Eleştirel dil farkındalığı için bir araç olarak stil bilimi

Bu çalışma, söylemde aktarılan ideolojileri değerlendirmek için çok önemli olan eleştirel dil farkındalığının (CLA) geliştirilmesinde stilistik analizin rolünü tartışmaktadır. Eleştirel Stilistik yaklaşım, kurgu ve kurgusal olmayan anlatı stratejilerini karşılaştırmak için kullanılır. Yüzlerce doğrulama sitesi insanlara 'gerçek anlamı' 'sahte anlamdan' nasıl ayıracaklarını anlatırken kitle iletişim araçlarında hakikat konusuna muğlak yaklaşımları göz önünde bulunduran bu çalışma, anlatılara dilbilimsel yaklaşımın okuyuculara yardımcı olarak eleştirel düşünmeyi teşvik edebileceğini savunuyor. Çağdaş edebi stratejilerin ışığında, edebiyat, okuyucunun çoklu anlamlarla ilişkili olarak metne açılma olarak yorumlamayı gerçekleştiren tarafında artan bir öz-bilgi ve içgörü anlamında 'hakikat' modu olarak onaylanır. Anlatı stratejilerine yönelik üslup yaklaşımı, kuralcı ve dogmatik okumaların engellenmesi ve eleştirel okuryazarlık için teşvik olarak belirtilmiştir.

Stylistics as a tool for critical language awareness

This study discusses the role of stylistic analysis in the development of critical language awareness (CLA) whichis crucial for assessing ideologies transmitted in discourse. The Critical Stylistic approach is used to comparenarrative strategies in fiction and non-fiction: in Ishiguro’s novel The Buried Giant (2015) and in Wolff’s bookFire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House (2018) by using analytical tools such as transitivity, participants,actions and processes, vocabulary, syntax, modality, generics, personal pronouns, speech acts. Consideringambiguous approaches to the issue of truth in mass media when hundreds of fact-checking sites are telling peoplehow to separate ‘true meaning’ from ‘fake meaning’, this study argues that the linguistic approach to narrativescan foster critical thinking by helping readers understand the interpretative nature of the meaning of the text. Inthe light of contemporary literary strategies, literature is affirmed as mode of ‘truth’ in the sense of an increasedself-knowledge and insight on the part of the reader who carries out interpretation as opening up to the text inrelation to multiple meanings. The stylistic approach towards narrative strategies is pointed out as prevention ofprescriptive and dogmatic readings and as encouragement for critical literacy.© 2020 JLLS and the Authors - Published by JLLS.

PDF

___

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words: The William James Lectures, J.O. Urmson & M. Sbisà (Eds.). Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Bakhtin, M.M.(1981). The dialogic imagination, C. Emerson & M. Holquist (Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
Booth, W. C. (1983). The rhetoric of fiction. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Brooks, P. (1992). Reading for the plot: Design and Intention in Narrative. Harvard University Press.
Clark, T. (2006). Interpretation: Hermeneutics. In P. Waugh (Ed.), Literary theory and criticism. An Oxford Guide (pp.59-70). Oxford University Press.
Cohn, D. (1999). The distinction of fiction. John Hopkins University Press.
Cohn, D. (2000). Discordant narration. Style, 34(2), 307-314.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish. The birth of the prison, A. Sheridan (Trans.). NY: Vintage books. Retrieved on February 2nd, 2020 from: https://monoskop.org/images/4/43/Foucault_Michel_Discipline_and_Punish_The_Birth_of_the_Pr ison_1977_1995.pdf
Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power (2nd ed.). London: Longman.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis (2nd ed.). London: Longman.
Fowler, R. (2003). Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in press. London: Routledge.
Green P. (2001). Critical literacy revisited. In H. Fehring &P. Green (Eds.), Critical Literacy, (pp.7- 12). International Reading Association.
Ishiguro, K. (2015). The buried giant. NY: Alfred A. Knopf. Kindle, EPUB.
Ishiguro, K. The persistence -and impermanence -of memory in ‘The buried giant’. In National Public Radio. Retrieved on January 15, 2020 from: https://www.npr.org/2015/02/28/389530345/thepersistence-and-impermanence-of-memory-in-the-buried-giant
Hall, G. (2005). Who said that? Who wrote that? Reporting, representation, and the linguistics of writing. In C. R. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Toolan (Eds.), The Writer’s Craft, the Culture’s Technology (pp. 151-167). NY: Rodopi.
Jeffries, L. (2010). Opposition in discourse. The construction of oppositional meanings. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Kempe, A. (2001). No single meaning: Empowering students to construct socially critical readings of the text. In H. Fehring & P. Green (Eds.), Critical literacy (pp.40-57). International Reading Association.
Matz, J. (2004). The modern novel: A short introduction. Oxford. UK: Blackwell Publishing.
McIntyre, D. (2011). The place of stylistics in the English curriculum. In L. Jeffries & D. McIntyre (Eds.), Teaching Stylistics (pp. 9-29). Palgrave Macmillan.
Nünning, A. (1997). But why will you say that I am mad: On the theory, history, and signals of unreliable narration in British fiction. AAA Arbeiten Aus Anglistik and Amerikanistik, 2(1), 83-105. JSTOR. Web. 09-05-2016.
Nünning, A. (1999). Reconceptualizing the theory and generic scope of unreliable narration. In J. Pier (Ed.), Recent Trends in Narratological Research (pp.63 -84). Tours University Press.
Olson, G. (2003). Reconsidering unreliability: Fallible and untrustworthy narrators. Ohio State University Press, 11(2), 93-109.
Phelan, J. (2005). Living to tell about it, a rhetoric and ethics of character narration. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
Riggan, W. (1981). Pícaros, madmen, naïfs, and clowns: The unreliable first-person narrator. The University of Oklahoma Press.
Semino, S. & Wynne, M. (2002). Revisiting the notion of faithfulness in discourse presentation using a corpus approach. Language and Literature ,11(4), 484-509.
Simpson, P. (2004). Stylistics. NY: Routledge.
Sternberg, M. & Yacobi, T. 2015. (Un)reliability in narrative discourse: A comprehensive overview. Poetics Today, 36(4), 329-483. Duke University Press.
The Nobel Prize in Literature 2017. NobelPrize.org. Retrieved on February 18, 2020 from: https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/literature/2017/press-release/
Todorov, T. (1966). Les catégories du récit littéraire. Communications, 8, 125-51.
van Dijk, T. A (2010). Discourse and context: A sociocognitive approach (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Weber, J. J. (1996). The stylistic reader. University Centre Luxemburg.
Wolff, M. (2018). Fire and fury: Inside the Trump White House. London: Little Brown.