The Relationship between Leader-Member Exchange and Innovative Work Behavior:The Mediating Role of the Voice Behavior

The Relationship between Leader-Member Exchange and Innovative Work Behavior:The Mediating Role of the Voice Behavior

Purpose - This research aims to examine the mediation mechanism between leader-member exchange(LMX) and innovative work behavior (IWB) through employee voice behavior. Specifically, this researchexploited the social exchange theory (SET) to examine the influence of LMX on IWB through employee voicebehavior. Within this context, employees performing in higher quality LMX relationships with IWB arelikely to exhibit more voice behavior.Design/methodology/approach – Self-reported questionnaires were applied to obtain data from 360employees mainly with engineering qualifications from four companies in the defense sector in Turkey.Data were collected with a simple random sampling method in November and December 2020. Hypotheseswere tested using correlation and regression analysis. The reason why the defense sector was selected forthis study is the fact that the defense industry field has characteristics that make for a unique workingenvironment.Findings - The findings show that LMX positively and significantly affects IWB and additionally voicebehavior has a mediating role in this relationship. LMX had a significant influence on employee voicebehavior that was ultimately associated with IWB. Finally, Voice behavior mediated the positive correlationbetween LMX and IWB, and stronger voice behavior boosted the indirect relationship.Discussion - This research reveals the effects of LMX and provides practical suggestions to help employeesexpress their opinions in the organization to enhance innovation performance. Based on the SET, thisresearch helps to understand how certain LMX which encourage high-quality exchange relationships withthe supervisors and foster employee voice behaviors, may nurture employee IWBs in the organizations.

___

  • Abstein, A. and Spieth, P. (2014). Exploring HRM Meta-features that foster employees’ innovative work behaviour in times of increasing work–life conflict, Creativity and Innovation Management, 23(2), 211- 225.
  • Adarves-Yorno, I., Postmes, T. and Haslam, S.A. (2007). Creative innovation or crazy irrelevance? The contribution of group norms and social identity to creative behavior, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(3), 410-416.
  • Amo, B.W. and Kolvereid, L. (2005). Organizational strategy, individual personality and innovation behavior, Journal of Enterprising Culture, 13(1), 7-19.
  • Anderson, N., Poto.cnik, K. and Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of thescience review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297- 1333.
  • Avey,J.B., Wernsing, T.S. and Palanski, M.E. (2012). Exploring the process of ethical leadership: The mediating role of employee voice and psychological ownership, Journal of Business Ethics, 107(1), 21- 34.
  • Bai, Y., Lin, L. and Li, P.P. (2016). How to enable employee creativity in a team context: A cross-level mediating process of transformational leadership, Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3240-3250.
  • Baron, R. M. and Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
  • Basu, R. and Green, S.G. (1997). Leader-member exchange and transformational leadership: an empirical examination of innovative behaviors in leader-member dyads, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27(6), 477-499.
  • Bateman, T.S. and Crant, J.M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(2), 103-118.
  • Bauer, T.N. and Green, S.G. (1996). Development of leader-member exchange: a longitudinal test, Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1538-1567.
  • Blau, P.M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life, New York, NY, John Wiley and Sons.
  • Blau, T.H. (1984). Foreword in Kaslow, F. (Ed.) Psychotherapy with psychotherapists, New York, John Wiley and Sons.
  • Bos-Nehles, A.C. and Veenendaal, A.A. (2019). Perceptions of HR practices and innovative work behavior: the moderating effect of an innovative climate, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(18), 2661-2683.
  • Botero, I.C. and Van Dyne, L. (2009). Employee voice behavior: interactive effects of LMX and power distance in the United States and Colombia, Management Communication Quarterly, 23 (1), 84-104.
  • Burris, E.R., Detert, J.R. and Chiaburu, D.S. (2008). Quitting before leaving: the mediating effects of psychological attachment and detachment on voice, Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 912-922.
  • Carnevale, J.B., Huang, L., Crede, M., Harms, P. and Uhl-Bien, M. (2017). Leading to stimulate employees’ ideas: A quantitative review of leader–member exchange, employee voice, creativity, and innovative behavior, Applied Psychology, 66(4), 517-552.
  • Chan, S.C. (2014). Paternalistic leadership and employee voice: does information sharing matter?, Human Relations, 67(6), 667-693.
  • Chen, A.S.-Y. and Hou, Y.-H. (2016). The effects of ethical leadership, voice behavior and climates for innovation on creativity: A moderated mediation examination, The Leadership Quarterly, 27(1), 1-13.
  • Cheung, M.F. and Wong, C.-S. (2011). Transformational leadership, leader support, and employee creativity. The Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 32(7), 656-672.
  • Chowhan, J., Pries, F. and Mann, S. (2017). Persistent innovation and the role of human resource management practices, work organization, and strategy, Journal of Management and Organization, 23(3), 456-471.
  • Dansereau, F., Graen, G. and Haga, W.J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 13(1), 46-78.
  • De Jong, J.P. and Den Hartog, D.N. (2007). How leaders influence employees’ innovative behavior, European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(1), 41-64.
  • Deci, E.L. and Ryan, R.M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 1024.
  • Dedahanov, A.T., Lee, D.H., Rhee, J. and Yoon, J. (2016). Entrepreneur’s paternalistic leadership style and creativity: The mediating role of employee voice, Management Decision, 54(9), 2310-2324.
  • Delmestri, G. and Walgenbach, P. (2005). Masteringtechniques or brokering knowledge? Middle managers in Germany, Great Britain and Italy, Organization Studies, 26, 197–220.
  • Denti, L. and Hemlin, S. (2012). Leadership and innovation in organizations: A systematic review of factors that mediate or moderate the relationship, International Journal of Innovation Management, 16(3), 124000-1- 124000-20.
  • Detert, J.R. and Burris, E.R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: is the door really open?, Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869-884.
  • Dienesch, R.M. and Liden, R.C. (1986). Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development, Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 618-634.
  • Dulebohn, J.H., Bommer, W.H., Liden, R.C., Brouer, R.L. and Ferris, G.R. (2012). A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader-member exchange: Integrating the past with an eye toward the future, Journal of Management, 38(6), 1715-1759.
  • Dundon, T. and Dobbins, T. (2015). Militant partnership: A radical pluralist analysis of workforce dialectics, Work Employment and Society, 29(6), 912-931.
  • Dutton, J.E. and Ashford, S.J. (1993). Selling issues to top management, Academy of Management Review, 18(3), 397-428.
  • Dyne, L.V., Ang, S. and Botero, I.C. (2003). Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs, Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1359-1392.
  • Edmondson, A.C. (2003). Speaking up in the operating room: How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams, Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1419-1452.
  • Fuller, J., Barnett, Hester, K. and Frey, L. (2007). An exploratory examination of voice behavior from a impression management perspective, Journal of Managerial Issues, 19(1), 134-151.
  • Gabris, G.T., Grenell, K., Ihrke, D.M. and Kaatz, J. (2000). Managerial innovation at the local level: Some effects of administrative leadership and governing board behavior, Public Productivity and Management Review, 23(4), 486-494.
  • Gerstner, C.R. and Day, D.V. (1997). Meta-Analytic review of leader–member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues, Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 827.
  • Gong, Y., Huang, J.C. and Farh, J.L. (2009). Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy, Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 765-778.
  • Gouldner, A.W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161-178.
  • Graen, G.B. and Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: development of leadermember exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi domain perspective, The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219-247.
  • Graham, J.W. and Van Dyne, L. (2006). Gathering information and exercising influence: Two forms of civic virtue organizational citizenship behavior, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 18(2), 89-109.
  • Grant, A.M. and Rothbard, N.P. (2013). When in doubt, seize the day? Security values, prosocial values, and proactivity under ambiguity, Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(5), 810-819.
  • Gu, J., Wang, G., Liu, H., Song, D. and He, C. (2018). Linking authoritarian leadership to employee creativity: The influences of leader–member exchange, team identification and power distance, Chinese Management Studies, 12(2), 384-406.
  • Gumusluoglu, L. and Ilsev, A. (2009). Transformational leadership and organizational innovation: The roles of internal and external support for innovation, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(3), 264- 277.
  • Guo, L., Decoster, S., Babalola, M.T., De Schutter, L., Garba, O.A. and Riisla, K. (2018). Authoritarian leadership and employee creativity: The moderating role of psychological capital and the mediating role of fear and defensive silence, Journal of Business Research, 92, 219-230.
  • Guzman, F.A. and Espejo, A. (2019). Introducing changes at work: how voice behavior relates to management innovation, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(1), 73-90.
  • Hammond, M.M., Neff, N.L., Farr, J.L., Schwall, A.R. and Zhao, X. (2011). Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: a meta-analysis, Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), 90-102.
  • Hassanzadeh, J.F. (2014). Leader-member exchange and creative work involvement: The importance of knowledge sharing. Iranian Journal of Management Studies, 7(2), 377-396.
  • Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new Millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408–420.
  • Hsiung, H.H. (2012). Authentic leadership and employee voice behavior: a multi-level psychological process, Journal of Business Ethics, 107(3), 349-361.
  • Hsiung, H.H. and Tsai, W.C. (2009). Job definition discrepancy between supervisors and subordinates: the antecedent role of LMX and outcomes, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82(1), 89- 112.
  • Huang, X., Van de Vliert, E. and Van der Vegt, G. (2005). Breaking the silence culture: Stimulation of participation and employee opinion withholding cross-nationally. Management and Organization Review, 1(3), 459-482.
  • Ilies, R., Nahrgang, J.D. and Morgeson, F.P. (2007). Leader-member exchange and citizenship behaviors: a Meta-analysis, Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 269-277.
  • Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort‐reward fairness and innovative work behavior, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287-302.
  • Janssen, O. and Van Yperen, N.W. (2004). Employees’ goal orientations, the quality of leader-member exchange, and the outcomes of job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 368-384.
  • Javed, B., Naqvi, S.M.M.R., Khan, A.K., Arjoon, S. and Tayyeb, H.H. (2017). Impact of inclusive leadership on innovative work behavior: The role of psychological safety, Journal of Management and Organization, 25(1), 1-20.
  • Kremer, H., Villamor, I. and Aguinis, H. (2019). Innovation leadership: Best-practice recommendations for promoting employee creativity, voice, and knowledge sharing, Business Horizons, 62(1), 65-74.
  • Le Pine, J.A. and Van Dyne, L. (2001). Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance: Evidence of differential relationships with big five personality characteristics and cognitive ability, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(2), 326.
  • Lee, J. (2008). Effects of leadership and leader-member exchange on innovativeness, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(6), 670-687.
  • Li, H., Sajjad, N., Wang, Q., Muhammad Ali, A., Khaqan, Z. and Amina, S. (2019). Influence of transformational leadership on employees’ innovative work behavior in sustainable organizations: Test of mediation and moderation processes, Sustainability, 11(6), 1594.
  • Liang, J., Farh, C.I. and Farh, J.-L. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination, Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 71-92.
  • Liden, R. C. and Maslyn, J. M. (1998). Multi-dimensionality of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development, Journal of Management, 24(1), 43-72.
  • Liu, W., Zhu, R. and Yang, Y. (2010). I warn you because I like you: Voice behavior, employee identifications, and transformational leadership, The Leadership Quarterly, 21(1), 189-202.
  • Mackey, J.D., Huang, L. and He, W. (2018). You abuse and I criticize: An ego depletion and leader–member exchange examination of abusive supervision and destructive voice, Journal of Business Ethics, 164, 1- 13.
  • Martins, E.C. and Terblanche, F. (2003). Building organisational culture that stimulates creativity and innovation, European Journal of Innovation Management, 6(1), 64-74.
  • Masood, M. and Afsar, B. (2017). Transformational leadership and innovative work behavior among nursing staff, Nursing Inquiry, 24(4), e12188.
  • Miao, Q., Newman, A., Schwarz, G. and Cooper, B. (2018). How leadership and public service motivation enhance innovative behavior, Public Administration Review, 78(1), 71-81.
  • Mo, S. and Shi, J. (2018). The voice link: A moderated mediation model of how ethical leadership affects individual task performance, Journal of Business Ethics, 152(1), 91-101.
  • Morrison, E.W. (2011). Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research, The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 373-412.
  • Morrison, E.W. (2014). Employee voice and silence, Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 173-197.
  • Morrison, E.W. and Milliken, F.J. (2000). Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world, Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 706-725.
  • Morrison, E.W. and Milliken, F.J. (2003). Speaking up, remaining silent: The dynamics of voice and silence in organizations, Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1353-1358.
  • Mowday, R.T., Porter, L.W. and Steers, R.M. (2013). Employee—organization Linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover, New York, NY, Academic Press.
  • Muñoz-Doyague, M.F. and Nieto, M. (2012). Individual creativity performance and the quality of interpersonal relationships, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 112(1), 125-145.
  • Ng, K.-Y., Van Dyne, L. and Ang, S. (2019). Speaking out and speaking up in multicultural settings: A twostudy examination of cultural intelligence and voice behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 151, 150-159.
  • Ng, T.W. and Feldman, D.C. (2012). Employee voice behavior: A meta-analytic test of the conservation of resources framework, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 216-234.
  • Oldham, G.R. and Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work, Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607-634.
  • Organ, D.W., Podsakoff, P.M. and MacKenzie, S.B. (2005). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications.
  • Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B. and Podsakoff, N.P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it, Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539-569.
  • Rank, J., Pace, V.L. and Frese, M. (2004) Three avenues for future research on creativity, innovation, and initiative, Applied Psychology, 53(4), 518-528.
  • Saeed, B.B., Afsar, B., Cheema, S. and Javed, F. (2019). Leader-member exchange and innovative work behavior: The role of creative process engagement, core self-evaluation, and domain knowledge, European Journal of Innovation Management, 22(1), 105-124.
  • Schermuly, C.C., Meyer, B. and Dämmer, L. (2013). Leader-member exchange and innovative behavior, Journal of Personnel Psychology, 12(3), 132-142.
  • Schuh, S.C., Zhang, X.A., Morgeson, F.P., Tian, P. and van Dick, R. (2018). Are you really doing good things in your boss’s eyes? Interactive effects of employee innovative work behavior and leader–member exchange on supervisory performance ratings, Human Resource Management, 57(1), 397-409.
  • Scott, S.G. and Bruce, R.A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace, Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.
  • Serva, M.A., Fuller, M.A. and Mayer, R.C. (2005). The reciprocal nature of trust: A longitudinal study of Interacting teams, Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 26(6), 625-648.
  • Singh, M. and Sarkar, A. (2012). The relationship between psychological empowerment and innovative behavior, Journal of Personnel Psychology, 11(3), 127-137.
  • Slåtten, T., Svensson, G. and Sværi, S. (2011). Empowering leadership and the influence of a humorous work climate on service employees’ creativity and innovative behaviour in frontline service jobs, International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 3 (3), 267-284.
  • Tangirala, S. and Ramanujam, R. (2008). Exploring nonlinearity in employee voice: The effects of personal control and organizational identification, Academy of Management Journal, 51(6), 1189-1203.
  • Tierney, P. (2008). Leadership and employee creativity, Zhou, J. and Shalley, C.E. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational creativity, New York, NY, Erlbaum, 95-123.
  • Uhl-Bien, M., Graen, G.B. and Scandura, T.A. (2000). Implications of leader-member exchange (LMX) for strategic human resource management systems: Relationships as social capital for competitive advantage, Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 18(1), 137-185.
  • Van Dyne, L. and Le Pine, J.A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: evidence of construct and predictive validity, Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108-119.
  • Van Dyne, L., Ang, S. and Botero, I. (2003). Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multi-dimensional constructs, Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 34.
  • Van Dyne, L., Kamdar, D. and Joireman, J. (2008). In-role perceptions buffer the negative impact of low LMX on helping and enhance the positive impact of high LMX on voice, Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1195-1207.
  • Volmer, J., Spurk, D. and Niessen, C. (2012). Leader–member exchange (LMX), job autonomy, and creative work involvement, The Leadership Quarterly, 23(3), 456-465.
  • Walumbwa, F.O. and Schaubroeck, J. (2009). Leader personality traits and employee voice behavior: mediating roles of ethical leadership and work group psychological safety, Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1275.
  • Wang, Y., Tang, C., Naumann, S.E. and Wang, Y. (2017). Paternalistic leadership and employee creativity: A mediated moderation model, Journal of Management and Organization, 25(1), 1-20.
  • Weiss, M. and Morrison, E.W. (2019). Speaking up and moving up: how voice can enhance employees’ social status, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(1), 5-19.
  • Whiting, S.W., Maynes, T.D., Podsakoff, N.P. and Podsakoff, P.M. (2012). Effects of message, source, and context on evaluations of employee voice behavior, Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 159-182.
  • Wijaya, N.H.S. (2019). Proactive personality, LMX, and voice behavior: Employee–supervisor sex (dis) similarity as a moderator, Management Communication Quarterly, 33 (1), 86-100.
  • Wu, T. and Wu, Y. (2019). Innovative work behaviors, employee engagement, and surface acting: A delineation of supervisor-employee emotional contagion effects, Management Decision, 57(11), 3200- 3216.
  • Yukl, G. (2002), Leadership in organizations (5th ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice-Hall.
  • Zhang, X. and Bartol, K.M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement, Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107-128.
  • Zhang, Y., Huai, M.-Y. and Xie, Y.-h. (2015). Paternalistic leadership and employee voice in China: A dual process model, The Leadership Quarterly, 26(1), 25-36.
  • Zhang, A.Y., Tsui, A.S., Song, L.J., Li, C. and Jia, L. (2008). How do I trust thee? The employee organization relationship, supervisory support, and middle manager trust in the organization, Human Resource Management, 47(1), 111-132.
  • Zhou, J. and George, J.M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice, Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682-696.
İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1309-0712
  • Yayın Aralığı: 4
  • Başlangıç: 2009
  • Yayıncı: Melih Topaloğlu