Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a linear programming based data analytic method for measuring the relative efficiency of organisational units where the presence of multiple inputs and outputs makes comparisons difficult. Academic departments have critical importance for a university so we agree to research and compare about academic faculties in a leading university in Turkey. The aim of the study is to measure the relative efficiency of the academic faculties and determine the efficient/inefficient ones in the studied university. 12 faculties of the university are investigated within the scope of this study. The input variables are considered as total number of academic staff, total number of non-academic staff, number of students and the output variables are as number of publications, number of projects and the percentage of budget used. While results of CCR model show an average of 90.5% relative efficiency value, five faculties are found 100% efficient according to the CCR model. According to BCC model, the results have an average of 93.7% and 6 faculties are 100% efficient. In terms of the potential improvements evaluated for each inefficient faculty, it is seen that faculty of mechanical engineering and faculty of civil engineering are the ones requiring the most improvement. This paper contributes to the literature a lot however it is a new and proper study on efficiency analysis of faculties of a Turkish university. On conclusion of the DEA efficiency scores, the existence of misallocation of resources or/and inefficient applications to the faculties' academic development are uncovered.
___
Arenas-Parra, M., Bilbao-Terol, A., & Jiménez, M. (2016). Standard goal programming with fuzzy hierarchies: a sequential approach. Soft Computing, 20(6), 2341-2352.
Abbott, M., & Doucouliagos, C. (2003). The efficiency of Australian universities: a data envelopment analysis. Economics of Education review, 22(1), 89-97.
Agha, S. R., Kuhail, I., Nabi, N. A., Salem, M., & Ghanim, A. (2011). Assessment of academic departments efficiency using data envelopment analysis. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 4(2), 301-325.
Alper, D., Sinuany-Stern, Z., & Shinar, D. (2015). Evaluating the efficiency of local municipalities in providing traffic safety using the Data Envelopment Analysis. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 78, 39-50.
Al-Shayea, A. S., & Battal, A. H. (2013). Evaluating the efficiency of faculties in Qassim University using data envelopment analysis. Journal of Business Administration and Education, 4(2), 132-138.
Avkiran, N. K. (2001). Investigating technical and scale efficiencies of Australian universities through data envelopment analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 35(1), 57-80.
Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management science, 30(9), 1078-1092.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European journal of operational research, 2(6), 429-444.
Colbert, A., Levary, R. R., & Shaner, M. C. (2000). Determining the relative efficiency of MBA programs using DEA. European journal of operational research, 125(3), 656-669.
Glass, J. C., McCallion, G., McKillop, D. G., Rasaratnam, S., & Stringer, K. S. (2006). Implications of variant efficiency measures for policy evaluations in UK higher education. Socio-economic planning sciences, 40(2), 119-142.
Izadi, H., Johnes, G., Oskrochi, R., & Crouchley, R. (2002). Stochastic frontier estimation of a CES cost function: the case of higher education in Britain. Economics of education review, 21(1), 63-71.
Johnes, G., & Johnes, J. (1993). Measuring the research performance of UK economics departments: an application of data envelopment analysis. Oxford economic papers, 332-347.
Kao, C., & Hung, H. T. (2008). Efficiency analysis of university departments: An empirical study. Omega, 36(4), 653-664.
Kokkelenberg, E. C., Sinha, E., Porter, J. D., & Blose, G. L. (2008). The efficiency of private universities as measured by graduation rates, Cornell Higher Education Research Institute Working Paper No. 113 (Ithaca NY, July 2008)
LaPlante, A. E., & Paradi, J. C. (2015). Evaluation of bank branch growth potential using data envelopment analysis. Omega, 52, 33-41.
Lopes, A. L. M., & Lanzer, E. A. (2002). Data envelopment analysis-DEA and fuzzy sets to assess the performance of academic departments: a case study at Federal University of Santa Catarina-UFSC. Pesquisa Operacional, 22(2), 217-230.
McMillan, M. L., & Chan, W. H. (2006). University efficiency: A Comparison and consolidation of results from stochastic and non-stochastic methods. Education economics, 14(1), 1-30.
Misiunas, N., Oztekin, A., Chen, Y., & Chandra, K. (2015). DEANN: A Healthcare Analytic Methodology of Data Envelopment Analysis and Artificial Neural Networks for the Prediction of Organ Recipient Functional Status. Omega. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2015.03.010
Sarıca, K., & Or, I. (2007). Efficiency assessment of Turkish power plants using data envelopment analysis. Energy, 32(8), 1484-1499.
Tauer, L. W., Fried, H. O., & Fry, W. E. (2007). Measuring efficiencies of academic departments within a college. Education economics, 15(4), 473-489.
Tzeremes, N., & Halkos, G. (2010). A DEA approach for measuring university departments’ efficiency. Working paper. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/24029/1/MPRA_paper_24029.pdf [Access July 22, 2015].
Worthington, A. C., & Lee, B. L. (2008). Efficiency, technology and productivity change in Australian universities, 1998–2003. Economics of education review, 27(3), 285-298.
Zografidou, E., Petridis, K., Arabatzis, G., & Dey, P. K. (2015). Optimal design of the renewable energy map of Greece using weighted goal-programming and data envelopment analysis. Computers & Operations Research. doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2015.03.012