Sesli okuma hatalarının tekrarlı okuma yöntemiyle düzeltilmesi

Bu araştırmada ilköğ retim 3. sı nıf öğ rencilerinin sesli okuma hataları nı düzeltmede tekrarlı okuma yönteminin etkisi incelenmiştir. Araştırma, Ankara’da İhsan Aras İlköğ retim Okulu ve Şiinasi İlköğ retim Okulundan araştırmanın amacı na uygun olarak seçilen 4 öğrenciyle yürütül - müştür. Seçilen öğrenciler zekâ, işitsel ve görsel yönden herhangi bir problemi olmaması na rağmen okuma güçlüğü bulunan öğrencilerdir. Okuma seviyesi tespit edilen her bir öğrenciye haftada 4 saat olmak üzere toplam 48 saat tekrarlı okuma yöntemi kullanı larak öğretim sunulmuştur. Öğretim haftada 2 oturum hâlinde 3 ay devam etmiş ve 24 oturumda tamamlanmı ştır. Uygulama, Talim Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı tarafından onaylı ilköğre - tim 2. sınıf Türkçe ders kitaplarından seçilen 24 hikâye türü okuma metni ile ya - pılmıştır. İşlemler, bireysel olarak sessiz bir ortamda yapılmıştır Tekrarlı okuma yöntemi ile sunulan 3 aylık bir eğitimin sonunda öğrencilerin okuma hatalarında önemli derecede bir azalma olduğu görülmüştür.

Oral reading errors correcting with repeated reading method

In this research, effect of repeated reading method is examined in correcting oral reading errors of primary school third grade students. Research is carried out with 4 students elected in proper with the aim of the research from İhsan Aras Primary School and Şinasi Primary School in Ankara. Despite not having any problems with aspects of mentality, auditory and visual, chosen students have reading difficulties. Each week four hours education total 48 hours using repeated reading method, is implemented to every student whose reading level is found. Education is continued 2 sessions for a week in 3 months and finished in 24 sessions. The application is perfomed with 24 story reading texts chosen from primary school Turkish second grade class texbooks certified by Chairmanship of Teaching and Education Commission. The procedures is performed individually in a quiet environment. After 3 months education period with repeated reading method, a significant decline at students’s reading errors were determined.

___

  • AKYOL, Hayati (2005). Yeni Programa Uygun Türkçe Öğretim Yöntemleri, Kök Yayıncılık,Ankara.
  • CAR VER, Ro nald P. ve HOFF MAN, Ja mes V. (1981). The Effect Of Practice Through Repeated Reading On Gain In Reading Ability Using A Computer Based Instructional System. Reading Re se arch Qu ar terly, (16), 374-390.
  • CHARD, Da vid J., SIM MONS, De bo rah C. ve KA ME ENUI, Ed ward J. (1995). “Word Recognition: Curricular And Instructional Implications For Diverse Learners. Technical Report No. 16”, (ERIC Document Reproductive Service No. ED 386 863).
  • CHOMSKY, Ca rol (1976). “After Decoding: What?”, Lan gu age Arts, (53), 288-296.
  • COŞKUN, Osman, EMECEN, Memiş ve YURT, Mihriban (2005). İlköğretim 2. Sınıf Türkçe Ders Kitabı, Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Yayınları, Ankara.
  • DAHL, Pat ri ca J. (1974). “An Experimental Program For Teaching High Speed Word Recogniti - on And Comprehension Skills”, (ERIC Document Reproductive Service No. ED 099 812).
  • DEMİR, Ercüment ve Başk. (2005). İlköğretim 3. Sınıf Türkçe Ders Kitabı, ÖzgünYayınları, Ankara.
  • DOWHOWER, Sara Lynn (1987). “Effects Of Repeated Reading On Second Grade Transitional Readers Fluency And Comprehension”, Re ading Re se arch Qu ar terly, (22), 389-406.
  • DOWHOWER, Sara Lynn (1989). “Repeated Reading: Research Into Practice”, The Re ading Teac her, (42), 502-507.
  • GONZALES, Phillip C. ve ELIJAH, David V. (1975). “Rereading: Effect On Error Patterns And Performance Levels On The IRI”, Reading Teacher, (28), 647-652.
  • HER MAN, Patrica A. (1985). “The Effect Of Repeated Readings On Reading Rate Speech Pauses And Word Recognition”, Re ading Re se arch Qu ar terly, 20, 553-565.
  • HOFF MAN, Ja mes V. ve ISAAES, M. E. (1991). “Developing Fluency Through Restructing The Task Of Guided Oral Reading” Theory Into Practice, (30), 185-194.
  • KARAFİLİK, Fatma, DEĞİRMENCİ, Gülcan ve BİLKAN, Nesrin (2005). İlköğretim 2. Sı nıf Türkçe Ders Kitabı, Harf Eğitim Yayınları, Ankara.
  • KEE, Pa ul Mc. (1958). İlkokulda Okuma Öğretimi II. (Çev. M. Şükrü Koç). Maarif Basımevi, İstanbul.
  • LAURITZEN, Carol (1982). “A ModiŞcation Of Repeated Readings For Gorup Instruction”, TheRe ading Teacher, (35), 456-458.
  • MAY, Frank B. (1986). Re ading As Communication: An Interacti ve Approach, Merril Publishing Com pany, USA.
  • O’SHEA, Lawrence J., SINDERAL, Paul T. ve O’SHEA, Do rothy J. (1985). “The Ef fects Of Repe - ated Readings And Attentional Cues On Reading Fluency And Comprehension”, Jo urnal Of Re ading Behavior (17), 129-142.
  • O’SHEA, Law ren ce J., SINDERAL, Paul T. ve O’SHEA, Do rothy J. (1987). “The Ef fects Of Repe - ated Readings And Attentional Cues On Reading Fluency And Comprehension Of Learning Disabled Readers”, Learning Disabilities Rese arch, (2), 103-109.
  • RASINSKI, Timothy V. (2003). The Flu ency Re ader “Oral Re ading Strategies For Bu il ding Word Re cog ni ti on Flu ency And Comp re hen si on”, Scholastic Professional Books, New York.
  • RASHOTTE, Carol A. ve TORGESEN, Jo seph K. (1985). “Repeated Readings And Reading Fluency In Learning Disabled Children”, Reading Research Quarterly, (20), 180-188.
  • SAMUELS, S. Jay (1979). “The Method Of Repe ated Readings”, The Reading Teac her, (32),403-408.
  • SA MU ELS, S. Jay (1997). “The Method Of Repeated Readings”, The Re ading Te ac her, 50, 376- 381.
  • STOD DARD, Kim ve Baflk. (1993). “Increasing Reading Rate And Comprehension: The Effects Of Repeated Readings Sentence Segmantation And Intonation Training”, Re ading Rese arch And Instruction, (32), 53-65.
  • SINDERAL, Paul T., MONDA,Li sa E. ve O’SHEA, Lawrence J. (1990). “Effects Of Repeated Readings On Instructi onal And Mastery Level Readers”, Juornal Of Edu ca ti onal Re search, (83), 220-226.
  • WEINSTEIN, Gloria ve COOKE, Nancy L. (1992). “The Ef fects Of Two Repe ated Re ading In terventions On Generalization Of Fluency”, Learning Disability Quar terly, (15), 21-28.
  • YOUNG, Arlene R., BOWERS, P. G. ve MAC KIN NON, G. E. (1996). Effects Of Prosodic Modeling And Repeated Reading On Poor Readers Fluency And Comprehension. App lied Psycholinguistics, (17), 59-84.
  • YILDIRIM, Sibel Janet, YILDIZ, Veysel ve DEMİR, Nihat (2005). İlköğretim Türkçe 2. Sınıf Ders Kitabı, Kök Yayıncılık, Ankara.