Endonezya'daki bir üniversitede İslam hukuku ve içtihat ders kitaplarında sistemik işlevsel dilbilim-yasal türler ve bunların konfigürasyonları

Ders kitaplarının akademik, pedagojik ve bilimsel dünyada İngilizce dilinde büyük önemi tartışmasızdır. Disiplinler arası bütünsel bilgi edinmek Endonezya'daki İslam hukuku öğrencileri için büyük önem taşımaktadır. Ancak, Endonezyalı öğrencilerin İngilizce okuma yeterliliği sorunludur. Mevcut araştırma, biçim türlerini tanımlamak ve onları çoğunlukla yapılandırıldığı kalıplar aracılığıyla ortaya çıkarmaktır. Çalışmanın verileri, Endonezya'daki Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara'da öğretim kaynağı olarak kullanılan bir İslam hukuku ders kitabı ve bir içtihat ders kitabıdır. Analiz için beş ana Sistemik işlevsel dilbilim tabanlı tür çerçevesine dayanarak, İslam hukuku ders kitabından elde edilen bulgular, dört tür ailesi altında önerilen üç tür de dahil olmak üzere 18 tür türünü gösterdi; bunlardan en sık kullanılanları Tarih türleri olan Açıklama, Rapor ve Bağımsız değişken türleridir. Öte yandan, rapor türlerinin en sık olduğu içtihatta, dört tür ailesine ait üç yeni olmak üzere 16 tür türü belirlendi, ardından Argüman, Açıklama ve Tarih türleri geldi. İki hukuk ders kitabı arasındaki bulguların ortak yönleri ve tutarsızlıkları, ideolojik farklılıkların mantıksal sonuçları ve hukuk disiplininin yöneldiği kaynak yönleri olarak kabul edilmektedir. Araştırmanın bulguları, öğrencilere hem İngilizce hem de hukuk öğretmenleri tarafından ne yazık ki ihmal edilen hukuki İngilizce metinleri okuma öğretimini kolaylaştıracak şekilde tasarlamada faydalı olacaktır.

Systemic functional linguistics-legal genres and their configurations in the Islamic law and jurisprudence textbooks at a university in Indonesia

The great importance of textbooks in the English language in the academic, pedagogic, and scientific world isuncontested. Acquiring holistic knowledge of legal transdisciplinary is of great importance to Islamic law studentsin Indonesia. Nevertheless, English reading proficiency of Indonesian students is problematic. The present researchwas to identify the genre types and unfold them through what patterns the genres are mostly structured. Data ofthe study were one Islamic law textbook and one jurisprudence textbook used as teaching resources and requiredreading at Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Indonesia. Based on the five main Systemic functionallinguistics-based genre frameworks for the analysis, findings from the Islamic law textbook showed 18 genre typesincluding three proposed ones under four genre families of which History genres are the most frequent onesfollowed by Explanation, Report, and Argument genres. On the other hand, 16 genre types including three newones belonging to four genre families were identified in the jurisprudence in which Report genres are the mostfrequent ones followed by Argument, Explanation, and History genres. The commonalities and discrepancies ofthe findings between the two legal textbooks are assumed to be the logical results of the ideological differencesand the resource aspects from which the legal discipline is oriented. The findings of the study would be useful todesign teaching of reading legal English texts that can facilitate students which is unfortunately neglected by bothEnglish and law teachers.© 2020 JLLS and the Authors - Published by JLLS.

PDF

___

Bernstein, B. (1990). Class, Codes and Control: The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse. London: Routledge.
Carrell, P. L. (1985). Facilitating ESL Reading by Teaching Text Structure. TESOL Quarterly, 19(4), 727-752. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586673
Carrell, P. L. (1992). Awareness of Text Structure: Effects on Recall. Language Learning, 42(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.2307/747572
Chinhengo, A. M. (2000). Essential Jurisprudence (2nd ed.). London: Cavendish Publishing Limited
Christie, F., & Derewianka, B. (2010). School Discourse: Learning to Write Across the Years of Schooling. London: Continuum.
Coffin, C. (1997). Constructing and Giving Value to the Past: An Investigation into Secondary School History. In F. Christie & J. R. Martin (Eds.). Genre and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School (pp. 196–230). London: Continuum.
Coffin, C. (2006). Historical Discourse: The Language of Time, Cause and Evaluation. London: Continuum.
Dalimunte, A. A., & Pramoolsook, I. (2020). Genres Classification and Generic Structures in the English Language Textbooks of Economics and Islamic Economics in an Indonesian University. LEARN Journal, 13(1), 1-19. https://www.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view
Derewianka, B. (1990). Exploring How Texts Work. Maryborough: Australian Print Group.
Derewianka, B., & Jones, P. (2012). Teaching Language in Context. Victoria: Oxford University Press.
Dickson, S. (1999). Integrating Reading and Writing to Teach Compare-Contrast Text Structure: A Research-based Methodology. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 14, 49-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/105735699278297
Durant, A., & Leung, J. (2016). Language and Law. New York: Routledge.
El-Fadl, K. A. (2013). The Shari’ah. In John L. E. & Shahin E. E. (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Islam and Politics (pp.7-26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Elliott, D. L., and Woodward, A. (Eds.). (1990). Textbooks and Schooling in the United States (89th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. New York: Tavistock Publications Limited.
Hallaq, W. B. (2009). An Introduction to Islamic Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hoey, M. (2001). Textual Interaction: An Introduction to Written Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.
Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
Kuhn, S.T. (1996). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (3rd ed.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lee, C. D., & Spratley, A. (2010). Reading in the Disciplines: The Challenges of Adolescent Literacy. New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
Leon, J. A., & Carretero, M. (1995). Intervention in Comprehension and Memory Strategies: Knowledge and Use of Text Structure. Learning and Instruction, 5(3), 203-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959- 4752(95)00011-Q
Martin, J. R. (1990). Factual Writing: Exploring and Challenging Social Reality (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Martin, J. R. (1993). Literacy in Science: Learning to Handle Text as Technology. In M. A. K. Halliday & J. R. Martin (Eds.). Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power (pp.166-202). London: Falmer Press.
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2008). Genre Relations: Mapping Culture. London: Equinox.
McGee, L. M. (1982). Awareness of Text Structure: Effects on Children's Recall of Expository Text. Reading Research Quarterly, 17(4), 581-590. https://doi.org/10.2307/747572
Meyer, B. J. F., (1975). Identification of the Structure of Prose and its Implications for the Study of Reading and Memory. Journal of Reading Behavior, 7(1), 7-47.
Okasha, S. (2002). Philosophy of Science: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Orwin, R. G. (1994). Evaluating coding decisions. In: H. Cooper & L.V. Hedges (Eds). The Handbook of Research Synthesis (pp.177-200). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Parodi, G. (2010). The Rhetorical Organization of the Textbook Genre Across Disciplines: A ‘Colonyin-Loops’? Discourse Studies, 12(2), 195-222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445609356500
Paul, R. & Elder, L. (2006). Critical thinking: learn the tools, the best thinkers use. USA: Pearson Education, Inc.
Richgels, D. J., McGee, L. M., Lomax, R. G., & Sheard, C. (1987). Awareness of Four Text Structures: Effects on Recall of Expository Text. Reading Research Quarterly, 22(2), 177-196.
Rose, D. (2012). Genre in the Sydney School. In J. Gee & M. Handford (Eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 209-225). London: Routledge.
Stern, L., & Roseman, J. E. (2004). Can Middle School Science Textbooks Help Students Learn Important Ideas? Findings from Project 2061’s Curriculum Evaluation Study: Life Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(6), 538-568. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20019
Strong, R. W., Silver, H. F., Perini, M. J., & Tuculescu, G. M. (2002). Reading for Academic Success: Powerful Strategies for Struggling, Average, and Advanced Readers, Grades 7-12. California: Corwin Press, Inc. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED465158
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2009). Promoting Gender Equality Through Textbook: A Methodological Guide. France: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
Unsworth, L. C., (1995). How and Why Recontextualizing Science Explanations in School Science Books (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). University of Sydney, Sydney.
Uso-Juan, E., & Flor, A. M. (Eds.). (2006). Current Trends in the Development and Teaching of the Four Language Skills. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Veel, R. (1997). Learning How to Mean-Scientifically Speaking: Apprenticeship into Scientific Discourse in the Secondary School. In F. Christie & J. Martin (Eds.). Genres and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School (pp.161-194). London: Continuum.
Zarrati, Z., Nambiar, R. M., & Maasum, T. N. R. T. M. (2014). The Importance of Text Structure Awareness in Promoting Strategic Reading among EFL Readers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 118, 537-544. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.073
Zhang, X. (2008). The Effects of Formal Schema on Reading Comprehension: An Experiment with Chinese EFL Readers. Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing, 13(2), 197- 214.