İlkay DELLAL, Gülşen KESKİN, F. Füsun TATLIDİL

A case study on the risk of rural poverty in semi-arid region of Turkey: Kırıkkale province Central district

Bu çalısmanın amacı Türkiye’de yarı-kurak bölgelerde bulunan tarım isletmelerinde kırsal fakirlik riskini belirlemektir. Bu amaca ulasmak için İç Anadolu Bölgesi’nde yer alan Kırıkkale ili yarı kurak alanları temsil eden il olarak seçilmistir. Çalısmada kullanılan veriler basit tesadüfi örnekleme yöntemi ile seçilen isletmelerden anket yoluyla toplanmıstır. Risk analizi, isletmelerde elde edilen gelirin (Brüt Tarımsal Gelir ve Toplam Aile Geliri) stokastik degerlerinin simülasyonu yoluyla yapılmıstır. Arastırma sonuçlarına göre incelenen isletmelerde ortalama isletme büyüklügü 89.59 dekardır. Tarla arazisinin %95.16’sı kuru tarım arazisi olup tahıl üretimi ile ugrasmaktadır. isletmelerde bitkisel üretim yanında hayvancılık da yapılmakta olup, isletmeler ortalamasında 2 bas süt inegi, 2.19 bas besi sıgırı, 13.03 bas koyun ve 1.45 bas keçi bulunmaktadır. Brüt Tarımsal Gelir 4988$ olup bunun %70.98’i bitkisel üretime %29.02’si ise hayvansal üretime aittir. Toplam Aile Geliri 5565$ olarak bulunmustur. Kırsal fakirlik riski isletmelerin Brüt Tarımsal Geliri dikkate alındıgında %26.66, Toplam Aile Geliri dikkate alındıgında ise %17.29 olarak bulunmustur.

Türkiye'de yarı-kurak bölgelerde kırsal fakirlik riski üzerine bir araştırma: Kırıkkale ili merkez ilçesi

The aim of this research is to determine the risk of rural poverty of farms located in semi-arid regions of Turkey. To reach the aim, it was selected that representing semi-arid areas as Kırıkkale province in Central Anatolia region. The bulk of the data was collected from selected farms by questionnaires which were selected from farms in the research area by random sampling method. The risk analysis was made by simulation of stochastic values of obtained income (Gross Agricultural Income and Total Family Income). According to research results, the average farm land was 89.59 decares. 95.16% of crop land was arid land and mainly, engaged in cereal production. Besides crop production, animal husbandry was done in the average as 2 head dairy cow, 2.19 head cow, 13.03 head sheep and 1.45 head goat. Gross Agricultural Income was $4988 in the average farm and 70.98% of them were from crop production, 29.02% was from animal production. Total Family Income was $5565. It was found that the risk of rural poverty was 26.66% as to obtained Gross Agricultural Income and 17.29% as to Total Family Income.

PDF

___

Anonymous 2001a. World Development Report 2000/2001: Attacking Poverty, Oxford University Pres, p:3-4.
Anonymous 2001b. Rural Povery Report 2001: The Chalenge of Ending Rural Poverty. International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). Oxford University Pres, p:3-4.
Anonymous 2008a. FAO. http://www.fao.org/glossary/ (24.12.2008)
Anonymous 2008b. Turkish State Meteorological Service. www.meteor.gov.tr (24.12.2008)
Anonymous 2008c. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Directorate of Kırıkkale Province. Unpublished data. Turkey.
Anonymous 2008d. World Soil Information. http://www.isric.org. (24.12.2008)
Bowker, J.M. and J.W. Richardson. 1989. Impacts of alternative farm policies on rural communities. Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 21 (2): 35-46.
Dar, W.D., C.L.L. Gowda and H.C. Sharma. 2003. Role of Modern Science and Techonologies in Agriculture for Poverty Alleviation in South Asia. South Asia Conference on Techonologies For Poverty Reduction, New Delhi.
Ray, D.E., J.W. Richardson, D. Ugarte and K. Tiller. 1998. Estimating price variablity in agriculture: Implications for decisions makers. J.of Ag.and App. Eco. 30 (1): 21-33.
Richardson, J.W. 2003. Simulation for Applied Risk Management, Texas A&M University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
Shiferaw, B. 2006. Poverty and Natural Resource Management in the Semi-Arid Tropics:Revisiting Challenges and Conceptual Issues. ejournal. www.icrisat.org/Journal/mpii/v2i1/v2i1poverty.pdf