Ulusal Hidrolik Yüksek Okulu'ndaki Cezayirli ESP öğrencileri arasında okuma stratejileri farkındalığının incelenmesi

Öğrencilerin okuma sürecine ilişkin bilgilerinin yanı sıra okuma stratejileri konusundaki üstbilişsel farkındalıklarının teşvik edilmesi, ESP öğretiminin önemli bir konusu ve şüphesiz yüksek öğrenim zorunlu bir konu haline geldi. Bununla ilgili olarak, bu makale Cezayirli ESP öğrencilerinin farkındalıklarını ve özellikle akademik konuları İngilizce okurken okuma stratejilerini kullanmalarını incelemeye çalışmaktadır. Bu çalışma, Mokhtari ve Sheorey'in (2002) Okuma Stratejileri Araştırması'nın (SORS) yönetimi aracılığıyla Ulusal Hidrolik Yüksek Okulunda (ENSH) birinci sınıf mühendislik derslerine kaydolan 100 öğrenciye esas olarak şu noktaları öğrenmek için yapılmıştır: 1) öğrencilerin farklı okuma stratejileri kullandığını bildirme sıklığı (Küresel, Problem Çözme ve Destek Okuma Stratejileri); 2) fark (lar) Eğer varsa, kız ve erkek öğrencilerin okuma stratejileri arasında kullanımı; ve öğrenciler, SORS'a dahil olmayan diğer stratejileri kullanıldığını bildirilmiştir; 3) öğrenciler, SORS'da yer almayan diğer stratejileri kullandıklarını bildirilmiştir. Bulgular, genel olarak okuma stratejilerinin ortak kullanıcıları olan Cezayirli ESP öğrencilerinin, problem çözmeyi diğer okuma stratejileri kategorilerinden daha fazla kullanma eğiliminde olduklarını ortaya koymaktadır; erkekler ve kadınlar arasında önemli farklılıkların olmaması okuma stratejilerinin kullanıldığını bildirmiştir; bu arada öğrenciler, Mokhtari ve Sheorey'in anketinde bahsedilenler dışındaki bazı stratejilerin kullanıldığını bildiriyor. Sonuç olarak, SORS'un uyarlanmış bir versiyonu, belirli amaçlar için Cezayir EFL bağlamına uyacak şekilde tasarlanmıştır.

An examination of reading strategies awareness among Algerian ESP students at the National Higher School for hydraulics

Promoting students’ knowledge of the reading process as well as their metacognitive awareness of readingstrategies has become a crucial issue of ESP teaching and undoubtedly an obligatory subject in higher education.Relevant to this, the present paper tries to examine Algerian ESP students’ awareness and use of reading strategies,especially while reading academic material in English. The study is realized through the administration ofMokhtari and Sheorey’s (2002) Survey of Reading Strategies (SORS) to 100 students enrolled in first yearengineering classes at the National Higher School for Hydraulics (ENSH), mainly to find out: (1) frequency ofstudents’ reported use of different reading strategies (Global, Problem-solving and Support reading strategies); (2)difference(s), if any, between female and male students’ reading strategies use; and (3) students reported use ofany other strategies which are not included in the SORS. Findings reveal that Algerian ESP students, as mediumusers of reading strategies in general, tend to use Problem-solving more than other categories of reading strategies;the absence of significant differences between males and females reported use of reading strategies; meanwhile,students report use of some strategies other than those mentioned in Mokhtari and Sheorey’s Survey.Consequently, an adapted version of the SORS is designed to fit the Algerian context of EFL for specific purposes.© 2020 JLLS and the Authors - Published by JLLS.

___

  • Abu-Snoubar, T. (2017). The metacognitive reading strategies employed by Jordanian English as foreign language students at Al-Baqa applied university. Journal of Literature, Languages and Linguistics, 35, 16-27.
  • Amer, A. et al. (2010). Students' teachers perceived use of online reading strategies. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 6(4), 102-113.
  • Alhaqbani, A., & Riazi, M. (2012). Metacognitive awareness of reading strategy use in Arabic as a second language. Reading in a Foreign Language, 24(2), 231-255.
  • Alsheikh, N., & Moukhtari, K. (2011). An examination of metacognitive reading strategies used by native speakers of Arabic when reading in English and Arabic. English Language Teaching, 4(2), 151-160.
  • Anderson, N. J. (2004). Metacognitive reading strategy awareness of ESL and EFL learners. The CATESOL Journal, 16(1), 11-27.
  • Benabdallah, A. (2013). Strands in teaching reading for social sciences: Change and innovation. English for Specific Purposes World, 14(38), 1-9.
  • Bernhardt, E. B. (1991). Reading development in second Language: Theoretical, empirical, and classroom perspectives. Ablex Publishing.
  • Boudaoud, R. (2016). Implementing a reading strategy-based instruction for promoting students’ achievement and self-regulation: In curricular skill integration perspectives: The case of first year students, University of Constantine (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Mentouri Bros. Constantine.
  • Bouklikha, W. (2016). Practice of the reading skill in an ESP context using web-retrieved materials: The case of engineering students at the University of Tlemcen (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Tlemcen.
  • Cook, D. L., & Kamalodeen, J. V. (2019). Mixed methods case study research. Mixed Methods International Research Association. Webinar. Retrieved on Sep 13, 2020 from https://www.ualberta.ca/international-institute-for-qualitative-methodology
  • Corner, P. (2003). Strategies for teaching science content reading. The Science Education Review, 2(4), 104-119.
  • Dhieb-Hania, N. (2006). Applying metacognitive strategies to skimming research articles in an ESP context. English Teaching Forum, 44(1).
  • Elkouti, M. (2017). The Impact of text structure on ESP learners’ reading comprehension: Case study: accounting and finance at the University of Ghardaia (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Ourgla.
  • Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911.
  • Gaith, G. (2018). English as a second/foreign language reading comprehension: A framework for curriculum and instruction. TESL Reporter, 50(2), 1-17.
  • Johns, A.,& Dudley-Evans, T. (1991). English for specific purposes: International in scope, specific in purpose. TESOL Quarterly, 25(2), 297-314.
  • Karbalaei, A. (2010). A comparison of the metacognitive reading strategies used by EFL and ESL readers. The Reading Matrix, 10(2), 165-180.
  • Kachef, S., Damavand, A., & Viyani, A. (2012). Strategy-based ESP instruction (SBI) of reading comprehension: Male vs. female students. International Journal of Education,4(2), 171-180.
  • Kymes, A. (2007). Investigation and analysis of online reading strategies.Oklahoma State University.
  • Ladjel, K., & Hamzaoui-Elachachi, H. (2017). Improving political sciences students’ reading comprehension of English texts. The Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes,5(4), 755-770.
  • Lamri, C., & Hamzaoui-Elachachi, H. (2018). Developing ELP students’ reading skills through a blended learning approach. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 389-407.
  • Malcolm, D. (2009). Reading strategy awareness of Arabic speaking medical students studying in English. System, 37, 640-651.
  • Martinez, A. C. (2008). Analysis of ESP university students’ reading strategy awareness. IBERICA, 15, 165-176.
  • Mebarki, Z. (2011). Factors underlying the reading performance of Algerian microbiology students. International Conference on Education and Educational Psychology.
  • Mokhtari, K., Dimitrov, D., & Reichard, C. (2018). Revising the "metacognitive awareness of reading strategies inventory" (MARSI) and testing for factorial invariance. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8, 219-246.
  • Mokhtari, K., & Sheorey, R. (2002). Measuring ESL students' awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Developmental Education,25(3), 2-10.
  • Munsakorn, N. (2012). Awareness of reading strategies among EFL learners at Bankok University. International Journal of Social and Human Sciences, 6, 497-500.
  • Omar, A. (2014). An investigation into the reading strategies of ESP students in the college of medical sciences at Umm Al-Qura University. Journal of Languages and Literatures, 13, 5-46.
  • Oranpattanachai, P. (2010). Perceived reading strategies used by Thai pre-engineering students. ABAC Journal, 30(2), 26-42.
  • Oxford, R. & Cohen, A. (1992). Language learning strategies: Crucial issues of concept and classification. Applied Language Learning, 3(1&2), 1-35.
  • Pani, S. (2004). Reading strategy instruction through mental modeling. ELT Journal,58(4), 355-362. Oxford University Press.
  • Pookcharoen, S. (2009). Metacognitive online reading strategies among Thai EFL University students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Indiana University.
  • Poole, A. (2009). The reading strategies used by male and female Colombian university students. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, (11), 29-40.
  • Poularvar, K., Zohrabi, M., & Ajideh, R. (2018). Investigating the relationship between learning styles and ESP reading strategies in academic setting. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 7(3), 156-164.
  • Rezaei, A., Rahimi, M., & Talepazan, S. (2012). Exploring EFL learners’ reading comprehension problems in reading ESP texts. Sino-US English Teaching, 9(3), 982-987.
  • Romly, R., Badusan, J., & Maarof, N. (2017). Metacognitive online reading strategies in reading academic texts among ESL University students. Conference paper. Seminar on Trans-Disciplinary Education (STED 2017). https://sted2017.wordpress.com/proceeding/
  • Roohani, A., Sabzeali, R., & Mirzaei, A. (2017). Exploring metacognitive strategies in reading academic texts among more and less proficient EFL university students. English Language Teaching, 4(4), 123-142.
  • Samimi, F., Sahragard, R., & Ramzjoo, S. (2016). On the development of a model of discipline-specific reading strategies in the context of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 4(15), 99-115.
  • Terzic, B. B. (2015). Metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among ESP students regarding their prior education. The Journal of Teaching English for Academic and Specific Purposes, 3(2), 257- 268.
  • Willaims, M., & Burden.R. (1997). Psychology for language teachers. Cambridge University Press.
  • Zhang, L. J. (2008). Constructivist pedagogy in strategic reading instruction: Exploring pathways to learner development in the English as a second language (ESL) classroom. Instructional Science, 36, 89-116.
Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies-Cover
  • ISSN: 1305-578X
  • Başlangıç: 2005
  • Yayıncı: http://www.jlls.org