1912

Vefatının İkiyüzüncü Yılında Tarihte En Önemli Fikir Binalarından Birinin Mimari Immanuel Kant'ı Anarken 22 Nisan 1724 - 12 Şubat 1804

Rene Descartes'la başlayan Yeniçağ (moderne) felsefesinde 'düşünen ben' —yine Descartes'm deyişiyle res cogitans— gün ışığına çıkarılmıştır. Kant, 'düşünen ben'in biçimsel düşünme —demekki duygudan soyutlanmış— işleyişini kendine araştırma konusu kılmıştır. 'Duyumlayan ben'in irdelenmesi 'psikoloji'nin işi olmasına karşılık, 'düşünen ben'in 'biçimsel düşünme işleyişi'ni (mecanisme) incelemek bir 'transsendental' işlemdir. Bu ödevi omuzlamak da filosofa düşer. 'Duyumlayan psikolojik ben'den farklı olarak, 'biçimsel düşünen transsendental özne', ahlâk ile.(bilimsel) bilgi binasının mimarıdır. Kant'ın inşâa etmiş olduğu muazzam felsefe yapısı (sistemi), yeni bir çığırın pınarıdır. Bu yeni oluşum, zamanla Alman transsendental idealism çığırının zeminini hazırlayacaktır.

At the Two Hundredth Anniversary of His Death Remembering and Reassessing Immanuel Kant's Epoch Making Achievement in Establishing a New Form of Philosophy-Science System

There are three main stations on the 'philosophical track' of the history of philosophy-science, namely Aristotle, Rene Descartes and Immanuel Kant. For a thoroughly professional grasp of philosophy in general and any of its special domains of research in particular, the study of these philosophers' systems is indespensable. Moreover, in order to comprehend the epistemology of science in its broader sense, and of specific sciences, again, it is crucial to fall back on a minute enquiry of the above-named philosophers' respective systems. The last of the so-called triumvirate, Immanuel Kant's system is the ultimate stage of philosophy-science systematization. He reversed, even revolutionized the precartesian metaphysical venture by asserting that instead, the being (object) as such, the cognizing transcendental subject's aperceptive capacities should be scrutinized. By doing so, the boundaries of sense could be discovered. This, in turn, would demonstrate to us "that a certain minimum structure is essential to any conception of experience which we can make truly intelligible to ourselves." On the other hand, "the attempt to extend beyond the limits of experience the use of structural concepts, or of any other concepts, leads only to claims empty of meaning. Dogmatic rationalism exceeds the upper bound of sense, as classical empiricism falls short of the lower." In this way Kant construed and subsequently built up a 'non-speculative metaphysical' system which supplied the framework of a new philosophical tradition, known as the German (transcendental) Idealism. All subsequent attempts of establishing fresh philosophy-science systems, whether of the speculative or non-speculative metaphysical order, by German philosopher-scientists, could be traced back to Immanuel Kant's endeavour. Finally, it has been witnessed that from certain German speculative. metaphysical constructs, in the early Twentieth century, an ideology has sprung forth. That ideology's wish and claim was to form an alternative civilization to the existing contemporaneous globalizing Anglo-Judaic one. However the ensuing (Second World) war, maybe the only one in history fought ferociously on ideological grounds, put an abrupt end to the above-mentioned assertion. In our lengthy essay below, written in Turkish, we try to find out the cultural, historical and geographical background-coordinates within which Immanuel Kant's personality as well as his transcendental critical system could be understood and explained.

PDF

___

Aristoteles: “Metafizik” (“Meta ta Füzika”), “The Metaphysics”, Yunanca – İngilizce, tercüme: Hugh Tredennick, “Loeb”, William Heinemann, Lodra, 1961.

Aristoteles: “Fizik” (“Füzikçs Akroasôs”), “The Physics”, Yunanca – İngilizce, tercüme: Philip H.Wicksteed, “Loeb”, William Heinemann, Londra, 1929.

Aristoteles: “İkinci Analitikler” (“Analütika Hüstera”/ L. “Analytica Posteriora”), Sir David Ross’un gözetiminde İngilizceye G.R.G. Mure tarafından tercüme edilmiştir; Oxford U. P, Londra, 1950.

Aristoteles: “Yoruma dair” (Y. aslı: “Περι Ερμηνειας” [“Peri Hermeneias”]; L “De Interpretatione”), terc. ve yay. h: C. W. A. Whitaker; O U. P., Oxford, 2002.

Aristoteles: “Hayvanların Oluşmasına Dair” (“Peri Zôiôn Geneseos”), Yunanca – İngilizce, tercüme: A.L. Peck, “Loeb”, William Heinemann, Londra, 1953.

Frederick C. Beiser: “The Fate of Reason/German Philosophy from Kant to Fichte”; Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1987.

Hermann Bonitz: “Index Aristotelicus”, Berlin, 1870. “The Cambridge Companion to Kant”, yayımlayan: Paul Guyer; Cambridge University Pres, 1992.

Ernst Cassirer: “Kant’s Life and Thought”, Almanca aslından İngilizceye tercüme: James Haden, Giriş:

Stephan Körner; Edward Brothers, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1981. Cherokee Language Home Page: http://www.cherokeeobserver.org, 1992 – 2005.

Thomas De Quincey: “Los Ultimos Dias de Emmanuel Kant”, İngilizce aslından Ispanyolcaya tercüme: José Rafael Hernandez Arias; Valdemar, Madrid, 2000.

Lambertius Marie de Rijk (1924 – ): “De Rol van de Taal in het Empirisme van Aristoteles”, Koninglijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wettenschappen, Amsterdam, 2004.

Giovanni De Sio Cesari: “Kant e la Modernita”, 1 – 11. syflr, cronologia.com/storia/biografie/kant, 29/2/2004.

Ş. Teoman Duralı: “A New System of Philosophy-Science from the Biological Standpoint”; Peter Lang, Frankfurt/M – Berlin – Bern – New York – Paris – Wien, 1996.

Şaban Teoman Duralı: “Felsefe-Bilim Nedir?”, Dergâh, Istanbul, 2006. Eflâtun: “The Collected Dialogues and Letters of Plato”, editedby Edith Hamilton & Huntington Cairns, Bollingen Series LXXI, Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 1987.

Rudolf Eisler: “Kant–Lexikon”; Georg Olms, Hildesheim, 1964.

Vicente Fatone: “Kant, Profesor de Geografia”, 1 – 3. syflr, ensayo.rom.uga.edu/antologia/XXA/fatone, 6/11/2003.

Fritz Gause: “Kant und Königsberg. Ein Buch der Erinnerungen an Kants 250. Geburstag am 22. April 1974.”, Leer/Ostfriesland, 1974.

Arsenij Gulyga: “Immanuel Kant”, Rusca aslından Almancaya tercüme: Sigrun Bielfeld; Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/Main, 1977.

Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel: “Rechts~, Pflichts~, und Religionslehre für die Unterklassen (1810ff). Erläuterungen zur Einleitung”, gesammte Werke (Bütün Eserler), 4.cilt, Frankfurt/M, 1986.

David Hume: “A Treatise of Human Nature”; Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1958.

Otto Jespersen: “Language/Its Nature, Development and Origin”; George Allen & Unwin, Londra, 1922.

“Immanuel Kant. Sein Leben in Darstellungen von Zeitgenossen. Die Biographien von L.E. Borowski, R.B. Jachmann und A.Ch. Wassianski”, çıkaranlar: F.Groß, 1912, yeniden basılış: Darmstadt, 1974.

Immanuel Kant: “Untersuchung über die Deutlichkeit der Grundsätze der natürlichen Theologie und der Moral”, Königl. Academie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 1763/4.

Immanuel Kant: “Träume eines Geistersehers, erläutert durch Träume der Metaphysik”; Monographie; Reclams Universal-Bibliothek, Stuttgart, 1976 (Johann Jacob Kanter, Königsber, 1766).

Immanuel Kant: “Gedanken von der wahren Schätzung der lebendigen Kraft”, I, 4, Bd 1, “vorkritische Schriften”, Berlin, (1746) 1910.

Immanuel Kant: “Untersuchungen über die Deutlichkeit der Grundsätze der natürlichen Theologie und der Moral”, 1764.

Immanuel Kant: “Idee zu einer allgemeinen Geschichte in weltbürgerlicher Absicht”,1784. —bkz: “Kant-Lexikon”.

Immanuel Kant: “Mutmaßlicher Anfang der Menschengeschichte”, 1786.

Immanuel Kant: “Fortschritte der Metaphysik”, 1791, yayımlayan: Rink, 1804.

Immanuel Kant: “Zum ewigen Frieden”, 1795 & 1796.

Immanuel Kant: “Streit der Fakultäten”, 1798; yayımlayan: Hufeland, 1824.

Immanuel Kant: “Über Pädagogik”, “Einleitung”; derslerinde tutulmuş kayıtlardan; yayımlayan: Rink, 1803.

Immanuel Kant: “Kritik der praktischen Vernunft”; Philipp Reclam, Leipzig, 1878 —ilk baskı: Riga, 1788.

Immanuel Kant: “Kritik der reinen Vernunft” (“Salt Aklın Eleştirisi”); Inselverlag, Leipzig, 1933.

Immanuel Kant: “Kritik der reinen Vernunft”, in neues, reines Deutsch übertragen von Georg Deycke; Verlag Charles Coleman, Lübeck, 1926.

Immanuel Kant: “Der einzig mögliche Beweisgrund zu einer Demonstration Gottes”, 1763.

Immanuel Kant: “Die Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der bloßen Vernunft”, 1793; in neues, reines Deutsch übertragen von Georg Deycke; Verlag CharlesColeman, Lübeck, 1922.

Immanuel Kant: “Kritik der Urteilskraft”; Philipp Reclam, Stuttgart, 1963

Immanuel Kant: “Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten”; Philipp Reclam, Leipzig, 1904.

Immanuel Kant: “Logik” —bkz: Rudolf Eisler: “Kant-Lexikon”dan.

Immanuel Kant: “geographische und andere naturwissenschaftliche Schriften”; Felix Meiner, Hamburg, 1985.

Immanuel Kant: “Schriften zur Geschichtsphilosophie”; Ph. Reclam, Stuttgart, 1974.

Immanuel Kant: “Ausgewählte kleine Schriften”; Felix Meiner, Leipzig, 1929.

Paul-Heinz Koesters: “Deutschland deine Denker”, Stern, Hamburg, 1984.

Manfred Kuehn: “Kant/ una biografia”, İngilizce aslından Ispanyolcaya tercüme: Carmen Garcia Trevijano Forte; Acento, Madrit, 2003.

Peter Kunzmann,...: “dtv Atlas zur Philosophie.

O. Küple: “Kant y su Tiempo”; Labor, Barselona, 1925; webdianoia/imprimir: 29/2/2004.

“Larousse Dictionnaire de Biographies des Inventeurs et Scientifiques”, Larousse, Paris, 1994.

Leo Lugarini: “Aristoteles e L’Idea della Filosofia”, Publicazioni dell’Istituto di Storia della Filosofia dell’Universita degli Studi di Milano, la Nuova Italia Editrice, Firenze, 1961.

Hans&Gertrud Mortensen: “Kants väterliche Ahnen und ihre Umwelt, in Jahrbuch der Albertus Universität Königsberg”, 1953.

Hasan Ünal Nalbantoğlu: “Kant… “,28. – 51.syflr, “Doğu- Batı”da, 7.yıl, 27. sayı, mayıs – haziran – temmuz 2004.

José Ortega y Gasset: “Triptico/ Mirabeau o el Politico, Kant, Goethe Desde Dentro”; Espasa-Calpe, Madrit, 1972.

“Oxford Dictionary of Scientists”, Oxford University Pres, New York, 1999. P.F. Strawson: “The Bounds of Sense”, Methuen, London, 1973.

Medardo Vitier: “Kant/ Iniciacion en su Filosofia”; Universitad Central de las Villas, Habana, 1958.

Karl Vorländer: “Kants Leben”, Hamburg, 1974.

Wilhelm Weischedel: “Die philosophische Hintertreppe/ vierunddreißig große Philosophen in Alltag und Denken”; dtv, Münih, 1979.

Alosius Winter: “Der andere Kant/ zur philosophischen Theologie Immanuel Kants”, Olms, Hildesheim, 2000.