CİHAN ERTAN, MERAL TİMURTURKAN, GÖNÜL DEMEZ, ELİFE KART

THE EXPERIENCE OF PROBATION IN TURKEY: CRIMINOGENIC NEEDS AND EXPECTATIONS OF PROBATIONERS

This study presents the findings of the research conducted with 2560probationers in Turkey, Antalya between the date of September 2014 and April 2017.From the larger data of the research, this study aims to focus on the criminogenic needs,expectations from probation service of probationers as well as on the areas probationerswould like to improve themselves which is related to criminogenic needs. In addition,the study seeks to illuminate the relationship of these with some demographicalvariables. In the light of relevant analysis, the study both presents the general portrait ofprobation service and probationers in Turkey, Antalya; and suggests some politicalpriorities that may be helpful to improve the quality of probation in Turkey.

Türkiye’de Denetimli Serbestlik Deneyimi: Kriminojenik İhtiyaçlar ve Denetimli Serbestlik Altındaki Bireylerin Beklentileri

Bu çalışma, Eylül 2014 ve Nisan 2017 tarihleri arasında Antalya, Türkiye'de denetimli serbestlik altında bulunan 2560 bireyle yürütülmüş olan bir araştırmanın bulgularına dayanmaktadır. Daha geniş bir araştırma verisinden hareketle bu çalışma, kriminojenik ihtiyaçlar, denetimli serbestlik altındaki bireylerin denetimli serbestlikten beklentileri ve aynı zamanda, kriminojenik ihtiyaçlarla ilintili olarak, denetimli serbestlik altındaki bireylerin kendilerini geliştirmek istedikleri alanlar üzerine odaklanmaktadır. Bununla birlikte çalışma, tüm bu odak noktalarının bazı demografik değişkenlerle olan ilişkisini aydınlatmayı hedeflemektedir. Konu ile ilgili analizler ışığında çalışma hem Antalya, Türkiye'de denetimli serbestlik hizmeti ve ondan yararlanan bireylerin genel bir tasvirini sunmakta hem de Türkiye'de denetimli serbestliğin niteliğini yükseltmeye yardımcı olabilecek bazı politik öncelikler önermektedir.

PDF

___

Andrews, D. A.; Bonta, J. (2010). The Psychology of Criminal Conduct, LexisNexis, Anderson Publishing, New Providence, NJ.

Andrews, D. A.; Bonta, J.; Hoge, R. D. (1990) Classification for Effective Rehabilitation: Rediscovering Psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17(1): 19 - 52.

Becker, G. S.; Mulligan, C. B. (1997) The Endogenous Determination of Time Preference, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(3): 729 - 758

Bengtsson, T. T. (2016) Performing Hypermasculinity: Experiences with Confined Young Offenders. Men and Masculinities, 19(4): 410 - 428, DOI: 10.1177/1097184X15595083

Bourgon, G.; Guiterrez, L. (2013). The Importance of Building Good Relationships in Community Corrections: Evidence, Theory, and Practice of the Therapeutic Alliance. In P. Ugwudike & P. Raynor (Eds.), What Works in Offender Compliance: International Perspectives and Evidence - Based Practice (pp. 256 - 279) London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Chernoff, N. W.; Simon, R. J., (2000). Women and Crime the World Over. Gender Issues, 18(3): 5-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-000- 0015-0

Decarpes, P.; Durnescu, I. (2014). Probation and Community Sanctions. In G. Bruinsma; D. Weisburd (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice (pp. 3957 – 3963). New York: Springer Rereference.

Demez, G.; Kart, E.; Ertan, C.; Timurturkan, M.; Cankurtaran, S.; Aktin, S. (2016). Yeniden Sosyalleşme ve Toplumsal Bütünleşme Süreçleri: Denetimli Serbestlik Altındaki Bireyler Örneği, Destekli Projeler Veri Tabanı, retrieved from www.UVT.ulakbim.gov.tr/Tübitak

Demez, G.; Kart, E.; Ertan, C.; Timurturkan, M.; Cankurtaran, S.; Aktin, S. (2017). Denetimli Serbestlikte Yeniden Sosyalleşme Suç ve Dezavantajlılığın Sosyolojisi, Bağlam Yayınları, İstanbul.

Demirbaş, T. (2016). Denetimli Serbestlik Tedbiri Uygulanarak Hapis Cezasının İnfazı (Cegtik M.105a). In D. Özyörük (Ed.), Türkiye’de Denetimli Serbestlik 10. Yıl Uluslararası Sempozyumu Bildiri Kitabı (pp. 15 - 23), Ankara: Adalet Bakanlığı Ceza Ve Tevkifevleri Genel Müdürlüğü, Atalay Matbası. Retrieved from Http://Www.Cte- Ds.Adalet.Gov.Tr/E_Bulten/Sempozyum_E_Kitap.Pdf

Department of Probation (N.d.). Retrieved from http://www.cteds. adalet.gov.tr

Dood T.; Hunter P. (1992). The National Prison Survey 1991, London: HMSO.

Evren, C.; Umut, G.; Bozkurt, M.; Evren, B.; Yılmaz, H. (2017) Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of Drug Use Disorders Identification Test–Extended (Turkish DUDIT-E) in substance-dependent adults under probation, Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology. 27(1): 70-75. DOI: 10.1080/24750573.2017.1293240

France, A.; Bottrell, D.; Armstrong, D. (2012). A Political Ecology of Youth and Crime, Palgrave Macmillan, London.

Gray P. (2005). The Politics of Risk and Young Offenders Experiences of Social Exclusion and Restorative Justice. The British Journal of Criminology, 45(6): 938-957. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azi018

Healy, D., O’Donnell, I. (2008). Calling time on crime: Motivation, generativity and agency in Irish probationers. The Journal of Community and Crime Justice, 55(1), 25 – 38. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550507085676

Kirkwood, S., McNeill, F. (2015). Integration and reintegration: comparing pathways to citizenship through asylum and criminal justice. Criminology & Criminal Justice (CCJ), 15(5), 511– 526. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1748895815575618

Krienert, J. L. (2003) Masculinity and Crime: A Quantitative Exploration of Messerschmidt’s Hypothesis, Electronic Journal of Sociology. Retrieved from http://www.sociology.org/content/vol7.2/01_krienert.html.

Latessa, E. J., Lowenkamp, C. T. (2006). What works in reducing recidivism. University of St. Thomas Law Journal, 3(3), 521 – 535.

Lochner, L. (2004). Education, Work, and Crime: A Human Capital Approach. International Economic Review, 45(3): 811–843. DOI: 10.1111/j.0020-6598.2004.00288.x

Lochner, L. (2010). Education and Crime. In P. Peterson; E. Baker & B. McGaw (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education Volume 2 (pp. 239 - 245) Oxford: Elsevier.

Lochner, L.; Moretti, E. (2004). The Effect Of Education On Crime: Evidence From Prison Inmates, Arrests, And Self-Report. American Economic Review 94(1): 155–189. DOI: 10.1257/000282804322970751

Machin, S.; Marie, O; Vujic, S. (2010) The Crime Reducing Effect of Education, CEP Discussion Paper No 979, London School of Economics and Political Science, London.

McNeill F.; Dawson M. (2014). Social Solidarity, Penal Evolution and Probation. BJC The British Journal of Criminology, 54(5): 892-907.

Özbek, M. S. (2010). Çağdaş ceza adaleti sistemlerinde alternatif çözüm arayışları ve arabuluculuk uygulaması, Kazancı Hukuk Dergisi. 1: 116-183. Retrieved from http://angora.baskent.edu.tr/acik_arsiv/dosya_oku.php?psn=8767&yn=17&dn= 1

Peace, R. (2001). Social exclusion: a concept in need of definition?. Social Policy Journal of New -Zealand, 16, 17 – 36.

Penal Institution Statistic. Turkey Statistical Institution (2017). Retrieved from http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=24676.

Republic of Turkey Ministry of Justice. (2015). Probation in Turkey. Retrieved from http://www.cep-probation.org/wpcontent/ uploads/2015/09/PROBATION-in-TURKEY.pdf

Silver, H. (1994). Social exclusion and social solidarity: three paradigms. International Labour Review, 133, 531 – 578.

Simons, R. L., Robertson, J. F. (1989) The Impact of parenting factors, deviant peers, and coping style upon adolescent drug use. Family Relations, 38(3), 273 – 281. doi: 10.2307/585052

Smith D.; Stewart J. (1997). Probation and Social Exclusion. Social Policy Administration, 31(5): 96 - 115.

Stewart G. (1996). Housing, In M. Drakeford; M. Vanstone (Eds.), Beyond Offending Behavior. Aldershot: Arena.

Stewart G.; Stewart J. (1993). Social Circumstances of younger Offenders Under Probation Supervision, Wakefield, ACOP.

Tuncer, G.; Duru, M. N. (2011). İş Doyumu: Denetimli Serbestlik Şubelerinde Çalışan Personel Örneği, İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi Dergisi (İAÜD). 10(3): 115 - 142. Retrieved from http://iaud.aydin.edu.tr/makaleler cilt1sayi9/12_gorkem_tuncer.pdf

W. Groot & H. M. van den Brink (2010) The effects of education on crime, Applied Economics, 42:3, 279-289, DOI: 10.1080/00036840701604412

Wooditch, A., Tang, L. L., Taxman, F. S. (2014). Which criminogenic need changes are most ımportant ın promoting desistance from crime and substance use?. Criminal Justice Behaviour, 41(3), 276 – 299. doi: 10.1177/0093854813503543

Wright, J. P.; Cullen, F. T. (2004) Employment, peers, and life- course transitions. Justice Quarterly, 21(1), 183-205. doi: 10.1080/07418820400095781

Yavuz, H. A. (2011). Ceza Adalet Sisteminde Denetimli Serbestlik (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Gazi Üniversitesi, Kamu Hukuku Anabilim Dalı, Ankara.

Yavuz, H. A. (2012). Denetimli Serbestliğin Türk Ceza Adalet Sistemindeki Tarihsel Gelişim Süreci, TBB Dergisi, 100: 318-342.

Yavuz, H. A. (2016). Türkiye’de Denetimli Serbestlik Mümkün Müdür? Dünü, Bugünü Ve Yarınıyla Türk Ceza Adalet Sisteminde Denetimli Serbestlik. In D. Özyörük (Ed.), Türkiye’de Denetimli Serbestlik 10. Yıl Uluslararası Sempozyumu Bildiri Kitabı (pp. 15 - 23), Ankara: Adalet Bakanlığı Ceza Ve Tevkifevleri Genel Müdürlüğü, Atalay Matbası. Retrieved from Http://Www.Cte-Ds.Adalet.Gov.Tr/E_Bulten/Sempozyum_E_Kitap.Pdf

Yazici, A. B., Yazici, E., Akkisi Kumsar, N., & Erol, A. (2015). Addiction profile in probation practices in Turkey: 5-year data analysis. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 11, 2259–2263. http://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S89417

Yüncü, Z.; Aydın, R.; Aydın, C.; Özbaran, B.; Köse, S. (2016) Determination of Clinical and Socio-demographical Di erences of Adolescents Applying to a Treatment Center with Family Encouragement or the Decision of the Probation O ce and Determination of Predictive Factors in Maintaining Soberness among Probation Cases, Arch Neuropsychiatr. 53: 130 - 135. DOI: 10.5152/npa.2015.8719