The Effects of Gravitation on the Inter-Media Agenda-Setting Central Process: The Case of the Murder of Hrant Dink

İlk düzey gündem belirleme araştırmaları, kitle iletişim araçlarından kamugündemine konuların dikkat çekiciliğinin transferi ile ilgilenmiş iken, ikinci düzey gündembelirleme araştırmaları haberde niteliklere yapılan vurgu ve kamu gündemi üzerine etkileriile ilgilenmektedirler. Bu araştırmalardan bazıları kitle iletişim araçlarının gündemineyönelmişlerdir. Kitle iletişim araçlarının birbirleri üzerinde etkileri hem birinci hem deikinci düzey kitle iletişim araçları arası gündem belirleme araştırmaları içinde incelenmiştir.Bu araştırmalarda, genellikle farklı tür kitle iletişim araçlarının birbirleri üzerine etkisiniincelemiştir. Sistematik teorik bir modelin boşluğu araştırmacıların farklı eğilimleri vearaştırma amaçlarındaki farklılıktan kaynaklanagelmiştir. Kitle iletişim araçları arasındakigündem belirleme araştırmaları içinde bir diğer boş bırakılmış alan da farklı ideoloji vesiyasi kimliklere sahip gazetelerin birbirleri üzerine gündem belirleme etkisidir. Buaraştırmanın amacı, farklı bakış açılarına sahip gazetelerin arasında kitle iletişim araçlarıarası gündem belirleme sürecinin incelenmesidir. Araştırma tasarımı, ana damar gazetelerindiğer gazeteler üzerinde merkezi çekim etkisini test etmek için tasarlanmıştır. Örnek olayolarak Hrant Dink Cinayeti seçilmiştir. ,

Kitle İletişim Arçları Arası Gündem Belirlemenin Merkezi Çekim Etkisi: Örnek Olay Hrant Dink in Öldürülmesi.

While the first level agenda setting researches focus on the transfer of issue saliencefrom the media to public agenda, second level agenda setting researches interest in theattributes emphasized in the news and their affect on the public agenda. Some of theseresearches tends to analysis the media agenda. Influences of the news media on each otherare studied by the inter-media agenda setting researches at at both the first and secondlevels. The same researches examine also the effects of different types of media on eachother. However there is the problem of lack of a systematic theoretical model. This iscaused by the differentiation in the aims of researchers and in their research objects. Theother problem in the inter-media agenda setting researches is that there is no research onthe agenda setting effects of the newspapers which have different ideological and politicalidentities. This research aims to scrutinize the inter-media agenda-setting effects amongvarious newspapers that have got different points of view. The research is designed to testthe central gravitation effects of the mainstream news papers. Here the Murder of HrantDink is selected as a case study.

___

  • Bichard, S., (2001). Agenda Setting And Political Discourse: The Framing of PoliticalCampaign Reform in 1999, PhD dissertation, University of Florida.
  • Breen, M.J., (1997). “A Cook, a Cardinal, his Priests and the Press: deviance as a trigger for intermedia agenda setting”, Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 74(2), 348-56.
  • Brubaker, J., (2005). The Role of the Internet in Agenda Setting: Asynthesized Uses and Gratifications and Agenda Setting Model, PhD dissertation, Kent State University.
  • Cohen, B.C., (1963). The Pres and Foreign Policy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Pres.
  • D’Angelo, P., (2002). «News Framing as a Multiparadigmatic Research Program: A Response to Entman”, Journal of Communication, Volume 52(4), 870-888.
  • Dearing, W.J. and Rogers, M.R., (1996). Agenda Setting, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.
  • Entman, R., (1993). “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractural Paradigm”, Journal of Communication, 43(4): 51-58.
  • Ghanam, S., (1997). “Filling in the Tapestry: The Second Level ofAgenda Setting”, Communication and Democracy, M.McCombs; D.L.Shaw ve D. Weaver (eds.), Mahvah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Publishers.
  • Golan, G., (2006). “Inter-Medıa Agenda Settıng And Global News Coverage”, Journalism Studies, 7(2) , 323 – 333.
  • Iyengar, Shanto; Peters, Mark D. ve Kinder, Donald R., (1982). “Experimental Demonstrations of the ‘Not-So-Minimal’ Consequences of Television News Programs”, The American Political Science Review, Vol. 76, No. 4. (Dec., 1982), pp. 848-858.
  • Kahneman, D. Ve Tversky, A., (1984), “Choice, Value and Frame”, American Psychologist, 39: 341-350.
  • King, Pu-Tsung, (1994). Issue Agendas in the 1992 Taiwan Legislative Election, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Austin: The University of Texas.
  • Ku, G., (2002). Intermedia Agenda-Setting in the 2000 Presidential Campaign: The Influence of Candidates’ Websites on Traditional News Media, PhD dissertation, Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma.
  • Lee, G., (2005). Agenda Setting Effects in the Digital Age: Uses Effects of Online Media, PhD dissertation, Austin: The University of Texsas.
  • Lippman, W., (1949). Public Opinion, New York: The Free Pres.
  • Lopez-Escobar, E.; Llamas, J.P.; McCombs, M. and Lennon, F.R., (1998). “Two Levels of Agenda Setting Among Advertising and News in the 1995 Spanish Elections”, Political Communication, 15, 225-238.
  • McCombs, M., (2005) Setting Agenda. 2nd edn, Cambridge: Politiy Pres.
  • McCombs M.E. ve Shaw D.L., (1972). “The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media”, The Public Opinion Quarterly. 36(2), 176-187.
  • McQuail, D., (1987). Mass Communication Theory: An Introduction. 2nd edn. Beverly Hills. CA: Sage Pulication Inc.
  • Palmgeen, P. ve Clarke, P., (1991). “Agenda-Setting With Local and National Issues”, Agenda Setting, Reading on Media, Public Opinion, and Policymaking, David L.Protess, Maxwell McCombs (eds.), Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
  • Reese, S.D. and Danielian, L.H., (1989). “Intermedia Influence and the Drug Influence: Converging on Coccine”, Communication Campaigns about Drugs: Government, Media, Public, Shoemaker P. (ed), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 29-46.
  • Roberts, M. and Mccombs, M., (1994). ‘‘Agenda Setting and Political Advertising: origins of the news agenda’’, Political Communication, 11, 249-62.
  • Takeshita, Toshio, (1997), “Exploring the Media’s Roles in Defining Reality: From Issue-Agenda Setting to Attribute-Agenda Setting”, Communication and Democracy, Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,Inc.
  • Tankard, J., Hendrickson, L., Silberman, J., Bliss, K., and Ghanem, S., (1991, August). Media frames: Approaches to conceptualization and measurement, Paper presented at the annual convention of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Boston, MA.
  • Weaver, David H., (2006). “Thoughts on Agenda Setting, Framing, and Priming”, Journal of Communication, Volume 57, Issue 1: 142-147.