Türkiye’de piliç eti ve piliç yemi fiyatlarının kointegrasyon analizi

Amaç: Etlik piliç yetiştiriciliğinde kullanılan girdiler içerisinde yem maliyetinin yüksek oranı piliç eti fiyatının oluşumunda belirleyici olmaktadır. Türkiye’de piliç yemi sanayinde kullanılan hammaddelerin üretiminin iç piyasayı karşılamada yeterli olmaması nedeniyle talep ithalat yoluyla karşılanmaktadır. Bundan dolayı döviz kurlarında meydana gelen değişim nihai ürünün fiyatına da yansımaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı piliç eti ve piliç yemi fiyat serilerine ait değişkenler arasındaki ilişkilerin analiz edilmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Türkiye’de 2006-2018 arası dönemde TL ile Dolar cinsinden piliç eti ve piliç yemi fiyat serilerine ait değişkenler arasındaki ilişkiler johansen koentegrasyon analiz tekniği ile belirlenmiştir. Bulgular: Analiz sonuçlarına göre; Türkiye’de etlik piliç yemi ve piliç eti fiyatlarının kısa dönemde eş bütünleşik olduğu, fiyatların birbirini takip ettiği tespit edilmiştir. Bu takibin yem fiyatlarındaki bir değişimin kanatlı eti fiyatlarına TL cinsinde iki dönem (2 ay) sonra, USD cinsinden ise bir dönem (1 ay) sonra etki ettiği belirlenmiştir. Öneri: Sonuç olarak piliç eti fiyatlarının kısa dönemde girdi maliyetleri göz önünde bulundurarak belirlenmesi gerekmektedir. Ancak dolar kurlarında meydana gelen dalgalanmalar girdi fiyatlarını çok kısa bir dönemde etkilediğinden dolayı piliç eti fiyatlarında etkili bir fiyat mekanizması oluşturulamamaktadır.

Cointegration analysis of broiler meat and broiler feed prices in Turkey

Aim: The high share of feed costs among the costs of inputs used in broiler breeding plays a significant role in the formation of broiler meat price. As the production of raw materials used in the broiler feed industry is not sufficient to meet the demand in the domestic market, the demand is met by importation. As such, the fluctuations in the exchange rates are reflected in the price of the final product. The aim of this study is to analyze the relationships between the variables of broiler meat and broiler feed price series.Materials and Methods: In Turkey, the relations between the variables related to the price series of broiler meat and broiler feed in TL and in USD between 2006 and 2018 were determined by johansen cointegration analysis technique.Results: The results of the analysis indicate that the broiler feed and broiler meat prices in Turkey are cointegrated in the short-term and follow each other's pattern. It was found that the change in the prices of feed had an effect on the TRY-denominated prices of poultry meat in two months and USD-denominated prices of poultry meat in onemonth.Conclusion: Consequently, broiler meat prices should be set taking into account the costs of inputs in the short-term. However, since the fluctuations in the USD exchange rate affect the input prices immediately, an effective price mechanism for broiler prices cannot be developed.

___

  • Akbay C, Bilgiç A, Miran B, 2008. Demand estimation for basic food products in Turkey. TJAE, 14(2), 55-65.
  • Armah P, Archer A, Phillips GC, 2009. Drivers leading to higher food prices: biofuels are not the main factor. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Plant, 45(3), 330-341.
  • Babula RA, Bessler DA, Schluter GE, 1991. Corn/broiler price transmissions and structural change since the 1950s. Agribusiness, 7(3), 269-284.
  • Banerjee A, 2011. Food, feed, fuel: transforming the competition for grains. Development and Change, 42(2), 529-557.
  • Barahona JF, Trejos B, Lee JW, Chulaphan W, et al., 2014. Asymmetric price transmission in the livestock industry of Thailand. APCBEE procedia, 8, 141-145.
  • CBRT, 2018. Indicative exchange rate. Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey. Accessible at: www.tcmb.gov.tr/kurlar/ kurlar_tr.html. Accessed on January 12, 2019.
  • Cinar G, Keskin B, 2018. The spillover effect of imported inputs on broiler prices in Turkey. New medit, 17(1), 37-47.
  • Çiçek H, Tandoğan M, 2007. Factors that are affected broiler meat prices in Turkey. JPR, 7(1), 52-57.
  • Denli M, Demirel R, Sessiz A, 2015. Situation analysis of the feed manufacturing industry in Diyarbakır province. Turjaf, 3(9), 701-706.
  • Engle RF, Granger CW, 1987. Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. JSTOR, 55(2), 251-276.
  • Erdem C, Şentürk İ, Şimşek T, 2011. An examination of price behavior in Turkish broiler markets. EEL, 10(6), 575-582.
  • EViews 8 Enterprise Edition, 2017. Retrieved 17 June 2017. Güneş E, Ozçelik A, Ozer O.O, Albayrak M, 2010. The analysis of some factors on feed compound production: A case study focused on Turkish feed industry. Afr. J. Bus. Manage, 4(7), 1329-1335.
  • Gür M, 1998. Analysis of profitability and productivity in broiler farms in Bolu province. Ph.D. Thesis, Graduate School of Health Science, Department of Animal Health Economics and Management, University of Ankara, Ankara, Turkey. Hatemi-J A, 2003. A new method to choose optimal lag order in stable and unstable VAR models. Appl. Econ. Lett, 10(3), 135-137.
  • Johansen S, 1988. Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. JEDC, 12(2-3), 231-254.
  • Johansen S, Juselius K, 1990. Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration-with applications to the demand for money. Oxf. Bull. Econ. Stat, 52(2), 169-210.
  • Karakuş Ü, 2010. Feed production and problems in Turkey. In: Turkey Agricultural Engineering VII. Technical Congress, Turkey, p.1-20.
  • Khiyavi PK, Moghaddasi R, Eskandarpur B, Mousavi N, 2012. Spillover effects of agricultural products price volatilities in Iran (Case study: poultry market). JBASR, 2(8), 7906- 7914.
  • Kotler P, 1982. Marketing for nonprofit organizations. Prentice Hall; New Jersey.
  • Njoroge S, Bett E, Njehia B, 2015. Impact of poultry feed price and price variability on commercial poultry production in Murang’a County, Kenya. IOSR-JEF, 6(1), 46-53.
  • Özen D, Tekindal MA, Çevrimli MB, 2019. Modeling and Forecasting Meat Consumption per Capita in Turkey. Erciyes Üniv Vet Fak Derg, 16(2), 122-129.
  • Özertan G, Saghaian S, Tekgüç H, 2014. Market power in the poultry sector in Turkey. BU Journal, 28(2), 19-32.
  • Rezitis AN, Stavropoulos KS, 2010. Supply response and price volatility in the Greek broiler market. Agribusiness, 26(1), 25-48.
  • Sakarya E, 1990. Analysis of profitability and productivity of poultry meat enterprises in Ankara province. Ankara Üniv. Vet. Fak. Derg, 37(2), 375-398.
  • Stock JH, Watson MW, 1993. A simple estimator of cointegrating vectors in higher order integrated systems. JSTOR, 61(4), 783-820.
  • Tandoğan M, 2014. Economic and econometric analysis of broiler production in Balikesir, Bolu and Sakarya province. Ph.D. Thesis, Graduate School of Health Science, Department of Animal Health Economics and Management, University of Afyon Kocatepe, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey.
  • TFIA, 2018. Turkey feed statistics. Turkish Feed Industrialists Association, Ankara, Turkey. Accessible at: http:// www.yem.org.tr/Birligimiz/istatistikler. Accessed on January 10, 2019.
  • TPMPBA, 2013. Broiler meat sector report (production, consumption, foreign trade, problems, opinions). Turkish Poultry Meat Producers and Breeders Association, Ankara, Turkey.
  • TURKSTAT, 2018. Broiler meat consumer prices. Turkish Statistical Institute. Ankara, Turkey. Accessible at: https:// biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas/?kn=110&locale=tr. Accessed on January 08, 2019.
Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1309-6958
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: Selçuk Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi