Learning from Alliance Partners: The Interplay Between CEO Duality And TMT Functional Background Diversity

Learning from Alliance Partners: The Interplay Between CEO Duality And TMT Functional Background Diversity

Purpose – Strategic alliances are essential vehicles for knowledge acquisition from alliance partnersespecially in the technology related sectors. This research examines the interplay between topmanagement team (TMT) functional background diversity and CEO duality on learning from alliancepartners.Design/methodology/approach – Data for 1012 strategic alliances from Information and Communicationssectors (computer equipment, electronics and telecommunications) in US are collected from multipledatabases: Firm data is retrieved from Compustat database, strategic alliance date is retrieved from SDCPlatinum database, patent data is retrieved from NBER database and finally the TMT information is codedfrom U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) database. We tested our hypotheses using thenegative binomial regression model since our dependent variable is discrete and non-negative (patentcitation counts). Findings – CEO duality moderates the relationship between TMT functional background and learningfrom alliance partner such that the effect of TMT functional background on learning from alliance partneris positive when CEO does not have dual roles and negative when he or she does.Discussion – This study contributes to the strategic alliance and inter-organizational learning literatureby demonstrating the roles of influential actors in the strategy process (i.e., the CEO and TMT). The studyfindings also extend the scope of upper echelons literatures by establishing the relevance of upper echelonstheory for a novel dependent variable (i.e., learning from alliance partners)

___

  • Acikgöz, A., Günsel, A., Kuzey, C., & Secgin, G. (2016). Functional diversity, absorptive capability and product success: The moderating role of project complexity in new product development teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 25(1), 90-109.
  • Almeida, P., & Phene, A. (2004). Subsidiaries and knowledge creation: The influence of the MNC and host country on innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8/9), 847-864.
  • Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(4), 634-665.
  • Blau, P. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. New York: Free Press.
  • Bunderson, J. S., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2002). Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 875-893.
  • Buyl, T., Boone, C., Hendriks, W., & Matthyssens, P. (2011). Top management team functional diversity and firm performance: the moderating role of CEO characteristics. Journal of Management Studies, 48(1), 151-177.
  • Cannella, Jr., A. A., Park, J. H., & Lee, H. U. (2008). Top management team functional background diversity and firm performance: Examining the roles of team member colocation and environmental uncertainty. The Academy of Management Journal, 51(4), 768-784.
  • Carpenter, M. A., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Sanders, W. G. (2004). Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of Management, 30(6), 749-778.
  • Certo, S. T., Lester, R. H., Dalton, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (2006). Top management teams, strategy and financial performance: A meta-analytic examination. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 813-839.
  • Chahine, S., & Tohmé, N. S. (2009). Is CEO duality always negative? An exploration of CEO duality and ownership structure in the Arab IPO context. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(2), 123- 141.
  • Chikh, S., & Filbien, J. (2011). Acquisitions and CEO power: Evidence from French networks. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(5), 1221-1236.
  • Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 169-187.
  • Dawson, J. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(1), 1-19.
  • De Wit, D. C., Herbert, S. A. (1958). Selective perceptions: A note on the departmental identifications of executives. Sociometry, 21(2), 140-144.
  • Díaz-Fernández, M. C., González-Rodríguez, M. R., & Simonetti, B. (2015). Top management teams’ demographic characteristics and their influence on strategic change. Quality & Quantity, 49(3), 1305- 1322.
  • Doz, Y. L. (1996). The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliances: Initial conditions or learning processes? Strategic Management Journal, 17(S1), 55-83.
  • Doz, Y. L., Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1989). Collaborate with your competitors and win. Harvard Business Review, 67(1), 133-139.
  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1996). Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science, 7(2), 136-150.
  • Elsayed, K. K. (2007). Does CEO duality really affect corporate performance? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(6), 1203-1214.
  • Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1990). Top-Management-Team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(3), 484-503.
  • Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and Networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 293-317.
  • Gulati, R., & Sytch, M. (2007). Dependence asymmetry and joint dependence in interorganizational relationships: Effects of embeddedness on a manufacturer’s performance in procurement relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 32-69.
  • Gwet, J. P., & Rivest, L. P. (1992). Outlier resistant alternatives to the ratio estimator. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87(420), 1174-1182.
  • Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. The Academy of Management Review, 32 (2), 334-343.
  • Hambrick, D. C., Cho, T. S., & Chen, M. J. (1996). The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms’ competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4), 659-684.
  • Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. The Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193-206.
  • Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1199-1228.
  • Hausman, J., Hall, B. H., & Griliches, Z. (1984). Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents’ R&D relationship. Econometrics, 52(4), 909-938.
  • Hitt, M. A., Dacin, T. M., Levitas, E., Arregle, J. L., & Borza, A. (2000). Partner selection in emerging and developed market contexts: Resource-based and organizational learning perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 449-467.
  • Holmberg, S. R., & Cummings, J. L. (2009). Building successful strategic alliances. Long Range Planning, 42(2), 164-193.
  • Janowicz-Panjaitan, M., & Noorderhaven, N. G. (2008). Formal and informal interorganizational learning within strategic alliances. Research Policy, 37(8), 1337-1355.
  • Kale, P., Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (2002). Alliance capability, stock market response, and long‐term alliance success: the role of the alliance function. Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 747-767.
  • Khanna, T., Gulati, R., Nohria, N. (1998). The dynamics of learning alliances: competition, cooperation, and relative scope. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 193-210.
  • Larsson, R., Bengtsson, L., Henriksson, K., & Sparks, J. (1998) The interorganizational learning dilemma: Collective knowledge development in strategic alliances. Organization Science, 9(3), 285-305.
  • Lee, H. U., & Park, J. H. (2006). Top team diversity, internationalization and the mediating effect of international alliances. British Journal of Management, 17(3), 195-213.
  • Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E., & Silverman, B. S. (1996). Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 77-91.
  • Ndofor, H. A., Sirmon, D. G., & He, X. (2015). Utilizing the firm’s resources: how TMT heterogeneity and resulting faultlines affect TMT tasks. Strategic Management Journal, 36(11), 1656-1674.
  • Pearce, J. A. & Zahra, P. II (1991). The relative power of CEOs and boards of directors: associations with corporate performance. Strategic Management Journal, 12(2), 135-153.
  • Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 1-28.
  • Ramaswamy, V., Anderson, E. W., & DeSarbo, W. S. (1994). A disaggregate negative binomial regression procedure for count data analysis. Management Science, 40(3), 405-417.
  • Rechner, P. L, & Dalton, D. R. (1991). CEO duality and organizational performance: A longitudinal analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 12(2), 155-160.
  • Rothaermel, F. T., & Deeds, D. L. (2006). Alliance type, alliance experience and alliance management capability in high-technology ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(4), 429-460.
  • Simons, T., Pelled, L. H., & Smith, K. A. (1999). Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of management journal, 42(6), 662-673.
  • Schildt, H., Keil, T., & Maula, M. (2012). The temporal effects of relative and firm-level absorptive capacity on interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 33(10), 1154-1173.
  • Sherlock, J. J., & Nathan, M. L. (2008). How power dynamics impact the content and process of nonprofit CEO learning. Management Learning, 39(3), 245-269.
  • Stuart, T. E. (2010). Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 21(8), 791-811.
  • Van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 1008.
  • Zeileis, A., Kleiber, C., & Jackman, S. (2008). Regression models for count data in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 27(8), 1-25.
  • Zollo, M., Reuer, J. J., & Singh, H. (2002). Interorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances. Organization Science, 13(6), 701-713.
  • Zona, F. (2014). Board leadership structure and diversity over CEO time in office: A test of the evolutionary perspective on Italian firms. European Management Journal, 32(4), 672-681.
  • Zoogah, D. B., Vora, D., Richard, O., & Peng, M. W. (2011). Strategic alliance team diversity, coordination, and effectiveness. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(3), 510-529.