SEMA ÖZKADİF, Abdullah VARLIK, İBRAHİM KALAYCI, EMRULLAH EKEN

Morphometric Evaluation of Chinchillas (Chinchilla lanigera) Femur with Different Modelling Techniques

Teknolojik gelişmelerle birlikte anatomik ve morfometrik çalışmalarda farklı yöntemler kullanılmaya başlanmıştır. Hatta bir çalışmada birden fazla yöntemle çalışılarak, bu yöntemlerin güvenilirliği ortaya konulmaya çalışılmaktadır. Sunulan bu çalışma şinşilla'nın femur'u üzerinde multidedektör bilgisayarlı tomografi (MDBT) görüntülerinden mimics programı ile elde edilen üç boyutlu (3B) rekonstrüksiyon ve fotogrametrik yöntemlerle elde edilen 3B model üzerinden gerçekleştirerek, her iki yöntem verilerini karşılaştırmak ve cinsiyetler ile sağ ve sol taraf arasında fark olup olmadığını ortaya koymak amacıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu amaçla her iki cinsiyetten 6'şar şinşilla kullanılmıştır. Önce hayvanların genel anestezi altındayken MDBT görüntüleri çekilerek, veriler DICOM formatında kişisel bilgisayara aktarılarak daha sonra 3B rekonstrüksiyonu yapılmıştır. MDBT görüntüleri alındıktan sonra usulüne göre hayvanların ölümü gerçekleştirilerek, maserasyon yöntemi ile femur elde edilmiştir. Kas ve yağlardan kaynatılarak temizlenen femur'un fotografları çekilerek, görüntülerden fotogrametrik yöntemlerle 3B modeli oluşturulmuştur. Her iki yöntemle oluşturulan modeller üzerinden ölçümler alınmış ve istatistiki işlemler yapılarak, femurun hacmi ve yüzey alanı p

Chinchilla (Chinchilla lanigera) Femur'unun Farklı Modelleme Teknikleri ile Morfometrik Değerlendirilmesi

Together with technological developments, different methods in anatomic and morphometric studies have been started to be used. In fact, in this study, more than one method was used and the reliability of these methods was presented. This study was performed in the aim of getting 3D model with three dimensional (3D) reconstruction and photogrammetric methods obtained from multidetector computerized tomography (MDCT) images of femur of chinchilla by mimics program, comparing the data of both methods and presenting whether there was a difference between genders as well as left and right sides. For this purpose, 6 chinchillas of both sexes were used. First of all, MDCT images of animals were taken under general anaesthesia and 3D reconstruction was obtained after transferring the data to personal computer as DICOM format. After taking MDCT images, the femurs of the animals killed by the conventional methods were cleaned of muscle and fats by boiling and their 3D models was formed by using images via photogrammetric methods. The measurements were taken from the models of two methods and volume and surface area of femur were found significant at a level of p<0.05 as a result of statistical processes. According to this, a statistically difference was not found in morphometric measurement values except volume and surface area. Moreover, while a statistical difference was not found between right and left femur of both sexes, a difference was determined between sexes and it was observed that the measurement values of females were higher than males. As a result, since 3D models obtained by both methods had almost same values, it was considered that these methods could be used in anatomic and morphometric studies.

PDF

___

Terzidis I, Totlis T, Papathanasiou E, Sideridis A, Vlasis K, Natsis K: Gender and side-to-side differences of femoral condyles morphology: osteometric data from 360 Caucasian dried femori. Anat Res Int, (2012), Article ID: 679658, 2012. DOI: 10.1155/2012/679658
Karakaş HM, Harma A: Femoral shaft bowing with age: A digital radiological study of Anatolian Caucasian adults. Diagn Interv Radiol, 14, 32, 2008.
Frelat MA, Mittereocker P: postnatal ontogeny of tibia and femur form in two human populations: A multivariate morphometric analysis. Am J Hum Biol, 23, 796-804, 2011. DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.21217
Lin KJ, Wei HW, Lin KP, Tsai CL, Lee PY: proximal femoral morphology and the relevance to design of anatomically precontoured plates: A study of the Chinese population. Sci Word J, 2014 (2014), Article ID: 106941, 2014. DOI: 10.1155/2014/106941
Ajayi IE, Shawulu JC, Zachariya TS, Ahmed S, Adah BMJ: Osteo- morphometry of the bones of the thigh, crus and foot in the New Zealand white rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Ital J Anat Embryol, 117 (3): 125- , 2012.
Pazvant G, Kahvecioğlu KO: Studies on homotypic variations of forelimb and hindlimb long bones of rabbits. J Fac Vet Med İstanbul Univ, 35 (2): 23-39, 2009.
Pazvant G, Kahvecioğlu KO: Studies on homotypic variations of forelimb and hindlimb long bones of guinea pigs. J Fac Vet Med İstanbul Univ, 39 (1): 20-32, 2013.
Lammers AR, Dziech HA, German RZ: Ontogeny of sexual dimorphism in Chinchilla lanigera (Rodentia: Chinchillidae). J Mammal, (1): 179-189, 2001.
Çevik-Demirkan A, Özdemir V, Türkmenoğlu İ, Demirkan İ: Anatomy of the hind limb skeleton of the chinchilla (Chinchilla lanigera). Acta Vet Brno, 76, 501-507, 2007. DOI: 10.2754/avb200776040501
Hishmat AM, Michiue T, Sogawa N, Oritani S, Ishikawa T, Hashem MAM, Maeda H: Efficacy of automated three-dimensional image reconstruction of the femur from postmortem computed tomography data in morphometry for victim identification. Leg Med, 16, 114-117, Araujo FAP, Sesoko NF, Rahal SC, Teixeira CR, Müler TR, Machado MRF: Bone morphology of the hind limbs in two cavimorph rodents. Anat Histol Embryol, 42, 114-123, 2013.
Şeker DZ, Duran Z, Ege A: An example for the application of digital photogrammetry in medicine. 30th year symposium, Konya, pp.382- , 2002.
Chang YC: photogrammetric system for 3D reconstruction of a scoliotic torso. Thesis of master program of biomedical engineering, university of Calgary, Alberta. 2008.
Freitas EP, Noritomi PY, Silva JVL: Use of rapid prototyping and 3d reconstruction in veterinary medicine, advanced applications of rapid prototyping tecnology in modern engineering. Haque M (Ed), ISBN: 978- 307-698-0, In Tech, Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/ books/advanced-applications-of-rapid-prototyping-technology-in- modern-engineering/use-of-rapid-prototyping-and-3d-reconstruction- in-veterinary-medicine, 2011.
Schumann S, Tannast M, Nolte LP, Zheng G: Validation of statistical shape model based reconstruction of the proximal femur - A morphology study. Med Eng Phys, 32, 638-644, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j. medengphy.2010.03.010
Poore OS, Sanchez-Halman A, Goslow GE: Wing upstroke and the evolution of flapping flight. Nature, 387, 799-802, 1997.
Prokop M: General principles of MDCT. Eur J Radiol, 45, 4-10, 2003. DOI: 10.1016/S0720-048X(02)00358-3
Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, Hamberg LM, Blake MA, Shepard J, Saini S: Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology, 230, 28, 2004. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2303021726
Alpak H, Onar V, Mutuş R: The relationship between morphometric and long bone measurements of the Morkaraman sheep. Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 33, 199-207, 2009. DOI: 10.3906/vet-0709-23
Birgül ÖB, Mutaf S, Alkan S: The effects of different perch systems on morphological and chemical traits of tibia and femur bones in broilers. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 17, 773-779, 2011. DOI: 10.9775/kvfd.2011.4426
Casteleyn C, Bakker J, Brugelmans S, Kondova I, Saunders J, Langermans JAM, Cornillie P, Broeck WV, Loo DV, Hoorebeke LV, Bosseler L, Chiers K, Decostere A: Anatomical description and morphometry of the skeleton of the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). Lab Anim, 46, 152-163, 2012. DOI: 10.1258/la.2012.011167