KAPİTALİST EĞİLİMİN KARŞITI OLARAK LUTHERİZM

Ekonomik konularla ilgili olarak, Luther, yalnızca tutucu değil fakat bu muhafazakarlığının yanında gerici bir kimseydi. Kırdaki doğal yaşamı daima kent hayatına tercih etmiş olan Luther, bu nedenle tarımsal sanayinin sağlıklı gelişmesinin zorunluluğu üzerinde ısrarlı olmuş, sürekli olarak kentsel sanayi ve ticaret mesleklerine katılanları günahın hizmetkarı olmakla suçlamıştır. Özellikle de tefecilik ve sabit fiyatlar gibi konular hakkında, Luther, havarilik hayatını ısrar etmiş olmakla Orta Çağların ilk dönemlerindeki son derece katı ve ödün vermez bir merhametsizlikteki standartlarına geri dönüş yapmış, on beşinci asırda ortaya çıkmaya başlayan kapitalist ticaret ve sanayi hareketlerinin gelişmesini kolaylaştırması için son dönem skolastikler tarafından düşünülen arıtmaları dahi reddetmiştir. Luther'e göre her fazla ödeme tefecilikti. Luther'in tefeciliği kınaması en aşırı şiddette olmasına rağmen, ahlaki ya da hukuksal bir temele dayanmıyordu. Luther'in bu suçlamaları, bundan dolayı, Thomas Aquinas'ın gerçekçi ifadelerinden ziyade ilk kilise babalarının ahlaki uyarılarına daha çok benzemektedir. Luther'in fikirlerinin Orta Çağ Katolikliğinin tutumundan farksız olmasının bir nedeni de, Luther'in faiz ile insafsız tefecilik arasında hiçbir fark gözetmemiş olmasıdır

LUTHERANISM AS OPPOSED TO THE CAPITALIST TENDENCY

On economic matters, Luther was not merely conservative but reactionary. Luther had a natural preference for country over town life, and consequently insisted on the necessity for a healthy growth of agricultural industry, and consistently charge with the evils which were often attendant upon urban commercial and industrial careers. Especially on such matters as usury and fixed prices, Luther turned back to the the harsh and unbending standards of early Middle Ages through insisted on Apostleship, and refused to consider the refinements which the later scholastics had suggested in order to facilitate the development of the capitalist movements in commerce and industry that were beginning to appear in the fifteenth century. According to Luther every surplus pay was mean usury. Luther’s denunciations of usury are violent in the extreme, but they do not rest upon any ethical or juristic basis. They thus more resemble the moral exhortations of the early fathers of the Church than the realistic expositions of Thomas Aquinas. One result of this indifference his ideas with Medieval Catholic treatment was that Luther drew no distinction between interest and unmerciful usury

___

  • BLAYNEY I.W. (1957). The Age of Luther : The Spirit of Renaissance-Humanism and the Reformation, Vantage Press, New York
  • BORNKAMM K. (1983). Luther in mid-career 1521-1530, Fortress Press, Philadelphia
  • BOTTNER L. (1932). The Reformed Doctrine of Predestination, The Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing, Philadelphia
  • BRENDLER G. (1967). Martin Luther : theology and revolution, Oxford University Press, New York
  • BRUBAKER R. (1984). The Limits of Rationality : An Essay on the Social and Moral Thought of Max Weber, Allan & Unwin, London
  • COHEN C.L. (1986). God’s Caress : The Psychology Of Puritan Religious Experience,Oxford University Press, New York
  • CROSSLEY R.N. (1974). Luther and the peasants' war; Luther's actions and reactions, Exposition Press, New York
  • EDWARDS M.U. (1983). Luther's last battles : politics and polemics, 1531-1546, Cornell University Press, Ithaca
  • FORELL G.W. (1969). Old Testament interpretation from Augustine to the young Luther, Belknap Press of Harvard University, New York
  • FORELL G.W. (1964). Faith active in love from shadow to promise : An Investigation of Principles Under Lying Luther’s Social Ethics, Augsburg Publisher, Minnepolis FREYTAG G. (1910). Martin Luther, The Open Court Publishing, Chicago
  • HARRAN M. (1983). Luther on conversion : the early years, Cornell University Press, Ithaca HEATON H. (2005). Avrupa İktisat Tarihi, Ankara
  • HERNDON F.R. (1970). Young Luther; the intellectual and religious development of Martin Luther to 1518, AMS press, New York
  • HYMA A. (1928). Luther's theological development from Erfurt to Augsburg, F.S. Crofts co, New York
  • KOOMAN W.J. (1954). By Faith Alone : The Life of Martin Luther, Lutterworth Press, London
  • KMŞ (2004). Kutsal Kitap Eski ve Yeni Antlaşma (Tevrat, Zebur, İncil), İstanbul
  • MARK U.E. (1975). Luther and the false brethren, Stanford University Press, New York
  • OBERMAN H.A. (1975). Luther : Man Between God and the Devil, Yale University Press, New Heaven
  • OBERMAN H.A. (1984). The Roots of Anti-Semitism in the age of Renaissance and Reformation, Fortress Press, Philadelphia
  • OLGUN H. (2001). Luther ve Reformu Katolisizm’i Protesto, Ankara
  • PARKS T. (2005). Medici Money : Banking, Metaphysics and Art in Fifteenth Century Florance, W.W.Norton, New York
  • PELİKAN J. (1968). Spirit versus structure; Luther and the institutions of the church, Harper & Row, New York
  • PREUS J.S. (1974). Carlstadt's ordinaciones and Luther's liberty : a study of the Wittenberg Movement 1521/1522, Harvard University Press, London
  • ROOVER R. (1974). Business banking, and economic thought in late medieval and early modern Europe, University of Chicago Press, Chicago
  • RUPP E.G. (1968). The righteousness of God: Luther studies, Hodder and Stoughton, London
  • RYN F.W. (1924). Usury and Usury Laws, Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston
  • SIMON E. (1968). Luther alive; Martin Luther and the making of the reformation, Garden City, New York
  • WATSON P.S. (1947). Let God be God. An Interpretation of the Theology of Martin Luther, Fortress Press, Philadelphia
  • WEBER M. (1984). The Protestant Ethic And The Spirit of Capitalism, George Allen and Unwin, London
  • WEBER M. (1964). The Sociology of Religion, Methuen Press, London
  • WEBER M. (1950). General Economic History, Illinois
  • WRIGHT W.J. (1988). Capitalism, the state, and the Lutheran Reformation : sixteenth-century, Ohio University Press, Ohio