A.Zehra GAZİ, A.Nurdan ATAMTÜRK, Hakan ATAMTÜRK, A.Fahriye AKSAL

Evaluation of performance management in state schools: A case of North Cyprus

Araştırma, Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk Cumhuriyeti devlet okullarının performans yönetimi açısından değerlendirilmesini temel almaktadır. Bu araştırma, öğretmenlerin ve sorumlu müdürlerinin performans yönetimine ilişkin algılarının değerlendirilmesini ele alarak KKTC devlet okullarının performans yönetimi ile kaliteyi yakalamasının değerlendirilmesini hedef almasıyla özgün bir niteliğe sahiptir. Araştırmada, nicel araştırma yaklaşımına bağlı anket ile nicel veriler elde edilmiş, veriler SPSS programına bağlı ANOVA ile yorumlanmıştır. Performans yönetimi boyutlarının kıdeme göre anlamlı farklılığı araştırmada dikkate alınmıştır. Çalışma grubunu, 11 devlet ortaokulunda görev yapan 16 sorumlu müdür ve 237 öğretmen oluşturmaktadır. Araştırma sonucunda KKTC ortaöğretim devlet okullarında görev yapan öğretmen ve müdürlerin performans yönetimine ilişkin farkmdalığı yaratılarak, kıdem ve performans yönetiminin boyutları olan performans hedeflerinin planlanması, raporlama işlemine ilişkin görüşler, performans değerlendirme, ödül ve ceza, bireysel performans ve örgüt kültürü ilişkisi arasında anlamlı fark olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır.

Devlet okullarının performans yönetimi açısından değerlendirilmesi: KKTC örneği

The research study aims to evaluate performance management in the state secondary schools in North Cyprus. This study is significant by shedding a light on perceptions of teachers and headmasters regarding quality control of schools through performance management. In this research, quantitative research was employed, and a survey was conducted to gather quantitative data through questionnaires. Quantitative data were analysed and interpreted through SPSS program based on ANOVA. 16 head teachers and 237 teachers from 11 state secondary schools participated in the research. The findings revealed that teachers and headmasters gained insights on performance management and its dimensions. In this research, the significant difference between work experience of teachers and headmasters and the dimensions of performance management was revealed. In other words, there is a significant difference between work experience and the dimensions of performance management which are the planning of individual performance goals, reflection on observation reports, performance measurement, reward-punishment and the relationship between individual performance and the culture of the organization

PDF

___

Alpargu, N. (1999). Performans değerleme. Retrieved April 11, 2001, from Http://www.treasury.gov.tr/anadolu/nergis.html.
Amaratunga, D., & Baldry, D. (2003). A conceptual framework to measure facilities management performance. Property Management, 21, 171-189.
Armstrong, M. (1996). Employee reward. London: Institute of Personnel and Development (IPD) House.
Armstrong, M., & Baron, A. (1998). Performance management, The New Realities. London : Institute of Personnel and Development.
Balcı, A. (1995). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma. Ankara: 72TDFO Bilgisayar Yayın. L.t.d.
Barber, M. (2000). High expectations and standards for all - no matter what, Times Educational Supplement.
Barutcugil, İ. (2002). Performans yönetimi. İstanbul: Kariyer Developer.
Bostancı, B. (2004). Türkiye 'deki resmi ve özel ilköğretim okullarında öğretmen performans yönetimi. Doktora Tezi, Ankara.
Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Buchner, T. W. (2007). Performance management theory: A look from the performer's perspective with implications for HRD, Human Resource Development International, 10: 1, 59 — 73.
Cheng, M., Dainty, A. R. J., & Moore, D. R. (2007). A multifaceted performance excellence framework for project-based organizations. International Journal of Human Resource Development and Management, 7(3/4), 254-275.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education. USA: Routledge Falmer.
Coşkun, A. (2005). işletmelerde performans yönetimi: Bir yönetim muhasebesi aracı olarak performans karnesi. Doktora tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. United Kingdom: SAGE.
Crouch, L., & Mabogoane, T. (2001 ). No magic bullets, just tracer bullets: The role of learning resources, social advantage, and education management in improving the performance of South African schools, Social Dynamics, 27: 1, 6078.
Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (1997). Organization development and change, (6th ed.). USA: ITP.
Cutler, T., & Waine, B. (2001). Developments: Report: Performance management—The key to higher standards in schools?. Public Money & Management, 21: 2, 69 — 72.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1990). Teacher professionalism, why and how?, in Lieberman, A (ed.) Schools as collaborative cultures: creating the future now. London: Falmer.
Down, B. Chadbourne, R., & Hogan, C. (1999). How are teachers managing performance management ? . Asia Pasific Journal of Teacher Education. 28 (3). 213-223.
Down, B., Hogan, C., & Chadbourne, R. (1999). Making sense of performance assessment: official rhetoric and teachers' reality. Asia- Pasific Journal of Teacher Education. 27 (1), 11-24.
Edwards, M. R., & Ewen, A. J. (1996). How to manage performance and pay with 360 degree feedback. Compensation & Benefits Review , 28 (3) , 41.
Fitzgerald, T. (2000). Middle managers in secondary schools: who are they and what do they need to know?. New Zealand Journal of Educational Administration, 15, 71-75.
Fitzgerald, T., Youngs, H., & Grootenboer, P. (2003). Bureaucratic control or professional autonomy? : Performance management in Vew Tealand schools. School Leadership & Management, 23(1), 91-105.
Grootenboer, P. (2003). Appraisal for quality learning. Waikato Journal of Education, 6, 121-32.
Gutteridge, T. G. (1986). Organizational career development systems: The state of the practice. In D. T. Hall and Associates , Career Development in Organizations. London: Jossey - Bass.
Haynes, G., Wragg, T., Wragg, C., & Chamberlin, R. (2003). Performance management for teachers: Headteachers' perspectives. School Leadership & Management, 23: 1, 75.
Hume , d. A. (1995) . Reward management (Employee performance, motivation and pay). Combrigge, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers.
Kagioglou, M., Cooper, R., & Aouad, G. (2001). Performance management in construction: A conceptual framework. Construction Management and Economics, 19: 1, 85 — 95.
Marsick, U. J., & Watkins , K. E. (1997). Lessons from incidental and informal learning. In J. Burgoyne, & M. Reynolds (eds.), In Management learning : Integrating perspectives in theory and practice .Thossand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Marşap, A. (2000). Yönetsel sistem. Ankara: Öncü Basımevi.
Mwita J. I. (2000). Performance management model. A system -based aproach to public service quality. The
International Journal of Public Sector Management. Volume: 13, Number 1, pp, 19-37 ISSN 0951-3558.
Öztekin A. (2006). Orta öğretim kurumlarında görev yapan yöneticilerin duygusal zeka becerilerini okul yönetiminde
kullanma düzeylerinin değerlendirilmesi. (Balıkesir Örneği). Yüksek lisans tezi, Balıkesir Üniversitesi, Balıkesir. s.14- 15, 25-30.
Palmer, M. J. (1993). Performans değerlendirmesi .İstanbul: Rota Yayınları.
Pretorius, SG, & Ngwenya, VC (2008). Teachers' perceptions of and attitudes towards performance appraisal in Zimbabwean schools. Africa Education Review, 5: 1, 144 — 164.
Randall, C. (2009). Effective teachers in primary schools: a reflective resource for performance management. Professional Development in Education, 35: 3, 502 — 503.
Rhodes, C. P., & Beneicke, S. (2002). Coaching, mentoring and peer - networking : Challenges for the management of teacher professional development in schools, Journal of In - Service Education, 28, 2, 297-309.
Silcock, P. (2002). Can we manage teacher performance?. Education 3-13, 30: 3, 23 — 27.
Storey, A. (2002). Performance management in schools: Could the balanced scorecard help?. School Leadership and Management, 22: 3, 321 — 338.
Tomlinson, H. (2000). Proposals for performance related pay in English schools. School Leadership and Management, 20 (3), pp 281-298.
Waal, A. , Hafizi, R. , Rahbar, A. H., & Rowshan, S. (2010). Studying performance management in Iran using an adapted performance management analysis. Journal of Transnational Management, 15: 3, 246 — 264.
Williams, R. S. (1998). Performance management: Perspectives on employer performance. International Thomson Business Press.
Yüksel, M. (2006). Duygusal zeka ve performans ilişkisi. Yüksek lisans tezi, Atatürk Üniversitesi, Erzurum.