HALİL CAN KUTAY, Emek DUMEN, ONUR KESER, Ayşe Şebnem BİLGİN, SEVGİ ERGİN, NEŞE KOCABAĞLI

Prevalence and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Salmonella in Rendered Animal Products Used in Poultry Feed in Turkey [1]

Kanatlılarda artan Salmonella bulaşıklığı son on yıldır bilimsel yönden büyük önem kazanmıştır. Bu çalışmada Türkiye'deki çeşitli yem fabrikaları ve üretim noktalarından toplam 500 adet hayvansal rendering ürünü (et unu, et-kemik unu, kan unu, tavuk unu ve tüy unu) toplanmış ve bu örnekler Salmonella spp., Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Typhimurium bakımından analiz edilmiştir. Sonuçlara göre yem farbrikalarından elde edilen 13, 11 ve 8 örnek sırasıyla Salmonella spp., Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Typhimurium bakımından pozitif olarak tespit edilmiştir. Bununla birlikte üretim noktalarından toplanan tüm örnekler ise negatif sonuç vermiştir. Pozitif olan izolatların antibiyotik duyarlılıkları 17 farklı antibiyotik kullanılarak tayin edilmiştir. Salmonella spp. ve Salmonella Enteritidis serovarlarının amikasin, sefazolin ve eritromisin'e dirençli, amoksisilin, kloramfenikol, flumoquin, fosfomisin, kanamisin, oksitetrasiklin, spiramisin, streptomisin, tetrasiklin, tobramisin ve vankomisin'e duyarlı, gentamisin, linkomisin ve rifampisin'e orta derecede duyarlı olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

Türkiye'de Kanatlı Yemlerinde Kullanılan Rendering Ürünlerde Salmonella Varlığı ve Bunların Antimikrobiyal Duyarlılığı

The increased prevalence of Salmonella contamination in poultry has gained considerable scientific attention during last decades. In this study, a total of 500 samples of rendered animal products (meat meal, meat-bone meal, blood meal, chicken meal and feather meal) were obtained from several feed factories and rendering plants in Turkey and these samples were analyzed for Salmonella spp., Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Typhimurium status. According to the results, 13, 11 and 8 samples obtained from feed factories were determined positive for Salmonella spp., Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Typhimurium respectively. However, all samples obtained form rendering plants were negative. Antibiotic susceptibility profiles of isolates confirmed as positive were determined by using 17 different antibiotics. It was determined that Salmonella spp. and Salmonella Enteritidis serovars were resistant to amikacin, cephazolin and erythromycin, sensitive to amoxicillin, chloramphenicol, flumoquin, phosphomycin, kanamycin, oxytetracycline, spiramycin, streptomycin, tetracycline, tobramycine and vancomycin and moderate sensitive to gentamicin, linkomycin and rifampicin.

PDF

___

Pearl GG: The Future of Animal Proteins in Poultry Diets. Proceedings of the Multi-State Poultry Meeting, May 14-16, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2002.
European Community: Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 October 2002 laying down health rules concerning animal by-products not intended for human consumption. Official Journal of the European Communities, 45, L 273: 95 EN 14.11.2009.
Official Gazette of Republic of Turkey: 28152, 24.012.2011 and , 06.01.2016
EFSA: Microbiological risk assessment in feedingstuffs for food- producing animals. The EFSA Journal, 720, 1-84, 2008.
Akyar I, Can S: Comparison of "Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry" plus chromogenic media with phoenix automated system in the rapid diagnosis of Salmonella species. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 19, 325-330, 2013. DOI: 10.9775/ kvfd.2012.7822
Mirhosseini SZ, Seidavi A, Shivazad M, Chamani M, Sadeghi AA, Pourseify R: Detection of Salmonella spp. in gastrointestinal tract of broiler chickens by polymerase chain reaction. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 15, 970, 2009. DOI: 10.9775/kvfd.2009.967
Jones FT: A review of practical Salmonella control measures in animal feed. J Appl Poult Res, 20, 102-113, 2011.
Franco DA: The Genus Salmonella. Proceedings of the Animal Protein Producers Industry. Institute for Continuing Education, 1- 22, 1999.
Kinley B, Rieck J, Dawson P, Jiang X: Analysis of Salmonella and enterococci isolated from rendered animal products. Can J Microbiol, 56, 73, 2010. DOI: 10.1139/W09-108
White PL, Naugle AL, Jackson CM, Fedorka-Cray PJ, Rose BE, Pritchard KM, Levine P, Saini PK, Schroder CM, Dreyfuss MS, Tan R, Holt KG, Harman J, Buchanan S: Salmonella Enteritidis in meat, poultry and pasteurized egg products regulated by the U.S. Food Safety and Inspection Service, 1998-2003. J Food Prot, 70, 582-91, 2007.
Mäde D, Petersen R, Trumper K, Stark R, Grohmann L: Inhouse validation of a real-time PCR method for rapid detection of Salmonella ssp. in food products. Eur Food Res Technol, 219, 171-177, 2004. DOI: 1016/j.foodres.2010.08.012
Anonymus: Food and Drug administration. Bacteriological Analytical Manual. http://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodScienceResearch/ LaboratoryMethods/ucm070149.htm; Accessed: 28 November 2013.
Rahn K, De Grandis DS, Clarke RC, Mc Ewen SA, Galan JE, Ginocchoio C, Curtiss R III, Gyles CL: Amplication of an invA gene sequence of Salmonella typhimurium by polymerase chain reaction as a specific method of detection of Salmonella. Moll Cell Probes, 6, 271-279, DOI: 10.1016/0890-8508(92)90002-f
Soumet C, Ermel G, Rose V, Rose N, Drouin P, Salvat G, Colin P: Evaluation of a multiplex-PCR-based assay for simultaneous identification of Salmonella sp., Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Typhimurium from environment swabs of poultry houses. Lett Appl Microbiol, 29, 113- , 1999. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00488.x
Doran JL, Collinson SK, Clouthier SC, Cebula TA, Koch WH, Burian J, Banser PA, Todd ECD, Kay WW: Diagnostic potential of sefA DNA probes to Salmonella Enteritidis and certain other Oserogroup D1 Salmonella serovars. Mol Cell Probes, 10, 233-246, 1996.
CLSI: Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Test: Approved Standart-Eleventh Edition. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Document M02-A11[ISBN 1-56238-781-2], Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute 940 West Valley Road, Suite 1400, Wayne, PA 19087, USA, 2012.
Boyer CI, Bruner DW, Brown JA: Salmonella Organisms Isolated from Poultry Feed. J Avian Dis, 2, 396, 1958. DOI: 10.2307/1587479
CAST: Foodborne Pathogens: Risks and Consequences. Task Force Report No. 122. Ames, Iowa, Council of Agricultural Science and Technology, Ockerman HW, Hansen CL: Animal by-product processing. Ellis Horwood Ltd. Chichester, England, 1988.
Troutt HF, Schaeffer D, Kakoma I, Pearl GG: Prevalence of Selected Foodborne Pathogens in Final Rendered Products. Fats and Proteins Research Foundation (FPRF), 312, Inc., Directors Digest, 2001.
Watkins JR, Flowers AI, Grumbles LC: Salmonella organisms in animal products used in poultry feeds. Avian Dis, 3, 290, 1959. DOI: 2307/1587676
Pomeroy BS, Grady MK: Salmonella Organisms Isolated from Feed Ingredients. Proc US Livestock Sanit Ass, 65, 449, 1961.
Ge B, LaFon PC, Carter PJ, McDermott SD, Abbott J, Glenn A, Ayers SL, Friedman SL, Paige JC, Wagner DD, Zhao S, McDermott PF, Rasmussen MA: Retrospective analysis of Salmonella, Campylobacter, Escherichia coli, and Enterococcus in animal feed ingredients. Foodborne Pathog Dis, 10, 684-691, 2013. DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2012.1470
Stojanac N, Stevancevic O, Stancic I: Estimation of the Salmonella spp. prevalence in pig farms with dry and wet feeding. Afr J Microbiol Res, , 3272-3274, 2013.
Laban SE, Moustafa GZ, Anwer W, Badawy EM: Microbial load of poultry by-products following rendering process. Global Veterinaria, , 756-759, 2014.
Sutton AL, Scheidt AB, Patterson JA: Final Research Report. Fats and Protein Research Foundation, 1992.
Capita R, Alonso-Calleja C: Antibiotic-resistant bacteria: a challenge for the food industry. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, 53, 11-48, 2013. DOI: 1080/10408398.2010.519837
Richens J: Major tropical syndromes by body system: The gastro- intestinal tract. Typhoid fever. In, Armstrong D, Cohen J (eds). Infectious diseases. 241, Mosby, London, 1999.
Rowe B, Ward LR, Threlfall EJ: Multidrug resistant Salmonella typhi: A worldwide epidemic. Clin Infect Dis, 24, 106-109, 1997. DOI: 10.1093/ clinids/24.supplement_1.s106
Kohinur B, Reza AT, Haque Hossain A, Hassan FMK, Hasan SN, Akhter N, Ahmed A, Barua U: Isolation, identification and antibiotic resistance pattern of Salomonella spp. from chicken eggs, intestines and environmental samples. Bangladesh Pharm J, 13, 23-27, 2010.
Yildirim Y, Gonulalan Z, Pamuk S, Ertas N: Incidence and antibiotic resistance of Salmpnella spp. on raw chicken carcasses. Food Res Int, , 725-728, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2010.12.040
Zarakolu P, Karabicak N, Oncul O, Guvener E: In vitro anti- microbial resistance of Salmonella Typhimurium isolates. Bull Microbiol, 30, 128, 1996.
Dallal MMS, Doyle MP, Rezadehbashi M, Dabiri H, Sanaei M, Modaressi S, Bakhtiari R, Sharify K, Taremi M, Zali MR, Sharifi-Yazdi MK: Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Salmonella serotypes, Campylobacter and Yersinia spp. isolated from retail chicken and beef, Tehran, Iran. Food Control, 21, 388-392, 2010.
Yan H, Li L, Alam MJ, Shinoda S, Miyoshi S, Shi L: Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella in retail foods in northern China. Int J Food Microbiol, 143, 230-234, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro. 07.034
Del Río E, Panizo-Morán M, Prieto M, Alonso-Calleja C, Capita R: Effect of various chemical decontamination treatments on natural microflora and sensory characteristics of poultry. Int J Food Microbiol, 115, 280, 2007.