___

• Adıgüzelli, Y. (2016). Dağıtılmış liderlik ile örgütsel güven arasındaki ilişkinin öğretmen görüşlerine göre incelenmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 41(185), 269-280.
• Akdemir, Ö. A. (2016). Öğretmen algılarına göre okul yöneticilerinin dağıtılmış liderlik davranışlarının okulların akademik iyimserlikleri ile örgütsel bağlılık ve okul başarısıyla ilişkisi (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Atatürk Üniversitesi, Erzurum.
• Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D.W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49(2), 155-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294170
• Baloğlu, N. (2011). Dağıtımcı liderlik: okullarda dikkate alınması gereken bir liderlik yaklaşımı. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(3), 127–148.
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
• Barth, R. (1990). Improving schools from within: Teachers, parents and principals can make a difference. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
• Beachum, F., & Dentith, A.M. (2004). Teacher leaders creating cultures of school renewal and transformation. Educational Forum, 68(3), 276–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720408984639
• Beard, K.S., Hoy, W.K., & Hoy, A.W. (2010). Academic optimism of individual teachers: confirming a new construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(5), 1136–1144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.02.003
• Beycioglu, K., Ozer, N, & Ugurlu C.T. (2012). Distributed leadership and organizational trust: the case of elementary schools. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3316–3319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro. 2012.06.058
• Boz, A. (2016). Okul yöneticilerinin otantik liderlik davranışları ile okulların akademik iyimserlik ve öğretmenlerin örgütsel sinizm düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Dicle Üniversitesi, Diyarbakır.
• Brinson, D., & Steiner, L. (2007). Building collective efficacy: How leaders inspire teachers to achieve (Issue Brief). Washington, DC: Center for Comprehensive School Reform and Improvement. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED499254.pdf
• Brower, H. H., Schoorman, F.D., & Tan, H. H. (2000). A model of relational leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(2), 227–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(00)00040-0
• Bryk, A., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in Schools: A Core Resource for Improvement, NY: Russell Sage Foundation
• Bursalıoğlu, Z. (2011). Okul yönetiminde yeni yapı ve davranış. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Çağlar, Ç. (2013). Akademik iyimserlik düzeyinin örgütsel bağlılık üzerindeki etkisi. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(1), 260–273.
• Çağlar, Ç. (2014). Okulların akademik iyimserlik düzeyleri ile değişime açıklık düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi, 7(1), 94-113. https://doi.org/10.5578/keg.5731
• Cassity, A.H. (2012). Relationships among perceptions of professional learning communities, school academic optimism, and student achievement in Alabama middle and high schools. (Order No. 3539972). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1095714772). Available at: https://search.proquest.com/docview/1095714772?accountid=2508
• Cemaloğlu, N., & Kılınç, A. Ç. (2012). İlköğretim okulu yöneticilerinin etik liderlik davranışları ile öğretmenlerin algıladıkları örgütsel güven ve yıldırma arasındaki ilişki. Eğitim ve Bilim, 37(165), 137–151.
• Chang, I-H. (2011). A study of the relationships between distributed leadership, teacher academic optimism and student achievement in Taiwanese elementary schools. School Leadership & Management, 31(5), 491–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2011.614945
• Chen, G., & Bliese, P.D. (2002). The role of different levels of leadership in predicting self-and collective efficacy: Evidence for discontinuity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 549–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021- 9010.87.3.549
• Çoban, D. (2010). Okulların akademik iyimserlik düzeyi ile öğretmenlerin örgütsel bağlılığı arasındaki ilişki (yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). İnönü Üniversitesi, Malatya.
• Çoban, D., & Demirtaş, H. (2011). Okulların akademik iyimserlik düzeyi ile öğretmenlerin örgütsel bağlılığı arasındaki ilişki. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 17(3), 317–348.
• Cole, D. A. (1987). Utility of confirmatory factor analysis in test validation research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55(4), 584–594. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.55.4.584
• Coleman, J. S., & Department of Health USA. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity (Vol. 2). Washington, DC: US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education.
• Dean, S. D. (2011). Collegial leadership, teacher professionalism, faculty trust: predicting teacher academic optimism in elementary schools. (Order No. 3461037). Available from ProQuest Central; ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (879551255). Available at: https://search.proquest.com/docview/879551255?accountid=25087
• Demirtaş, H., & Güneş, H. (2002). Eğitim yönetimi ve denetimi sözlüğü, Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
• Frazier, P.A, Tix, A.P., & Barron, K.E. (2004). Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(1), 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.51.1.115
• Fukuyama, F. (1998). Güven: sosyal etmenler ve refahın yaratılması (Çev. A. Buğdaycı). İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası.
• Goddard, R. D. (2002). Collective efficacy and school organization: a multilevel analysis of teacher influence in schools. In Miskel, C. and Hoy, W. K. (Eds.), Theory and Research in Educational Administration (pp. 169-184). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing
• Goddard, R.D., Hoy, W.K., & Hoy, A.W. (2004). Collective efficacy beliefs: theoretical developments, empirical evidence, and future directions. Educational Researcher, 33(3), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/ 0013189X033003003
• Goddard, R. D., Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. K. (2001). A multilevel examination of the distribution and effects of teacher trust in students and parents in urban elementary schools. The Elementary School Journal, 102(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1086/499690
• Gordin, L. (2010). Conceptualization and support of the role of teachers serving as team leaders in a professional learning community. (Order No. 3415533). Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/725645784? accountid=25087
• Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B., (2014). Essentials of statistics for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
• Griffith, J. (2002). A multilevel analysis of the relation of school learning and social environments to minority achievement in public elementary schools. The Elementary School Journal, 102(5), 349–366. https://doi.org/10.1086/499708
• Gronn, P. (2000). Distributed properties. Educational Management & Administration, 28(3), 317–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263211X000283006
• Harris, A., & Lambert, L. (2003). Building leadership capacity for school improvement. Philadelphia: Open University.
• Harris, A., & Muijs, D. (2005). Improving schools through teacher leadership. UK: Open University.
• Hartley, D. (2007). The emergence of distributed leadership in education: why now?. British Journal of Educational Studies, 55(2), 202–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2007.00371.x
• Hasanvand, M. M., Zeinabadi, H. R., Shomami, M. A., & Karfestani, Z. J. (2013). The study of relationship between distributed leadership and academic optimism in high schools of Iran. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 7(7), 623-630.
• Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2009). Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership to school improvement and growth in math achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 659–689. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209340042
• Hong, F.Y. (2017). Antecedent and consequence of school academic optimism and teachers’ academic optimism model. Educational Studies, 43(2), 165– 185. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2016.1248902
• Hosmer, L. T. (1995). Trust: the connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics. The Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 379– 403. https://doi.org/10.2307/258851.
• Hoy, A. W., Hoy, W. K., & Kurz, N. M. (2008). Teacher's academic optimism: the development and test of a new construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(4), 821–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.08.004
• Hoy, W.K., & Miskel, C.G. (2008). Educational Administration: Theory, Research and Practice. NY: McGraw Hill.
• Hoy, W. K., Sweetland, S. R., & Smith, P. A. (2002). Toward an organizational model of achievement in high schools: the significance of collective efficacy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X02381004
• Hoy, W. K., Tarter, C. J., & Hoy, A. W. (2006). Academic optimism of schools: a force for student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 43(3), 425–446. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312043003425
• Hoy, W.K, Tarter, C.J., & Witkoskie, L. (1992). Faculty trust in colleagues: linking the principal with school effectiveness. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 26(1), 40–47.
• Hoy, W. K., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (1999). Five faces of trust: an empirical confirmation in urban elementary schools. Journal of school Leadership, 9(3), 184–208.
• Jahraus, L. C. (2016). The relationship between the emotional intelligence of an elementary school principal, the level of school academic optimism , and school achievement. (Order No. 10128772). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1814762620). Available at: https://search.proquest.com/docview/1814762620?accountid=8319
• Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (2001). LISREL 8.51. Mooresvile: Scientific Software.
• Karapınar, P. B. (2015). Okul yöneticisine güven: bağlanma stilleri ile ilişkisi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(3), 73–86.
• Kılıçlar, A. (2011). Yöneticiye duyulan güven ile örgütsel adalet ilişkisinin öğretmenler açısından incelenmesi. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(3), 23- 36.
• Kılınç, A. Ç. (2013). İlköğretim okullarında liderlik kapasitesinin belirlenmesi. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
• Kline, R. B. (2005). Principle and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford.
• Koşar, S. (2015). Öğretmen profesyonelizminin yordayıcıları olarak okul müdürüne güven ve öz yeterlik. Eğitim ve Bilim, 40(181), 255–270.
• Lambert, L. (2003). Leadership capacity for lasting school improvement. Virginia: ASCD.
• Leithwood, K. A., & Riehl, C. (2003). What we know about successful school leadership. Philadelphia: Temple University.
• Little, J. W. (1990). The persistence of privacy: autonomy and initiative in teachers’ professional relations. Teachers College Record, 91(4), 509–536.
• Louis, K. S. (2007). Trust and improvement in schools. Journal of Educational Change, 8(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-006-9015-5
• Malloy, J. P. (2012). Effects of distributed leadership on teachers’academic optimism and student achievement (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Toronto. Retrieved from https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/34799/3/Malloy_John_P_ 201211_EdD_thesis.pdf
• Marzano, R.J., Waters. T., & McNulty, B.A. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
• Mascall, B., Leithwood, K., Strauss, T., & Sacks, R. (2009). The relationship between distributed leadership and teachers' academic optimism. In A. Harris (Ed.), Distributed Leadership. New York: Springer.
• McGuigan, L. (2005). The role of enabling bureaucracy and academic optimism in academic achievement growth (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Thesis database. (UMI No. 3179683).
• McGuigan, L., & Hoy, W. K. (2006). Principal leadership: creating a culture of academic optimism to improve achievement for all students. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 5(3), 203–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760600805816
• Mechanic, D., & Rosenthal, M. (1999). Responses of HMO medical directors to trust building in managed care. The Milbank Quarterly, 77(3), 283–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.00137
• Messick, P. P. (2012). Examining relationships among enabling school structures, academic optimism and organizational citizenship behaviors. (Order No. 3520487). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1033785180). Available at: https://search.proquest.com/docview/ 1033785180?accountid=25087
• Mishra, J., & Morrissey, M. A. (1990). Trust in employee/employer relationships: a survey of West Michigan managers. Public Personnel Management, 19(4), 443–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/009102609001900408
• Mitchell, R., & Tarter, J. (2017). Effects of principal professional orientation towards leadership, professional teacher behavior, and school academic optimism on school reading achievement. In Leithwood K, Sun J and Pollock K (eds) How School Leaders Contribute to Student Success: The Four Paths Framework (pp. 263–277). Springer International Publishing Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50980-8_12
• Nelson, L. M. (2012). The relationship between academic optimism and academic achievement in middle schools in Mississippi (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://aquila.usm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi? article=1837&context=dissertations
• Oduro, G. K. T. (2004). Distributed leadership in schools. Education Journal, 80, 23–25.
• Özdemir, S., & Kılınç, A. Ç. (2014). The relationship between bureaucratic school structure and teachers' level of academic optimism. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 10(1), 1–23.
• Özdemir, S., & Sezgin, F. (2013). Etkili okullar ve öğretim liderliği. Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2(3), 266-282.
• Roney, K., Coleman, H., & Schlichting, K. A. (2007). Linking the organizational health of middle grades schools to student achievement. NASSP Bulletin, 91(4), 289–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192636507310161
• Schumacker, R. E, & Lomax, R. G. (1996). A Beginners Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Scribner, J. P., Hager, D. R., & Warne, T. R. (2002). The paradox of professional community: tales from two high schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(1), 45–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0013161X02381003
• Smylie, M.A., Mayrowetz, D., Murphy, J., & Louis, K. S. (2007). Trust and the development of distributed leadership. Journal of School Leadership, 17, 469-503.
• Spillane, J. P. (2005). Distributed leadership. The Educational Forum, 69(2), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720508984678
• Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: a distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X030003023
• Tarter, C. J., Sabo, D., & Hoy, W. K. (1995). Middle school climate, faculty trust, and effectiveness: a path analysis. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 29(1), 41–49.
• Trace, N. (2016). The relationship among teacher job satisfaction, trust in the principal, and principal support. (Order No. 10111571). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1799038586). Available at: https://search.proquest.com/docview/1799038586?accountid=25087
• Trochim, W. M., & Donnelly, J. P. (2006). The research methods knowledge base (3rd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Atomic Dog.
• Tschannen-Moran, M. (2009). Fostering teacher professionalism in schools: the role of leadership orientation and trust. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45(2), 217–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08330501
• Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. (1998). Trust in schools: a conceptual and empirical analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, 36(4), 334–352. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578239810211518
• Walker, K., Kutsyuruba, B., & Noonan, B. (2011). The fragility of trust in the world of school principals. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(5), 471–494. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111159502
• Wu, J.H., Hoy. W. K., & Tarter, C. J. (2013). Enabling school structure, collective responsibility, and a culture of academic optimism: toward a robust model of school performance in Taiwan. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(2), 176–193. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231311304698
• Wu, J. H., & Sheu, T. M. (2015). How to improve academic optimism? An inquiry from the perspective of school resource and investment. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(4), 663-674.
• Yıldız, G. (2011). Akademik iyimserlik ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanabilirliğinin incelenmesi (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
• Yılmaz, D., & Turan, S. (2015). Dağıtılmış liderliğin okullardaki görünümü: bir yapısal eşitlik modelleme çalışması. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 21(1), 93–126. https://doi.org/10.14527/kuey.2015.005
• Yılmaz, E. (2005). Okullarda örgütsel güven ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 14(1), 567– 580.
• Yılmaz, E., & Kurşun, A.T. (2015). Okulların örgütsel kültürü ile akademik iyimserliği arasindaki ilişki. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(35), 46–69.
• York-Barr, J., & Duke, K. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 255–316. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074003255
• Youngs, H. (2008, April). “Should I stand back, or should I lead?” Developing intentional communal cultures of emergent and distributed forms of leadership in educational settings. Paper presented at the International Educational Leadership Conference, Auckland, New Zealand.
• Zeinabadi, H., & Rastegarpour, H. (2010). Factors affecting teacher trust in principal: testing the effect of transformational leadership and procedural justice. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 1004–1008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.226