Öğrencilerin dilsel performanslarını güçlendirmek için sosyal ağ sitelerini kullanma konusundaki algıları

Günümüzde dijital cihazlardaki benzeri görülmemiş ilerleme, dillerin kazanılması da dahil olmak üzere bilginin inşasını kolaylaştıran teknolojinin kullanımına olan güvenin artmasıyla sonuçlanmıştır (Thorne, 2010). Örgün eğitim büyük ölçüde gelişmiştir ve ne eğitimciler ne de sınıf girdileri tek bilgi kaynağı olarak algılanmamaktadır; öğrencilerin bilgi inşa etmeleri için sınırsız kaynaklar mevcuttur (Benson, 2007). Çevrimiçi uygulamalar, öğrencilerin özerkliğini ve bağımsızlığını geliştirir ve Sosyal Ağ Siteleri (SAS) gibi farklı araçları kullanarak özgün durumlarda hedef dili uygulamalarını teşvik eder. Son çalışmalar SAS’lerin öğrencilerin motivasyonunu (Aydın, 2014), etkileşim ve sosyalleşmeyi (Ryberg ve Christiansen, 2008) ve pragmatik ve dilsel yeterliliği arttırdığını işaret etmektedir (Blake, 1998). Ne kadar çok dil öğrencisinin bunları etkili bir şekilde kullanma fırsatları olursa; çoklu-çekicilik ve dijital becerilerinde daha büyük gelişme olur (Chartrand, 2012). Bu çalışma, lisans öğrencilerinin SAS’ler hakkındaki algılarını ve dil performanslarını güçlendirmek için onlardan ne kadar yararlandıklarını araştırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Veriler bir anketteki kapalı uçlu ve açık uçlu maddeler yoluyla toplanmaktadır. Analiz, katılımcıların SAS'lerin sözlü ve iletişim becerilerini geliştirmeye yardımcı olabileceği yönündeki algılarını göstermektedir, ancak yazma tekniklerini ve dilbilgisi bilgisini geliştirmede bu platformlardan çok fazla yararlanamamışlardır. Veriler ayrıca katılımcıların Livemocha, iTalki, Lang-8, HelloHello, Duolingo, Palabea ve diğer ilgili uygulamalar gibi dil öğrenme uygulamalarını kullanma konusundaki endişelerini ve sınırlamalarını göstermektedir. Katılımcılar bunu, bu kaynakları kullanma konusunda eğitim eksikliğine bağlamışlardır. Bu çalışma, bu dijital platformların kullanılmasının sonuçlarını ortaya koymaktadır.

Learners’ perceptions on using social networking sites to reinforce their linguistic performance

The unprecedented progress in digital appliances nowadays resulted in increasing reliance on the use oftechnology, which facilitated construction of knowledge including the acquisition of languages (Thorne, 2010).Formal education has developed drastically and neither educators nor classroom input is perceived as the onlysource of information; unlimited resources exist for learners to construct knowledge (Benson, 2007). Onlineapplications foster learners’ autonomy and independence and encourage them to practise the target language inauthentic situations using different tools like Social Networking Sites (SNSs). Recent studies signal how SNSsincrease learners’ motivation (Aydin, 2014), interaction and socialization (Ryberg & Christiansen, 2008), andpragmatic and linguistic proficiency (Blake, 1998). The more language learners have opportunities to use themeffectively; the greater improvement in their multiliteracy and digital skills is (Chartrand, 2012). This study aimsat investigating the perceptions of undergraduate learners on SNSs and the extent to which they benefit from themto reinforce their linguistic performance. The data are collected from a survey questionnaire through closed-endedand open-ended items. The analysis shows the participants’ perceptions that SNSs can help improve oral andcommunication skills, yet they could not get the much benefit from these platforms in improving writingtechniques and knowledge of grammar. The data also signal the participants’ concerns and limitations in usinglanguage-learning applications like Livemocha, iTalki, Lang-8, Hello-Hello, Duolingo, Palabea, and other relevantones. They attributed this to lack of training on using these resources. This study provides implications of usingthese digital platforms.© 2020 JLLS and the Authors - Published by JLLS.

___

  • Al Ghazali, F. (2018a). Understanding the sociolinguistic variation in EFL among Arab siblings. Journal of Language and Linguistics Studies, 14(4), 301-315.
  • Al Ghazali, F. (2018b). Independent language learners in ESOL. The TESOL Encyclopaedia of English Language Teaching (1-7). Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. DOI: 10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0202
  • Almarwaey, A. (2017). Using social-networking sites in learning English language and students' selfefficacy. US-China Education Review, 7(5), 246-254.
  • Aydin, S. (2014). Foreign language learners’ interactions with their teachers on Facebook. System, 42, 155-163.
  • Benson, P. (2007). Autonomy in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 40, 21-40.
  • Blake, R. (1998). The role of technology in second language learning. In H. Byrnes (Eds.), Learning foreign and second languages: Perspectives in research and scholarship (pp. 209-237). New York: Modern Language Association.
  • Blattner, G., & Fiori, M. (2009). Facebook in the language classroom: Promises and possibilities. Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, (ITDL), 6(1), 17−28.
  • Cahyono, B. Y., & Mutiaraningrum, I. (2016). Indonesian EFL teachers’ familiarity with and opinion on internet-based teaching of writing. English Language Teaching, 9(1), 199-208.
  • Chambers, J. K. (1995). Sociolinguistic theory: linguistic variation and its social significance. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
  • Chapelle, C.A. (1997). CALL in the year 2000: Still in search of research paradigms? Language Learning and Technology, 2(1), 22-34.
  • Chartrand, R. (2012). Social networking for language learners: Creating meaningful output with Web 2.0 tools. Knowledge Management and E-learning: An International Journal, 4(1), 97-101.
  • Clark, C., & Gruba, P. (2010). The use of social networking sites for foreign language learning: An autoethnographic study of Live Mocha. Proceedings Ascilite, 1(2), 164-173.
  • Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. USA: M.I.T. Press.
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2003). Questionnaires in second language research: construction. New Jersey, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Go-Gulf (2019). Social media usage in Middle East: statistics and figures. Retrieved on April 02, 2019, from https://www.go-gulf.ae/blog/social-media-middle-east/.
  • Harrison, R. (2013). Profiles in online communities: social network sites for language learning – Live Mocha revisited. In M. a. Lamy (Eds.), Social networking for language education (pp. 100-116). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Harrison, R. a. (2009). Identity in online communities: Social networking sites and language learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society, 7(2), 109-124.
  • Hodges, C. B. (2013). Suggestions for the design of e-learning environments to enhance learner selfefficacy. IADIS International Conference, 1(2), 10-16. Texas: USA.
  • Kabilan, M., Ahmad, N., and Abidin, M. (2010). Facebook: an online environment for learning of English in institutions of higher education? Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 179-187.
  • Karpati, A. (2009). Web 2 technologies for net native language learners: a social CALL. ReCALL, 139- 156.
  • Komatsu, S. (2011). Sosharu media to gaikokugo gakushu, education –furansugo no atarashii manabi no tameni (Social media and learning foreign languages: A new approach for learning French). Archives of Rencontres Pédagogiques du Kansai, 76-80.
  • Krashen, S. (1994). The input hypothesis and its rivals. In N. C. Ellis (ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (45–78). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Kroonenberg, N. (1995). Developing communicative and thinking skills via e mail. TESOL J, 4(2), 24- 27.
  • Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie and T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition. San Diego: Academic Press: 413– 468.
  • Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  • Mills, N. (2011). Situated learning through social networking communities: The development of joint enterprise, mutual engagement, and a shared repertoire. CALICO Journal, 28(2), 345–368.
  • Mitchell, K. (2012). A social tool: Why and how ESOL students use Facebook. CALICO Journal, 29(3), 471-493.
  • Ryberg, T., & Christiansen, E. (2008). Community and social network sites as technology enhanced learning environments. Technology, Pedagogy & Education, 17(1), 207-219.
  • Samano, A. (2014). Learning English in the social media: a resource to keep learning outside the classroom. Retrieved on April, 4th, 2018, from www.researchgate.net/publication/266853314
  • Stevenson, M. P., & Liu, M. (2010). Learning a language with Web 2.0: Exploring the use of social networking features of foreign language learning websites. CALICO Journal, 27(1), 233-259.
  • Swain, M. and Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16(1), 371-391.
  • Thorne, S. L. (2010). The Intercultural turn and language learning in the crucible of new media. In F. H. Guth (ed.), Telecollaboration 2.0 for language and intercultural learning (139-164). Bern: Peter Lang.
  • Villano, M. (2007). Social revolution. Campus Technology, 20(5), 40–45.
  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Yu, A. Y., Tian, S. W., Vogel, D., & Kwok, R. C. (2010). Can learning be virtually boosted? An investigation of online social networking impacts. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1494-1503.