Digital Parenting: Perceptions on Digital Risks

Today, child rearing has become more complicated since the recent changes caused by digital technologies in daily lives of families. Digital media brings both new learning opportunities and risks for its consumers simultaneously. Especially, children and adolescents are susceptible for the digital risks. Parents are expected to have a mediating role for their children in adapting digital life. The purpose of the study was to investigate parents’ perceptions related to digital risks and on what aspects of digital media (risks or opportunities) they wanted to be trained. Seventy-nine parents (38 mothers and 41 fathers) of children aged 10 to 18 responded to survey on digital risks. Parents’ perceptions related to the risks involved in the digital media were investigated by forced-choice and open-ended questions and the responses analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. The results revealed that, parents had knowledge on digital risks and taking precautions against those risks. Besides, according to the findings from content analysis, parents utilized several parenting strategies and they needed to be educated on both risks and opportunities of digital media for their children.

Dijital Ebeveynlik: Dijital Risklere Dair Algılar

Dijital teknolojideki ilerlemeler günlük hayatı doğrudan etkilemekte ve özellikle bu teknolojilerin çocuklar ve gençler tarafından kullanımı, ebeveynlerin temel sorumluluğu olan çocuk yetiştirme işini karmaşıklaştırmaktadır. Dijital medya kullanıcılarına, öğrenme fırsatlarını sunarken bir yandan da dijital riskleri beraberinde getirmektedir. Ebeveynler ise çocuklarını öğrenme fırsatlarından yararlandırma ve onları dijital risklerden koruma arasında kalmaktadırlar. Bu çalışmanın amacı, ebeveynlerin dijital risklere ve bu risklere yönelik tedbir almak konusunda kendilerini ne kadar yeterli gördüklerine dair algılarının ve dijital medyanın çocukları tarafından kullanımına aracılık ederken hangi boyutlarda daha fazla bilgi sahibi olmak istediklerinin incelenmesidir. Bu amaçla, 38 anne ve 41 babadan oluşan, çocuklarının yaşları 10 ila 18 arasında değişen 79 ebeveyne, kapalı ve açık uçlu sorulardan oluşan bir anket uygulanmıştır. Bu sorulardan elde edilen bulgular ise nicel ve nitel olarak analiz edilmiştir. Çalışmanın sonuçları, ebeveynlerin riskler hakkında bilgili olduklarını, önlemler konusunda da kendilerini bilgi sahibi olarak değerlendirdiklerini gösterirken, yapılan içerik analizi ebeveynlerin dijital ebeveynlik stratejilerini ve dijital medyanın riskleri ve olanaklarına dair hangi noktalarda daha fazla bilgi sahibi olmak istediklerini ortaya koymuştur.

___

Anderson, C. and Bushman, B. (2001). Effects of violent video games on aggressive behavior, aggressive cognition, aggressive affect, physiological arousal, and prosocial behavior: A meta-analytic review of the scientific literature. Psychological Science, 12(5), 353-359.

Arıcak, T., Siyahhan, S., Uzunhasanoğlu, A., Sarıbeyoğlu, S., Çıplak, S., Yılmaz, N. and Memmedov, C. (2008). Cyberbullying among Turkish adolescents. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11(3), 253-261.

Aslan, A. (2016). The changes in safer internet use of children in Turkey between the years of 2010-2015 and impacts of related implementations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Atatürk University Institute of Educational Sciences.

Austin, E. W. (1990). Effects of family communication on children’s interpretation of television. In J. Bryant and J. A. Bryant, (Eds.). Television and the American family (377-395). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Bartholow, B. D. and Anderson, C. (2002). Effects of violent video games on aggressive behavior: Potential sex differences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(3), 283-290.

Berson, I. R. and Berson, M. J. (2005). Challenging online behaviors of youthfindings from a comparative analysis of young people in the United States and New Zealand. Social Science Computer Review, 23, 29-38.

Bornstein, M. H. (2001). Parenting: Science and practice. Parenting, 1(2), 1- 4. doi: 10.1080/15295192.2001.9681208.

Campbell, M. A. (2005). Cyber bullying: An old problem in a new guise? Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 15, 68-76.

Chaudron, S., Beutel, M. E., Donoso Navarrete, V., Dreier, M., Fletcher-Watson, B., Heikkilä, A. S. and Mascheroni, G. (2015). Young children (0- 8) and digital technology. A qualitative exploratory study across seven countries (EUR-Scientific and Technical Research Reports). Publications Office of the EU. Retrieved from; http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC93239.

Cheng, C. and Li, A. Y. (2014). Internet addiction prevalence and quality of real life: A meta-analysis of 31 nations across seven world regions. Cyberpsychology, Behaviour and Social Networking, 17, 755-760.

Clark, L. S. (2011). Parental mediation theory for the digital age. Communication Theory, 21(4), 323-343.

Cohen, L. Manion, L. and Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). London: Routledge.

Çepni, S. (2007). Araştırma ve proje çalışmalarına giriş. Trabzon: Celepler Matbacılık.

Çetin, A. B. and Ceyhan, A. A. (2014). Ergenlerin internette kimlik denemeleri ve problemli internet kullanım davranışları. The Turkish Journal on Addictions, 1(2), 5-46.

Darling, N. and Steinberg, L. (1993). Parenting style as context: An integrative model. Psychological Bulletin, 113(3), 487-496.

Davies, V. (2012). Interconnected but underprotected? Parents' methods and motivations for information seeking on digital safety issues. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(12), 669-674.

Dürager, A. and Livingstone, S. (2012). How can parents support children's internet safety? (EU kids online). Retrieved from; http://www.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/research/EUKidsOnline/EU%20Kids%20III/Reports/ParentalMediation.pdf.

d’Haenens, L., Vandonink, S. and Donoso, V. (2013). How to cope and build resilience. London: EU Kids Online, LSE. Retrieved from; http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/48115/

Elo, S. and Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107-115.

Ferguson, C. J. (2007). The good, the bad and the ugly: A meta-analytic review of positive and negative effects of violent video games. Psychiatric Quarterly, 78, 309-316. doi: 10.1007/s11126-007-9056-9.

Ferguson, C. J. (2013). Violent video games and the Supreme Court. American Psychologist, 68, 57-74. doi: 10.1037/a0030597.

Fraenkel, J. R. and Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill: International Edition.

Gentile, D. A., Lynch, P. J., Linder, J. R. and Walsh, D. A. (2004). The effects of violent video game habits on adolescent hostility, aggressive behaviors, and school performance. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 1, 5-22.

Griffiths, M. (2000). Does internet and computer “addiction” exist? Some case study evidence. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 3(2), 211-218.

Hasebrink, U., Livingstone, S. and Haddon, L. (2008). Comparing children's online opportunities and risks across Europe: Cross-national comparisons for EU Kids Online. London: EU Kids Online (Deliverable 3.2.).

Helsper, E. (2008). Digital natives and ostrich tactics?: The possible implica tions of labelling young people as digital experts. Bristol, UK: Futurelab.

Helsper, E. J., Kalmus, V., Hasebrink, U., Sagvari, B. and De Haan, J. (2013) Country classification: Opportunities, risks, harm and parental mediation. London: EU Kids Online, LSE.

Hinduja, S. and Patchin, J. W. (2012). Cyberbullying: Neither an epidemic nor a rarity. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(5), 539- 543.

Hsieh, H. F. and Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288.

Kaşıkcı, D., Çağıltay, K., Karakuş, T., Kurşun, E. and Ogan, C. (2014). Türkiye ve Avrupa’daki çocukların internet alışkanlıkları ve güvenli internet kullanımı. Eğitim ve Bilim, 39(171), 230-243.

Karasar, N. (2007). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi (17. baskı). Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.

Kırık, A. M. (2014). Aile ve çocuk ilişkisinde internetin yeri: Nitel bir araştırma. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(1), 337-347.

Kocatürk, M. (2014). Ortaokul öğrencilerinde akran zorbalığı ile siber zorbalık arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Unpublished master’s thesis. İstanbul Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.

Lauricella, A. R., Wartella, E. and Rideout, V. J. (2015). Young children's screen time: The complex role of parent and child factors. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 36, 11-17.

Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A. and Ólafsson, K. (2011). Risks and safety on the internet: The perspective of European children. Full Findings. LSE, London: EU Kids Online.

Livingstone, S. and Helsper, E. J. (2008). Parental mediation of children’s Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(4), 581- 599.

Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., Dreier, M., Chaudron, S. and Lagae, K. (2015). How parents of young children manage digital devices at home: The role of income, education and parental style. London: EU Kids Online, LSE.

Livingstone, S. and Smith, P. K. (2014). Annual research review: Harms experienced by child users of online and mobile technologies: The nature, prevalence and management of sexual and aggressive risks in the digital age. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55(6), 635-654.

Mitchell, A. and Savill-Smith, C. (2005). The use of computer and video games for learning: A review of the literature. London: LSDA.

Nathanson, A. I. (1999). Identifying and explaining the relationship between parental mediation and children’s aggression. Communication Research, 26(2), 124-143.

Nathanson, A. I. (2002). The unintended effects of parental mediation of television on adolescents. Media Psychology, 4, 207-230.

Nikken, P. and Jansz, J. (2006). Parental mediation of children’s videogame playing: A comparison of the reports by parents and children. Learning, Media and Technology, 31(2), 181-202.

Serin, H. (2012). Ergenlerde siber zorbalık/siber mağduriyet yaşantıları ve bu davranışlara ilişkin öğretmen ve eğitim yöneticilerinin görüşleri. Unpublished master’s thesis. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.

Staksrud, E. and Livingstone, S. (2009). Children and online risk: Powerless victims or resourceful participants? Information, Communication and Society, 12(3), 364-387. doi: 10.1080/13691180802635455.

Tomczyk, Ł. and Wąsiński, A. (2017). Parents in the process of educational impact in the area of the use of new media by children and teenagers in the family environment. Eğitim ve Bilim, 42(190), 305-323.

Yao, M. and Zhong, Z. (2014). Loneliness, social contacts and internet addiction: A cross-lagged panale study. Computers in Human Behaviour, 30, 164-170.

Yang, F., Helgason, A. R., Sigfusdottir, I. D. and Kristjansson, A. L. (2013). Electronic screen use and mental well-being of 10-12 year old children. European Journal of Public Health, 23(3), 492-498.

Ybarra, M. L., Mitchell, K. J., Finkelhor, D. and Wolak, J. (2007). Internet prevention messages: Targeting the right online behaviors. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 161(2), 138-145.

Yıldırım, A. and Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.

Zaman, B. and Nouwen, M. (2016). Parental controls: Advice for parents, researchers and industry (EU kids online). http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/65388/