The Effect of Board Structures on Financial Performance in Family Businesses: The Case of Borsa Istanbul in Turkey

Purpose – The aim of this study is to analyze the relationship between the structures of the board of directors and financial performances of family businesses listed on the Borsa Istanbul. Design/methodology/approach – In this study, in parallel with the report of the European Commission, if the entrepreneur who established or acquired the firm (share capital) or their families or descendants possess 25 percent of the decision-making rights mandated by their share capital, the business has been accepted as a family business. As the determinants of the board structure of the businesses; the board size, the non-executive member rate in the board, the independent member rate in the board and the women member rate in the board were used. Benefiting from the previous research, financial performances of businesses are measured by return on assets (ROA), return on equity (ROE), return on sales (ROS) and leverage (LEV). A total of 160 family businesses (except financial institutions) in Borsa Istanbul which can be reached board structure of businesses are included in the scope of the research. Data on the board structures and financial performances of businesses belong to January 1-December 31, 2018. The relationship between the board structures and financial performances of family businesses has been tested by regression analysis. Findings – As a result of the analysis, it has been found that there is no significant relationship between the board structures of family businesses and ROA, ROE, ROS. On the other hand, the model between the board structures of family businesses and LEV (F = 3.304, sig. = 0.012) has been found significant. Accordingly, while a negative relationship has been found between the independent member rate in the board and LEV, there is no significant relationship between the board size, non-executive member rate, women member rate and leverage. Discussion – According to the findings, it can be stated that the board size, rate of non-executive members, rate of independent members and rate of female members in family businesses do not affect financial performance in terms of ROA, ROE, ROS. However, it can be said that the leverage decreases as the rate of independent members in the board of directors in family businesses increase.

___

Akbank, Deloitte, Sabancı Üniversitesi Yönetici Geliştirme Birimi and TAIDER (2016). Aile şirketlerinde sürdürülebilir başarının anahtarları, https://www2.deloitte.com/tr/tr/pages/risk/articles/the-keys-to-sustainable-success-in-the-family-business.html (Date of access: 2 October 2019).

Aktan, C. C. (2013). Kurumsal şirket yönetimi, Organizasyon ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(1), 150-191.

Al-Ghamdi, M. and Rhodes, M. (2015). Family ownership, corporate governance and performance: Evidence from Saudi Arabia, International Journal of Economics and Finance, 7(2), 78-89.

Ankara Chamber of Industry (2005). Aile şirketleri: Değişim ve süreklilik, https://www.aso.org.tr/kurumsal/media/kaynak/TUR/yayinlarimiz/ailesirketleri.pdf (Date of access: 11 November 2019).

Arosa, B., Iturralde, T. and Maseda, A. (2010). Outsiders on the board of directors and firm performance: Evidence from Spanish non-listed family firms, Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1(4), 236-245.

Athanassiou, N., Crittenden, W. F., Kelly, L. M. and Marquez, P. (2002). Founder centrality effects on the Mexican family firm’s top management group: firm culture, strategic vision and goals, and firm performance, Journal of World Business, 37, 139-150.

Atılgan, Ö. (2017). Yönetim kurulu büyüklüğü, bağımsız üye oranı ve kadın üye oranı ile finansal performans ilişkisi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 32(2), 315-354.

Atılgan, Ö. and Aynacı, T. (2016). BIST’te aile işletmelerinin yönetim kurullarında kadın üyeler, Dündar, D. (Ed.), 7. Aile İşletmeleri Kongresi, İstanbul, 14-15 Nisan 2016, İstanbul Kültür Üniversitesi Aile İşletmeleri ve Girişimcilik Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi, 297-305.

Avrupa İmar ve Kalkınma Bankası and Nestor Advisors (2018). Türkiye’deki halka açık şirketlerin kurumsal yönetim yapıları ve uygulamaları hakkında araştırma raporu, Sermaye Piyasası Kurulu’na Kurumsal Yönetim İlkelerinin Uygulanması Konusunda Destek Projesi.

Aygün, M., İç, S. and Sayın, C. (2011). Yönetim kurulu büyüklüğünü belirleyen faktörler ve yönetim kurulu büyüklüğü ile firma performansı arasındaki ilişki: Türk sermaye piyasası üzerine bir inceleme, Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10(1), 77-92.

Barry, B. (1975). The development of organization structure in the family firm, Journal of General Management, 3(1), 42-60.

Carter, D. A., D’Souza, F., Simkins, B. J. and Simpson W. G. (2010). The gender and ethnic diversity of US boards and board committees and firm financial performance, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(5), 396–414.

Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Ellstrand, A. E. and Johnson, J. L. (1998). Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance, Strategic Management Journal, 19, 269- 290.

Donckels, R. and Frohlich, E. (1991). Are family businesses really different? European experiences from STRATOS, Family Business Review, 4, 149-160.

Donnelley, R. G. (1964). The family business, Harvard Business Review, 42(3), 93-105.

Erhardt, N. L., Werbel, J. D. and Shrader, C. B. (2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance, Corporate Governance, 11(2), 102-111.

Erkan, M. (2012). Türk Ticaret Kanunu’nda Aile İşletmelerinde Kurumsallaşma ve İç Denetim, Bursa, Ekin Basın Yayın Dağıtım.

European Commission (2009). Final report of the expert group – Overview of family-business-relevant issues: Research, networks, policy measures and existing studies.

Family Firm Institute (2017). Global Data Points, https://archive.org/details/perma_cc_CF89-K2JB (Date of access: 15 January 2020).

Georgen, M. and Renneboog, L. (2006). Corporate Governance and Shareholder Value, Lowe, D. and Leiringer, R. (Eds.), Commercial Management of Projects: Defining the Discipline, Blackwell Publishing, 100-131.

Gordini, N. and Rancati, E. (2017). Gender diversity in the Italian boardroom and firm financial performance, Management Research Review, 40(1), 75-94.

Heidrick & Struggles (2014). Towards Dynamic Governance 2014, European Corporate Governance Report.

Ibrahim, H. and Samad, F. A. (2011). Corporate governance mechanisms and performance of public-listed family-ownership in Malaysia, International Journal of Economics and Finance, 3(1), 105-115.

Kao, M.-F., Hodgkinson, L. and Jaafar, A. (2019). Ownership structure, board of directors and firm performance: evidence from Taiwan, Corporate Governance, 19(1), 189-216.

Karpuzoğlu, E. (2002). Büyüyen ve Gelişen Aile Şirketlerinde Kurumsallaşma, İstanbul, Hayat Yayınları.

Kılıç, M. (2014). Yönetim kurulu yapısının işletme performansına etkisi: Türkiye’de bir uygulama, Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, 3, 33-56.

Kızıltoprak, S. and Aksoy, M. (2018). Borsa İstanbul’da işlem gören aile işletmelerinin finansal performanslarının analizi, Ege Academic Review, 18(1), 135-152.

Lansberg, I. and Astrachan, J. H. (1994). Influence of family relationships on succession planning and training: The importance of mediating factors, Family Business Review, 7(1), 39-59.

Lee-Kuen, I. Y., Sok-Gee, C. and Zainudin, R. (2017). Gender diversity and firms’ financial performance in Malaysia, Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 13(1), 41-62.

Ling, W., Jhou, L., Chan, Y., Wang, W., Lin, Y. and Wei, C. (2016). Do corporate governance and social performance differ between family-owned and non-family-owned businesses in Taiwan-Listed CSR companies?, Asian Economic and Financial Review, 6(1), 15-26.

Marimuthu, M. (2008). Ethnic diversity on boards of directors and its implications on firm financial performance, The Journal of International Social Research, 1(4), 431-445.

OECD (2004). OECD Principles of Corporate Governance, https://www.oecd.org/daf/ca/oecd-principles-corporate-governance-2004.htm (Date of access: 5 December 2019).

OECD (2019). OECD Corporate Governance Factbook 2019, http://www.oecd.org/corporate/corporate/governance-factbook.htm (Date of access: 13 February 2020).

Poroy Arsoy, A. and Bora, T. (2015). Relationship Between Corporate Governance and Internal Control, Kurt, G. and Uçma Uysal, T. (Eds.), Holistic Approach to Risk-Based Internal Financial Control for SMEs, Gazi Kitabevi, Ankara, 31-54.

Poutziouris, P., Savva, C. S. and Hadjielias, E. (2015). Family involvement and firm performance: Evidence from UK listed firms, Journal of Family Business Strategy, 6(1), 14-32.

Prencipe, A. and Bar-Yosef, S. (2011). Corporate governance and earnings management in family-controlled companies, Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 26(2), 199-227.

Saidat, Z., Silva, M. and Seaman, C. (2019). The relationship between corporate governance and financial performance: Evidence from Jordanian family and nonfamily firms, Journal of Family Business Management, 9 (1), 54-78.

Schank, M. J. (2019). Board diversity – determinant of firm’s financial performance, Revista Tinerilor Economişti, 33, 17-31.

Spencer Stuart (2019). 2019 Turkey Spencer Stuart Board Index, Sixth edition, https://www.spencerstuart.com/research-and-insight/turkey-board-index (Date of access: 3 March 2020).

SPK (2003). Kurumsal Yönetim İlkeleri.

SPK (2014). Kurumsal Yönetim Tebliğ (II-17.1), 28871 sayılı Resmi Gazete.

SPK (2019). Kurumsal Yönetim Raporlama Rehberi, https://www.spk.gov.tr/Sayfa/Dosya/1297 (Date of access: 18 February 2020).

Şengür, D. E. and Özbek Püskül, A. S. (2011). İMKB kurumsal yönetim endeksindeki şirketlerin yönetim kurulu yapısı ve işletme performansının değerlendirilmesi, Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 31, 33-50.

TKYD (2009). Kurumsal Yönetim İlkeleri Işığında Aile Şirketleri Yönetim Rehberi, İstanbul, Türkiye Kurumsal Yönetim Derneği Yayınları.

TKYD (2016). BIST Yönetim Kurulları Araştırması 2016, İstanbul, Türkiye Kurumsal Yönetim Derneği Yayınları.

Wellalage, N. H. and Locke, S. (2013). Women on board, firm financial performance and agency costs, Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 2, 113-127.

World Bank (2005), Developing Corporate Governance Codes of Best Practice, Volume I.
İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1309-0712
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2009
  • Yayıncı: Melih Topaloğlu
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Geleneksel Performans Değerlendirme Ölçütlerinin Ekonomik Katma Değere Etkisi: Bilişim Endeksi Uygulaması (XBLSM)

İlker CALAYOĞLU

Ürün Yerleştirmenin Satın Alma Niyeti Üzerindeki Etkisi: Kahramanmaraş İlinde Bir Saha Çalışması

Elif KARA, Tevfik Şükrü YAPRAKLI

Paternalistik Liderliğin Hizmet İnovasyon Davranışı Üzerine Etkisinin ve İş Tatmininin Aracılık Rolünün Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi ile Test Edilmesi

Ahmet YILDIZ, Erhan EKİNGEN

The Impact of Social Media Marketing on Customer Inspiration and Customer Purchase Intention: A Case Study on Kabul-Afghanistan Telecom Industry

Hamayoun GHAFOURZAY, Nurettin PARILTI

Analysis of the Impact of Covid-19 on Different Sectors in Turkey During Early Periods of the Pandemic

Zeyneb Hafsa ORHAN, Nurullah TIRMAN

Seyahat Acentası Çalışanlarının Cam Tavan Sendromu Algılamaları: Ege Bölgesi Seyahat Acentalarında Bir Uygulama

Gürkan AKDAĞ, Umut Haydar ÜÇYILDIZ

Türkiye Organizasyonel Girişimcilik Ölçeği Geliştirilmesi: İmalat ve Toptan/Perakende Ticaret Sektöründe Uygulama

Hasan Çebi BAL, M. Mithat ÜNER, Mehmet Arslan TEKİNSOY, Aziz BATTAL, Ece DOĞUÇ, Pınar UÇAKKUŞ, Cüneyt GENÇ

Örgütlerde Teknostresin Ölçümüne Yönelik Bir Alan Araştırması

Arif Selim EREN, Hüseyin ÇİÇEKLİOĞLU

Comparison of Personality Traits and Demographic Factors of the Entrepreneurs: The Case of Erzincan Province

Fatma YILMAZ, Cenk AKSOY

Kadın Astların Perspektifinden Kadın Yöneticiler: Hiyerarşik İlişkiler Bağlamında Nitel Bir Araştırma

Ebru TOLAY