 20, 3, 253-269.
  • Cook, M. J. (2011) American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, College of Nursing, Michigan State University.
  • De’tienne, F., Cahour, B., Legout, M.C., Gourvennec, B., Relieu, M., Coppin, G., (2012). Springer - Verlag, London.
  • Evans, S., (2012). Springer Science + Business Media, Integr Psych Behav 46:512-528 DOI 10.1007/s12124-012-9215-x.
  • Gibson, William (1984). Neuromancer. New York: Ace Books. p. 69.
  • Goffman, E.: Interaction Ritual; Essays in Face-to-Face Behavior. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick (1967).
  • Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Penguin, London.
  • Gonzalez, C.H., Solarte, M.G., Vargas, G.M., (2013) Psicología Desde el Caribe Vol. 30, n. 2.
  • Hardey, M. (2008). The Sociological Review, Volume 50, Issue 4.
  • Hawley, John Stratton; Vasudha Narayanan (2006). The life of Hinduism. University of California Press.p. 174.
  • Hyungsung Park, H., Seo S. (2013). Effects of Collaborative Activities on Group Identity in Virtual World. Interactive Learning Environments. 21, 6, 516-527.
  • Jeter, S., Jr. D. T., (2012).The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences Volume 6, Issue 10.
  • Kim, B., (2012). Understanding Key Factors of Users’ Intentions to Repurcahse and Recommend Digital Items in Social Virtual Worlds. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 15, 10, 543-550.
  • Lawrence Erlbaom Associates, Mahwah (2002) Peachey, A.: Living in Immaterial Worlds: Who are We When We Searn and Teach in Virtual Worlds?
  • Lee, J. E., Park, S. G. (2011). “Whose Second Life is this? How Avatar-based Racial Cues Shape Ethno-racial Minorities’ Perception of Virtual Worlds. Cyberpsychology, Behaviour, and Social Networking. 14, 11, 637-642.
  • Lee, S. (2013). Can Speaking Activities of Residents in a Virtual World Make Differen-ce to Their Self-Expression? Educational Technology & Society, 16, 1, 254–262.
  • Lee, S., Kang, Kang, M., Kang, H. (2013). Mechanisms Underlying Aggravation and Relaxation of Virtual Aggression: A Second Life Survey Study. Behaviour & Information Technology. 32, 7, 735-746.
  • Lisewski, A. M. (2006). The Concept of Strong and Weak Virtual Reality. Minds and Machines. 16, 2, 201-219.
  • McKenna, K.Y. A., Green, A. S., Smith, P. K. (2001). Demarginalizing the Sexual Self. Journal of Sex Research. 38, 4, 302-311.
  • Miller, H., (1995) Paper presented at Embodied Knowledge and Virtual Space Conference. Goldsmiths’ College, University of London.
  • Morgan, E. J. (2013). Virtual Worlds: Integrating Second Life into the History Classro-om. History Teacher. 46, 4, 547-559.
  • Ochoa, T. T. (2012). Who Owns an Avatar? Copyright, Creativity, and Virtual Worlds. Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Te-chnology Law. 14, 4, 959-991.
  • Papacharissi, Z. (2002). The Presentation of Self in Virtual Life: Characteristics of Personal Home Pages. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. 79, 3, 643-660.
  • Peachey, Anna (2010) The Third Place in Second Life: Real Life Community in a Virtual World. Researching Learning in Virtual Worlds 2010: 91-110.
  • Pickard, M., D., Brody, R.G., Burns,M.B., (2013) Insights to a Changing World Journal. Vol. 2013 Issue 1, p53-69. 17p. 1 Chart.
  • Pollack, Andrew, New York Times,“For Artificial Reality, Wear A Computer,” April 10, 1989.
  • Prude, M. A. (2013). A Classroom of Bunnies, Blimps and Werewolves: Teaching Asian Religions Online in Second Life. Asia Network Exchange. 20, 2, 11-22.
  • Tawa, J., Gongvatana, A., Anello, M., Shanmugham, U., Lee-Chuvala, T., Suyemoto, K. L. (2012) Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 6(3), article 2. doi: 10.5817/CP2012-3-2.
  • Taylor, T.L.: Living digitally: embodiment in virtual worlds. In: Schroeder, R. (ed.) The Social Life of Avatars: Presence and Interac- tion in Shared Virtual Environments. Springer, London (2002).
  • Umberto Eco, Travels In Hyperreality, New York, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1986, p. 43.
  • Veronin, M. A., Daniels, L., Demps, E. (2012). Pharmacy Cases in Second Life: An Elective Course. Advances in Medical Education and Practice. 3, 105-112.
  • Wang, C. X., Calandra, B., Hibbard, S. T., McDowell Lefaiver, M. L. (2012). Learning Effects of an Experimental Program in Second Life. Educational Technology Research and Development. 60, 5, 943–961.
  • Wang, F., Shao, E. (2012). Using Second Life to Assist EFL Teaching: We do not have to Sign in to the Program. TechTrends.56, 4, 15-18.
  • Williams, D., Kennedy, T. L. M., ve Moore, R. J. (2011). Behind the Avatar: The Patterns, Practices, and Functions of Role Playing in MMOS. Games and Culture. 6, 2, 171-200.