Slovakian and Turkish students’ fear, disgust and perceived danger of invertebrates

İnsanoğlu omurgasız hayvanları omurgalı hayvanlara göre daha az olumlu algılamaktadır. Çünkü bu hayvanlar davranış ve morfolojik yapı olarak çok alışılmamışlardır. Bu kültürlerarası çalışma Slovak (n=150) ve Türk (n=164) öğrencilerin 25 omurgasız canlı ile ilgili algılanan tehlike, korku ve nefretlerini araştırmaktadır. Türk öğrencilerden farklı olarak, Slovak öğrencilere bu canlıların sınıflandırmaları üzerine sorular sorulmuştur. Slovak öğrencileri ile karşılaştırıldığında, Türk öğrencileri daha yüksek düzeyde korku, nefret ve tehlike algısına sahiptirler. Kızlar lehine cinsiyet farkı sadece Slovak öğrenciler arasında ve potansiyel olarak tehlikeli olan canlılar için gözlemlenmiştir. Bu durum kız öğrencilerin tehlikeli hayvanları az veya çok ayırt edemediğini göstermiştir. Herhangi bir ev hayvanına sahip olma ile öğrencilerin görüşleri arasında bir ilişki bulunamamıştır. Ayrıca, sınıflandırma becerileri ile öğrencilerin görüşleri arasında da bir ilişki bulunamamıştır.

Slovak ve Türk öğrencilerinin omurgasız hayvanlara ilişkin algılanan tehlike,korku ve nefretleri

Human perceives invertebrates less positively than vertebrates because they are small and behaviourally and morphologically unfamiliar. This cross-cultural research focused on Slovakian (n=150) and Turkish (n=164) students’ fear, disgust and perceived danger regarding 25 invertebrates [including 5 disease relevant adult insects, 5 ectoparasites, 5 endoparasites, 5 disease irrelevant adult insects and 5 insect larvae/earthworm]. A subsample of Slovakian children was asked for taxonomic identification of these animals. It was found that Turkish students rated higher in all three dimensions fear, disgust and dangerousness, compared with Slovakian students. Gender difference favouring higher score of females were found only among Slovakian students and these differences were observed for potentially harmful animals. This implies that females were able to distinguish between more and less dangerous animals. It was neither detected any effects of owning animals on students’ ratings, nor found any correlation between identification skills and rating scores.

___

  • Alsop, S., & Watts, M. (2003). Science education and affect. International Journal of Science Education 25 (9), 1043-1047.
  • Bjerke, T., 0stdahl, T., & Kleiven, J. (2003). Attitudes and activities related to urban wildlife: Pet owners and non-owners.Anthrozoös, 16 (3), 252-262.
  • Cohen, D. (2001). Cultural variation: Considerations and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 127 (4), 451- 471.
  • Curtis, V., Aunger, R., & Rabie, T. (2004). Evidence that disgust evolved to protect from risk of disease. Biology Letters, 272:S131-3
  • Davey, G. C. L. (1994). The "disgusting" spider: The role of disease and illness in the perpetuation of fear of spiders. Society and Animals, 2(1), 17-25.
  • Dervisoglu, S., Menzel, S, Soran, H. & Boegeholz, S. (2009) Influence of Values, Beliefs and Problem Perception on Personal Norms for Biodiversity Protection. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi-Hacettepe University Journal Of Education, 37 50-59.
  • Fessler, D. & Navarrete, C. (2003). Domain specific variation in disgust sensitivity across the menstrual cycle: evidence in favour of an evolutionary account of sexual disgust. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24 (6), 406-417
  • Fincher, C. L., & Thornhill, R. (2008). Assortive sociality, limited dispersal, infectious disease and the genesis of the global pattern of religious diversity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 275, 2587-2594.
  • Gangestad, S. W., Haselton, M. G. & Buss, D. M. (2006). Evolutionary foundations of cultural variation: evoked culture and mate preferences. Psychological Inquiry, 17 (2), 75-95.
  • Gerdes A. B. M., Uhl, G., & Alpers, G. W. (2009). Spiders are special: fear and disgust evoked by pictures of arthropods.Evolution and Human Behavior, 30 (1), 66-73.
  • Guernier, V., Hochberg, M. E., & Guégan, J.-F. (2004). Ecology drives the worldwide distribution of human diseases. PloS Biology, 2, 740-746.
  • Herzog, H., & Burghardt, G. M. (1988). Attitudes toward animals: Origins and diversity. Anthrozoös, 1 (4), 214-222.
  • Jeronen, E. Jeronen, J. & Raustia, H. (2009) Environmental Education in Finland - A Case Study of Environmental Education in Nature Schools, International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4 (1), 123.
  • Kellert, S. R. (1985). Attitudes toward animals: Age-related development among children. Journal of Environmental Education, 16 (3), 29-39.
  • Kellert, S. R. (1993). Values and perceptions of invertebrates. Conservation Biology, 7(4), 845-855.
  • Lindemann-Matthies, P. (2005). 'Loveable' mammals and 'lifeless' plants: how children's interest in common local organisms can be enhanced through observation of nature. International Journal of Science Education, 27 (6), 655-677.
  • Martin-Lôpez, B., Montes, C., & Benayas, J. (2007). The non-economic motives behind the willingness to pay for biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation, 139(1-2), 67-82.
  • Morgan, J. M. (1992). A theoretical basis for evaluating wildlife-related education programs. The American Biology Teacher, 54 (3), 153-157.
  • Murray, D. R., & Schaller, M. (2010). Historical prevalence of infectious diseases within 230 geopolitical regions: A tool for investigating origins of culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41 (1), 99-108.
  • Preczewski, P.J., Mittler A. & Tillotson, J.W. (2009). Perspectives of German and US students as they make meaning of science in their everyday lives, International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 247-258
  • Prokop, P., & Fancovicova, J. (2010). The association between disgust, danger and fear of macroparasites and human behaviour. Acta Ethologica, 13 (1), 57-62.
  • Prokop, P., & Tunnicliffe, S.D. (2008). "Disgusting" animals: Primary school children's attitudes and myths of bats and spiders. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 4 (2), 87-97.
  • Prokop, P., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2010). Effects of having pets at home on children's attitudes toward popular and unpopular animals. Anthrozoös, 23 (1), 21-35.
  • Prokop, P., Fancovicova, J., & Kubiatko, M. (2009a). Vampires are still alive: Slovakian students'attitudes toward bats. Anthrozoös, 22(1), 19-30.
  • Prokop, P., Özel, M., & Uşak, M. (2009b). Cross-cultural comparison of student attitudes toward snakes. Society and Animals, 17 (3), 224-240.
  • Prokop, P, Uşak, M. & Fancovicova, J.(2010a). Health and the avoidance of macroparasities: A preliminary cross-cultural study, Journal of Ethology, 28 (2), 345-351.
  • Prokop, P., Tolarovicova, A., Camerik, A., & Peterkova, V. (2010b). High school students' attitudes towards spiders: A cross-cultural comparison, International Journal of Science Education. 32 (12), 1665 - 1688
  • Prokop, P., Prokop, M., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2008). Effects of keeping animals as pets on children's concepts of vertebrates and invertebrates. International Journal of Science Education, 30 (4), 431-449.
  • Prokop, P., & Rodak, R. (2009). Ability of Slovakian pupils to identify birds. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 5 (2), 127-133.
  • Randler, C. (2008). Pupils' factual knowledge about vertebrate. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 7 (1), 48-54.
  • Randier, C., Ilg, A., & Kern, J. (2005). Cognitive and emotional evaluation of an amphibian conservation program for elementary school students. Journal of Environmental Education, 37 (1), 43-52.
  • Sachs, J., & Malaney, P. (2002). The economic and social burden of malaria. Nature, 415 (6872), 680-685.
  • Schaller, M. & Duncan, L. A. (2007). The behavioral immune system: its evolution and social psychological implications. In Evolution and the social mind (eds J. P. Forgas, M. G.Haselton & W. von Hippel), pp. 293-307. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  • Schaller, M., & Muray, D.R. (2008). Pathogens, personality, and culture: Disease prevalence predicts worldwide variability in sociosexuality, extraversion, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95 (1), 212221.
  • Shepardson, D. P. (2002). Bugs, butterflies, and spiders: Children's understanding about insects. International Journal of Science Education, 24 (6), 627-643.
  • Snaddon, J. L. & Turner, E. C. (2007). A Child's eye view of the insect world: perceptions of insect diversity, Environmental Conservation, 34 (1), 33-35.
  • Snaddon, J. L., Turner, E. C. & Foster, W. A. (2008). Children's perceptions of rainforest biodiversity: Which animals have the lion's share of environmental awareness? Plos One, 3 (7) e2579.
  • Strommen, E. (1995). Lions and tigers and bears, oh my - children's conceptions of forests and their inhabitants. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32 (7), 683-698.
  • Van de Vliert, E. (2009). Climate, affluence, and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wilson, E. O. (1987). The little things that run the world (the importance and conservation of invertebrates). Conservation Biology, 1 (4), 344-346.
  • Zoldosovâ, K., & Prokop, P. (2006). Education in the field influences children's ideas and interest toward science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(3), 304-313.