___

• Adams, G., & Povey, H. (2018). “Now there’s everything to stop you”: Teacher autonomy then and now. In M. Jurdak, & R. Vithal (Eds.), ICME-13 Monographs (s. 209-230). Springer.
• Akbari, R. (2008). Postmethod discourse and practice. TESOL Quarterly, 42(4), 641-652.
• Amado, D., Del Villar, F., Leo, F. M., Sanchez Oliva, D., & Sanchez Miguel, G. C. (2014). Effect of a multi-dimensional intervention programme on the motivation of physical education students. PLoS ONE, 9(1), 1-6.
• Anderson, L. W. (1987). The decline of teacher autonomy: teers or cheers? International Review of Education, 3(3), 357-373.
• Angel Alvarado, R., Wilhelmi, M. R., & Belletich, O. (2020). Teaching autonomy: does Spanish education system achieve the desired effect? Psychology, Society, & Education, 12(1), 85-96.
• Angelle, P. M., & Teague, G. (2014). Teacher leadership and collective efficacy: Teacher perceptions in three US school districts. Journal of Educational Administration, 52(6), 738 - 753.
• Aoki, N. (2007). Aspects of teacher autonomy: Capacity, freedom, and responsibility. In P. Benson, & S. Toogod (Eds.), Learner autonomy 7: Challenges to research and practice (s. 110-124). Dublin: Authentik.
• Ayral, M., Özdemir, N., Türedi, A., Yılmaz Fındık, L., Büyükgöze, H., Demirezen, S., . . . Tahirbegi, Y. (2014). The relationship between teacher autonomy and student achievement: PISA sample. Journal of Educational Sciences Research International E-Journal, 4, 208-218.
• Bahar, M. A. (2017). The effect of metacognitive reading training according to 4MAT teaching system on the level of using metacognitive reading strategies and reading comprehension of factual informative texts. (Unpublished PhD thesis). Gazi University, Ankara.
• Bakioğlu, A., & Baltacı, R. (2013). Güney Kore eğitim sistemi. In A. Bakioğlu (Eds.), Karşılaştırmalı eğitim yönetimi: PISA’da başarılı ülkelerin eğitim sistemleri (pp. 43-87). Ankara: Nobel.
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
• Barfield, A., Ashwell, T., Carroll, M., Collins, K., Cowie, N., Critchley, M., . . . Robertson, M. C. (2002). Exploring and defining teacher autonomy. On developing autonomy: proceedings of the JALT college and university educators' conference (pp. 217-222). Tokyo: JALT.
• Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. New York: Longman.
• Benson, P. (2010). Teacher education and teacher autonomy: Creating spaces for experimentation in secondary school English language teaching. Language Teaching Research, 14(3), 259-275.
• Bilgin, N. (2014). Sosyal bilimlerde içerik analizi teknikler ve örnek çalışmalar. Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi.
• Brown, M. W. (2009). The teacher-tool relationship: Theorizing the design and use of curriculum materials. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics Teachers at Work-Connecting Curriculum Materials and Classroom Instruction (pp. 17–36). New York: Routledge.
• Burkhauser, M. A., & Lesaux, N. K. (2015). Exercising a bounded autonomy: novice and experienced teachers’ adaptations to curriculum materials in an age of accountability. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(3), 291-312.
• Bümen, N. T. (2019). Türkiye’de merkeziyetçiliğe karşı özerklik kıskacında eğitim programları: sorunlar ve öneriler. Kastamonu Education Journal, 27(1), 175-185.
• Bümen, N. T., & Çakar Göğebakan Yıldız, D. (2014). Curriculum fidelity and factors affecting fidelity in the Turkish context. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 14(1), 203-228.
• Camilleri, G. (1997). Learner autonomy: The teachers’ views. Aspects of Teaching Methodology in Bilingual Classes at Secondary School Level. Graz: European Centre for Modern Languages.
• Canpolat, Y. (2020). Türkiye`de ortaöğretim öğretmenlerinin mesleki özerkliği: var olan ve olası politikaların bir analizi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 45(202), 141-171.
• Castle, K. (2004). The meaning of autonomy in early childhood teacher education. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 25(1), 3-10.
• Castle, K., & Aichele, D. B. (1994). Professional development and teacher autonomy. In D. B. Aichele, & A. F. Coxford (Eds.), Professional development for teacher of mathematics (pp. 1-8). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
• Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., Lee, Y., & Lee, J. (2018). Why autonomy-supportive interventions work: explaining the professional development of teachers’ motivating style. Teaching and Teacher Education, 69, 43-51.
• Christensen, L. B., Johnson, R. B., & Turner, L. A. (2015). Research methods design and analysis. (M. Sever, Translator) Ankara: Anı. Chuck, Y. P. (2010). Learning to teach, teaching to learn: A longitudinal study of student teachers’ autonomous development. (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
• Cowie, N., & Sakui, K. (2011). Crucial but neglected: English as a foreign language teachers’ perspectives on learner motivation. Identity, Motivation and Autonomy in Language Learning, 54, 212-228.
• Crawford, B. A. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 916–937.
• Crawford, R. M. (2001). International relations as an academic discipline: if it’s good for America, is it good for the world? In C. R. M. A., & D. S. Jarvis (Eds.), International relations - still an American social science? Toward diversity in international thought. New York: State University of New York.
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2015). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. (A. Delice, Translator) Ankara: Anı. Çakır, A., & Balçıkanlı, C. (2012). The use of the EPOSTL to foster teacher autonomy: ELT student teachers' and teacher trainer's views. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37 (3), 1-16.
• Çelik, Z., Gümüş, S., & Gür, B. S. (2017). Moving beyond a monotype education in Turkey: major reforms in the last decade and challenges ahead. In Y. Cha, J. Gundara, S. Ham, & M. Lee (Eds.), Multicultural education in global perspectives (pp. 103-119). Singapore: Springer.
• Çolak, İ. (2016). The relationship between school climate and teacher autonomy, Muğla sample. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğla.
• Çolak, İ., & Altınkurt, Y. (2017). The relationship between school climate and teacher autonomy behaviours. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 23(1), 33- 71.
• Çubukçu, F. (2016). The correlation between teacher trainers’ and pre-service teachers’ perceptions of autonomy. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 232, 12-17.
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300–314.
• Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto: Learning Policy Institute.
• Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R. C., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession. Washington: National Staff Development Council.
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109–134.
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: a macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology, 182–185.
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Motivation, personality, and development within embedded social contexts: An overview of self-determination theory. In R. M. Ryan (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 85-107). New York: Oxford University Press.
• Demirkasımoğlu, N. (2010). Defining teacher professionalism from different perspectives. Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences, 9, 2047-2051.
• Deniz, M., Avşaroğlu, S., & Fidan, Ö. (2006). İngilizce öğretmenlerinin öğrencileri motive etme düzeylerinin incelenmesi. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11, 61-63.
• Dierking, R. C., & Fox, R. F. (2013). “Changing the way I teach”: building teacher knowledge, confidence, and autonomy. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(2), 129-144.
• Dikilitaş, K., & Mumford, S. E. (2019). Teacher autonomy development through reading teacher research: agency, motivation and identity. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 13(3), 253-266.
• Diseth, A., & Samdal, O. (2014). Autonomy support and achievement goals as predictors of perceived school performance and life satisfaction in the transition between lower and upper secondary school. Social Psychology of Education, 17(2), 269-291.
• Downie, M., K. R., ElGeledi, S., & Cree, K. (2004). The impact of cultural internalization and integration on well-being among tricultural individuals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(3), 305–314.
• Drake, C., & Sherin, M. G. (2006). Practicing change: Curriculum adaptation and teacher narrative in the context of mathematics reform education. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(2), 153-187.
• Duyar, İ.; Ras, N. & Pearson, C. L. (2015). Analysis of teachers’ task and extra role performance under different autonomy regimes. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 64(4), 499-522.
• Einolf, A. (2002). A study of teacher autonomy in charter school. (Unpublished PhD Thesis). Virginia Commonwealth University.
• Elhan, A. H., & Atakurt, Y. (2005). Ölçeklerin değerlendirilmesinde niçin Rasch analizi kullanılmalıdır? Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası, 58(1), 47-50.
• Emo, W. (2015). Teachers’ motivations for initiating innovations. Journal of Educational Change, 16(2), 171-195.
• Errs, M. & Kalmus, V.; Autio, T. H. (2016). ‘Walking a fine line’: Teachers’ perception of curricular autonomy in Estonia, Finland and Germany. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(5), 589-609.
• Errs, M.; Kalmus, V. (2018). Discourses of teacher autonomy and the role of teachers in Estonian, Finnish and Bavarian teachers’ newspapers in 1991-2010. Teacher and Teacher Education, 76, 95-105.
• Erss, M. (2018). Complete freedom to choose within limits” – Teachers' views of curricular autonomy, agency and control in Estonia, Finland and Germany. The Curriculum Journal, 29(2), 238–256.
• European Commission. (2007). Communication from the commission to the council and the European parliament: Improving the quality of teacher education. Brussels: Comission of Europe.
• Eurydice. (2008a). Levels of autonomy and responsibilities of teachers in Europe. Brussels: Eurydice European Unit. Eurydice. (2008b). Responsibilities and teacher autonomy. Brussels: Eurydice European Unit.
• Feldmann, D. (2011). The maintenance of teacher autonomy in a policy-driven era. Mid- Western Educational Researcher, 24(1), 2-4.
• Flamini, E., & Jiménez Raya, M. (2007). Action research: Professional development through enquiry. In M. Jiménez Raya, & L. Sercu (Eds.), Challenges in teacher development: learner autonomy and intercultural competence (pp. 105-124). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
• Fox, C. M., & Jones, J. A. (1998). Uses of Rasch modelling in counselling psychology research. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 45(1), 30-45.
• Franklin, H. N. (1988). Principle consideraiton and its relationship to teacher sense of autonomy. (Unpublished PhD Thesis). University of Oregon.
• Freidman, A. I. (1999). Teacher-perceived work autonomy: The concept and its measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59(1), 58-76.
• Freeman, D. (2009). The scope of second language teacher education. In A. Burns & J. C. Richards (Eds.). The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education, (pp.11-19). New York: Cambridge University.
• Gavrilyuk, O. A. (2018). The autonomy-oriented approach as a way to develop higher medical education. Medical University, 1(1), 8-12. Gebhard, J., & Oprandy, R. (2005). Language teaching awareness. New York: CUP.
• Genç, Z. S. (2010). Teacher autonomy through reflective journals among teachers of English as a foreign language in Turkey. Teacher Development, 14(3), 397-409.
• Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. D. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11, 255-274.
• Gurganious, N. J. (2017). The relationship between teacher autonomy and middle school students' achievement in science. (Published PhD Thesis) Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection.
• Güvenç, E., & Güvenç, H. (2014). İlköğretim matematik ile fen ve teknoloji öğretmenlerinin sinif yönetim biçemleri ve özerklik desteği algıları. Education Sciences, 9(3), 311-320.
• Hargreaves, A., Liebermann, A., Fullan, M., & Hopkins, D. (2010). International handbook of educational change. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Harrison, J. K., Lawson, T., & Wortley, A. (2005). Mentoring the beginning teacher: developing professional autonomy through critical reflection on practice. Reflective Practice, 6, 419-441.
• Hoerr, T. R. (2013). Who decides what? Educational Leadership, 70(7), 86-87.
• Huang, J. (2005). Teacher autonomy in language learning: A review of the research. In K. R. Katyal, H. C. Lam, & X. J. Ding (Eds.), Research studies education (pp. 203-218). Faculty of Education, the University of Hong Kong.
• Huang, J. (2013). Autonomy, agency and identity in foreign language learning and teaching. Bern: Peter Lang.
• Huang, J., & Benson, P. (2013). Autonomy, agency and identity in foreign and second language education. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 36, 6–27.
• Hunter, J., & Cooke, D. (2007). Through autonomy to agency: giving power to language learners. Prospect, 22(2), 72–88.
• Ingersoll, R. M. (1994). Organizational control in secondary schools. Harvard Educational Review, 64(2), 150-173.
• Ingersoll, R. M. (1996). Teachers' decision-making power and school conflict. Sociology of Education, 69(2), 159-176.
• Ingersoll, R. M. (2007). Short on power long on responsibility. Educational Leadership, 65(1), 20-25.
• Ingersoll, R. M., & Collins, G. J. (2017). Accountability and control in American schools. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(1), 75-95.
• Ingersoll, R.M., & Collins, G.J. (2018). The status of teaching as a profession. In J. Ballantine, J. Spade, and J. Stuber (Eds.), Schools and Society: a sociological approach to education (pp. 199-123). California: Pine Forge Press/Sage.
• Javadi, F. (2014). On the relationship between teacher autonomy and feeling of burnout among Iranian EFL teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 98, 770-774.
• Jia, Y., Way, N., Ling, G., Yoshikawa, H., Chen, X., H. D., . . . Lu, Z. (2009). The influence of student perceptions of school climate on socioemotional and academic adjustment: a comparison of Chinese and American adolescents. Child Development, 80, 1514-1530.
• Jiménez Raya, M., & Vieira, F. (2015). Enhancing Autonomy in Language Education: a case- based approach to teacher and learner development. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Jiménez Raya, M., Lamb, T., & Vieira, F. (2007). Pedagogy for autonomy in language education in Europe: towards a framework for learner and teacher development. Dublin: Authentik.
• Johnson, K. E. (2009). Second language teacher education: a sociocultural perspective. New York: Routledge.
• Jugar, R. R. (2013). An inquiry on the roles of personal test ıtem banking (PTIB) and table of specifications (TOS) in the construction and utilization of classroom tests. International Journal of Education and Research, 1(12), 1-8
• Kamali, J. (2014). Post method survival. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 98, 824- 829.
• Kanadlı, S. (2017). Prospective teachers’ professional self-efficacy beliefs in terms of their perceived autonomy support and attitudes towards the teaching profession: a mixed methods study. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 17(5), 1847-1871.
• Karabacak, M. S. (2014). Ankara ili genel liselerinde görev yapan öğretmenlerin özerklik algıları ile özyeterlik algıları arasındaki ilişki. (Unpublished Master Thesis). Ankara University, Ankara.
• Kaur, A., Hashim, R. A., & Noman, M. (2015). Teacher autonomy support intervention as a classroom practice in a Thai school. Journal for Multicultural Education, 9(1), 10-27.
• Kocaman Karoğlu, A. (2016). Karma yöntem: gelişen Paradigma. In M. Y. Özden, & L. Durdu (Eds.), Eğitimde üretim tabanlı çalışmalar için nitel araştırma yöntemleri (pp. 71-92). Ankara: Anı.
• Kumaravadivelu, B. (2001). Toward a postmethod pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 35(4), 537- 560.
• Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Critical language pedagogy: A post method perspective on English language teaching. World Englishes, 22(4), 539-550.
• LaCoe, C.S. (2008). Teacher autonomy: a multifaceted approach for the new millennium. Amherst: Cambria Press.
• Lai-ngok, J. W. (2004). School Autonomy in China: a comparison between government and private schools within the context of decentralization. International Studies of Educational Administration, 32(3), 54-73.
• Lamb, T. (2008). Learner autonomy and teacher autonomy: Synthesising an agenda. In Lamb, T. E. & Reinders, H. (Eds.) Learner and teacher autonomy: concepts, realities and responses, (pp. 269-284). Amsterdam: John Benjamin.
• Lamb, T. (2000). Finding a voice: Learner autonomy and teacher education in an urban context. In B. Sinclair, I. McGrath, & T. Lamb (Eds.), Learner autonomy, teacher autonomy: future directions (pp. 118-127). London: Longman.
• Lightfoot, S. L. (1986). On goodness of school: themes of empowerment. Peabody Journal of Education, 63(3), 9-28.
• Ling, I. (2007). Fostering teacher autonomy in the use of English teaching materials. CELEA Journal, 30(1), 96-102.
• Little, D. (1995). Learning as dialogue: The dependence of learner autonomy on teacher autonomy. System, 23(2), 175-182.
• Little, D. (2007). Language learner autonomy: some fundamental considerations revisited. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 14-29.
• Littlewood, W. (1997). Self-access work and curriculum ideologies. In P. Benson, & P. Voller (Eds.), Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 181-191). London: Longman.
• Littlewood, W. (1999). Defining and developing autonomy in East Asian contexts. Applied Linguistics, 20(1), 71-94.
• Llaven Nucamendi, M. E. (2014). Autonomy in language learning: the learner, the teacher and the institution. Chetumal: Universidad de Quintana Roo.
• Lu, J., Jiang, X., Yu, H., & Li, D. (2014). Building collaborative structures for teachers‟ autonomy and self-efficacy: the mediating role of participative management and learning culture. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 26(2), 1-18.
• Machin, S., & Vernoit, J. (2011). Changing school autonomy: academy schools and their introduction to England’s education. Centre for the Economics of Education.
• Maviş Sevim, F. Ö., Yazıcı, L., & Maviş, R. (2017). Avrupa ülkeleri ve Türkiye’de okul ve öğretmen özerkliğinin karşılaştırılması. Route Educational and Social Science Journal, 4(2), 1-12.
• Martinek, D.; Zumbacj, J., & Carmignola, M. (2020). The impact of perceived autonomy support and autonomy orientation on orientations towards teaching and self-regulation at university. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, 1-8.
• McGrath, I. (2000). Teacher autonomy. In B. Sinclair, I. McGrath, & T. Lamb (Eds.), Learner autonomy, teacher autonomy: Future directions (pp. 100-110). London: Longman.
• Meirink, J., Imants, J., Meijer, P., & Verloop, N. (2010). Teacher learning and collaboration in innovative teams. Cambridge Journal of Education, 40(2), 161–181.
• Montgomery, B. M., & Prawitz, A. D. (2011). Autonomy in teachers of family and consumer sciences: Factors contributing to educational decision making. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences Education, 29(2), 26-37.
• Moreira, M. A., & Ribeiro, D. (2009). Then the I becomes Us… on collaborative supervision journals and the development of professional autonomy. In F. Vieria (Eds.), Struggling for autonomy in language education: Reflecting, acting, and being (pp. 63-80). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
• Mourshed, M., Chijioke, C., & Barber, M. (2010). How the world's most improved scholl systems keep getting better. London: McKinsey&Company.
• Munoz, D. P. (2007). Exploring five Mexican English language teachers’ perceptions of their professional development and its relation to autonomy. ELTED, 10, 1-12.
• Mustafa, M., & Cullingford, C. (2008). Teacher autonomy and centralised control: The case of textbooks. International Journal of Educational Development, 28, 81-88.
• Newby, D., Allan, R., Fenner, A. B., Jones, B., Komorowska, H., & Soghikyan, K. (2007). European portfolio for student teachers of language: a reflection tool for language teacher education. Graz: Council of Europe Publishing.
• Nguyen Thi Hong, D. (2019). Teacher autonomy in Finnish primary schools: an exploratory study about class teachers’ perceptions, (Unpublished Master's Thesis). Tampere University.
• Nguyen, X. N., & Walkinshaw, I. (2018). Autonomy in teaching practice: Insights from Vietnamese English language teachers trained in Inner-Circle countries. Teaching and Teacher Education, 69, 21-32.
• Noormohammadi, S. (2014). Teacher Reflection and its Relation to Teacher Efficacy and Autonomy. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 98, 1380 – 1389.
• Ollerhead, S. (2010). Teacher Agency and Policy Response in the Adult ESL Literacy Classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 44, 606–618.
• Özaslan, G. (2015). Teachers’ perceptions of the level of their professional autonomy. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 3(2), 25-39.
• Parker, G. (2015). Postmodernist perceptions of teacher professionalism: A critique. Curriculum Journal, 26(3), 452-467.
• Pearson, L. C., & Hall, B. W. (1993). Initial construct validation of the teaching autonomy scale. The Journal of Educational Research, 86(3), 172-178.
• Pearson, L. C., Moomaw, W. (2005). The relationship between teacher autonomy and stress, work satisfaction, empowerment and professionalism. Educational Research Quarterly. 29 (1), 37-53.
• Pearson, L., & Moomaw, W. (2006). Continuing validation of the teaching autonomy scale. The Journal of Educational Scale, 100(1), 44-51.
• Perlman, D. (2011). The Influence of an autonomy-supportive intervention on preservice teacher. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(11), 73-79.
• Pinter, A., & Kennedy, J. (2007). Developing teacher autonomy through teamwork. In A. Barfield, & S. H. Brown (Eds.), Reconstructing autonomy in language education: inquiry and innovation (pp. 209-221). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Pitt, A. (2010). On having one’s chance: autonomy as education’s limit. Educational Theory, 60(1), 1-18.
• Ramos, R. C. (2006). Considerations on the role of teacher autonomy. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 8, 183-202.
• Ratnam, T. (2007). Understanding the development of teacher autonomy using a cultural historical approach. Proceedings of the Independent Learning Association 2007 Japan Conference. Chiba.
• Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 159– 175.
• Reeve, J., & Cheon, S. H. (2016). Teachers become more autonomy supportive after they believe it is easy to do. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 22, 178-189.
• Reeve, J., Jang, H. R., & Jang, H. (2018). Personality-based antecedents of teachers' autonomy- supportive and controlling motivating styles. Learning and Individual Differences, 62, 12-22.
• Reeve, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Assor, A., Ikhlas, A., Cheon, S. H., Jang, H., . . . Wang, C. K. (2014). The beliefs that underlie autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching: A multinational investigation. Motivation and Emotion, 38(1), 93-110.
• Reinders, H., & Balçıkanlı, C. (2011). Do classroom textbooks encourage learner autonomy? Novitas Royal Research on Youth and Language, 5(2), 265-272.
• Reinders, H., & Balçıkanlı, C. (2011b). Learning to foster autonomy: The role of teacher education materials. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 2, 15-25.
• Republic of Turkey Ministry of National Education. (2017). Öğretmen strateji belgesi. Ankara: Republic of Turkey Ministry of National Education.
• Republic of Turkey Ministry of National Education Teacher Training and Development General Directorate (2017). Öğretmenlik mesleği genel yeterlikleri. Ankara: Republic of Turkey Ministry of National Education.
• Republic of Turkey Ministry of National Education. (2019). Eğitimde 2023 vizyonu. Ankara: Republic of Turkey Ministry of National Education. Richards, J., & Schmidt, R. [2002]. Dictionary of language teaching & applied linguistics.Essex: Longman.
• Rosenholtz, S. J. (1987). Education reform strategies: will they increase teacher commitment? American Journal of Education, 95(4), 534-562.
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: The Guilford Press.
• Saldaña, J. (2019). Nitel Araştırmacılar için Kodlama El Kitabı. (A. Akcan Tüfekci, Translator) Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Salokangas, M., & Wermke, W. (2020). Unpacking autonomy for empirical comparative investigation. Oxford Review of Education, 1-19.
• Salokangas, M., Wermke, W., & Harvey, G. (2020). Teachers’ autonomy deconstructed: Irish and Finnish teachers’ perceptions of decision-making and control. European Educational Research Journal, 19(4), 329–350.
• Schwienhorst, K. (1999). Teacher autonomy in multiple-user domains: supporting Language teaching in collaborative environments. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 8, 199–214.
• Seçgin, M. G. (2019). Autonomy, competence and relatedness perceived by teacher candidates: A self-determination practice using creative drama, (Unpublished Master Thesis). Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University.
• Sehrawat, J. (2014). Teacher Autonomy: key to teaching success. Bhartiyam International Journal of Education & Research, 4(1), 1-8.
• Semerci, Ç. (2011). Doktora yeterlikler çerçevesinde öğretim üyesi, akran ve öz değerlendirmelerin Rasch ölçme modeliyle analizi. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme, 2(2), 164-171.
• Shaw, J. (2007). Team-teaching as negotiating autonomy and shared understandings of what we are doing. In T. Lamb, H. Reinders, & U. Jung (Eds.), Learner and teacher autonomy concepts, realities and responses-AILA Applied Linguistics Series, (pp. 205-236). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Sherin, M. G., & Drake, C. (2009). Curriculum strategy framework: Investigating patterns in teachers’ use of a reform based elementary mathematics curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 41(4), 467-500.
• Sinclair, B. (2008). Multiple voices: negotiating pathways towards teacher and learner autonomy. In T. Lam, & H. Reinders (Eds.), Learner and teacher autonomy: concepts, realities and responses-AILA Applied Linguistics Series. (pp. 237-266). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
• Skinner, A. (1996). Teacher Development. Report on Workshop 16/96 New Trends in Foreign Language Learning and Teaching for Foreign Language Teachers and Multipliers from Bosnia-Herzegovina. Graz: European Centre for Modern Languages.
• Smith, R. (2001). Learner and teacher development: connections and constraints. The Language Teacher, 25(6), 43-44.
• Smith, R. (2003). Teacher education for teacher-learner autonomy. In J. Gollin, G. Ferguson, & H. TrappesLomax (Eds.), Symposium for language teacher Educators: Papers from Three IALS Symposia (CD-ROM). Edinburgh: IALS, University of Edinburg.
• Smith, R. (2008). Commentary on “teacher education for teacher and learner autonomy”. In L. T. Jiménez Raya and Lamb, T. E. (Eds.), Pedagogy for Autonomy in Modern Languages Education: Theory, Practice. Pedagogy for Autonomy, (pp. 303-307). Dublin: Authentik.
• Smith, R. C. (2000). Starting with ourselves: Teacher-learner autonomy in language learning. In B. Sinclair, I. McGrath, & T. Lamb (Eds.), Learner autonomy, teacher autonomy: Future directions (pp. 89-99). London: Longman.
• Smith, R. C. (2001). Learner and teacher development: Connections and constraints. The Language Teacher, 25(6), 43-44.
• Smith, R., & Erdoğan, S. (2008). Teacher-learner autonomy: Programme goals and student- teacher constructs. In T. E. Lamb, & H. Reinders (Eds.), Learner and teacher autonomy: Concepts, realities and responses (pp. 83-103). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Smith, R., & Vieira, F. (2009). Teacher education for teacher-learner autonomy: building a knowledge base. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 3(3), 215-220.
• Srivastava, A. P., & Dhar, R. L. (2015). Training comprehensiveness: construct development and relation with role behaviour. European Journal of Training and Development, 39(7), 641-662.
• Šteh, B., & Marentič Požarnik, B. (2005). Teachers’ Perception of Their Professional Autonomy in the Environment of Systemic Change. In D. Beijaard, P. C. Meijer, G. Morine Derhimer & T. Harm (Eds.). Teacher professional development in changing conditions, (pp.349-363). Dordrecht: Springer.
• Street, M. S., & Licate, J. W. (1989). Supervisor expertise: Resolving the dilemma between bureaucratic control and teacher autonomy. Planning and Changing, 20(2), 97-107.
• Strong, L. E., & Yoshida, R. K. (2014). Teachers' autonomy in today's educational climate: Current perceptions from an acceptable instrument. Educational Studies: A Journal of the American Educational Studies Association, 50, 123-145.
• Stros, M. (1995). Understanding Teacher Development for Primary Schools. Age 6- 10. Report on Workshop 6/95. Graz: ECLM/ Council of Europe Publishing.
• Sugrue, C. (2011). Irish teachers’ experience of professional development: Performative or transformative learning? Professional Development in Education, 37(5), 793–815.
• Surgrue, C. (2013). Autonomy and accountability. In H. O'Sullivan, & J. West Burnham (Eds.), Leading and Managing Schools (pp. 59-74). London: Sage.
• Şirin, S. (2018). Bir Türkiye Hayali. İstanbul: Doğan ve Egmont.
• Tang, Q., Fang, X. Y., Hu, W., Chen, H. D., Wu, M. X., & Wang, F. (2013). The association between parental and teacher autonomy support and high school students' development. Psychological Development and Education, 29(6), 604-615.
• Teng, M. F. (2019). Understanding Teacher Autonomy, Teacher Agency, and Teacher Identity: Voices from Four EFL Student Teachers. English Teaching & Learning, 43, 189–212.
• Thavenius, C. (1999). Teacher Autonomy for Learner autonomy. In S. Cotterall and D. Crabbe (Eds.), Learner autonomy in language learning: in defining the field and effecting change, (pp. 156-166). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
• The Grand National Assembly of Turkey. (1973, 06 14). National Education Basic Law. 1739. Ankara: Republic of Turkey Resmî Gazete. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2014). TALIS 2013 Results: An International Perspective on Teaching and Learning, Paris: OECD Publishing.
• The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016). Supporting Teacher Professionalism: Insights from Teaching and Learning International Survey-2013, Paris: The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Publishing.
• Tokgöz, Ö. (2013). Transformation of centralized curriculum into teaching and learning processes: Teachers’ journey of thought curriculum into enacted one. (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis). Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
• Tort Moloney, D. (1997). Teacher autonomy: a Vygotskian theoretical framework. CLCS Occasional Paper No 48. Dublin: Trinity College, CLCS.
• Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk-Hoy, A. (2007). The differential antecedents of self-efficacy of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 944–956.
• Tschirhart, C., & Rigler, E. (2009). LondonMet e-packs: A pragmatic approach to learner/teacher autonomy. Language Learning Journal, 37(1), 71-83.
• Turkish Education Association-Mem. (2015, 10 21). Öğretmen Özerkliği ve Okul Özerkliği Üzerine. 06 05, 2020: https://tedmem.org/mem-notlari/ogretmen-ozerkligi-ve-okul-ozerkligi-uzerine.
• Ulaş, J., & Aksu, M. (2015). Development of Teacher Autonomy Scale for Turkish Teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 189, 344-349.
• United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2017). Global Education Monitoring Report (Accountability in education: Meeting Our Commitments). Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
• Ushioda, E., Smith, R., Mann, S., & Brown, P. (2011). Promoting teacher-learner autonomy through and beyond initial language teacher education. Language Teaching, 44(1), 118- 121.
• Usma, J. (2007). Teacher autonomy: A critical review of the research and concept beyond applied linguistics. Ikala: Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 12(18), 245-275.
• Üzüm, P., & Karslı, M. D. (2013). Awareness Levels of Classroom Teachers about Teacher Autonomy (An Example of the Province of Izmir). Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 14(3), 79-94.
• Vangrieken, K., Grosemans, I., Dochy, F., & Kyndt, E. (2017). Teacher autonomy and collaboration: A paradox? Conceptualising and measuring teachers' autonomy and collaborative attitude. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 302-315.
• Vansteenkiste, M., Sierens, E., Goossens, L., Soenes, B., Dochy, F., Mouratidis, A., . . . Beyers, W. (2012). Identifiying configurations of perceived teacher autonomy support and structure: Associations with self-regulated learning, motivation and problem behaviour. Learning and Instruction, 22, 431-439.
• Varathraj, R., Abdullah, A., & Ismail, A. (2015). The effect of teacher autonomy on assessment practices among Malaysian cluster school teachers. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 5(1), 31-36.
• Varghese, M., Morgan, B., Johnston, B., & Johnson, K. A. (2005). Theorizing language teacher identity: three perspectives and beyond. Journal of Language Identity & Education Identity, 1, 21-44.
• Verhoest, K., Peters, B., Bouckaert, G., & Verschuere, B. (2004). The study of organisational autonomy: a conceptual review. Public Administration and Development, 24(2), 101- 108.
• Vieira, F. (1999). Pedagogy for autonomy. exploratory answers to questions any teacher should ask. In M. Müller Verweyen (Eds.), Standpunkte zur Sprach- und Kulturvermittlung 7 (pp. 53-72). München: Goethe-Institut.
• Vieira, F. (2003). Addressing constraints on autonomy in school contexts: Lessons from working with teachers. In D. Palfreyman, & R. C. Smith (Eds.), Learner autonomy across cultures: Language education perspectives (pp. 220-237). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Vieira, F. (2007a). Reflective teacher development toward pedagogy for autonomy in schools: promoting and understanding change through pedagogical inquiry. In M. Jiménez Raya, & L. Sercu (Eds.), Challenges in Teacher Development: Learner Autonomy and Intercultural Competence (pp. 147-167). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
• Vieira, F. (2007b). Teacher development through inquiry: getting started. In A. Barfield, & S. H. Brown (Eds.), Reconstructing autonomy in language education: inquiry and innovation (pp. 15–29). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Vieira, F., Paiva, M., Marques, I., & Fernandes, I. S. (2008). Teaching education towards teacher and learner autonomy: What can be learnt from teacher development practices? In T. E. Lamb, & H. Reinders (Eds.), Learner and teacher autonomy: concepts, realities and responses (pp. 217-236). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Webb, P. T. (2002). Teacher power: The exercise of professional autonomy in an era of strict accountability. Teacher Development, 6(1), 47-62.
• Wermke, W., & Höstfält, G. (2014). Contextualizing Teacher Autonomy in time and space: a model for comparing various forms of governing the teaching profession. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(1), 58-80.
• Wermke, W., Rick, S. O., & Salokangas, M. (2019). Decision making and control: Perceived autonomy of teachers in Germany and Sweden. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 51(3), 306-325.
• White, P. A. (1992). Teacher empowerment under "ideal" school-site autonomy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(1), 69-82.
• Worth, J., & van den Brande, J. (2020). Teacher autonomy: how does it relate to job satisfaction and retention? Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research.
• Wu, Y., & Wu, F. (2018). The relationship between teacher autonomy and ict competency of pre-service teachers. 7th International Conference of Educational Innovation through Technology, (pp. 11-15).
• Xu, H. (2015). The development of teacher autonomy in collaborative lesson preparation: A multiple-case study of EFL teachers in China. System, 52, 139-148.
• Yan, H. (2010). A Brief Analysis of Teacher Autonomy in Second Language Acquisition. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(2), 175-176.
• Yazıcı, A. Ş. (2016). The Relationship between the Teacher Autonomy and Learner Autonomy Support Behaviours. Journal of Educational Sciences Research, 6(2), 1-23.
• Yazıcılar, Ü., & Bümen, N. T. (2019). Crossing over the brick wall: Adapting the curriculum as. Issues in Educational Research, 29(2), 583-609.
• Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2006). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin.
• Yılmaz Uçman, T. (2019). The post method era pedagogy in foreign language teaching. The Journal of International Social Research, 12(62), 1143-1157.
• Yolcu, O., & Akar Vural, R. (2020). A scale development study on measuring science teachers' autonomy on curriculum. International Journal of Curriculum and Instructional Studies, 10(1), 29-52.