Düşünce Tarzlarına Dayalı Kalite Fonksiyon Göçerimi Aracılığıyla Hizmet İşletmelerine Yönelik Bir İş Değerleme Uygulaması

Ödeme ve teşvik sistemlerinin etkili ve adaletli bir şekilde belirlenmesi, çalışanların iş tatmini, bağlılıkları ve performansları gibi birçok iş çıktıları üzerinde etkili olmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, eşit işe eşit ücret felsefesini gerçekleştirmeyi amaçlayan iş değerleme tekniklerinin hizmet endüstrisinde etkili bir şekilde uygulanabilirliğinin araştırılması ve bu bağlamda bir iş değerleme tekniğinin önerilmesidir. Bu amaçla beş yıldızı bir otel işletmesi örneğinde çalışma yapılmış ve önerilen tekniğin hizmet işletmelerinde sağlayabileceği avantajlar tartışılmıştır. Kalite fonksiyon göçerimi ve düşünce tarzlarının birarada kullanılması ile 10 farklı işin değerlemesinin yapıldığı çalışma sonucunda, kanun koyucu, idareci ve hiyerarşik düşünce tarzlarını gerektiren işlerin daha değerli olduğu tespit edilmiş ve bu değerleri ifade eden ve Kalite Evi'nden elde edilen ağırlıkların ödeme ve teşvik sistemlerinde esas alınabilecek katsayılar olarak değerlendirilebileceği ifade edilmiştir.

An Application of Job Evaluation for Service Businesses Through Thinking Styles-Based Quality Function Deployment

effective on the job outcomes such as employee satisfaction, loyalty and performance. The main purpose of this study is to search for the applicability of job evaluation techniques, which has the philosophy of equal pay for equal work, in service industry influentially, then to propose a job evaluation technique for service organizations. With this purpose, a five star hotel case is used to illustrate to discuss the advantages of the propoed approach. At the end of evaluation of ten different jobs through the combination of quality function deployment and thinking styles of employees, jobs that require legislative, executive and hierarchic thinking styles were determined as the most valuable jobs relaive to the compared ones. The relative weights in the house of quality were mentioned to be used as ratio when determining the payments and intentives.

___

  • Akbaba, A (2005). "Müşteri odaklı hizmet üretiminde kalite fonksiyon göçerimi (KFG) yaklaşımı: Konaklama işletmeleri için bir uygulama çalışması", Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 16(1), 59-81.
  • Armstrong, M. (2006). Human Resources Management Practice, 10. Baskı, Kogan Page Limited, London.
  • Armstrong, M., Cummings, A., Hastings, S. ve Wood, W. (2003). Job Evaluation A Guide to Achieving Equal Pay, Kogan Page Limited, London.
  • Abraham, R. (1997). "Thinking styles as moderators of role stressor job satisfaction relationships", Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 18(5), 236- 243.
  • Aydın, A. (1983). İş Değerlendirme Tekniği ve Uygulamaları. MPM Yayınları, Ankara.
  • Beck, J. W., Beatty, A. S. ve Scakett, P. R. (2014). "On the distribution of job performance: The role of measurement characteristics in observed departures from normality", Personnel Psychology, 67(3), 531-566.
  • Cano-Garcia, F. ve Hughes, E. H. (2000). "Learning and Thinking Styles: an analysis of their interrelationship and influence on academic achievement", Educational Psychology, 20(4), 413-430.
  • Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (2004), Chartered Professional Standards,www.cipd.co.uk/mandq/standards/pr ofessionalstandardsfullversion.htm ?IsSrchRes¼1. Erişim: 11 Kasım 2015). Cools, E (2010). "Taking a style perspective to understand organizational behavior: a four-decade review", Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School, 11, 1-40.
  • Dağdeviren, M., Akay, D.ve Kurt, M. (2004). "İş değerlendirme sürecinde analitik hiyerarşi prosesi ve uygulaması", Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(2): 131-138.
  • Davis, K. R. ve Sauser, W. I. (1993). "A comparison of factor weighting methods in job evaluation: Implications for compensation systems", Public Personnel Management, 22(1), 91-106.
  • Duru, O., Bulut, E. and Huang, S. T. and Yoshida, S. (2013). "Shipping performance assessment and the role of key performance ındicators (KPIs): 'QualityFunction Deployment' for transforming shipowner's expectation", SSRN, January (3), 1-18.
  • Erbaş, E. (2015). "Kalite fonksiyon göçerimi ve analitik hiyerarşi süreci aracılığıyla stratejik destinasyon rekabetçiliği planlaması: Termal turizm destinasyonları örneği" Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi, SBE Enstitüsü, Nevşehir.
  • Fan, W. ve Zhang, L. (2009). "Are achievement motivation and thinking styles related? A visit among Chinese university students", Learning and Individual Diferences, 19, 299-303.
  • Gilbert, K. (2005). "The Role of Job Evaluation in determining equal value in tribunals: Tool, weapon or cloaking device?", Employee Relations, 27(1), 7-19.
  • Gilbert, K. (2012). "Promises and practices: job evaluation and equal pay forty years on!", Industrial Relations Journal, 43(2), 137-151.
  • Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., ve Parkter, S. K. (2007). "A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent context", Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 327-347.
  • Goepel, K. D. (2013). "Implementing the analytic hierarchy process as a standard method for multi-criteria decision making in corporate enterprises - A new AHP excel template with multiple inputs, Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process.
  • Güllü, E. ve Ulcay, Y. (2002). "Kalite fonksiyon yayılımı ve bir uygulama", Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(1), 71-91.
  • Hajii, M. A. (2011). " An analytical approach to the unequivocal need of organizations for job evaluation", International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(18), 8- 13.
  • Hauser, J. R. ve Clausing, D. (1988). "The house of quality", Harvard Business Review, May-June, 1-16.
  • Higgings, P. ve Zhang, L. (2009). "The thinking styles of human resource practitioners", The Learning Organization, 16(4), 276-289.
  • Hou, Y., Gao, G., Wang, F., Li, T. ve Yu, Z. (2011). "Organizational commitment and creativity: The infuence of thinking styles", Annals of Economics and Finance, 12(2), 411-431.
  • Huang, C. ve Hsueh, S. (2014). "A study of the effect of ıncentive system on job performance-an example of hotel's IT staffs in Taiwan", The Journal of Global Business Management, 10(2), 57-66.
  • Katz, D. ve Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations, Wiley, New York.
  • Kelesbayev, D. (2014). "Türk Dünyasının eğitim sistemindeki ortak mesele: Kalite", Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim Dergisi, 3(2), 291-306.
  • Ko, W. ve Chen, L. (2014). "An approach of new product planning using quality function deployment and fuzzy linear programming model", International Journal of Production Research, 52(6), 1728-1743.
  • Korschun, D., Bhattacharya,C. B. ve Swain, S. D. (2014). "Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer Orientation, and the Job Performance of Frontline Employees", Journal of Marketing, 78(May), 20-37.
  • Kurgun, O. A. ve Yemişci, D. A. (2007). "İş değerlemede puanlama yöntemi ve büyük ölçekli bir otel işletmesinde uygulama", Çimento İşveren, Temmuz, 4-15.
  • Kutlu, A. C., Ekmekçioğlu, M. ve Kahraman, C. (2013). "A fuzzy multi-criteria approach to point-factor method for job evaluation", Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems: Applications in Engineering and Technology, 25(3), 659-671.
  • Lam , J. S. L. ve Dai, J. (2015). "Developing supply chain security design of logistics service providers: An analytical network process-quality function deployment approach", International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 45(7), 674-690.
  • Lee, Y., Kim, S., Son, M. ve Kim, (2015). "Linking organizational justice to job performance: Evidence from the restaurant industry in East Asia", Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 20(1), 1527-1544.
  • Leonard, L. D. (2011). "Analysis representation related to the activities relative values evaluated using the method job evaluation through the load" Review of International Comparative Management, 12(5), 963-970.
  • Lin, Y. ve Pekkarinen, S. (2011). "QFD-based modular logistics service design", Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 26(5), 344-356.
  • Mohammadi, F., Sadi, M. K., Nateghi, F. Abdullah, A. ve Skitmore, M. (2014). "A hybrid quality function deployment and cybernetic analytic network process model for project manager selection", Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 20(6), 795-809.
  • Mohiuddin-Noetzel, S. (1998). The Effect of Job Title on Job Evaluation Ratings. Illinois Institute of Technology.
  • Nasurdin, A. M. ve Khuan, S. L. (2007). "Organizational justice as an antecedent of job performance", Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 9(3), 325-343.
  • Nistor, D. L. (2012). "The analysis of the representativeness of results obtained after applying the method of job evaluation through tasks", Theoretical and Applied Economics, XIX(3), 121-136.
  • Orcik, Vrgovic ve Tekic (2014). "Thinking styles and product development project types: how to match them?, 69, 830-837.
  • Pandey, J. ve M, L. (2012). "A study on job evluation point factor analysis", Asian Journal of Research in Business and Management, 2(5), 179-239.
  • Raju, R. (1998). "Peromnes job evaluation method and its application to a library environment", S. Afr. J. Libr. Inf. Sci., 66(3), 107-113.
  • Risher, H. (1978). "Job evaluation: Mystical or statistical", Personnel, 55(September), 23-36.
  • Robbins, S. P. (2001). Organizational Behavior, 9th Edition, Prentice Hall. NJ.
  • Sofyalıoğlu, Ç. ve Tunail, İ. (2012). "Kano modelinin kalite fonksiyon göçerimi planlama matrisinde kullanımı", Ege Akademik Bakış, 12(1), 125-135.
  • Sun, X. ve Luo, N. (2013). "Study on the effectiveness of point-factor job evaluation system in operation position", Communications in Information Science and Management Engineering, 3(3), 154-160.
  • Tunca, M. Z. ve Bayhan, M. (2012). "Kalite fonksiyon göçerimi yönetiminin tedarikçi seçiminde kullanımı", Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 11, 53-69.
  • Vance, C. M., Groves, K. S., Paik, Y. ve Kindler, H. (2007). "Understanding and measuring linear/nonlinear thinking style for enhanced management education and professional practice", Academy of Management Learning and Education, 6(2), 167-185.
  • Zaim, S. ve Şevkli, M. (2002). "The methodology of quality function deployment with crisp and fuzzy approaches and an application in the Turkish shampoo industry", Journal of Economic and Social Research, 4(1), 27-32.
  • Zandi, F. ve Tavana, M. (2011). "A fuzzy group quality function deployment model for e-CRM framework assessment in agile manufacturing", Computers and Industrial Engineering, 61(1), 1-19.
  • Zhang, L.F. and Higgins, P. (2008). "The predictive power of socialization variables for thinking styles among adults in the workplace", Learning and Individual Differencesb18(1), 11-18.
  • Zhang, L. F. ve Sternberg, R. J. (2005). "A threefold model of intellectual styles", Educational Psychology Review, 17(1), 1-53.
  • Zhang, L.F. ve Sternberg, R.J. (2006). The Nature of Intellectual Styles, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
  • Zhang, L. F. (2004). "Thinking styles: University students' preferred teaching styles and their conceptions of effective teachers", The Journal of Psychology, 138, 233-252.
  • Zhu, C. ve Zhang, L. F. (2011). "Thinking styles and conceptions of creativity among university students", Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 31(3), 361-375.