Takipteki Kredi Oranını Etkileyen Faktörlerin Belirlenmesi: Mevduat Bankaları Üzerinde Bir Dinamik Panel Veri Uygulaması

Bu çalışmada 2001 yerel finansal krizi sonrasında bankaların takipteki kredi oranları üzerinde etkili olan faktörlerin belirlenmesi hedeflenmiştir. Bu amaçla çalışma kapsamında 2002-2014 yılları arasında Türkiye'de faaliyet gösteren kamusal sermayeli mevduat bankaları, özel sermayeli yerli mevduat bankaları ve Türkiye'de kurulmuş yabancı sermayeli mevduat bankaları incelenmiştir. GMM yöntemlerinden (Generalized Method of Moments- Genelleştirilmiş Momentler Metodu) Sistem GMM ve Fark GMM kullanılarak yapılan analiz sonucunda bir önceki dönemdeki takipteki kredi oranı, net faiz marjı, sermaye yeterliliği ve ödeme gücü oranının takipteki krediler üzerinde negatif etkileri olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Kredilere uygulanan faiz, kredi/ mevduat oranı, etkinsizlik ve faaliyet etkinliği değişkenleri ile ise takipteki krediler arasında pozitif ilişki bulunmuştur. Ahlaki tehlike hipotezi ve kötü yönetim hipotezi ile uyumlu sonuçlar bulunurken, çeşitlendirme hipotezi ile zıt sonuçlar bulunmuştur.

Assessing the Factors that Impact Non-Performing Loan Ratio: An Application On Deposit Banks By Using Dynamic Panel Data

This study aims to determine the factors that are effective on non-performing loans ratio after the 2001 local financial crisis. State-owned banks, privately-owned banks and foreign banks that operate in Turkey between the years 2002 and 2014 are examined. According to System-GMM and Difference GMM results, lagged value of non-performing loans, net interest margin, capital adequacy and solvency ratio have negative effects on non-performing loans ratio. On the other hand, interest applied to loans, loans/ deposits ratio, inefficiency and operating efficiency have positive effects on non performing loans. Although the results are consistent with moral hazard and bad managemet hypothesis, they are inconsistent with diversification hypothesis.

___

  • Alper, D., Anbar, A., (2011). "Bank Specific and Macroeconomic Determinants of Commercial Bank Profitability: Empirical Evidence from Turkey", Business and Economics Research Journal, Vol.2, No.2, 139-152.
  • Arellano, M., Bond, S., (1991). "Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data. Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations", Review Economic Studies, Vol.58, 277-297.
  • Arellano, M., Bover, O., (1995). "Another Look at the Instrumental Variable Estimation of Error Correction Models", Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 68, 29-51.
  • Arslan, Ö., Karan, M. B., (2009). "Credit Risks and Internationalization of SMEs", Journal of Business Economics and Management, Vol.10, No.4, 361-368.
  • Badar, M., Javid, A. Y., (2013). "Impact of Macroeconomic Forces on Nonperforming Loans: An Empirical Study of Commercial Banks in Pakistan", Transactions on Business and Economics, Vol.10, 40-48.
  • Bebczuk, R., Sangiácomo, M., (2008), "The Determinants Of Non-Performing Loan Portfolio in The Argentine Banking System", Ensayos Económicos, Vol.51, 83- 121.
  • Berger, A. N., DeYoung, R., (1997). "Problem Loans and Cost Efficiency in Commercial Banks", Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol.21, 849-870.
  • Blundell, R., Bond, S., (1998). "Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models", Journal of Econometrics, Vol.87, 115-143.
  • Boudriga, A., Taktak, N. B., Jellouli, S., (2010). "Bank Specific, Business and Institutional Environment Determinants of Banks Nonperforming Loans: Evidence from MENA Countries", Economic Research Forum Working Paper Series, No.547.
  • Clair, R. T., (1992). "Loan Growth and Loan Quality: Some Preliminary Evidence from Texas Banks", Economic Review, 3rd Quarter, 9-22.
  • Çifter, A., Yılmazer, S., Çifter, E., (2009). "Analysis of Sectoral Credit Default Cycle Dependency with Wavelet Networks: Evidence from Turkey", Economic Modelling, Vol.26, 1382-1388.
  • Espinoza, R., Prasad, A., (2010). "Nonperforming Loans in the GCC Banking System and their Macroeconomic Effects", International Monetary Fund Working Paper, No.10/224.
  • Ghosh, A., (2015). "Banking-Industry Specific and Regional Economic Determinants of Non-performing Loans: Evidence from US States", Journal of Financial Stability, Vol.20, 93-104.
  • Hu, J. L., Li. Y., Chiu, Y. H., (2004). "Ownership and Nonperforming Loans: Evidence from Taiwan's Banks", The Developing Economies, Vol.42, No.3, 405-420.
  • İslamoğlu, M., (2015). "The Effect of Macroeconomic Variables on Non-performing Loan Ratio of Publicly Traded Banks in Turkey", Transactions on Business and Economics, Vol.12, 10-20.
  • Jakubik, P., Reininger, T., (2013). "Determinants of Nonperforming Loans in Central, Eastern and Southeastern Europe", Focus on European Economic Integration, Vol.3, 48-66.
  • Keeton, W. and Morris, C., (1987). "Why Do Banks' Loan Losses Differ?" Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Economic Review, May, 3-21.
  • Keeton, W. R., (1999). "Does Faster Loan Growth Lead to Higher Loan Losses?" Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic Review, Second Quarter.
  • Klein, N., (2013). "Non-performing Loans in CESEE: Determinants and Impact on Macroeconomic Performance", International Monetary Fund Working Paper, No.13/72.
  • Korkmaz, A., (2011). "Finansal Krizler ve Aktarım Kanalları: Literatür İncelemesi", Türkiye Bankalar Birliği Bankacılar Dergisi, Sayı.77, 52-69.
  • Louizis, D. P., Vouldis, A. T., Metaxas, V. L., (2012). "Macroeconomic and Bankspecific Determinants on Non-performing Loans in Greece: A Comparative Study of Mortgage, Business and Consumer Loan Portfolios", Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol.36, 1012-1027.
  • Macit, F., (2012). "What Determines the Non-Performing Loans Ratio: Evidence From Turkish Commercial Banks", CEA Journal of Economics, Vol.7, 33-39.
  • Macit, F., Keçeli, B. (2012). "Takipteki Kredi Oranını Etkileyen Faktörler: Türkiye'de Katılım Bankaları Örneği", Avrasya İncelemeleri Dergisi, Cilt.1, Sayı.1, 193-207.
  • Makri, V., Tsagkanos, A., Bellas, A., (2014). "Determinants of Non-performing Loans: The Case of Eurozone", Panoeconomicus, Vol.2, 193-206.
  • Messai, A., Jouini, F., (2013). "Micro and Macro Determinants of Non-performing Loans", International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Vol.3, No.4, 852-860.
  • Saba, I., Kouser, R., Azeem, M., (2012). "Determinants Of Non Performing Loans: Case Of US Banking Sector", The Romanian Economic Journal, No.44, 141-152.
  • Salas, V., Saurina, J., (2002). "Credit Risk in Two Institutional Regimes: Spanish Commercial and Savings Banks", Journal of Financial Services Research, Vol.22, No.3, 203-224.
  • Shehzad, C. T., Haan, J., Scholtens, B., (2010). "The Impact of Bank Ownership Concentration on Impaired Loans and Capital Adequacy", Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol.34, 399-408.
  • Skarica, B., (2014). "Determinants of Non-performing Loans in Central and Eastern European Countries, Financial Theory Practice, Vol.38, No.1, 37-59.
  • Şahbaz, N., İnkaya A., (2014). "Türk Bankacılık Sektöründe Sorunlu Krediler ve Makro Ekonomik Etkileri", Optimum Ekonomi ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt.1 Sayı.1, 69-82.
  • Vatansever, M., Hepşen, A., (2013). "Determining Impacts on Non-Performing Loan Ratio in Turkey", Journal of Finance and Investment Analysis, Vol.2, No.4, 119- 129.
  • Vogiazas, S. D., Nikolaidou, E., (2011). "Investigating the Determinants of Nonperforming Loans in the Romanian Banking System: An Empirical Study with Reference to the Greek Crisis", Economics Research International, Vol.2011, 1-13.
  • Yağcılar, G. G., Demir, S., (2015). "Türk Bankacılık Sektöründe Takipteki Kredi Oranları Üzerinde Etkili Olan Faktörlerin Belirlenmesi", Uluslararası Alanya İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt.7, Sayı.1, 221-229.
  • Yücememiş, B. T., Sözer, İ. A., (2011). "Bankalarda Takipteki Krediler: Türk Bankacılık Sektöründe Takipteki Kredilerin Tahminine Yönelik Bir Model Uygulaması", Finansal Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi, Cilt.3, Sayı.5, 43-56.