Türkiye’de eğitimin değerinin ölçülmesi

İktisat teorisinde, eğitimin değeri özellikle gelişmekte olan ülkeler açısından iki ayrı teorik yaklaşımla ele alınmaktadır; beşeri sermaye teorisi ve yapabililirlikler teorisi. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye için eğitimin değerini söz konusu iktisat teorilerinin ışığı altında değerlendirmektir. Bu amaçla, söz konusu teorileri temsil eden değişkenler yardımıyla Türkiye için eğitimin değeri tartışılmıştır. Beşeri sermaye teorisi çerçevesinde, hem daha önce yapılmış olan çalışmalar hem de OECD - Education at a Glance 2010'dan elde edilen eğitim göstergeleri, Türkiye'de hem bireylerin gelir artışı, hemde iktisadi büyüme için eğitimin önemine dikkat çekmektedir. Çalışma, aynı zamanda yapabilirlikler teorisi çerçevesinde Türkiye için eğitimin değerinin, kişilerin olmaya ya da yapmaya değer verdiği sağlıklı olma ve siyasi katılım gibi diğer önemli işlevleri gerçekleştirebilmesi için temel bilişsel işlevleri sağlamasından da kaynaklandığını göstermektedir. Ancak, temel eğitim olanaklarının sağlaması konusunda son yıllarda ilerlemeler kaydedilmekle birlikte Türkiye iktisadi olarak kendisine benzer ya da bazı daha yoksul ülkelerden geri konumdadır. Aynı zamanda eğitim olanaklarının bölgesel ve cinsiyet bazındaki dağılımında eşitsizlikler bulunmaktadır.

Measuring the value of education in Turkey

In economic theory, the value of education is evaluated by way of two different theoretical approaches; the human the capital approach and human capabilities approach. In this paper our aim is to evaluate the value of education in Turkey in the light of these two approaches. Existing studies on human capital and education indicators drawn from OECD’s Education at a Glance 2010 show the importance of education to increase individual income as well as the economic growth. The results of the study also support the argument that, within the context of human capabilities approach the value of education also arising from the fact that education provides the basic cognitive skills necessary for achieving other essential functionings such as health and civic engagement. This study shows that although there have been some improvements, in comparison with the countries that have same or less income level than Turkey, Turkey still is behind in terms of providing the capability-increasing cognitive skills that are enabled by a basic education. At the same time, another important point for Turkey is the considerable gender and regional inequality with regard to capability development.

___

  • Akkoyunlu Wigley, A. ve Wigley S. (2008). Basic education and capability development in Turkey. İçerisinde A. M Nohl, A. Akkoyunlu Wigley ve S. Wigley (Eds), Education in Turkey, New York/ Münster: Waxmann Publishing, 271-297.
  • Akkoyunlu Wigley ve Wigley, S. (2009). A regional analysis of capabilities and education in Turkey. Development of Competencies in the World of Work and Education (DECOWE),'de sunulan Tebliğ, 24-26 Eylül, 2009, Slovenya.
  • Barro, R. (1991). Economic growth in a cross section of countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 407-443.
  • Barro, R.J. ve Sala-i-Martin Xavier.( 1995). Economic growth. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Becker, G. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical analysis with special reference to education. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Bils, M. ve Klenow, P. J. (2000). Does schooling cause growth?. The American Economic Review, 90 ( 5), 1160-1183.
  • Card, D. (1999). The causal effect of education on learning. In O. Ashenfelter ve D. Card (Eds), Handbook of Labor Economics, Bölüm 30, 1802-1859, Elsevier.
  • Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü, (2003). Bölgesel istatistikler, 1980-2003. Başbakanlık DİE Yayınları, Ankara
  • Dowrick, S. (2003). Ideas and education: Level or growth effects? NBER Working Paper Series, No: 9770. Cambridge, Mass.i
  • Fitzsimons, P. (1999). Human capital theory and education. Encyclopedia of Philosophy of Education.
  • http://www.ffst.hr/ENCYCLOPAEDIA/doku.php?id=human capital theory and education adresinden erişildi.
  • Gakidou, E., Cowling, K., Lozano, R., Christopher J, ve Murray, L. (2010). Increased educational attainment and its effect on child mortality in 175 countries between 1970 and 2009: A systematic analysis. Lancet, 376, September 18.
  • Güngör, N. D. (1997). Education and economic growth in Turkey 1980-1990: A panel study. METU Studies in Development, 24 (2), 185-214. I
  • Güngör, N. D. (2010). Education, human capital inequality and economic growth: Evidence from Turkey. Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies. 10 (2). http://www.usc.es/~economet/journals2/eers/eers1024.pdf adresinden erişildi.
  • Griliches, Z. (1996). Education, human capital, and growth: A personal perspective. NBER Working Paper Series, No: 5426. Cambridge, Mass.
  • Hall, R. ve Jones, C. (1999). Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111, 83-116.
  • Jamison, E. A, Jamison, D. T ve Hanushek , E. A . (2006). The effects of education quality on income growth and mortality decline. NBER Working Paper, No:12652.
  • Machin, S. (2008). The new economics of education: Methods, evidence and policy. Journal of Population Economics, 2, 119.
  • Mıhcı, H. ve Mıhcı S. (2008). Economics of education in Turkey: Human capital and economic growth. İçerisinde A.M. Nohl, A. Akkoyunlu Wigley ve S. Wigley (Eds), Education in Turkey, New York/ Münster: Waxmann Publishing, 227-246.
  • Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • OECD (2010). Education at Glance, OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD. http://www.oecd.org/document/35/0,3343,en 2649 39263238 45897844 1 1 1 37455,00 adresinden erişidi.
  • OECD/UNESCO (2002). Financing education, investment and returns: Analysis of the world education indicators. Paris: OECD.
  • OECD. http://www.uis.unesco.org/TEMPLATE/pdf/wei/WEI ExecSummary Eng.pdf adresinden erişildi.
  • Olaniyan, D.A ve Okemakinde, T. (2008). Human capital theory: Implications for educational development. European Journal of Scientific Research, 24 (2), 157-162.
  • Psacharopoulos, G.ve Patrinos, H.A. (2004). Returns to investment in education: A further update. Education Economics, 12 (2), 111 — 134.
  • Schultz, T. (1961). Investment in human capital. American Economic Review, 51, 1-17.
  • Sen, A. (1985). Commodities and capabilities. North Holland, Amsterdam.
  • Sen, A (1987). The standard of living. Cambridge Mass: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sen, A (1992). Inequality reexamined . Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press.
  • Sen, A (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Anchor Books.
  • Sianesi, B. ve Van Reenen, J. (2003). The Returns to education: Macroeconomics. Journal of Economic Surveys, 17 ( 2), 157 - 200.
  • Sharpe, A. (2001). The development of indicators for human capital sustainability. Annual meeting of the canadian economics association, McGill University, Montreal, June 1-3.
  • Tansel, A. (1994). Wage employment, earning and returns to schooling for men and women in Turkey. Economics of Education Review, 13(4), 305-320.
  • Tansel, A. (1999). Türkiye ve seçilmiş ülkelerde eğitimin getirisi. METU Studies in Development, 26 (3-4), 453-472.
  • Temple J. (1999). A positive effect of human capital Growth. Economics Letters, 65, 131-134.
  • Van-Den-Berg, H. (2001). Economic Growth and Development. New York. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
  • Wigley, S ve A. Akkoyunlu Wigley (2006). Human capabilities and human capital: Gauging the value of education in developing countries. Social Indicators Research, 78 (2), 287-304.