Türkçe Konuşan Çocuklarda Fonolojik İşlemleme Becerileri İlk Okuma Performansını Yorduyor mu? Boylamsal Sonuçlar

İlkokula başlamadan önceki dönemde, okuma ve yazmaya temel oluşturan bazı beceri ve bilişsel yeterlilikler, okumayı öğrenme sürecindeki başarıyı etkilemektedir. Okuma yazmaya temel oluşturan bu yeterliliklerden biri de fonolojik işlemleme becerileridir. Bu araştırmada anadili Türkçe olan çocuklarda anasınıfının güz ve bahar dönemlerindeki fonolojik işlemleme becerilerinin (sesbilgisel farkındalık, hızlı isimlendirme ve fonolojik bellek) okumayı öğrenme aşamasındaki okuma başarısını yordama durumu incelenmiştir. Araştırmanın katılımcıları, Ankara ilinde alt, orta ve üst sosyoekonomik düzeyleri temsil eden 45 okuldan seçkisiz örnekleme yoluyla seçilen ve yaşları 56.74 ile 70.75 ay (Ort =66.24, SS= 3.64) arasında değişen 392 çocuktan oluşmuştur. Değerlendirmeler, anasınıfı güz döneminde (A1), anasınıfı bahar döneminde (A2) ve okumayı öğrenme süreci olan birinci sınıfın güz döneminin sonunda (İ1) gerçekleştirilmiştir. A1 ve A2’de çocukların fonolojik işlemleme becerileri, İ1’de ise okuma becerileri değerlendirilmiştir. Fonolojik işlemleme becerilerinin, okuma başarısını yordama durumu yapısal eşitlik modeli kullanılarak incelenmiştir. Analizlerin sonucunda sesbilgisel farkındalık, hızlı isimlendirme ve fonolojik bellek becerilerine ilişkin ortalamalarının zaman içinde artış gösterdiği ve bu becerilerinin okuma becerilerine farklı düzeylerde katkı sağladığı bulunmuştur. Ek olarak A1’deki sesbilgilsel farkındalığın İ1’deki okuma başarısını hızlı isimlendirme ve fonolojik bellek aracılığıyla yordadığı, A2’deki hızlı isimlendirme ve fonolojik belleğin ise İ1’deki okuma başarısını sesbilgisel farkındalık aracılığı ile yordadığı bulunmuştur. Sonuçlar, Türkçe konuşan çocukların okuma becerilerinin erken dönem yordayıcılarına ilişkin gelişimsel açıdan önemli bulgular ortaya koymaktadır.

Do Phonological Processing Skills Predict the Beginning Reading Performance of Turkish-Speaking Children? Longitudinal Results

Some skills and cognitive competencies children own in the preschool period form the basis for reading and writing and affect the achievement in the process of learning to read. One of these competencies is phonological processing skills. In this study, it was aimed to investigate the predictive power of phonological processing skills (phonological awareness, rapid naming and phonological memory) measured in the fall and spring semesters of kindergarten for the beginning reading achievement in Turkish-speaking children. The participants of the study consisted of 392 children aged between 56.74 and 70.75 months (Mean=66.24, SD =3.64) who were selected by random sampling from 45 schools representing the lower, middle and upper socioeconomic levels in Ankara. Assessments were made in the fall (K1) and spring (K2) of kindergarten and at the end of fall semester of first grade (F1). Structural equation modeling was used to determine whether phonological processing skills predicted reading achievement. Results showed that the phonological awareness, rapid naming, and phonological memory performances of children increased over time and their contribution to reading differentiated by time. In addition, it was found that the phonological awareness in K1 predicted the reading achievement in F1 through rapid naming and phonological memory, while the rapid naming and phonological memory in K2 predicted the reading achievement in F1 through phonological awareness. Results revealed important developmental findings regarding the early predictors of reading in Turkish-speaking children.

___

  • Akoğlu, G., Acarlar, F. (2014). Türkçe Anlamsız Sözcük Tekrarı Listesinin 3-9 Yaş Grubu Çocuklarda Kullanımının İncelenmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 39(173), 13-24.
  • Araújo, S., & Faísca, L. (2019). A meta-analytic review of naming-speed deficits in developmental dyslexia. Scientific Studies of Reading, 23(5), 349-368.
  • Araújo, S., Pacheco, A., Faísca, L., Petersson, K. M., & Reis, A. (2010). Visual rapid naming and phonological abilities: Different subtypes in dyslexic children. International Journal of Psychology, 45(6), 443-452.
  • Babayiğit, S., & Stainthorp, R. (2007). Preliterate phonological awareness and early literacy skills in Turkish. Journal of Research in Reading, 30(4), 394-413.
  • Babayiğit, S., & Stainthorp, R. (2010). Component processes of early reading, spelling, and narrative writing skills in Turkish: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing, 23(5), 539-568.
  • Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36(3), 189-208.
  • Bowey, J. A. (2005). Predicting individual differences in learning to read. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: a handbook (pp 155-172). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Caravolas, M., & Bruck, M. (1993). The effect of oral and written language input on children′ s phonological awareness: A crosslinguistic study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 55(1), 1-30.
  • Caravolas, M., Lervåg, A., Mousikou, P., Efrim, C., Litavský, M., Onochie-Quintanilla, E., Salas, N., Schöffelová, M., Defior, S., Mikulajová, M., Seidlová-Málková, G., Hulme, C. (2012). Common patterns of prediction of literacy development in different alphabetic orthographies. Psychological Science, 23(6), 678-686.
  • Catts, H. W., Fey, M. E., Zhang, X., & Tomblin, J. B. (2001). Estimating the risk of future reading difficulties in kindergarten children: A research-based model and its clinical implementation. Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 32(1), 38– 50.
  • Chow, B. W. Y., McBride-Chang, C., & Burgess, S. (2005). Phonological processing skills and early reading abilities in Hong Kong Chinese kindergarteners learning to read English as a second language. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(1), 81-87.
  • Crawford, L., Tindal, G., & Stieber, S. (2001). Using oral reading rate to predict student performance on statewide achievement tests. Educational Assessment, 7(4), 303-323.
  • Cunningham, A. J., Witton, C., Talcott, J. B., Burgess, A. P., & Shapiro, L. (2015). Deconstructing phonological tasks: The contribution of stimulus and response type to the prediction of early decoding skills. Cognition, 143, 178–186.
  • de Jong, P. F. (1998). Working memory deficits of reading disabled children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 70(2), 75- 96
  • de Jong, P. F., & van der Leij, A. (1999). Specific contributions of phonological abilities to early reading acquisition: Results from a Dutch latent variable longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 450-476.
  • de Jong, P. F., & van der Leij, A. (2003). Developmental changes in the manifestation of a phonological deficit in dyslexic children learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 22-40.
  • Dispaldro, M., Leonard, L. B., & Deevy, P. (2013). Real-word and nonword repetition in Italian-speaking children with specific language impairment: A study of diagnostic accuracy. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 56(1), 323-336.
  • Durgunoğlu, A. Y., Öney, B. (2002). Phonological awareness in literacy acquisition: It’s not only for children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6(3), 245–266.
  • Ehri, L., Nunes, S., Willows, D., Schuster, B., Yaghoub‐Zadeh, Z., & Shanahan, T. (2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the national reading panel's meta‐analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 250–287.
  • Ergül, C.. & Demir, E. (2018). Hızlı İsimlendirme Testi uygulayıcı kılavuzu. Ankara.
  • Ergül, C., Ökcün-Akçamuş, M., Akoğlu, G., Kılıç-Tülü, B. ve Demir, E. (2018). Okuma Yazma Değerlendirme Bataryası. Ankara.
  • Ergül, C., Yılmaz, Ç. Ö., & Demir, E. (2017). Validity and reliability of the working memory scale for children aged 5-10 years. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 14(2), 187–214.
  • Felton, R. H. (1993). Effects of instruction on the decoding skills of children with phonological-processing problems. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26(9), 583-589.
  • Francis, D. J., Shaywitz, S. E., Stuebing, K. K., Shaywitz, B. A., & Fletcher, J. M. (1996). Developmental lag versus deficit models of reading disability: A longitudinal, individual growth curves analysis. Journal of Educational psychology, 88(1), 3-17.
  • Georgiou, G. K., Parrila, R., & Liao, C. H. (2008). Rapid naming speed and reading across languages that vary in orthographic consistency. Reading and Writing, 21, 885-903.
  • Georgiou, G. K., Parrila, R., Cui, Y., & Papadopoulos, T. C. (2013). Why is rapid automatized naming related to reading? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115(1), 218-225.
  • Georgiou, G. K., Parrila, R., & Papadopoulos, T. C. (2008). Predictors of word decoding and reading fluency across languages varying in orthographic consistency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 566-580.
  • Gillon, G. T. (2000). The efficacy of phonological awareness intervention for children with spoken language impairment. Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 31(2), 126–141.
  • Goodrich, J. M., & Lonigan, C. J. (2017). Language-independent and language-specific aspects of early literacy: An evaluation of the common underlying proficiency model. Journal of educational psychology, 109(6), 782-793.
  • Herbers, J. E., Cutuli, J. J., Supkoff, L. M., Heistad, D., Chan, C. K., Hinz, E., & Masten, A. S. (2012). Early reading skills and academic achievement trajectories of students facing poverty, homelessness, and high residential mobility. Educational Researcher, 41(9), 366-374.
  • Hoien-Tengesdal, I., & Tonnessen, F. (2011). The relationship between phonological skills and word reading. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 52, 93–103.
  • Hornung, C., Martin, R., & Fayol, M. (2017). The power of vowels: contributions of vowel, consonant and digit RAN to clinical approaches in reading development. Learning and Individual Differences, 57, 85-102.
  • Hulme, C., Bowyer‐Crane, C., Carroll, J., Duff, F., & Snowling, M. (2012). The causal role of phoneme awareness and letter sound knowledge in learning to read: Combining intervention studies with mediation analyses. Psychological Science, 23, 572–577.
  • Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2013). Learning to read: What we know and what we need to understand better. Child Development Perspectives, 7(1), 1-5.
  • Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2014). The interface between spoken and written language: developmental disorders. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 369, 20120395.
  • Kaderavek, J. N. (2011). Language disorders in children: Fundamental concepts of assessment and intervention. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
  • Kaderavek, J. N.,& Justice, L. M. (2004). Embedded-explicit emergent literacy intervention II. Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 35(3), 212-228.
  • Karakelle, S. (2004). Fonolojik farkındalık ve harf bilgisinin ilk okuma becerisi üzerindeki etkisi. Psikoloji Çalışmaları, 24, 45-56.
  • Kargın, T., Ergül, C., Büyüköztürk, Ş, & Güldenoğlu, B. (2015). Anasınıfı çocuklarına yönelik Erken Okuryazarlık Testi (EROT) geliştirme çalışması. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 16(03), 237–270.
  • Kirby, J. R., Desrochers, A., Roth, L., & Lai, S. S. (2008). Longitudinal predictors of word reading development. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(2), 103-110.
  • Kirby, J. R., Parrila, R. K., & Pfeiffer, S. L. (2003). Naming speed and phonological awareness as predictors of reading development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(3), 453-464.
  • Knoop‐van Campen, C. A., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2018). How phonological awareness mediates the relation between working memory and word reading efficiency in children with dyslexia. Dyslexia, 24(2), 156-169.
  • Korkmaz, M., Bildiren, A., Demiral, N., & Çulha, D. G. (2018). TONI-3 Sözel Olmayan Zeka Testinin 6-11 yaş örneklemi norm ve standardizasyon çalışması. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, 19, 76-83.
  • Leppänen, U., Aunola, K., Niemi, P., & Nurmi, J. E. (2008). Letter knowledge predicts Grade 4 reading fluency and reading comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 18(6), 548-564.
  • Liao, C. H., Georgiou, G. K., & Parrila, R. (2008). Rapid naming speed and Chinese character recognition. Reading and Writing, 21(3), 231-253.
  • Lonigan, C. J., Anthony, J. L., Phillips, B. M., Purpura, D. J., Wilson, S. B., & McQueen, J. D. (2009). The nature of preschool phonological processing abilities and their relations to vocabulary, general cognitive abilities, and print knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 345-358.
  • Mattys, S. L., Baddeley, A., & Trenkic, D. (2018). Is the superior verbal memory span of Mandarin speakers due to faster rehearsal? Memory & Cognition , 46(3), 361-369.
  • Mayes, S. D., Calhoun, S. L., Bixler, E. O., & Zimmerman, D. N. (2009). IQ and neuropsychological predictors of academic achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(2), 238-241.
  • Melby-Lervåg, M., Lyster, S. A. H., & Hulme, C. (2012). Phonological skills and their role in learning to read: a meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 322-352.
  • Meyer, M. S., Wood, F. B., Hart, L. A., & Felton, R. H. (1998). Selective predictive value of rapid automatized naming in poor readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31(2), 106-117.
  • Moore, M. W. (2018). Consonant age of acquisition effects are robust in children's nonword repetition performance. Applied Psycholinguistics, 39(5), 933-959.
  • Muter, V., Hulme, C., Snowling, M. J., & Stevenson, J. (2004). Phonemes, rimes, vocabulary, and grammatical skills as foundations of early reading development: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 40(5), 665–681.
  • Nikolopoulos, D., Goulandris, N., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2006). The cognitive bases of learning to read and spell in Greek: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94(1), 1-17.
  • Norton, E. S., & Wolf, M. (2012). Rapid automatized naming (RAN) and reading fluency: Implications for understanding and treatment of reading disabilities. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 427-452.
  • Oktay, A.,& Aktan, E. (2002). A cross-linguistic comparison of phonological awareness and word recognition in Turkish and English. International Journal of Early Years Education, 10(1), 37-48.
  • Olsthoorn, N. M., Andringa, S., & Hulstijn, J. H. (2014). Visual and auditory digit-span performance in native and non-native speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism, 18(6), 663-673.
  • Ortiz, M., Folsom, J. S., Al Otaiba, S., Gruelich, L., Thomas-Tate, S., & Connor, C. M. (2012). Predicting first grade reading outcomes from kindergarten language and literacy skills: Examining the contributions of dialect and morpho-syntactic skills within a component model of reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 406-417.
  • Öney, B., & Durgunoğlu, A. Y. (1997). Beginning to read in Turkish: A phonologically transparent orthography. Applied psycholinguistics, 18(1), 1-15.
  • Papadopoulos, T. C., Spanoudis, G. C., & Georgiou, G. K. (2016). How is RAN related to reading fluency? A comprehensive examination of the prominent theoretical accounts. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1-15-.
  • Parrila, R., Kirby, J. R., & McQuarrie, L. (2004). Articulation rate, naming speed, verbal short-term memory, and phonological awareness: Longitudinal predictors of early reading development? Scientific Studies of Reading, 8(1), 3-26.
  • Reuterskiold-Wagner, C., Sahlen, B. & Nyman, A. (2005). Non-word repetition and non-word discrimination in Swedish preschool children. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 19(8), 681-99.
  • Roman, A. A., Kirby, J. R., Parrila, R. K., Wade-Woolley, L., & Deacon, S. H. (2009). Toward a comprehensive view of the skills involved in word reading in Grades 4, 6, and 8. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102(1), 96-113.
  • Schatschneider, C., Fletcher, J. M., Francis, D. J., Carlson, C. D., & Foorman, B. R. (2004). Kindergarten prediction of reading skills: A longitudinal comparative analysis. Journal of Education & Psychology, 96, 265–282.
  • Song, S., Georgiou, K., Su, M., & Hua, S. (2016). How well do phonological awareness and rapid automatized naming correlate with Chinese reading accuracy and fluency? A meta-analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20(2), 99–123.
  • Stainthorp, R., & Hughes, D. (1999). Learning from children who read at an early age. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  • Tobia, V., & Marzocchi, G. M. (2014). Predictors of reading fluency in Italian orthography: Evidence from a cross-sectional study of primary school students. Child Neuropsychology, 20(4), 449-469.
  • Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1994). Longitudinal studies of phonological processing and reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(5), 276-286.
  • Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Herron, J., & Lindamood, P. (2010). Computer-assisted instruction to prevent early reading difficulties in students at risk for dyslexia: Outcomes from two instructional approaches. Annals of Dyslexia, 60(1), 40– 56.
  • Vaessen, A., Bertrand, D., Tóth, D., Csépe, V., Faísca, L., Reis, A., & Blomert, L. (2010). Cognitive development of fluent word reading does not qualitatively differ between transparent and opaque orthographies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 827–842
  • Vaessen, A., & Blomert, L. (2010). Long-term cognitive dynamics of fluent reading development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105(3), 213-231.
  • Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101(2), 192-212.
  • Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1994). Development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bidirectional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 30(1), 73-87.
  • Whitehurst, G. J., & Lonigan, C. J. (2002). Emergent literacy: Development from prereaders to readers. In S. B. Neuman, & C. J. Lonigan (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 11-29). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  • Wolf, M., Bowers, P. G., & Biddle, K. (2000). Naming-speed processes, timing, and reading: A conceptual review. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 387–407.
  • Wyse, D., Goswami, U. (2013). Early reading development, In J. Larson & J.C. Marsh, (Ed.), The Sage Handbook of Early Childhood Literacy (379-394). London: Sage Pub.
  • Ziegler, J. C., Bertrand, D., Tóth, D., Csépe, V., Reis, A., Faísca, L., Blomert, L.(2010). Orthographic depth and its impact on universal predictors of reading: A cross-language investigation. Psychological Science, 21, 551–559..
Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • Başlangıç: 1986
  • Yayıncı: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dekanlığı
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Türkçe Konuşan Çocuklarda Fonolojik İşlemleme Becerileri İlk Okuma Performansını Yorduyor mu? Boylamsal Sonuçlar

Cevriye ERGÜL, Meral Çilem ÖKCÜN AKÇAMUŞ, Gözde AKOĞLU, Zeynep BAHAP KUDRET, Burcu KILIÇ TÜLÜ, Ergül DEMİR, Fethi Emre OKŞAK

Dil Okulu Türünün ve Cinsiyetin İran İngilizcesi Öğretmenlerinin İş Tatmini Üzerindeki Etkisi

Masoumeh Seyyed REZAEI, Mehdi SARKHOSH

Mesleki Müzik Eğitimi Alan Öğrencilerin Bireysel Çalgı Dersine İlişkin Motivasyonlarının İncelenmesi

Şevki Özer AKÇAY, Yavuz ŞEN

Öğretmenlik Uygulaması Dersinin Üç Paydaşının Beklentilerinin Beklentinin İhlali Teorisine Göre Tespiti

Tuğba YÜKSEL, Banu AVŞAR ERÜMİT

İlkokul 4. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Organik ve Organik Olmayan Besinler Konusuna Yönelik Kavramsal Gelişimlerinin İncelenmesi: Ortak Bilgi Yapılandırma Modeli Örneği

Ergün YURTBAKAN, Muammer ÇALIK, Tekin GÜLER

Öğretmenlerinin Maruz Kaldıkları Şiddet ve Başa Çıkma Stratejilerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Habib HAMURCU, Ramazan KOCA, Demet ÜNALAN

Çocukluk Çağı Travmaları ile İyileşme Arasındaki İlişkide Kolektivist Başa Çıkma Stillerinin Aracı Rolü

Sinem KOCADAYI, Eyüp Sabır ERBİÇER

Öğretmen Adaylarının Bilimin Doğası Öğretimine Yönelik Anlayışlarının Değerlendirilmesi*

Seda ÇAVUŞ GÜNGÖREN, Ergin HAMZAOĞLU

Müziğin Sosyal Gücü: Müzik Temelli Etkinliklerin ve Eğitim Programlarının Sosyal Etkilerine Gelişimsel Bakış

Gaye SOLEY, Begüm KÖSELER

Birleştirilmiş Program Modelinin Yazma Becerilerine Etkisi

Ülkü AKÇA ÜŞENTİ, Zekiye Ümit Tülin DAVASLIGİ