Ar-Ge Kompozisyonu ve Vergi Planlaması İlişkisi: BİST İşletmeleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Bu çalışmada, işletmelerin araştırma ve geliştirme (Ar-Ge) harcamalarının dağılımı ile vergi planlaması arasındaki ilişki incelenmektedir. Bu kapsamda 2010 ile 2019 yılları arasında faaliyet gösteren 73 BİST firması örnekleminde veri seti oluşturulmuş, vergi planlaması davranışlarının Ar-Ge harcamaları dağılımına etkisi genelleştirilmiş tahmin eşitliği yöntemiyle sınanmıştır. Çalışmada elde edilen bulgulara göre vergi planlamasını ölçmek amacıyla yararlanılan etkin vergi oranı değişkeninin Ar-Ge harcamaları toplamı üzerinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir etkisi bulunmamaktadır. Bununla birlikte elde edilen sonuçlar, vergi planlaması agresifleştikçe dönem gideri yazılan araştırma harcamalarının arttığını, aktifleştirilen geliştirme harcamalarının ise azaldığını göstermektedir. Dolayısıyla işletmenin vergi planlamasına yönelik tutumu araştırma ve geliştirme harcamalarının kendi içindeki dağılımını etkilemektedir.

The Relationship between R&D Composition and Tax Planning: An Investigation on BIST Firms

This study examines the relationship between the composition of R&D expenditures and tax planning. In this context, a data set is created in the sample of 73 BIST companies operating between 2010 and 2019, and the effects of companies' tax planning behaviors on the composition of R&D expenditures are tested with the generalized estimation equation method. According to the findings obtained, the effective tax rate variable used to measure tax planning does not have a statistically significant effect on the total R&D expenditures. However, the results show that as tax planning becomes more aggressive, expensed research expenditures increase, while capitalized development expenditures decrease. Therefore, tax planning carried out by firms affects the composition of research and development expenditures.

___

  • Aerts, K. ve Thorwarth, S. (2009), “Additionality Effects of Public R&D Funding: R vs.D”, FBE Research Report, MSI_0811, KU Leuven. Akçiğit, U. ve Kerr, W.R. (2018), “Growth through Heterogeneous Innovations”, Journal of Political Economy, 126(4), 1374-1443.
  • Aksan, I., Setiawan, D. ve Gantyowati, E. (2019), “Research Development Related to Implementation of Financial Accounting Standards in Indonesia”, International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR), 3(04).
  • Armstrong, C.S., Blouin, J.L. ve Larcker, D.F. (2012), “The Incentives for Tax Planning”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(1-2), 391-411. Arrow, K.J. (1971), “The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing”, Readings in the Theory of Growth içinde, Palgrave Macmillan, London, 131-149.
  • Arrow, K.J. (1998), “Innovation and Increasing Retums to Scale”, Increasing Returns and Economic Analysis içinde, Palgrave Macmillan, London, 403-408.
  • Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R., Griffith, R., ve Howitt, P. (2005), “Competition and Innovation: An Inverted-U Relationship”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(2), 701-728.
  • Asheim, B.T. ve Coenen, L. (2005), “Knowledge Bases and Regional Innovation Systems: Comparing Nordic Clusters”, Research Policy, 34, 1173–1190.
  • Audretsch, D.B., Hafenstein, M., Kritikos, A.S. ve Schiersch, A. (2018), “Firm Size and Innovation in the Service Sector”, DIW Berlin Discussion Paper, 1774.
  • Aw, B.Y., Roberts, M.J. ve Xu, D.Y. (2011), “R&D Investment, Exporting, and Productivity Dynamics”, American Economic Review, 101(4), 1312- 44.
  • Ball, R. (1980), “Discussion of Accounting for Research and Development Costs: The Impact on Research and Development Expenditures”, Journal of Accounting Research, 27-37.
  • Ballinger, G.A. (2004). “Using Generalized Estimating Equations for Longitudinal Data Analysis”, Organizational Research Methods, 7(2), 127-150.
  • Barge-Gil, A. ve López, A. (2014), “R&D Determinants: Accounting for the Differences between Research and Development”, Research Policy, 43(9), 1634-1648.
  • Bilir, L.K. ve Morales, E. (2020), “Innovation in the Global Firm”, Journal of Political Economy, 128(4), 1566-1625.
  • Blume-Kohout, M.E. ve Sood, N. (2013), “Market Size and Innovation: Effects of Medicare Part D on Pharmaceutical Research and Development”, Journal of Public Economics, 97, 327-336.
  • BOBİ FRS, Büyük ve Orta Boy İşletmeler İçin Finansal Raporlama Standardı Bronzini, R. ve Piselli, P. (2016), “The Impact of R&D Subsidies on Firm Innovation”, Research Policy, 45(2), 442-457.
  • Buzzell, R.D., Gale, B.T. ve Sultan, R.G. (1975), “Market Share-A Key to Profitability”, Harvard Business Review, 53(1), 97-106.
  • Cazavan-Jeny, A., Jeanjean, T. ve Joos, P. (2011), “Accounting Choice and Future Performance: The Case of R&D Accounting in France”, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30(2), 145-165.
  • Chaganty, N.R. (1997), “An Alternative Approach to The Analysis of Longitudinal Data via Generalized Estimating Equations”, J Stat Plann Inference, 63(1), 39-54.
  • Chan, S.H., Martin, J.D. ve Kensinger, J.W. (1990), “Corporate Research and Development Expenditures and Share Value”, Journal of Financial Economics, 26(2), 255-276.
  • Cheng, J.C., Lu, C.C. ve Kuo, N.T. (2016), “R&D Capitalization and Audit Fees: Evidence from China”, Advances in Accounting, 35, 39-48.
  • Chiesa, V. ve Frattini, F. (2007), “Exploring the Differences in Performance Measurement between Research and Development: Evidence from A Multiple Case Study”, R&D Management, 37(4), 283–301.
  • Clausen, T.H. (2009), “Do Subsidies Have Positive Impacts on R&D and Innovation Activities at the Firm Level?”, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 20(4), 239-253.
  • Cohen, W.M. ve Klepper, S. (1996), “Firm Size and the Nature of Innovation within Industries: The Case of Process and Product R&D”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 232-243.
  • Crépon, B., Duguet, E. ve Mairesse, J. (1998), “Research, Innovation and Productivity: An Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level”, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 7(2), 115-158.
  • Criscuolo, C., Haskel, J.E. ve Slaughter, M.J. (2010), “Global Engagement and the Innovation Activities of Firms”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 28(2), 191-202.
  • Cucculelli, M. (2018), “Firm Age and the Probability of Product Innovation, Do CEO Tenure and Product Tenure Matter?”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 28(1), 153-179.
  • Czarnitzki, D., Hottenrott, H. ve Thorwarth, S. (2011), “Industrial Research versus Development Investment: The Implications of Financial Constraints”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 35(3), 527-544.
  • Czarnitzki, D., Kraft, K. ve Thorwarth, S. (2009), “The Knowledge Production of ‘R’ and ‘D’.” Economics Letters, 105, 141-143.
  • Dai, X., Guo, Y. ve Wang, L. (2020a), “Composition of R&D Expenditures and Firm Performance”, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32(6), 739-752.
  • Dai, X., Verreynne, M.L., Wang, J.H. ve He, Y. (2020b), “The Behavioral Additionality Effects of A Tax Incentive Program on Firms’ Composition of R&D Investment”, R&D Management, 50(4), 510-521.
  • Damanpour F. (1992), “Organizational Size and Innovation”, Organization Studies, 13, 375-402.
  • Damanpour, F. ve Evan, W.M., (1984), “Organizational Innovation and Performance: The Problem of Organizational Lag”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(3), 392-409.
  • Demirel, P. ve Mazzucato, M. (2012), “Innovation and Firm Growth: Is R&D Worth It?”, Industry and Innovation, 19(1), 45–62.
  • Dhanora, M., Sharma, R. ve Jose, M. (2020), “Two-way Relationship between Innovation and Market Structure: Evidence from Indian High and Medium Technology Firms”, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 29(2), 147-168.
  • Ertuğrul, M. (2020), “Direct and Indirect Value Relevance of R&D Capitalization”, İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(37), 781-802.
  • Feller, A. ve Schanz, D. (2017), “The Three Hurdles of Tax Planning: How Business Context, Aims of Tax Planning, and Tax Manager Power Affect Tax Expense”, Contemporary Accounting Research, 34(1), 494-524.
  • Freel, M.S. (2000), “Do Small Innovating Firms Outperform Noninnovators?”, Small Business Economics, 14(3), 195-210.
  • Freimane, R. ve Bāliņa, S. (2016), “Research and Development Expenditures and Economic Growth in the EU: A Panel Data Analysis”, Economics and Business, 29(1), 5-11.
  • Ganotakis, P. ve Love, J.H. (2011), “R&D, Product Innovation, and Exporting: Evidence from UK New Technology Based Firms”, Oxford Economic Papers, 63(2), 279-306.
  • Gilbert, R. (2006), “Looking for Mr. Schumpeter: Where are We in the Competition--Innovation Debate?”, Innovation Policy and the Economy, 6, 159-215.
  • González Álvarez, N. ve Argothy, A. (2019), “Research, Development and Growth in State-owned Enterprises: Empirical Evidence from Ecuador”, Industry and Innovation, 26(2), 158-175.
  • Griliches, Z. (1979), “Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth”, The Bell Journal of Economics, 92-116.
  • Grimpe, C., Sofka, W., Bhargava, M. ve Chatterjee, R. (2017), “R&D, Marketing Innovation, and New Product Performance: A Mixed Methods Study”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34(3), 360-383.
  • Gümüş, E., ve Çelikay, F. (2015), “R&D Expenditure and Economic Growth: New Empirical Evidence”, Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 9(3), 205-217.
  • Hajar, I. (2015), “The Effect of Business Strategy on Innovation and Firm Performance in the Small Industrial Sector”, The International Journal of Engineering and Science, 4(2), 1-9.
  • Hall, B.H. (2011), “Innovation and Productivity”, Nordic Economic Policy Review, 2(2011), 167-195.
  • Hall, B.H., Mairesse, J. ve Mohnen, P. (2010), “Measuring the Returns to R&D”, Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, 2(1), 1033–1082.
  • Hanlon, M. ve Heitzman, S. (2010), “A Review of Tax Research”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2-3), 127-178.
  • Hanlon, M. ve Slemrod, J. (2009), “What does Tax Aggressiveness Signal? Evidence from Stock Price Reactions to News about Tax Shelter Involvement”, Journal of Public Economics, 93(1-2), 126-141.
  • Hodžić, S. (2012), “Research and Development and Tax Incentives”, South East European Journal of Economics & Business, 7(2).
  • Hoffman, W.H. (1961), “The Theory of Tax Planning”, The Accounting Review, 36(2), 274.
  • Kalay, F. ve Kızıldere, C. (2015), “Türk İşletmelerinin İnovasyon Performansını Etkileyen Faktörler Üzerine Bir Araştırma”, Ordu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5 (13) , 36-63.
  • Karlsson, M., Trygg, L. ve Elfström, B.O. (2004), “Measuring R&D Productivity: Complementing the Picture by Focusing on Research Activities”, Technovation, 24(3), 179-186.
  • Kiracı, M., Çelikay, F. ve Çelikay, D. (2016), “The Effects of Firms’ R & D Expenditures on Profitability: An Analysis with Panel Error Correction Model for Turkey”, International Journal of Business and Social Science, 7(5), 233-240.
  • Krasnikov, A. ve Jayachandran, S. (2008), “The Relative Impact of Marketing, Research-and-Development, and Operations Capabilities on Firm Performance”, Journal of Marketing, 72(4), 1-11.
  • Leal-Rodríguez, A.L., Eldridge, S., Roldán, J.L., Leal-Millán, A.G. ve Ortega-Gutiérrez, J. (2015), “Organizational Unlearning, Innovation Outcomes, and Performance: The Moderating Effect of Firm Size”, Journal of Business Research, 68(4), 803-809.
  • Lee, C.Y. (2010), “A Theory of Firm Growth: Learning Capability, Knowledge Threshold, and Patterns of Growth”, Research Policy, 39(2), 278–289.
  • Leifer, R. ve Triscari, T. (1987), “Research Versus Development: Differences and Similarities”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 34(2), 71-78.
  • Liang, Y. ve Zeger, S.L. (1986), “Longitudinal Data Analysis Using Generalized Linear Models”, Biometrika, 73, 13-22.
  • Link, A.N. (1982), “An Analysis of the Composition of R&D Spending”, Southern Economic Journal, 342-349.
  • Mansfield, E. (1981), “Composition of R and D Expenditures: Relationship to Size of Firm, Concentration, and Innovative Output”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 610-615.
  • Markarian, G., Pozza, L. ve Prencipe, A. (2008), “Capitalization of R&D Costs and Earnings Management: Evidence from Italian Listed Companies”, The International Journal of Accounting, 43(3), 246-267.
  • Mercer-Blackman, V. (2008), “The Impact of Research and Development Tax Incentives on Colombia's Manufacturing Sector: What Difference Do They Make?”, IMF Working Paper, 08/178.
  • Minasian, J.R. (1969), “Research and Development, Production Functions, and Rates of Return”, The American Economic Review, 59(2), 80-85.
  • Neicu, D., Teirlinck, P. ve Kelchtermans, S. (2016), “Dipping in the Policy Mix: Do R&D Subsidies Foster Behavioral Additionality Effects of R&D Tax Credits?”, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 25(3), 218-239.
  • Nelson, R.R. ve Winter, S.G. (1982), “The Schumpeterian Tradeoff Revisited”, The American Economic Review, 72(1), 114-132.
  • Novotná, M., Volek, T., Rost, M. ve Vrchota, J. (2020), “Impact of Technology Investment on Firm’s Production Efficiency Factor in Manufacturing”, Journal of Business Economics and Management, 22(1), 135-155.
  • OECD (2005), Oslo Manual, Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation, Baskı 3, OECD Publications, Paris. Oktar, C. (2004), İşletmelerde Vergi Planlaması ve Türkiye Örneği, Filiz Kitabevi.
  • Peker Kılıçer, İ. (2017), “Vergi Planlamasının Kötüye Kullanımını Önleyici Bir Etken Olarak İşletmelerde Vergi Uyumunun Sağlanmasına Yönelik Politikalar”, Mali Çözüm Dergisi, 144.
  • Pellegrino, G. ve Piva, M. (2020). “Innovation, Industry and Firm Age: Are There New Knowledge Production Functions?”, Eurasian Business Review, 10(1), 65-95.
  • Petruzzelli, A.M., Ardito, L. ve Savino, T. (2018), “Maturity of Knowledge Inputs and Innovation Value: The Moderating Effect of Firm Age and Size”, Journal of Business Research, 86, 190-201.
  • Pfeiffer, O. ve Spengel, C. (2017), “Tax Incentives for Research and Development and Their Use in Tax Planning”, ZEW-Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper, 17-046.
  • Plesko, G.A. (2003), “An Evaluation of Alternative Measures of Corporate Tax Rates”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 35(2), 201-226. Porter, M. ö E. (1990), “The Competitive Advantage of Nations”, Harvard Business Review, 73-91.
  • Rajapathirana, R.J. ve Hui, Y. (2018), “Relationship between Innovation Capability, Innovation Type, and Firm Performance”, Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 3(1), 44-55.
  • Ramírez, S., Gallego, J. ve Tamayo, M. (2020), “Human Capital, Innovation and Productivity in Colombian Enterprises: A Structural Approach using Instrumental Variables”, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 29(6), 625-642.
  • Rego, S.O. ve Wilson, R. (2012), “Equity Risk Incentives and Corporate Tax Aggressiveness”, Journal of Accounting Research, 50(3), 775-810. Robinson, J.R., Sikes, S.A. ve Weaver, C.D. (2010), “Performance Measurement of Corporate Tax Departments”, The Accounting Review, 85(3), 1035-1064.
  • Robinson, W.T. (1990), “Product Innovation and Start-up Business Market Share Performance”, Management Science, 36(10), 1279-1289.
  • Rosenberg, J.B. (1976), “Research and Market Share: A Reappraisal of the Schumpeter Hypothesis”, The Journal of Industrial Economics, 101-112.
  • Ryu, H. S., Lee, J. N. ve Choi, B. (2014), “Alignment between Service Innovation Strategy and Business Strategy and Its Effect on Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 62(1), 100-113.
  • Scherer, F.M. ve Ross, D. (1990), “Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance”, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.
  • Schubert, T., Baier, E. ve Rammer, C. (2018), “Firm Capabilities, Technological Dynamism and the Internationalisation of Innovation: A Behavioural Approach”, Journal of International Business Studies, 49(1), 70-95.
  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1942), Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, New York: Harper and Brothers.
  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1947), “Theoretical Problems of Economic Growth”, The Journal of Economic History Supplement, 1–9.
  • Shefer, D. ve Frenkel, A. (2005), “R&D, Firm Size and Innovation: An Empirical Analysis”, Technovation, 25(1), 25-32.
  • Sougiannis, T. (1994), “The Accounting Based Valuation of Corporate R&D”, Accounting Review, 44-68.
  • Stoneman, P. (1995), Handbook of The Economics of İnnovation and Technological Change, No. 50.003 HAN.
  • Taşkın, Y. ve Peker, İ. (2019), “Vergi Planlaması: Muhasebe Meslek Mensupları Üzerine Bir Alan Araştırması”, Mali Çözüm Dergisi, 153 Tek Düzen Hesap Planı Açıklamaları TMS 38 Maddi Duran Varlıklar
  • Wahab, E.A.A., Ariff, A.M., Marzuki, M.M. ve Sanusi, Z.M. (2017), “Political Connections, Corporate Governance, and Tax Aggressiveness in Malaysia”, Asian Review of Accounting, 25(3).
  • Wieser, R. (2005), “Research and Development Productivity and Spillovers: Empirical Evidence at the Firm Level”, Journal of Economic Surveys, 19(4), 587-621.
  • Yang, Y. (2019), “Reliability of R&D Capitalization: Evidence from Ex Post Impairment in China”, China Journal of Accounting Research, 12(3), 251-269.
  • Yeldan, E. (2012), “Türkiye Ekonomisi İçin Beşeri Sermaye ve Bilgi Sermayesi Birikimine Dayalı Bir İçsel Büyüme Modeli”, Ekonomi-tek, 1(2), 21-60.
Maliye Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-3623
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1973
  • Yayıncı: Hazine ve Maliye Bakanlığı