Kavram haritası ve yapılandırılmış gridle elde edilen puanların geçerlik ve güvenirliklerinin incelenmesi

Bu çalışmada, "Newton'un Hareket Yasaları" ünitesinde öğrencilerin başarılarım ölçmek için kullanılan kavram haritası ve yapılandırılmış gridin geçerlik ve güvenirlikleri araştırılmıştır. Çalışma grubunu, 2009-2010 öğretim yılında Fen Bilgisi Öğretmenliği ve Fizik Öğretmenliği programı 1. sınıfta okuyan 102 öğrenci oluşturmaktadır.Kavram haritası ve yapılandırılmış gridin geçerliği için ölçüt olarak aynı konuda geliştirilen kısa cevaplı bir test kullanılmıştır. Kavram haritasından ve kısa cevaplı testten elde edilen puanlar arasındaki Pearson korelasyon katsayısı 0.57 bulunmuştur (p

An analysis on the validity and reliability of concept map and structural communication grid scores

This study aims to research on the validity and reliability of concept maps and structured communication grids used to assess students’ achievement regarding the unit called “Newton’s Laws of Motion”. The sampling consisted of 102 students studying in their Year One at Science Teaching and Physics teaching departments during 2009 – 2010 academic year. The responses to the short-answer test consisted of the main measure in checking the validity of the concept map and the structured communication grid. The Pearson Correlation Coefficient between the scores of the shortanswer test and the concept map was calculated to be 0.57. In order to find the reliability state of the concept map, the calculation concluded as 0.69. The degree of the relationship between structured communication grid and short answer test scores was calculated (0.69; p

PDF

___

Bahar, M. (2003). A study of pupils ideas about the concept of life. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 11, 93-104.
Bahar, M., Aydın, F., & Karakırık, D. (2009). A diagnostic study of computer application of structural communication grid. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8 (2), 5-20.
Baykul, Y. (2000). Eğitimde ve psikolojide ölçme: Klasik test teorisi ve uygulamaları. Ankara: ÖSYM Yayınları.
Danili, E., & Reid, N. (2005) Assesment formats: do they make a differerence? Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 2005, 6 (4), 204-212.
Demirel, Ö. (2002). Planlamadan değerlendirmeye öğretme sanatı. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
Demirel, Ö. (2007). Eğitimde program geliştirme. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
Durmuş, S., & Karakırık, E. A (2005). Computer assessment tool for structural communication grid. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 4, 1303-6521.
Edwards, J., & Fraser, K. (1983). Concept maps as reflectors conceptual understanding. Research in Science Education, 13(1), 19-26.
Egan, K. (1972). Structural communication- a new contribution to pedagogy. Program Learning and Educational Technology, 1, 63-78.
Hassan, A.K., Hill, R.A., & Reid, N. (2004). Ideas underpinning success in an introductory courrse in organic chemistry. The Higher Education Chemistry Journal of The Royal Society of Chemistry, 8 (2), 40-52.
İyilik, H. (2007). İki farklı kavram haritası tekniğinden elde edilen puanların güvenirlik ve geçerliğinin incelenmesi. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.
Johnstone, A. H., & Ambusaidi, A. (2000). Fixed response: what are we testing? Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 1(3), 323-328.
Johnstone, A. H., Bahar, M., & Hansell, M. H. (2000). Structural communication grids: A valuable assessment and diagnostic tool for science teachers. Journal of Biological Education, 34(2), 87-89.
Kandil-İngeç, Ş. (2008). Kavram haritalarının değerlendirme aracı olarak fizik eğitiminde kullanılması. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 35, 95-206.
Kehoe, J. (1995). Basic item analysis for multiple-choice tests. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 4(10). 12.04.2010 tarihinde http://PAREonline.net/ getvn.asp?v=4&n=10 adresinden alınmıştır.
MacGuire, P.R.P. & Johnstone, A.H. (1987). Techniques for investigating the understanding of concepts in science. International Journal of Science Education, 9, 565-577.
McClure, J.R., & Bell, P.E. (1990). Effects of an environmental education related STS approach instruction on cognitive structures of pre-service science teachers. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED 341 582).
McClure, J.R., Sonak, B., & Suen, H.K. (1999). Concept map assessment of classroom learning: Reliability, validity, and logistical practicality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 4, 475-492.
Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı, (2008). Program Dosyaları. 14.04.2010 tarihinde
http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/ogretmen/modules.php?name=downloads&d_op=viewdownload&cid=1 adresinden alınmıştır.
Novak, J. D. (1984). Application of advances in learning theory and philosophy of science to the improvement of chemistry teaching. Journal of Chemical Education, 61, 607-612.
Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Novak, J. D., Gowin, D. B., & Johansen, G. T. (1983). The use of concept mapping and knowledge: Vee mapping with junior high school science students. Science Education, 67(5), 625-645.
Nunnually, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ruiz-Primo, M.A. (2004). Examining concept maps as an assessment tool. Computer and Information Science, 36-43.
Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Schultz, S. E., Li, M., & Shavelson, R. J. (2001). Comparison of the reliability and validity of scores from two concept-mapping techniques. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 260-278.
Rye, J. A., & Rubba, P. A. (2002). Scoring concept maps: An expert map-based scheme weighted for relationships. School Science and Mathematics. 102(1), 33-42.
Şahin, B. (2003). Matematik dersinde kavram haritası yöntemini kullanarak öğrenci başarısının değerlendirilmesi. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.
Şen, A. İ., & Aykutlu, I. (2008). Using concept maps as an alternative evaluation tool for students' conceptions of electric current. The Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 31 (8), 75-92.
Turgut, M.F. (1992). Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme. Ankara: Saydam Matbaacılık.