İnovasyon ile Küresel Rekabetçilik Düzeyi Arasındaki İlişkide Ekonomik Serbestliğin Düzenleyici Rolü

Amaç – Bu araştırmanın amacı, ülke ekonomilerinin inovasyon kabiliyeti ile küresel rekabetçilik düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkide ekonomik serbestliğin düzenleyici rolünü saptamaktır. Yöntem – Araştırma modelini test etmek amacıyla 2019 yılına ait üç farklı küresel rapordan (Küresel İnovasyon Endeksi, Ekonomik Serbestlik Endeksi ve Küresel Rekabetçilik Endeksi) elde edilen veriler analiz edilmiştir. Araştırmaya her üç raporda da verisi bulunan ülkeler dahil edildiği için, 125 ülke araştırmanın kapsamını oluşturmaktadır. Araştırma hipotezini test etmek amacıyla gerçekleştirilen düzenleyici etki analizlerinde Hayes (2018) tarafından geliştirilen Process Macro programı ve korelasyon analizlerinde SPSS 25 istatistik programı kullanılmıştır. Bulgular – Regresyon analiz sonuçları, ülkelerin ekonomik serbestlik düzeylerinin, inovasyon ve küresel rekabetçilik düzeyi arasındaki ilişkide düzenleyicilik rolü olduğunu göstermiştir. Özellikle inovasyon kabiliyetinin orta düzeyi geçtiği durumlarda eknomik serbestliğin düşük olması rekabetçlik üzerinde olumlu etkiye neden olmaktadır. Tartışma – Ülkelerin küresel rekabet gücünü arttırmak için uyguladıkları inovasyon politikalarında, ekonomik düzenlemelerin ihmal edilmemesi gereken kritik bir unsur olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Küresel işletmelerin ise doğrudan dış yatırım kararlarında aday ülkenin inovasyon gücü yanında ekonomik düzenlemelerini de göz önünde bulundurmaları önerilmektedir.

The Moderator Role of Economic Freedom in the Relationship Between Innovation and Global Competitiveness

Purpose – This study aims to determine the moderator role of economic freedom in the relationship between the economies' ability of the country's economies and global competitiveness levels. Design/methodology/approach – The data obtained from three global reports (Global Innovation Index, Economic Freedom Index, and Global Competitiveness Index) of 2019 were analyzed to test the research model. The scope of the research consists of 125 countries that have data in all three global reports. The research hypothesis test was carried out with Hayes's (2018) Process Macro program for the moderator effect analysis and the SPSS 25 statistical program for correlation analysis. Findings – Regression analysis results showed that countries' economic freedom levels have a moderator role in the relationship between innovation and global competitiveness. Notably, when the country's innovation capability exceeds the medium level, low economic freedom positively affects global competitiveness. Discussion – The results reveal that economic regulations are a critical factor that should not be neglected in countries' innovation policies to increase their global competitiveness. Accordingly, it is recommended that global enterprises consider the candidate country's innovation power and economic regulations in foreign direct investment decisions.

___

  • Andersson, M., Moen, O., & Brett, P. O. (2020). The organizational climate for psychological safety: Associations with SMEs' innovation capabilities and innovation performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 55: 1-13.
  • Battisti, E., Miglietta, N., Nirino, N., & Diaz, M. V. (2019). Value creation, innovation practice, and competitive advantage. European Journal of Innovation Management, 22, 1-18.
  • Ciocanel, A. B., & Pavelescu, F. M. (2015). Innovation and competitiveness in European context. Procedia Economics and Finance, 32(15), 728-737.
  • Cirera, X., & Muzi, S. (2020). Measuring innovation using firm-level surveys: Evidence from developing countries. Research Policy, 49(3): 1-19.
  • Coccia, M. (2017). Sources of technological innovation: Radical and incremental innovation problem-driven to support competitive advantage of firms. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 29(9), 1048-1061.
  • Falciola, J., Jansen, M., & Rollo, V. (2020). Defining firm competitiveness: A multidimensional framework. World Development, 129, 104857: 1-14.
  • Feldman, P. R., Jacomossi, R. R., Barrichello, A., & Morano, R. S. (2019). The relationship between Innovation and Global Competitiveness: The mediating role of Management Practices evaluated by Structural Equation Modeling. Review of Business Management, 21(2), 195-212.
  • Fonseca, L. M., & Lima, V. M. (2015). Countries three wise men: Sustainability, Innovation, and Competitiveness. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 8(4), 1288-1302.
  • Gao, A., Lin, Y., & Zhou, Y. (2020). Does an Innovative Climate Help to Sustain Competitiveness? The Moderating Effect of Government Support and Market Competition. Sustainability, 12(5), 2029.
  • García-Sánchez, A., Siles, D., & Vázquez-Méndez, M. D. M. (2019). Competitiveness and innovation: effects on prosperity. Anatolia, 30(2), 200-213.
  • GCR. (2019). The Global Competitiveness Report. http://www3.weforum.org /docs/WEF_ TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2019.pdf Erişim Tarihi: 05.02.2020
  • GII. (2019). The Global Innovation Index. https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/home Erişim Tarihi: 22.01.2020
  • Guillotin, B., & Mangematin, V. (2015). Internationalization strategies of business schools: how flat is the world?. Thunderbird International Business Review, 57(5), 343-357.
  • Gürbüz, S. (2019). Sosyal bilimlerde aracı, düzenleyici ve durumsal etki analizleri. Ankara: Seçkin Akademik ve Mesleki Yayınlar.
  • Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. 2nd Edition, Guilford publications.
  • IEF. (2019). Index of Economic Freedom. https://www.heritage.org/index/ Erişim Tarihi: 05.02.2020.
  • Ivanová, E., & Čepel, M. (2018). The impact of innovation performance on the competitiveness of the Visegrad 4 countries. Journal of Competitiveness, 10(1), 54.
  • Khessina, O. M., Goncalo, J. A., & Krause, V. (2018). It’s time to sober up: The direct costs, side effects and long-term consequences of creativity and innovation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 38, 107-135.
  • McGrath, R. G., Tsai, M. H., Venkataraman, S., & MacMillan, I. C. (1996). Innovation, competitive advantage and rent: a model and test. Management Science, 42(3), 389-403.
  • Menna, A., & Walsh, P. R. (2019). Assessing environments of commercialization of innovation for SMEs in the global wine industry: A market dynamics approach. Wine Economics and Policy, 8(2), 191-202.
  • Murtinu, S., & Scalera, V. G. (2016). Sovereign wealth funds' internationalization strategies: the use of investment vehicles. Journal of International Management, 22(3), 249-264.
  • O'Brien, K. (2020). Innovation types and the search for new ideas at the fuzzy front end: Where to look and how often?. Journal of Business Research, 107, 13-24.
  • Petrakis, P. E., Kostis, P. C., & Valsamis, D. G. (2015). Innovation and competitiveness: Culture as a long-term strategic instrument during the European Great Recession. Journal of Business Research, 68(7), 1436- 1438.
  • Pikkemaat, B., Peters, M., & Bichler, B. F. (2019). Innovation research in tourism: Research streams and actions for the future. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 41: 184-496.
  • Räisänen, J., & Tuovinen, T. (2020). Digital innovations in rural micro-enterprises. Journal of Rural Studies, 73, 56-67.
  • Rodionova, I. (2013). Competitiveness of countries in the world innovation economy: Central-Eastern Europe and Russia. Quaestiones Geographicae, 32(2), 15-24.
  • Schmid, S. (2018). Strategies of internationalization: An overview. (in) Internationalization of Business: Cases on Strategy Formulation and Implementation. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Sim, A. B., & Pandian, J. R. (2007). An exploratory study of internationalization strategies of Malaysian and Taiwanese firms. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 2(3), 252-273.
  • Toker, K., Cakirel, Y., & Cinar, D. (2013). An investigation on a production company via the scope of Mintzberg’s adhocratic organization structure. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 2(1): 22-30.
  • Tsai, H. T., & Eisingerich, A. B. (2010). Internationalization strategies of emerging markets firms. California Management Review, 53(1), 114-135.
  • Trunfio, M., & Campana, S. (2019). Drivers and emerging innovations in knowledge-based destinations: Towards a research agenda. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 14, 1-11.
  • Urbancova, H. (2013). Competitive advantage achievement through innovation and knowledge. Journal of Competitiveness, 5(1), 82-96.
  • Ustaömer, T. C., & Şengür, F. (2018). Türk Havaalanı Sektörünün Uluslararası Rekabetçilik Analizi, Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 10(26), 811-831.
  • Veselica, R. (2019). Linking Innovation and National Competitiveness. Economic and Social Development: Book of Proceedings, 279-287.
  • Zhao, X., & Sun, B. (2016). The influence of Chinese environmental regulation on corporation innovation and competitiveness. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 1528-1536.
İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1309-0712
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2009
  • Yayıncı: Melih Topaloğlu