Doğu Avrupa'da radikal neo-liberal dönüşüm

Bu çalısmanın amacı Doğu Avrupa’daki dönüsüm ve bütünlesme süreçlerini irdelemektir. Çalısmada öncelikli olarak iç içe geçen bu süreçlerin nasıl okunabileceği tartısılmaktadır. Süreçlerin tekil faktörlerden öte ulusal ve uluslararası aktör ve faktörlerin etkilesimini vurgulayan bütüncül bir yaklasımla incelenmesi gerektiği önerilmektedir. Böylesi bir yaklasım bölgedeki yeniden yapılanma süreçlerinin neo-liberal küresel yeniden yapılandırma politikaları ile olan etkilesimini, uluslararası mali kuruluslar ve Avrupa Birliği’nin neo-liberal süreci farklı formlarda nasıl yeniden ürettiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Bu kurulus ve kurumlar esgüdüm içerisinde yürütülen sartlara dayalı siyasi yaklasımlarıyla eklemlenmeyi hızlandırmak amacıyla coğrafi bölgede ayrıstırmaya gitmislerdir. Temel olarak hedeflenen bölge ülkelerinin Avrupa Birliği üyelikleri gerçeklesmis olsa da izlenen neo-liberal dönüsüm projesi sorunlara çözüm üretememis, hatta sorunların yeniden üretilmesine neden olmustur. Bu durum Batı’nın üçüncü dünya ülkeleri ile olan iliskisine benzer bir sekilde yardıma dayalı bağımlılık mekanizmasının yeniden üretilmesi anlamına da gelmektedir.

Radical neo-liberal transformation in Eastern Europe

This paper aims to analyse the transformation and integration processes in Eastern Europe. It first discusses the approaches towards these intertwined processes. It argues that the processes should be studied through a holistic approach which emphasises the dialectical relationship between internal and global actors and factors. Such an approach reveals the dialectical process between the transformation and integration processes and neo-liberal process of global restructuring, and how the international financial institutions and the European Union reproduced various forms of neo-liberal process in the region. These institutions have favoured geographical differentiation in the region with an aim to accelerate the integration through their political approach based on conditionality. Although the main aim, membership of the countries of the region into the European Union, is achieved the neo-liberal radical transformation project is far from finding answers to the problems of the region. In a way it helped reproduce these problems reproducing the mechanism of dependency through aid in a similar way to the relations between the West and the Third World.

___

  • • Aksit, Sait, Transformation and the Politics of Conditionality: A Comparative Analysis of Poland and Romania until the mid-1990s, yayınlanmamıs Doktora tezi, Uluslararası Đliskiler Bölümü, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Ankara, Türkiye, Temmuz 2006.
  • • Böhle, Dorothee ve Greskovits, Bela, “Capitalism without Compromise: Strong Business and Weak Labor in Eastern Europe's New Transnational Industries”, Studies in Comparative International Development, Bahar 2006, Cilt 41, Sayı 1.
  • • Bruszt, Laszlo, “Transformative Politics: Social Costs and Social Peace in East Central Europe”, East European Politics and Societies, Cilt 6, Sayı 1, kıs 1992.
  • • Bryant, Christopher G. A. ve Mokrzycki, Edmund (der.), The New Great Transformation? Change and Continuity in East-Central Europe, Londra ve New York, Routledge, 1994.
  • • Buira Ariel, “An Analysis of IMF Conditionality”, Group of 24 Research Program Discussion Paper, Haziran 2002, http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~.drodrik.academic.ksg/g24buira.pdf web sayfasından alınmıstır (Erisim tarihi: 5 Ocak 2009).
  • • Castle, Stephen, “A French-Czech dispute over stimulus packages”, International Herald Tribune, 11 Subat 2009.
  • • Chossudovsky, Michel, The Globalisation of Poverty: Impacts of IMF and World Bank Reforms, Londra ve New Jersey, Zed Boks Ltd., 1998.
  • • CNN, “Chirac lashes out at 'new Europe'”, 18 Subat 2003.
  • • Commission of the European Communities, Agenda 2000: For a Stronger and Wider Union, COM (97) 2000 final, Brüksel, 15 Temmuz 1997.
  • • Commission of the European Communities, EC Assistance to Central and Eastern Europe, Brüksel, Temmuz 1991.
  • • Commission of the European Communities, Economic Reform Monitor: Economic Situation and Reform in Central and Eastern Europe, Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs, Ocak/Subat 1992.
  • • Commission of the European Communities, Responses to the Challenges of Globalisation: A Study on the International Monetary and Financial System and on Financing for Development, Working Document of the Commission Services, Brüksel, SEC(2002) 185 final, 14 Subat 2002.
  • • Commission of the European Communities, The Phare Programme: Annual Report 1999, Kasım 2001. http://ec.europa.eu/comm/enlargement/pas/phare/pdf/phare1999.pdf web sayfasından alınmıstır (Erisim tarihi: 6 Temmuz 2006).
  • • Commission of the European Communities, Towards a Closer Association with the Countries of Central and Eastern Europe, SEC(93) 648 final, Brüksel, 18 Mayıs 1993.
  • • Daianu, Daniel ve Veremis, Thanos (der.), Balkan Reconstruction, Londra, Frank Cass, 2001.
  • • De Boer-Ashworth, Elisabeth, The Global Political Economy and Post- 1989 Change: The Place of the Central European Transition, Londra, Macmillan Press Ltd., 2000.
  • • Devrim Sevimay / Soru-Cevap “Bu krizden sonra ‘savas’ gelebilir”, Milliyet, 6 Ekim 2008.
  • • Dimitrova, Antoaneta L., “Enlargement-driven Change and Post- Communist Transformations: A new Perspective”, Antoaneta L. Dimitrova (der.), Driven to Change: the European Union’s Enlargement Viewed from the East, Manchester, Manchester University Press, 2004 içinde.
  • • Feldstein, Martin, “Refocusing the IMF”, Foreign Affairs, Mart/Nisan 1998.
  • • Financial Times, “EU summit pledges aid for eastern states”, 1 Mart 2009.
  • • Fischer, Stanley ve Sahay, Ratna, “The Transition Economies after Ten Years”, IMF Working Paper, WP/00/30, Subat 2000.
  • • Förster, Michael, Jesuit, David ve Smeeding, Timothy, “Regional Poverty and Income Inequality in Central and Eastern Europe: Evidence from the Luxembourg Income Study”, United Nations University, World Institute for Development Economics Research, Discussion Paper No. 2003/65, September 2003.
  • • Grabbe, Heather, “A Partnership for Accession? The Implications of EU Conditionality for the Central and East European Applicants”, EUI Working Papers RSC No. 99/12, Floransa, European University Institute, 1999.
  • • Greskovits, Bela, Political Economy of Protest and Patience, Budapeste, Central European University Press, 1998.
  • • Holman, Otto, “Integrating Eastern Europe: EU Expansion and the Double Transformation in Poland, the Czech Republic, and Hungary”, International Journal of Political Economy, Cilt 28, Sayı 2, Yaz 1998.
  • • Holmes, Leslie, Post-Communism, Durham, Duke University Press, 1997.
  • • IMF, “Conditionality in Fund-Supported Programs – Overview”, Policy Development and Review Department, 2001, http://www.imf.org/external/np/pdr/cond/2001/eng/overview/ web sayfasından alınmıstır (Erisim tarihi: 4 Ekim 2003).
  • • International Herald Tribune, “East Europeans deal with rebuff at EU summit”, 3 Mart 2009.
  • • International Herald Tribune, “Eastern Europe crisis raises bailout risk”, 28 Subat 2009.
  • • Kolodko, Grzegorz W., “Ten Years of Postsocialist Transition: the Lessons for Policy Reforms”, The World Bank Development Economics Research Group, Washington, D.C., 1998, http://www.worldbank.org/html/dec/Publications/Workpapers/wps2000seri es/wps2095/wps2095.pdf web sayfasından alınmıstır (Erisim tarihi: 6 Temmuz 2006).
  • • Kolodko, Grzegorz W., “Transition to a Market Economy and Sustained Growth: Implications for the Post-Washington Consensus”, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 27, 1999.
  • • Korkut, Umut, “Doğu-Orta Avrupa’da Küresellesme Üzerine Elestirel Bir Bakıs”, Cem Karadeli (der.), Küresellesme ve Alternatif Küresellesme, Ankara, Phoenix Yayınevi, 2005 içinde.
  • • Mayhew, Alan, Recreating Europe: The European Union’s Policy towards Central and Eastern Europe, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press,1998.
  • • Mungiu-Pippidi, Alina, “Of Dark Sides and Twilight Zones: Enlarging to the Balkans”, East European Politics and Societies, Cilt 17, Sayı 1.
  • • Mungıu-Pippidi, Alina, “The Unbearable Lightness of Democracy: Poland and Romania after Communism”, Current History, Kasım 2004.
  • • Nello, Susan S., “The Impact of External Economic Factors: The Role of The IMF”, J. Zielonka ve A. Pravda (der.), Democratic Consolidation in Eastern Europe, Volume 2, International and Transnational Factors, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001 içinde.
  • • Önis, Ziya ve Fikret Senses, “Rethinking the Emerging Post-Washington Consensus: A Critical Appraisal”, ERC Working Paper 03/09, Kasım 2003.
  • • Ost, David ve Marc Weinstein, “Unionist against Unions: Toward Historical Management in Post-Communist Poland”, East European Politics and Societies, Cilt 13, Sayı 1, Kıs 1999.
  • • Poznanski, Kazimierz Z., “Building Capitalism with Communist Tools: Eastern Europe’s Defective Transition”, East European Politics and Societies, Cilt 15, Sayı 2, 2001.
  • • Przeworski, Adam, “Economic Reforms, Public Opinion, and Political Institutions: Poland in the Eastern European Perspective,” Luiz Carlos Bresser Pereira, Jose Maria Maravall, Adam Przeworski (der.), Economic Reforms in New Democracies Cambridge, Cambridge University Pres, 1993 içinde.
  • • Rodrik, Dani, “Understanding Economic Policy Reform”, Journal of Economic Literature, 1996, Cilt 34.
  • • Schöpflin, George, Politics in Eastern Europe, Oxford, Blackwell, 1993.
  • • Stallings, Barbara, “International Influence on Economic Policy: Debt, Stabilization, and Structural Reform”, S. Haggard ve R. R. Kaufman (der.), The Politics of Economic Adjustment: International Constraints, Distributive Conflicts, and The State, Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 1992 içinde.
  • • Stiglitz, Joseph E., “Failure of The Fund: Rethinking the IMF Response”, Harvard International Review, Yaz 2001.
  • • Stiglitz, Joseph E., “More Instruments and Broader Goals: Moving Towards the Post-Washington Consensus”, WIDER Annual Lecture 2, Helsinki, The United Nations University - World Institute for Development Economics Research, 1998, http://www.wider.unu.edu/publications/publications.htm web sayfasından alınmıstır (Erisim tarihi: 1 Haziran 2006).
  • • Stiglitz, Joseph E., “Whither Reform? Ten Years of the Transition”, B. Pleskovic ve J. Stiglitz (der.), Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics 1999, Washington D.C.: The World Bank, 2000 içinde.
  • • Stiglitz, Joseph E., Globalization and its Discontents, Londra, Penguin Books, 2002.
  • • The Economist, “Europe: The end of enlargement?” Londra, 16 Temmuz 2005, Cilt. 376, Sayı. 8435.
  • • Thorpe, Nick, “Solidarity runs dry in Poland”, BBC News, 28 Temmuz 2007.
  • • Türkes, Mustafa ve Göksu Gökgöz, “The European Union's Strategy towards the Western Balkans: Exclusion or Integration?”, East European Politics and Societies, Cilt 20, Sayı 4, 2006.
  • • Türkes, Mustafa, “The Double Process: Transition and Integration and Its Impact on the Balkans” Petar-Emil Mitev ve James Riordan (der.), Towards Non-violence and Dialogue Culture in Southeast Europe, Sofya, Iztok-Zapad Publishing House, 2004 içinde.
  • • Vinton, Louisa, “Dissonance: Poland on the Eve of New Elections”, RFE/RL Research Paper, Cilt 2, Sayı 33, 20 Ağustos 1993.
  • • Vinton, Louisa, “Walesa Applies Political Shock Therapy”, RFE/RL Research Paper, Cilt 2, Sayı 24, 11 Haziran 1993.
  • • Weiner, Robert, “Romania, the IMF and Economic reform since 1996,” Problems of Post-Communism, Cilt 48, Sayı. 1, Ocak-Subat 2001.
  • • Williamson, John (der.), “What Washington Means by Policy Reform?” Latin American Adjustment: How Much has Happened?, Washington, Institute for International Economics, 1990 içinde.
  • • Williamson, John, “What Should the World Bank Think about the Washington Consensus?” The World Bank Research Observer, Cilt 15, Sayı 2, Ağustos 2000.
  • • Winiecki, Jan, “The Applicability of Standard Reform Packages to Eastern Europe”, Journal of Comparative Economics, 20, 1995.
  • • Winiecki, Jan, Transition Economies and Foreign Trade, Londra ve New York, Routledge, 2002.
  • • World Bank, “Financial Crisis Could Trap 53 Million More People in Poverty”, 12 Subat 2009, Dünya Bankası web sitesinden alınmıstır: http://go.worldbank.org/1FWPZ7KCJ0 (Erisim tarihi: 15 Subat 2009).
  • • World Bank, “Framework for World Bank Group Support to EU Accession Candidate Countries of Central and Eastern Europe”, prepared by the Europe and Central Asia Region, World Bank, revised January 17, 2002, s. 6, http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTEUEINP/Resources/StrategytoSupp ortEUAccessionCandidates.pdf (Erisim tarihi 28 Mayıs 2006).
  • • World Bank, “World Bank Urges Europe to Protect Eastern European Gains in Economic Growth and Poverty Reduction”, Dünya Bankası basın açıklaması, 20 Subat 2009. Dünya Bankası web sitesinden alınmıstır: http://go.worldbank.org/RQKADANS40 (Erisim tarihi: 20 Subat 2009).
  • • World Bank, EU10 Regular Economic Report, February 2009.
  • • World Bank, Growth, Poverty, and Inequality in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union, 2005, s. 51. Rapora http://go.worldbank.org/12MK6K5P20 internet adresinden ulasılabilir (Erisim tarihi: 15 Ocak 2009).