Girişimci İşletmelerde Pazarlama Yeteneklerinin Belirleyicileri ve Sonuçlarının Araştırılması

Amaç – Girişimci işletmelerin, pazarda rekabet avantajını elde etmeleri için pazarlama yeteneklerini doğru bir şekilde geliştirmeleri gerekmektedir. Çalışmada, çevresel türbülansın yanı sıra işletmelerin girişimcilik yönlülüğü ve pazar yönlülüğü işletmelerin pazarlama yeteneklerinin bir belirleyicisi olarak analiz edilmiştir. İşletme performansı, pazarlama yetenekleri yapısının bir sonucu olarak analiz edilmiştir. Yöntem – Çalışma ,Eylül 2018- Ocak 2019 tarihleri arasında Antalya’da faaliyet gösteren 220 büyük ve orta boy işletmelerde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Verilerin elde edilmesinde anket yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Oluşturulan modeli test etmek için kısmi en küçük kareler yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Bulgular – Elde edilen sonuçlara göre; çevresel türbülansın, girişimci yönlülük ve pazar yönlülük üzerinde önemli bir etkiye sahip olduğu görülmüş, girişimci yönlülüğün pazar yönlülük ve pazarlama yetenekleri üzerinde, pazar yönlülüğün pazarlama yetenekleri üzerinde, pazarlama yeteneklerinin ve girişimci yönlülüğün işletme performansı üzerinde önemli bir etkiye sahip oldukları görülmüştür. Tartışma – Yapılan bu araştırmada girişimci işletmelerde çeşitli belirleyiciler ve pazarlama yeteneklerinin sonuçlarını test eden daha önceki araştırmalara dayanarak bütünleştirici bir çerçeve önerilmektedir.

Researching the Determinants and Results of Marketing Capabilities in Entrepreneur Business

Purpose – Entrepreneur businesses should properly develop their marketing capabilities in order to gain competitive advantage in the market. In this study besides environmental turbulence, the entrepreneurship orientation and market orientation of businesses are analyzed as a determinant of marketing capabilities of businesses. Design\methodology\approach – The performance of a business was analyzed as the result of its marketing capabilities structure. The study was conducted on 220 big and medium businesses operating in Antalya between the dates of September 2018 and January 2019. In the collection of the data, questionnaire method was used. In order to test the created model, partial least-square method was used. Findings – According to the acquired data; it was observed that environmental turbulence has an important effect on entrepreneurship orientation and market orientation, entrepreneurship orientation has an effect on market orientation and marketing capabilities, entrepreneurship orientation has an effect on marketing capabilities, marketing capabilities and entrepreneurship orientation have an important effect of the performance of the business. Discussion – In this research, an integrative framework is suggested based on the previous researches which tested the various determinants and marketing capabilities in entrepreneur businesses.

___

  • Achrol, R., S., (1991). Evolution of the marketing organization: New forms for turbulent environments. Journal of Marketing, 55(4), 77-93.
  • Agarval R., and Karahanna E., (2000). Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about ınformation technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665-694.
  • Avkiran, N., K., (2018). Rise of the partial least squares structural equation modeling: An applications in Banking. [İçinde], Avkiran, N.,K., ve Ringle, C., M. [Ed], Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling, Recent Advances in Banking and Finance, Springer, 1-29.
  • Bagozzi R., and Yi Y., (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 16 (1), 74-94.
  • Barney, J., (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
  • Barney, J., Wright, D.,J., and Ketchen, Jr., (2001). The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991. Journal of Management, 27 (6), 625-641.
  • Bingham, C., B., Eisenhardt, K.,M., and Furr, N.,R., (2007). What makes a cprocess a capability? Heuristics strategy and effective capture of opportunities. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(12), 27-47.
  • Chin, W.,W., (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. [İçinde], Marcoulides, G.,A., [Ed], Modern Methods for Business Research, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erbaum Associates, 295-336.
  • Collingson, E., and Shaw, E., (2001). Entrepreneurial marketing: A historical perspective on development and practice, Management Decision, 39(9), 761-766.
  • Covin, J., G., and Slevin, D.,P., (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal. 10(1), 75-88.
  • Covin, J., G., and Slevin, D.,P., (1994). Corporate entrepreneurship in high and low technology industries: A comparison of strategic variables strategic patterns and performance in global markets. Journal of Euro Marketing, 3 (3), 99-127.
  • Davis, D., Morris, M., and Allen, J., (1991). Perceived environmental turbulence and its effect on selected entrepreneurship marketing and organizational characteristics in industrial firms. Journal of Academy of Marketing Sicience, 19(1), 43-51.
  • Day, G., S., (1994). The capabilities of market driven organizations. Journal of Marketing, 58(4), 37-52.
  • Day, G., S., and Wensley, R., (1988). Assessing advantage: A framework for diagnosing competitive superiority. Journal of Marketing, 52(2), 1-20.
  • Deshpande, R., Farley, J., and Webster, Jr., (1993). Corporate culture, customer orientation and innovativeness. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 23-37.
  • Dijkstra, T., K., and Henseler, J., (2015). Consistent and asymptotically normal PLS estimators for linear structural equations. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 81(1),10-23.
  • Duncan, R., M., (1972). Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty. Adminstrative Science Quarterly, 17(3), 313-327.
  • Eisenhard, K.,M., and Martin, J., A., (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are the?. Strategic Management Journal, 21(1011), 1105-1121.
  • Fornell C., and Lacker, F., D., (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1), 39-50.
  • Garson, G., D., (2016). Partial Least Squares: Regression & Structural Equation Models. Statistical Associates Publishing, USA:Asheboro
  • Grant, R., M., (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation, California Management Review, 33(3), 114-135.
  • Grant, R., M., (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(52), 109-122.
  • Hair J., E., Ringle C., M., and Sarstedt M., (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-151.
  • Hair, J., F., Hult, G.,T., M., Ringle, C.,M., & Sarstedt, M., (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), Second Edition, Thousand Oaks:Sage
  • Hall, R., (1993). A framework linking intangible resources and capabilities to sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 14(8), 607-618.
  • Hamel, G., and Prahalad, C.,K., (1989). Strategic intent, Harvard Business Review, (May-June), 63-76.
  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C.,M., and Sarstedt, M., (2012). Using partial least squares path modeling in international advertising research: Basic concept and recent issues. [İçinde], Okzaki, S., [Ed], Handbook of Reseacrh on International Advertising, Edward Elgar Publishing: USA, 252-276.
  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C.,M., and Sarstedt, M., (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.
  • Higgins, C., A., Duxbury, L.,E., and Irving, R.,H., (1992). Work-family conflict in the dual-career family. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 51(1), 51-75.,
  • Hills, G., E., Hultman, C.,M., and Miles M., (2008). The evolution and development of entrepreneurial marketing. Journal of Small Business Management, 46(4), 99-112.
  • Höck, M., and Ringle, C.,M., (2006). Strategic Networks in the software industry: An emprical analysis of the value continuum. IFSAM VIIIth World Congress, Berlin, 1-21.
  • Hrebiniak, L., G., and Joyce, W.,F., (1985). Organizational adaptation, strategic choice and environmental determinism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30 (October), 336-349.
  • Hu, L., T., and Bentler, P., M., (1998). Fit indices in covariance structural modeling: Sensivitiy to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Method, 3(4), 424-453.
  • Hu, L.,T., and Bentler, P., M., (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55
  • Hulland, J., S., (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS), in strategic management research: A reciew of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20(4), 195-204.
  • Hult, G., T., M., and Ketchen, Jr., (2001). Does market orientation matter? A test of the relationship between positional advantage and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 22-(9), 899-906.
  • Hunt, S., D., and Morgan, R.,M., (1995). The comparative advantage theory of competition. Journal of Marketing, 59(2), 1-15.
  • Jaworski, B., J., and Kohli, A.,K., (1993). Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 53-70.
  • Keh, H., T., Nguyen, T.,T., M., and Ng, H., P., (2007). The effects of entrepreneurial orientation and marketing information on the performance of SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 592-611.
  • Kohli, A., K., and Jaworski, B.,J., (1990). Market orientation: The construct research propositions and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 1-18.
  • Lengnick-Hall, C., A., and Wolff, J.,A., (1999). Similarities and contradictions in the core logic of three strategy research streams. Strategic Management Journal, 20(12), 1109-1132.
  • Makadok, R., (2001). Toward a synthesis of the resource based and dynamic-capability views of rent creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22(5), 387-401.
  • Menon, A., and Varadajan, P.,R., (1992). A model of marketing knowledge use within firms. Journal of Marketig, 56(4), 53-71.
  • Miller, D., (1988). Relating Porter’s business strategies to environment and structure: Analysis and performance implications. Academy of Management Journal, 31(2), 280-308.
  • Miller, D., and Friesen, P.,H., (1983). Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two models of strategic momentum. Strategic Management Journal, 3 (1), 1-25.
  • Morris, M., Schindehutte, M., and Laforge, R., (2002). Entrepreneurial marketing: A construct for integrating emerging entrepreneurship and marketing perspective, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 10(4), 1-19.
  • Naman, J., L., and Slevin, D.,P., (1993). Entrepreneurship and the concept of fit: A model and empirical tests. Strategic Management Journal. 14(2), 137-153.
  • Narver, J., C., and Slater, S.,F., (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 20-35.
  • Prahalad, C., K., and Hamel, G., (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, (May-June), 3-15.
  • Priem, R., L., and Butler, J.,E., (2001). Is the resource-based view a useful perspective for strategic management research?. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 22-40.
  • Qureshi, S., and Kratzer, J., (2011). An investigation of antecedents and outcomes of marketing capabilities in entrepreneurial firms: An empirical study of small technology-based firms in Germany. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 24(1), 49-66.
  • Reinartz, W., Krafft, M., and Hoyer, W., D., (2004). The customer relationship management process: Its measurement and impact on performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(3), 293-305.
  • Ruakert, R., W., Walker, O.,C., and Roering, K.,J., (1985). The organization of marketing activities: A contingency theory of structure and performance. Journal of Marketing, 49(1), 13-25.
  • Slater, S., F., and Narver, J.,C., (1994). Does competitive environment moderate the market orientation performance relationship. Journal of Marketing, 58 (January), 46-55.
  • Slater, S., F., and Narver, J.,C., (1998). Customer-led and market oriented: Let’s not confuse the two. Strategic Management Journal. 19(10), 1001-1006.
  • Slater, S., F., and Narver, J.C., (1995). Market orientation and the learning organization. Journal of Marketing, 59(3), 63-74.
  • Spanos, Y., E., and Lioukas, S., (2001). An examination of the causal logic of rent generation: Contrasting Porter’s competitive strategy framework and the resource-based perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 22(10), 907-934.
  • Teece, D., J., Pisano, G., and Shuen, A., (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-535.
  • Venkatraman, N., (1989). Strategic orientation of business enterprises: The construct dimensionality and measurement. Management Science, 35(8), 942-962.
  • Voorhees, C., M., Brady, M.,K., Calantone, R., and Ramirez, E., (2016). Discriminant validity testing in marketing: An analysis, causes for concern and proposed remedies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 119-134.
  • Vorhies, D., W., Harker, M., and Rao, C.,P., (1999). The capabilities and performance advantages of market-driven firms. European Journal of Marketing, 33(1112), 1171-1202.
  • Vorhies, D.,W., and Harker, M., (2000). The capabilities and performance advantages of market-driven firms: An empirical investigation. Australian Journal of Management, 25(2), 145-171.
  • Webster, F.,E., (1981). Top management’s concerns about marketing: issues for the 1980s. Journal of Marketing, 45(3), 1-15.
  • Weerawardena, J., (2003). The role of marketing capability in innovation-based competitive strategy. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 11(1),15-35.
  • Wernerfelt, B., (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.
  • Wong, K., K., K., (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) techniques using SmartPLS. Technical Note 1, Marketing Bulletin, 24, 1-32.
  • Zahra, S., and Garvis, D., (2000). International corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance: The moderating effect of international environmental hostility. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5), 469-492.
İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1309-0712
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2009
  • Yayıncı: Melih Topaloğlu
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

The Relationship Between Tourism Income and Financial Development in The Mena Countries

Emirhan YENİŞEHİRLİOĞLU, Tayfur BAYAT

The Impact of Electronic Word-of-Mouth Marketing on the Generation-Y's Intention to Buy Tourism Services

Nuriye GÜREŞ, Cevher YÜKSEL, Seda ARSLAN, Menekşe GÜNDOĞDU, Duygu BABAT

Otel İşgörenlerinin Örgütsel Dışlanma Algılarının Örgütsel Sinizm Düzeylerine Etkisi: Beş Yıldızlı Otel İşletmelerinde Bir Araştırma

HASAN HÜSEYİN SOYBALI, Osman PELİT

The Impact of Electronic Word-of-Mouth Marketing on the Generation-Y's Intention to Buy Tourism Services

NURİYE GÜREŞ, SEDA ARSLAN, CEVHER YÜKSEL, Duygu BABAT, Menekşe GÜNDOĞDU

Türkiye’de Bireysel Emeklilik Sistemi: Modelleme ile Gelişiminin Değerlendirilmesi

Özgül YALÇIN, BEYHAN MARŞAP

Girişimci İşletmelerde Pazarlama Yeteneklerinin Belirleyicileri ve Sonuçlarının Araştırılması

A. Buğra HAMŞIOĞLU

Örgütsel Desteğin Örgütsel Bağlılık Üzerine Etkisinde Örgütsel Güven Algısının Aracı Rolü

SERKAN NAKTİYOK, ÖMER FARUK İŞCAN

Presenteizm İle Örgütsel Sessizlik Arasındaki İlişki Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Mehmet Halit YILDIRIM, Şükran ORUÇ

Etik Liderliğin İşten Ayrılma Niyetine Etkisinde Algılanan Kurumsal İtibarın Rolü

Hüseyin ŞEN, Cihat ERBIL, ENVER AYDOĞAN

Pazar Odaklılık ve Pazarlama Yeteneklerinin İşletmelerin Pazarlama Performansına Etkisi, İSO 1000 Grubunda Bir Araştırma

Meziyet UYANIK, Cemal YÜKSELEN