Eş-öğretimin ileri EFL öğrencilerinin yazma becerisine etkisi

Öğrencilerin okuryazar bir topluma katılabilmeleri için yetenekli yazarlar olmaları gerekir. Öğrencilere etkili ve uygun bir öğretim yaklaşımı sağlamak, daha kolay ve daha iyi bir beceri ustalığına sağlayabilir. Bu yaklaşımlardan biri eş- öğretim olabilir. Bu çalışma, İranlı ileri EFL öğrencilerinin yazma becerisine yönelik eş- öğretimin etkisini araştırmaktadır. Ortak öğretim yaklaşımı, deney grubuyla aynı sınıfta öğretim yazma sürecinde iki öğretmenin aynı anda işbirliği yaptığı bir yöntem olarak ele alınmıştır. Kontrol grubunun katılımcıları tüm sınıf oturumlarında geleneksel olarak tek bir öğretmen tarafından öğretildi. İki grubu karşılaştırdıktan sonra yapılan veri analizlerine göre, yardımcı öğretmenler deney grubunun genel yazma yeteneğini geliştirmede daha başarılı olmuşlardır. Temel gerekçeye göre, iki öğretmeni olan bir sınıfın öğretilmesinin ilk önce çeşitli öğretim stilleri, geri bildirim verme, danışma ve daha iyi öğretim pratiğine yol açabilecek ve aynı zamanda öğretmen- öğrenci etkileşim süresini artırarak sınıf süresini iki katına çıkarabilecek bir konudur.

The effect of co-teaching on advanced EFL learners’ writing ability

Students need to be skilled writers to get involved in a literate society. Providing learners with effective andappropriate teaching approach can lead to an easier and better mastery of skills. One of these approaches may beco-teaching. This study investigates the effect of co-teaching for Iranian advanced EFL learners’ ability to write.The co-teaching approach was taken as a treatment through which two teachers were cooperating simultaneouslyduring the teaching writing process in the same class with the experimental group. The participants of the controlgroup were taught traditionally by a single teacher during all class sessions. According to the data analyses aftercomparing the two groups, co-teachers have been more successful in improving the overall writing ability of thetreatment group. The underlying rationale is one in which teaching a class with two teachers may first add to thevariety of teaching styles, feedback giving, consultation and reviewing the teaching process that can lead to betterteaching practice and also doubling the class time by increasing teacher-student interaction time.© 2020 JLLS and the Authors - Published by JLLS.

___

  • Aliakbari, M., & Bazyar, A. (2012). Exploring the impact of parallel teaching on general language proficiency of EFL learners. Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 16(1), 55-71.
  • Aliakbari, M., & Nejad, A. (2013). On the effectiveness of team teaching in promoting learners' grammatical proficiency. Canadian Journal of Education, 36(3), 5-22.
  • Al-Hammadi, F., & Sidek, K., (2015). Academic writing in the Yemeni EFL context: History, challenges and future research. The Effects of Brief Mindfulness Intervention on Acute Pain experience: An Examination of Individual Difference, 1, 167-174.
  • Alvarez, L., Ananda, S., Walqui, A., Sato, E., & Rabinowitz, S., (2014). Focusing formative assessment on the needs of English language learners. West ED.
  • Andrews, K., & Wooten, B. (2005). Closing the gap: helping students identify the skills employers want. NACE Journal, 64(4), 49–52.
  • Asrobi, Maman, & Prasetyaningrum, A. (2017). Trait Based Assessment on Teaching Writing Skill for EFL Learners. English Language Teaching, 10(1), 199-212.
  • Badger, R., & White, G. (2000). Process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal, 54(2), 153- 160.
  • Bauler, C.V., Kang, E., Afanador-Vega, A., & Stevenson, A. (2019). My partner always helps me: Exploring two co-teachers’ practices to support writing in a first-grade linguistically diverse elementary class. TESL-EJ, 24(2),1-18.
  • Benoit, R. (2001). Team teaching tips for foreign language teachers. The Internet TESL Journal, 7(10), 15-32.
  • Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy, 2nd ed. California: San Francisco State University.
  • Brown, J. D. (1991). Do ESL and English faculties rate writing samples differently? TESOL Quarterly, 25(4), 587-603.
  • Brusca-Vega, R., Brown, K., & Yasutake, D. (2011). Science achievement of students in co-taught, inquiry based classrooms. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 17(1), 23-31.
  • Coulmas, F. (2003). Writing systems: An introduction to their linguistic analysis. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
  • Cook, L., & Friend, M. (1995). Co-teaching: Guidelines for creating effective practices. Focus On Exceptional Children, 28(3), 1-16.
  • Darragh, J. J., Picanco, K. E., Tully, D., & Henning, A. S. (2011). When teachers collaborate, good things happen: Teacher candidate perspectives of the coteach model for the student teaching internship. AILACTE Journal, 8, 83-104.
  • Dove, M. G., & Honigsfeld, A. M. (2017). Co-teaching for English learners: A guide to collaborative planning, instruction, assessment, and reflection. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
  • Emig, J. (2019). Writing as a mode of learning. College Composition and Communication, 28(2), 122- 128.
  • Foster, E., & Rotoloni, B. (2013). Reciprocal teaching. The University of Georgia.
  • Friend, M., & Cook, L. (2004). Co-teaching: Principles, practices and pragmatics, Quarterly Special Education Meeting Albuquerque, NM.
  • Friend, M. (2015). Welcome to co-teaching 2.0. Educational Leadership, 73(4), 16-22.
  • Gall, M., D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007) Educational research: An introduction. Boston: Pearson Education.
  • Gillespie, D., & Israetel, A. (2008). Benefits of co-teaching in relation to student learning. Paper represented at Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Massachusetts.
  • Grami, G. M. A. (2010). The Effects of Integrating Peer Feedback into University-Level ESL Writing Curriculum: A Comparative Study in a Saudi Context (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) Newcastle University, Newcastle.
  • Guyton, E., & McIntyre, D. J. (1990). Student teaching and school experiences. In W. R. Houston, M. Haberman, & J. Sikula (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: A project of the Association of Teacher Educators (pp.514- 534). New York, NY: Macmillan.
  • Hammidi, F. A., & Sidek, H. M. (2015). An analytical framework for analyzing secondary EFL writing curriculum: Approaches for writing and preparation for higher education. International Education Studies, 8(1), 203-221.
  • Hang, Q., & Rabren, K. (2009). An examination of co-teaching: Perspectives and efficacy indicators. Remedial and Special Education, 30(5), 259–268.
  • Honigsfeld, A., & Dove, M. (2008). Co-teaching in the ESL classroom. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 74(2), 8-14.
  • Honigsfeld, A., & Dove, M. (2010). Collaboration and co-teaching: Strategies for English learners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
  • Hyland, K. (2003). Teaching and Researching Writing. Harlow: Longman.
  • Ibrahim, M. G. (2013). The Effect of Using Facebook on Improving Students’ Writing Skills in English (Unpublished master’s thesis). Al-Najah National University, Palestine.
  • Isherwood, R. S., & Barger, A. R. (2008). Factors affecting the adoption of co-teaching models in inclusive classrooms: One school’s journey from mainstreaming to inclusion. Journal of Ethnographic & Qualitative Research, 2, 121-128.
  • Keefe, B., & Moore, V. (2004). The challenge of co-teaching in inclusive classrooms at the high school level and what the teachers told us. American Secondary Education, 32, 77-88.
  • Krashen, S. D. (1984). Writing: Research, theory, and applications. Oxford: Pergamon Institute of English.
  • Long, M. H., & Richards, J. C. (2003). Series editors’ preface. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing (pp. 15-16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. McMillan Encyclopedia. (1986). London: McMillan Limited.
  • Martinussen, R., Tannock, R., & Chaban, P. (2011). Teachers’ reported use of instructional behavioral management practices for students with behavior problems: Relationship to role and level of training in ADHD. Child Youth Care Forum, 40, 193-210.
  • Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., Graetz, J., Norland, J., Gardizi, W., & McDuffie, K. (2005). Case studies in co-teaching in the content areas: Successes, failures, and challenges. Intervention in School and Clinic, 40, 260–270.
  • McKenzie, R. G. (2009). A national survey of pre-service preparation for collaboration. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 32, 379-393.
  • McLeskey, J., & Brownell, M. (2015). High-leverage practices and teacher preparation in special education (Document No.PR-1). Retrieved from University of Florida, Collaboration for Effective Educator, Development, Accountability, and Reform Center website: http://ceedar.education, ufl.edu/tools/best-practice-review/
  • Morocco, C. C., & Aguilar, C. M. (2002). Co-teaching for content understanding: A schoolwide model. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultations, 13(4), 315-347.
  • Murawski, W. W. (2012). Observing co-teaching: What to ask for, look for, and listen for. Intervention in School and Clinic, 46(3), 174-183.
  • Nevin, A. I., Thousand, J. I., & Villa, R. A. (2009). Collaborative teaching for teacher educators: What does the research say? Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 569–574.
  • Nichols, J., Dowdy, A., & Nichols, C. (2010). Co-teaching: An educational promise for children with disabilities or a quick fix to meet the mandates of No Child Left Behind? Education, 130, 647-651.
  • Nightingale, P. (2000). Improving student writing. In S. Makoni (Ed.), Improving teaching and learning in higher education: A handbook for Southern Africa (pp. 131-166). Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.
  • Nunan, D. (2001). Research Methods in Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Olcott, K. C., Nieroda, J., & Crandall, B. R. (2014). Co-planning and co-teaching in a summer writing institute: A formative experiment. Teaching/Writing: The Journal of Writing Teacher Education, 3(2), 13-34.
  • Paltridge, B. (2004). Approaches to genre in ELT. In J. Cummins, & C. Davison (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching (pp. 931-943). Springer US.
  • Pincas, A. (1982). Teaching English writing. Macmillan Press.
  • Potter, J. (2011). New literacies, new practices and learner research: Across the semi-permeable membrane between home and school. Kansanvalistusseura: Helsinki, Finland
  • Pratt, S. M., Imbody, S. M., Wolf, L. D., & Patterson, A. L. (2016). Intervention in School and Clinic 1–7: Hammill Institute on Disabilities.
  • Pugach, M. C., & Winn, J. A. (2011). Research on co-teaching and teaming: An untapped resource for induction. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 24(1), 36-46.
  • Salend, S. J., Garrick Duhaney, L. M., & Montgomery, W. (2002). A comprehensive approach to identifying and addressing issues of disproportionate representation. Remedial and Special Education, 23(5), 289-299.
  • Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & McDuffie, K. A. (2007). Co-teaching in inclusive classrooms: A metasynthesis of qualitative research. Exceptional Children, 73(4), 392-416.
  • Silverman, J. C. (2007). Epistemological beliefs and attitudes toward inclusion in preservice teachers. Teacher Education and Special Education, 30, 42-51.
  • Simmons, R. J., & Magiera, K. (2007). Evaluation of co-teaching in three high schools within one school district: How do you know when you are truly co-teaching? Teaching Exceptional Children Plus, 3(3), 23-37.
  • Solis, M., Solis, A., Perez, H., Manjarrezb, N., & Floresa, M. (2012). Microbial decolouration of azo dyes: a review. Process Biochem, 47, 1723-1748.
  • Taki, S., & Fardafshari, E. (2012). Weblog-based Collaborative Learning: Iranian EFL Learners’ Writing Skill and Motivation. International Journal of Linguistics, 4(2), 412-429.
  • Valdés, G. (2001). Learning and not learning English: Latino students in American schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Vaughn, S., Schumm, J. S., & Arguelles, M. E. (1997). The ABCDEs of co teaching. Teaching Exceptional Children, 30(2), 1–10.
Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies-Cover
  • ISSN: 1305-578X
  • Başlangıç: 2005
  • Yayıncı: http://www.jlls.org
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Yağma, ateş etmeye yol açar: Başkan Trump’ın Floyd’un ölümü hakkındaki tartışmacı söyleminin pragma-diyalektik analizi

Gibreel Sadeq Alaghbary

Mütercim tercümanlık becerilerinin dilbilimsel ve bilişsel yönleri

İsmail Erton

Çinli öğrencilerde "Ton Uygulaması" kullandıktan sonra Tayca tonlar ve tutumları

Phanintra Teeranon

İngilizce öğretmen adaylarının duygu durumları ve öğretme yaklaşımları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi

Arif Sarıçoban, Özkan Kırmızı

Türkçe öğrenen C1 düzeyindeki Arap öğrencilerin yazılı anlatım çalışmalarındaki ulaçların ve ulaç görevli yapıların görünümleri

Salih Kürşad Dolunay, Hüseyin Karabuğa

Amerika’nın yeni en iyi modeli ve Asya’nın sonraki en iyi model yarışmalarında jüri yorumlarına ilişkin edimsel eylemlerin analizi: Kültürler arası pragmatik

Ni Wayan Sartini, Muchamad Sholakhuddin Al Fajri, Riza Alifianti Putri

İngiliz dili ve edebiyatı öğrencilerinin 21. yüzyıl becerilerinin farkındalığı

Aydan Irgatoğlu, Gülsev Pakkan

Boğazsıl seslerin, vurgulu seslerin ve vurgu olgusu'nun Fallaahi Ürdün Arapçası'nda yayılması: Doğrusal olmayan bir analiz

Muneera Jaradat

Cinsiyet ve sosyoekonomik durum: İranlı EFL öğrencileri tarafından Farsça ve İngilizce taleplerde kullanılan nezaket stratejilerinin pragmatik bir analizi

Farzaneh Khakzad Esfahlan, Mohsen Boroumand

Thai tones in Chinese students after using the “Tone Application” and their attitudes

Phanintra TEERANON