Köpeklerde regio analis’in makro anatomik, kesitsel anatomik ve bilgisayarlı tomografik incelemesi

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı köpeklerde regio analis’i oluşturan anatomik yapıları farklı anatomik inceleme yöntemleri ile inceleyerek bölgeye üç farklı (diseksiyon, kesit anatomisi, bilgisayarlı tomografi) açıdan yaklaşım sergilemektir. Hernia perinealis, anal kese yangı ve fistülleri, prolapsus recti v.b klinik vakalara yeni yaklaşımlar sergilemek açısından çalışmamız önem arzetmektedir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışma 12 köpek kadavrası üzerinde gerçekleştirildi. Regio perinealis’in karşılaştırmalı diseksiyon çalışması 3 erkek ve 3 dişi köpek kadavrasında yapıldı. Kesit anatomisi çalışması ise 3 adet erkek ve 3 adet dişi kadavrasında icra edildi. Bir adet erkek köpek kadavramızdan regio perinealis’in bilgisayarlı tomografik görüntüleri temin edilerek çalışmamız kapsamında elde edilen görüntülere eklendi. Bulgular: Çalışmamız kapsamında regio analis üç anatomik başlık altında incelendi. Literatürde genelde şekil ve çizim ile gösterilen diaphragma pelvis ve oluşumuna katılan anatomik yapılar diseksiyon, kesit anatomisi ve bilgisayarlı tomografi yöntemleri ile tespit edildi. Kesit anatomisi ve bilgisayarlı tomografi yöntemleri aracılığı ile sagittal, transversal ve horizantal kesitler ile üç boyutlu anatomik bilgi karşılaştırmalı olarak tespit edildi. Ayrıca regio analis’in yapısını oluşturan kasların origo, insertio, kalınlık ve genişlik gibi değerleri ölçülerek köpeğin yaşı ile yapılan ölçümler arasında bir ilişki kurulmuştur. Öneri: Özellikle hernia perinealis, prolapsus recti, urethrotomi, anal keselerin yangısı ve fistülleri gibi patolojik ve klinik vakalara sergilenecek yaklaşımlarda teşhis ve tedavi yöntemlerinin geliştirilmesinde bu çalışmanın katkısı oldukça önem arzetmektedir.

Macro-anatomic, cross-sectional anatomic, and computerized tomographic examination of anal region in dogs

Aim: The aim of the study is to examine the anatomical structures of anal region in dogs via different anatomical examination methods and to present an approach to the region in terms of three perspectives. Our study is important for presenting new approaches for the clinical cases such as perineal hernia, anal sac inflammation and fistulae,rectal prolapse etc.Materials and Methods: The study was conducted on 12 dog cadavers. Comparative dissection study was conducted on perineal region of 3 male and 3 female dog cadavers. A cross-sectional anatomical study was performed in 3 male and 3 female cadavers. From 1 male dog cadaver, computerized tomographic images of perineal region were obtained and added to the images obtained within the scope of the present study.Results: In the study, anal region was examined under three anatomical titles. Pelvic diaphragm and its anatomical structures, which are shown via figures and drawings in the literature, were determined using dissection, cross-sectional anatomy, and computerized tomography methods. Three-dimensional anatomical data obtainedby sagittal, transversal and horizontal sections was comparatively determined via cross-sectional anatomy and computerized tomographymethods. In addition, the values of the muscles of the anal region such as origin, insertion, thickness and width were measured and a correlation was found between the age of the dog and the measurements.Conclusion: The contribution of this study is important for development of diagnostic and treatment methods in approaches to be exhibited especially towards pathological and clinical cases such as perineal hernia, rectal prolapse, urethrotomy, anal sac inflammation and fistulae.

___

  • Adam PP, Karen LC, 2005. Managing anal furunculosis in dogs. University of ıllinois at urbana-champsign may. Compendium on Continuing Education for the Practicing Veterinarian, 27, 339-55.
  • Aktaş M, Özer K, Perk C, Acar SE, 2002. Köpeklerde diverticulum rectinin dorsal yaklaşım tekniği ile sağıltımı. İstanbul Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(1), 209-18.
  • Alpak H, 1992. Yerli koyun ve yerli keçilerde regio perinealis’in maro-anatomik farklılıkları. Doktora Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
  • Anderson WD, Anderson GB, 1994. Atlas of canine anatomy. Lea & Febiger, Chester Field Parkway Malvern, Pensilvanya, pp; 775-811.
  • Atoji Y, Yamamoto Y, Komatsu T, Suzuki Y, et al., 1998. Circumanal glands of the dog: a new classification and cell degeneration. Anat. Rec. 250 (3), 251-67. PMID:9517843.
  • Barone R, 1996. Anatomie comparee des mammifieres domesticues. Splanchnologie ǁ. Vıgot, Paris, 4, pp; 311- 443.
  • Bellenger CR, 1980. Perineal hernia in dogs. Austral¬ian Veterinary Journal, 56, 434–38. PMID:7458783.
  • Bellenger CR, Canfield RB, 2002. Perineal hernia. In: Slatter D.(ed.): Textbook of Small Animal Surgery. 3rd ed., Saunders, Philadelphia, pp; 487–98.
  • Boyd JS, Paterson C, May AH, 1994. Color atlas of clinical anatomy of the dog & cat. First Ed., Mosby-Wolfe, pp; 80-200. NLM ID:9106481.
  • Bright RM, 1994. Anorectal surgery in small animal practice. Third Edition, W.B Saunders Cc. Philedelphia, London, Toronto, Montreal, Sydney, Tokyo. pp; 787-92.
  • Budras D, Fricke W, Richter R, 2009. Veteriner anatomi atlası köpek. 1. Baskı, Medipres Yayıncılık, Malatya, Türkiye, pp; 8-174.
  • Chambers JN, Punnton PT, Allen SW, Moore Jl, 1990. Ldentllicatioo and anatomiccategorization theva sculer paems to the pemc limb muscles dogs. Am. J.Vet. Res, 51 (2), 305- 312. PMID: 2301845.
  • Çalışlar T, 1976. Köpeklerin diseksiyonu. Veteriner Fakültesi Yayınları, Fırat Üniversitesi, Ankara, Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi, pp; 6-73.
  • Daniel A, Thomas F, Robert M, 1991. Atlas of correlatıve imagıng anatomy of the normal dog, ultrasound and computed tomography. Philadelphia, London, Toronto, pp;1-382.
  • Dursun N, 2008a, Veteriner Anatomi ǁǁ. 12.Baskı, Ankara, Medisan Yayınevi, pp; 139-178.
  • Dursun N, 2008b,Veteriner Topografik Anatomi. 12.Baskı, Ankara, Medisan Yayınevi, pp; 121-80.
  • Doğuer S, 1962. Evcil hayvanların comparativ sistematik anatomisi. Ders kitabı, 2.Baskı, Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Yayınları, Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi. pp; 73-238.
  • Doğuer S, 2003. Regional topoğrafik anatomi. Ders Kitabı, Birinci Baskı, Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi, Ankara, pp; 20-90.
  • Done S, Goody P, Evans SA, Stickland N, 2009. Color atlas of veterinary anatomy, the dog and cat. Volume 3, Mosby, London, 2, pp; 1-540.
  • Dyce KM, Sack WO, Wensing CJG, 1987. Textbook of veterinary anatomy. First Edition, WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia, pp; 1-860.
  • Dyce KM, Sack WO, Wensing CJ, 2018. Veteriner anatomi konu anlatımı ve atlası. Fourth Ed., Elsevier, Ankara, pp; 3-475.
  • Ellenberger W, Baum H, 1943. Handbuch der vergleichenden anatomie haustiere, 8.ed, Berlin, pp; 277-311.
  • Feeney DA, Fletcher TF, Hardy RM, 1992. Atlas of correlative imaging anatomy of the normal dog, ultrasound and computed tomography. Philadelphia, Can Vet J, 33(8): 546. PMCID: PMC1481357
  • Geiger GV, 1956. Anatomial structure of pelvic outlet in small ruminants. Anat Anz., 22; 103(17-20), 321-39. PMID:13403210.
  • Gerisch D, Neurand K, 1973. Topography and histology of glands in the anal region of the dog. Zentralbl Veterinarmed C., 2(3), 280-94. PMID:4777507.
  • Getty R, 1975. The Anatomy of domestic animals. Fifth Edition, WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia, pp; 1576-1650.
  • Habel RE, 1966. The Topographic anatomy of the muscles, nerves, and arteries of the bovine female perineum. America Journal of Anatomy, 119, 79-96. Doi:10.1002/ aja.1001190106.
  • Hare WCD, 1959. Radiographic anatomy of the canine. Pectoral limb. Developing limb. Part II., J. Am. Vet. Med. Ass., 135, 305–310.
  • Hare WCD, 1960. Radiographic anatomy of the canine. Pelvic limb. Developing limb. Part II. J. Am. Vet. Med. Ass., 136, 603–611.
  • Hauptman J, 1984. Perineal urethrostomy. Surgical tecnique and management of complications. Vet. Clin. Notrh. Am. Small Anim., 14, 93-102. PMID:6372228.
  • Hauptman J, 1984. Perineal urethrostomy. Surgical tecnique and management of complications. Vet. Clin. North. Am. Small Anim., 14, 93-102. PMID:6372228.
  • Holmes GM, Sachs BD, 1994. Physiology and mechanics of rat levator ani muscle: evidence for asexual function. Physiol Behav., 55, 255–266. PMID:8153163.
  • Kealy JK, 1979. Diagnostic radiology of the dog and cat. First Edition, W.B.Saunders, Philadelphia, pp;10-500.
  • König HE, Liebich HG, 2015. Veteriner Anatomi (Evcil Memeli Hayvanlar). 6. Baskı, Medipres Yayıncılık, Malatya, Türkiye, pp;150-556.
  • Levitt RG, Sagel SS, Stanley RJ, Evens RG, 1978. Computed tomography of the pelvis. Semin Roentgenol, 13, 193-200. PMID:210521.
  • Martin WD, Fletcher TF, Bradley WE, 1974. Perineal musculature in the cat. 180(1), 3-13. Doi: 10.1002/ar.1091800103.
  • Mckeown DB, Cockshutt JR, Partlow GD, Dekleer VS, 1984. Dorsal aproach of the caudal pelvic canal and rectum: Effect on Normal Dogs. Vet. Surg, 13, 181-83.
  • Miller ME, 1979. Miller’s anatomy of the dog. Fourth Ed., WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia, pp; 1-491.
  • Miller ME, 1993. Miller’s guide to the dissection of the dog. Fourth Ed., WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia, pp; 211- 43.
  • NAV, 2017. Nomina Anatomica Veterinaria. International committee on veterinary gross anatomical nomenclature. Sixth Edition, W.A.V.A, pp; 1-178.
  • Nickel R, Schummer A, Seiferle E, 1979. The Anatomy of the domestic animals. Volume III. Verlag Paul Parey, Berlin Hamburg, pp; 44-178.
  • Niebauer GW, 1990. Rectum, anüs and perianal and perineal regions. İn: Small Animal Surgery. Ed; Harvey CE, Philedelphia, Grand Rapids, New york, San Francisco, London, Sydney, Tokyo, pp; 381-402.
  • Özkadif S, Eken E, Kalaycı İ, 2014. A three-dimensional reconstructive study of pelvic cavity in the New Zealand rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). The Scientific World Journal, 1-7. Doi:10.1155/2014/489854.
  • Pasquini C, Spurgeon T, Pasquini S, 2003. Anatomy of domestic animals systemic & Regional Approch. 11th. Edition, Sudz Publishing, Unites States of America, pp; 220-520.
  • Popesko P, 1989. Atlas der topographischen anatomie der haustiere. 3 Auflage, Stuttgart. pp; 174-185.
  • Rolf B, 1995. Angewandtenund topographische anatomie der haustiere. 4 Auflage, Stuttgart, pp; 345-60.
  • Schaller O, 2007. Illustrated veterinary anatomical nomenclature. Second Ed., MVS Medizinverlage Stutgart, Germany, pp; 1-265.
  • Shahar R, Shamir MH, Niebauer GW, Johnston DE, 1996. A possible association between acquired nontraumatic inguinal and perineal hernia in adult male dogs. Can Vet J, 37, 614-16. PMID:8896877.
  • Smith RN, 1962. The normal and radiological anatomy of the hip joint of the dog. J. Small Anim. Pract., 4, 1–9. Doi: doi. org/10.1111/j.1748-5827.1963.tb05991.x
  • Stolzenburg JU, 2002. Sphincteric musculature of female canine urethra in comparison to woman including 3d reconstruction. Cells Tissue Organs, 170, 151-61.
  • Tisnado J, Amendola AM, Walsh JW, Jordan RL, et al., 1981. Computed tomography of the perineum. AJR, 136, 475-81. Doi:10.2214/ajr.136.3.475.
Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1309-6958
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: Selçuk Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi