Mesleki Özdeşleşme ve Psikolojik Sahiplenme Çalışanların İş BiçimlendirmelerineEtki Eder Mi?: Hizmet Sektörü Çalışanlarına Yönelik Bir Araştırma

Amaç – Bu çalışmanın amacı mesleki özdeşleşme ve psikolojik sahiplenme düzeyinin çalışanların işbiçimlendirme davranışlarındaki etkisini ortaya koymaktır.Yöntem – Araştırmamızın evreni Türkiye’deki hizmet sektörü çalışanları, örneklemini ise Ankara’da görevyapan güvenlik, eğitim, sağlık, finans gibi hizmet alanlarında çalışanlar oluşturmaktadır. Bu bağlamda,Ankara’da görev yapan hizmet sektörü çalışanlarından elden ve elektronik ortamda doldurulan anketformlarından 442 katılımcıya ait veriler analiz edilmiştir. Çalışmada değişkenler arası ilişkiler ve etkilerinibelirlemek için korelâsyon ve regresyon analizleri gerçekleştirilmiş, değişkenlere ait ölçeklerindoğrulanması için ise yapısal eşitlik modeli kullanılmıştır.Bulgular – Hizmet sektörü çalışanlarını mesleki özdeşleşme düzeyinin iş biçimlendirme davranışlarınıanlamlı ve pozitif şekilde etkilediği görülmüştür. Benzer şekilde yine işlerini psikolojik olarak sahiplenençalışanların daha çok iş biçimlendirme davranışları sergiledikleri sonucuna varılmıştır.Tartışma – Bu çalışma mesleki özdeşleşme ve psikolojik sahiplenme düzeylerinin iş biçimlendirmedavranışlarına etkisini ortaya koymaya çalışmaktadır. Yazında hizmet sektörü çalışanları açısından sözkonusu değişkenlerin ikili ilişkilerini ele alan çalışmaların oldukça sınırlı sayıda olduğu görülmüş, üçdeğişkeni birlikte inceleyen bir çalışmaya ise rastlanamamıştır. Bu bağlamda çalışma sonuçlarının hemyazın hem de uygulayıcılar açısından olduğu değerlendirilmektedir.

Do Occupational Identification and Psychological Ownership Affect The Employees’ Job Crafting?: A Research on Service Sector Employees

Purpose – The aim of this study is to reveal the effect of occupational identification and psychologicalownership level on employees' job crafting behaviors.Design/methodology/approach – The population of our research consists of service sector employees inTurkey, and the sample consists of those working in service areas such as security, education, health andfinance in Ankara. The data of 442 participants from the questionnaire forms filled in hand and electronicallyfrom service sector employees working in Ankara were analyzed. In the study, correlation and regressionanalyzes were performed to determine the relationships and effects between variables, and the structuralequation model was used to verify the scales of the variables.Findings – When the findings are examined, it was seen that the level of professional identification of servicesector employees significantly and positively affects job crafting behaviors. Similarly, it was concluded thatemployees psychologically adopting their jobs exhibit more job crafting behaviors. Discussion – This study tries to reveal the effect of occupational identification and psychological ownershiplevels on job crafting behaviors. Quite a limited number of studies dealing with the bilateral relations ofthese variables in terms of service sector employees have been observed in the literature, and no studyexamining the three variables together has been found. In this repect, the findings of this study is thoughtto be importatant both for the literature and the practitioners.

___

  • Akın, A., Sarıçam, H., Kaya Ç. ve Demir, T. (2014). Turkish Version of Job Crafting Scale (JCS): The Validity and Reliability Study. International Journal of Educational Researchers, 5(1), 10-15.
  • Anderson, J. ve Gerbing, D. (2004). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis,Psychometrika, 49(2), 155- 173.
  • Ashforth, B. E. ve Mael, F. (1989). Social Identity Theory and The Organizations, Academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39.
  • Ashforth, B.E., Harrison, S.H. ve Corley, K.G. (2008). Identification in Organizations: An Examination of Four Fundamental Questions, Journal of Management, 34, 325-374.
  • Ashforth, B.E., Joshi, M., Anand, V., O’Leary-Kelly, A.M. (2013). Extending the expanded model of organizational identification to occupations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 2426-2448.
  • Avey, J.B., Avolio, B.J., Crossley, C.D., Luthans, F. (2009). Psychological Ownership: Theoretical Extensions, Measurement and Relation to Work Outcomes, Journal of Organizational Behavior 30, 173-191.
  • Bacaksiz, F. E., Tuna, R., & Seren, A. K. H. (2017). The relationships between organisational identification, job performance, and job crafting: A study among nurses. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 10, 251- 259
  • Bamber, E.M. ve Iyer, V.M. (2002). Big 5 Auditors’ Professional and Organizational Identification: Consistency Or Conflict?, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 21, 21-38.
  • Becker, A., Hagenberg, N., Roessner, V., Woerner, W. veRothenberger, A. (2004). Evaluation of the selfreported SDQ in a clinical setting: Do self-report tell us more than ratings by adult informants? European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 13(2), 17-24.
  • Belk, R.W. (1988). Possessions and The Extended Self, Journal of Consumer Research 15, 139-168.
  • Bell, N. E., & Staw, B. M. (1989). People as sculptors versus sculptor: the roles of personality and personal control in organizations. In M. B. Arthur, D. T. Hall, & B. S. Lawrence (Eds.), Handbook of career theory (pp. 232– 251). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Berg, J. M., Dutton, J. E., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2007). What is job crafting and why does it matter?Retrieved form the website of Positive Organizational Scholarship on April, 15, 2020.
  • Berg, J. M., Grant, A. M. ve Johnson, V. (2010). When Callings are Calling: Crafting Work and Leisure in Pursuit of Unanswered Occupational Callings. Organization Science, 21(5), 973-994.
  • Berg, J. M., Dutton, J. E. ve Wrzesniewski, A. (2013). Job Crafting and Meaningful Work. B. J. Dik, Byrne, Z. S. ve Steger, M. F. (Ed.). Purpose and Meaning in the Workplace içinde. Washington DC, American Psychological Association Books: 81-104.
  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley.
  • Bora, D. (2019). Örgütlerde Özerklik ve Vatandaşlık Davranışı İlişkisinde Psikolojik Sahiplenmenin Aracılık Rolü: Nevşehir Otel İşletmeleri Örneği, Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi.
  • Brown, G, Pierce, J.L, Crossley, C. (2014) Toward an Understanding of the Development of Ownership Feelings. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, 318-338.
  • Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. (2002). Quantitative data analysis with SPSS release 10 for Windows: A guide for social scientists. Routledge.
  • Buchko, A.A. (1992), “Effects of Employee Ownership on Employee Attitudes a Test of Three Theoretical Perspectives”, Work and Occupations, 19(1), 59-78.
  • Burke P.J., Reitzes, D.C. (1991). An Identity Theory Approach to Commitment, Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 239-251.
  • Bülbül, H. &Demirer, Ö. (2008). Hizmet Kalitesi Ölçüm Modelleri SERVQUAL ve SERPERF’in Karşılaştırmalı Analizi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 20, 181-198.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı, Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
  • Demerouti, E. (2014). Design your own job through job crafting. European Psychologist, 19, 237-247.
  • Dittmar, H. (1992). The Social Psychology of Material Possessions: To Have is to Be. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
  • Doğan, A. (2020). Mesleki Özdeşleşme İle Tükenmişlik İlişkisinde İş Yükü Algısı Ve Psikolojik Dayanıklılığın Aracı Rolü, Doktora Tezi Başkent Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  • Fayganoğlu, P. (2019). Bilgi Yoğun Örgütler Öznesinde Örgütsel Güç ve Örgüt İçi Koalisyon Kavramları. Gazi İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 5(2), 119-138.
  • Fayganoğlu, P. (2019a). Örtük Bilgi Ve Örtük Bilgi Paylaşımının Örgütler İçin Enilikçilik Ve Hayatta Kalma Açısından Önemi. Journal of International Social Research, 12(63).
  • Field, A. (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS, Third Edition.
  • Florkowski, G. W. (1987), “The Organizational Impact of Profit Sharing”, Academy of management Review, 12(4), 622-636.
  • Ghitulescu, B. E. (2007). Shaping Tasks and Relationships at Work: Examining the Antecedents and Consequences of Employee Job Crafting (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Pittsburgh, ABD, University of Pittsburgh.
  • Gillet, N., Colombat, P., Michinov, E., Pronost, A.M. & Fouque-Reau, E. (2013). Procedural Justice, Supervisor Autonomy Support, Work Satisfac-Tion, Organizational İdentification And Job Performance: The Mediating Role Ofneed Satisfaction And Perceived Organizational Support, Journal of AdvancedNursing 69(11), 2560–2571.
  • Grant, A. M., & Parker, S. K. (2009). Redesigning work design theories: The rise of relational and proactive perspectives. The Academy of Management Annals, 3, 317-375.
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., &Tatham, R. L. (2014) Multivariate Data Seventh Edition, Pearson Education Limited. USA.
  • Hirschi A. (2012). Callings and Work Engagement: Moderated, Occupational Identity and Occupational SelfEfficacy, Journal of Counseling Psychology, 59(3), 479-485.
  • Hu, L.T. ve Bentler, P.M. (1995). Evaluating model fit, içinde: R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. CA: Sage.
  • Hur, W. M., Shin, Y., Rhee, S. Y. ve Kim, H. (2017). Organizational Virtuousness Perceptions And Task Crafting: The Mediating Roles Of Organizational Identification And Work Engagement, Career Development International, 22(4), 436-459.
  • Ibarra, H. (1999). Provisional Selves: Experimenting with Image And Identity in Professional Adaptation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 764-791.
  • Johnson, Richard A., and Dean W. Wichern. (2002). Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis: Vol. 5 No. 8. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Jonsson, Patrik. 2000. “An Empirical Taxonomy of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.” International Journal of Operations & Production Management 20(12): 1446-1474.
  • Kaiser, H.F., 1974. An index of factorial simplicity.Psychometrika. 39 (1), 31–36.
  • Katz, D. and R. L. Kahn, (1966) the Social Psychology of Organizations, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Kerse, G. (2017). “İş Becerikliliği (Job Crafting) Ölçeğini Türkçe’ye Uyarlama ve Duygusal Tükenme İle İlişkisini Belirleme”. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9 (4), 283-304.
  • Kılıç, E., Tatar, B., & Erdil, O. (2020). The relationship between job crafting and organizational ıdentification: The mediating role of affective well-being. Business and Economics Research Journal, 11(1), 201-212.
  • Kırkbeşoğlu, E., Tüzün, İ.K. (2009). Bireycilik - Toplulukçuluk İkileminde Mesleki Özdeşleşme Ve Örgütsel Özdeşleşme Ayrımı, Organizasyon Ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi Cilt 1(1): 1-8.
  • Kira, M., F. van Eijnatten, M. ve Balkin, D.B. (2010). Crafting Sustainable Work: Development of Personal Resources. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 23(5), 616-632.
  • Kirkendall, C. D. (2013). Job Crafting: The Pursuit Of Happiness At Work. (Doctor Of Philosophy), Wright State University Graduate School, Wright State University.
  • Kreiner, G.E. ve Ashforth, B.E. (2004). Evidence Toward An Expanded Model Of Organizational Identification, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 1-27.
  • Kroon, D.P. ve Noorderhaven, N.G. (2018). The Role of Occupational Identification During Post-Merger Integration, Group & Organization Management, 43(2) 207-244.
  • Lance, C. E.,&Vandenberg, R. J. (2001). Confirmatory factor analysis. In F. Drasgow&N. Schmitt (Eds.), Measuring and analyzing behavior in organizations: Advances in measurement and data analysis (pp. 221- 256). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Leana, C., Appelbaum, E. ve Shevchuk, I. (2009). Work Process and Quality of Care in Early Childhood Education: The Role of Job Crafting. Academy of Management Journal, 52(6), 1169–1192.
  • Lichtenthaler, P. W ve Fischbach, A. (2016). Promotion-and Prevention-Focused Job Crafting: A Theoretical Extension and Meta-Analytical Test (5-9 Ağustos 2016). 76. Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management Proceedings içinde, California, ABD. Liu Y. (2003). Developing a scale to measure the interactivity of websites, Journal of Advertising Research, 43(2), 207-217.
  • Loi, R., Ngo, H. Y. ve Foley, S. (2004). The Effect of Professional Identification on Job Attitudes: A Study of Lawyers in Hong Kong, Organizational Analysis, 12, 109-128.
  • Luthans, F., Youssef, C.M. ve Avolio, B.J. (2007). Psychological Capital: Developing the Human Competitive Edge, Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Mael, F.A. ve Ashforth, B.E. (1992). Alumni and Their Alma Mater: A Partial Test Of The Reformulated Model Of Organizational Identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103-123.
  • Maritz, L. (2011). Experiencing Psychological Ownership: A Qualitative Study. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Paretoria Üniversitesi, Güney Afrika.
  • Marsh, H.W. ve Hocevar, D. (1985). Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First- and higher-order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 562–582.
  • Mayhew, M.G., Ashkanasy, N.M., Bramble, T., Gardner, J. (2007), “A Study of The Antecedents and Consequences of Psychological Ownership in Organizational Settings”, The Journal of social psychology, 147(5), 477-500.
  • Miscenko, D. Ve Day, D.V. (2016). Identity and identification at work. Organizational Psychology Review, 6, 215-247.
  • Niessen, C., Weseler, D. ve Kostova, P. (2016). When and Why Do Individuals Craft Their Jobs? The Role of Individual Motivation and Work Characteristics For Job Crafting. Human Relations. 69.6, 1287-1313.
  • Olckers, C., Plessis, D. (2012). The Role of Psychological Ownership in Retaning Talent: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Human Resource, 10 (2), 1-18.
  • Qing Miao, Nathan Eva, Alexander Newman & Gary Schwarz (2019) Public service motivation and performance: The role of organizational identification, Public Money & Management, 39:2, 77-85.
  • Petrou, P., Demerouti, E. ve Schaufeli, W. B. (2015). Job Crafting in Changing Organizations: Antecedents and Implications for Exhaustion and Performance. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 20(4), 470- 480.
  • Pierce, J.L, Rubenfield, S.A, Morgan, S. (1991) Employee ownership: A Conceptual Model of Process and Effects. Academy of Management Review, 16 (1), 121–144.
  • Pierce, J.L.,Kostova, T., Dirks, K.T. (2001), “Toward a Theory of Psychological Ownership in Organizations”, Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 298-310.
  • Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2003). The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology, 7, 84-107.
  • Pierce, J L., Jussila, I., Cummings, A. (2009), “Psychological Ownership within The Job Design Context: Revision of The Job Characteristics Model”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(4), 477-496.
  • Pierce, J.L. ve Jussila, I. (2011). Psychological Ownership and the Organizational Context: Theory, Research Evidence, and Application. Edward Elgar, 15-56.
  • Pierce, J.L. ve Peck, J. (2018), “The History of Psychological Ownership and its Emergence in Consumer Psychology,” in Psychological Ownership and Consumer Behavior, Edited by Joann Peck and Suzanne B. Shu, Springer.
  • Ravichandran, T, and Arun Rai. 1999. “Total Quality Management in Information Systems Development: Key Constructs and Relationships.” Journal of Management Information Systems 16(3):119-155.
  • Riketta, M. (2005). Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 358-384.
  • Schermelleh E. K., Moosbrugger, H. ve Muller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74.
  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003).Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74.
  • Schober, P., Boer, C., & Schwarte, L. A. (2018). Correlation coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 126(5), 1763-1768.
  • Shenavar, F. (2017). Assessment the mediating role of person-job fit and psychological ownership in the relationship between job crafting and job satisfaction. Journal of Psychology, 20(4), 376–392.
  • Skorikov, V.B. ve Vondracek, F.W. (2011). Occupational Identity. In: Schwartz S., Luyckx K., Vignoles V. (eds) Handbook of Identity Theory and Research. Springer, New York
  • Slemp, G.R. & Vella-Brodrick, D.A. (2013). “The Job Crafting Questionnaire: A New Scale To Measure The Extent To Which Employees Engage in Job Crafting”. International Journal of Wellbeing, 3(2): 126-146.
  • Snape, E. ve Redman, T. (2003). An evaluation of a three-component model of occupational commitment: Dimensionality and consequences among United Kingdom human resource management specialists. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 152-159.
  • Staw, B.M., Boettger, R.D. (1990). Task revision: A neglected form of work performance. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 534-559.
  • Steiger, J.H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 25, 173-180.
  • Streiner, D.L., Norman, G.R., 2003. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to their Development and Use. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Tajfel, H. ve Turner J.C. 1985. The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior, in S.Worchel and W.G. Austin (ed.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Chicago: Nelson-Hail, 7–24.
  • Tims, M., Bakker, A.B. & Derks, D. (2012) “Development and Validation of The Job Crafting Scale”. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 173-186.
  • Ullman, J.B. (2001). Structural equation modeling, Içinde: B. G. Tabachnick ve L. S. Fidel (Ed.), Using multivariate statistics, (4th ed; s.:653- 771), MA: Allyn&Bacon.
  • Vandewalle, D.Van Dyne, L. ve Kostova, T. (1995). Psychological Ownership: An Empirical Examination of its Consequences, Group & Organization Management, 20(2), 210-226.
  • Vandenberg, R. J. (2006). Introduction: statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: where, pray tell, did they get this idea? Organizational Research Methods, 9(2): 194-201.
  • Van Dick, R. Wagner U.Stellmacher J. (2005). Category Salience and Organizational Identification, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 273-285.
  • Van Dick, R., Wagner, U., Stellmacher, J., Christ, O. (2004). The Utility of a Broader Conceptualization of Organizational Identification: Which Aspects Really Matter? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 171-191.
  • Van Dyne, L. ve Pierce, J.L. (2004). Psychological Ownership And Feelings Of Possession: Three Field Studies Predicting Employee Attitudes And Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(4), 439-459.
  • Wang, H. J., Demerouti, E. ve Le Blanc, P. (2017a). Transformational Leadership, Adaptability, And Job Crafting: The Moderating Role Of Organizational Identification, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 100, 185-195.
  • Wang, H., Demerouti, E., & Le Blanc, P. M. (2017b). A job crafting perspective on empowering leadership and job performance. Paper Presented at the 77th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Atlanta, GA.
  • Wang, H.J., Demerouti, E., Blanc, P.L. and Lu, C.Q. (2018), “Crafting a job in ‘tough times’: when being proactive is positively related to work attachment”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 91 No. 3, pp. 569-590.
  • Wagner, S.H., Parker, C.P. ve Christianson, N.D. (2003). Employees that Think and Act Like Owners: Effects of Ownership Beliefs and Behaviors on Organizational Effectiveness, Personal Psychology, 56: 847-871.
  • Witt, L. A. (1993). Reactions to Work Assignment As Predictors Of Organizational Commitment: The Moderating Effect Of Occupational İdentification. Journal of Business Research, 26, 17-30.
  • Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting A Job: Revisioning Employees As Active Crafters Of Their Work. Academy of Management Review, 26, 179-201.
  • Yavuz, M. (2018). İş Zanaatkârlığı İle Bireysel Performans Çıktıları Arasındaki İlişkide Çalışanların Dışsal Prestij ve Kurum Destek Algılarının Rolü. (Yayınlanmış Doktora Tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi, 44-93.
İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1309-0712
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2009
  • Yayıncı: Melih Topaloğlu
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Yıkıcı Yönetim Algısı: Demografik Değişkenlere Göre Bankacılık Sektöründe BirAraştırma

Seda GÜĞERÇİN

Demir-Çelik Sektörü Çalışanlarının Örgütsel Bağlılık Düzeylerinin İncelenmesi:Kardemir Örneği

Kasım YILMAZ, Volkan TEMİZKAN

Bağımsız Denetçi Perspektifinden Maliyetleme Yöntemlerinin İşletme Fiyat BelirlemeKararları Üzerinde Etkisi: Ampirik Bir Çalışma

Orhan BOZKURT, Nazlı Bahar ÇAKMAK

Banka, Kredi, Sigorta ve Risk Kavramlarına İlişkin Bankacılık ve SigortacılıkÖğrencilerinin Metaforik Algılarının Değerlendirilmesi (Sakarya İli Örneği)

Tuncay YILMAZ, Erdinç CESUR

Destinasyon Marka Farkındalığı, Destinasyon Marka İmajı ve Algılanan KaliteninDestinasyon Marka Sadakatine Etkisi: Mardin Odaklı Bir Araştırma

Betül KODAŞ

Akıllı Telefon Bağımlılığının Çalışanların İş Tatminleri Üzerine Etkisi

Mahmut ÖZDEMİR, Nurcan ÇETİNER

Bir Tekstil İşletmesinde Yalın Altı Sigma İle Süreç İyileştirmeye Yönelik Bir ÖrnekOlay Çalışması

Gülseren ÇELEBİ GÜRSOY, Mehmet Selami YILDIZ

İçsel Pazarlama Anlayışının İş Tatminine Etkisi: Akademik Personel Üzerinde BirUygulama

Ece ARMAĞAN, Ahmet CAN

The Mediating Role of Motivation Between Brand Citizenship Behavior and EmployeePerformance: A Study of Supervisors’ Perception

Marwan GHALEB, Güven ORDUN

Stratejik Yönetim Perspektifinden Örgüt DNA’sının Yönetişime Etkisi

Ela OĞAN, Mehmet Ozan CİNEL