___

• Balım, A.G., İnel, D., & Evrekli, E. (2008). The effects of using the concept cartoons in science education on students’ academic achievements and enquiry learning skill perceptions. İlköğretim Online, 7(1), 188-202.
• Bandiera, M., & Bruno, C. (2006). Active/cooperative learning in schools. Journal of Biological Education, 40(3), 130-134
• Chambers, S., & Andre, T. (1997). Gender, prior knowledge, interest and experience in electricity and conceptual change text manipulations in learning about direct current. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 107-123.
• Chin, C., & Teou, L. (2008). Using Concept Cartoons in Formative Assessment: Scaffolding students’ argumentation, International Journal of Science Education, 1–26
• Dabell, J. (2004). The maths coordinator’s file—Using concept cartoons. London: PFP Publishing.
• Dabell, J. (2008). Using concept cartoons. Mathematics Teaching Incorporating Micromath, 209, 34-36
• Driver, R., & Erickson, G. (1983). Theories-in-action: Some theoretical and empirical issues in the study of students’ conceptual frameworks in science. Studies in Science Education, 10, 37-60.
• Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994) Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5-12.
• Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien, A. (1985). Children’s Ideas in Science. Buckingham: Open University Press.
• Ekici, F., Ekici, E., & Aydın, F. (2007). Utility of concept cartoons in diagnosing and overcoming misconceptions related to photosynthesis, International Journal of Environmental and science Education, 6, 111- 124.
• Feasey, R. (1998). Effective questioning in science. In R.Sherrington (Ed.) ASE guide to primary science education (pp.156-167). Hatfield: ASE/Stanley Thornes.
• Huck, S. W., & Cormier, W.H. (1996). Reading Statistics and Research. New York: Harper Collins.
• İngeç, Ş. K. (2008). Use of concept cartoons as an assessment tool in physics education. US-China Education Review, 5 (11), 47-54.
• İngeç, Ş. K., Yıldız, İ., & Ünlü, P. (2006). Identification of misconception about uniform circular motion by the use of concept cartoons, VII. National Science and Mathematics Education Conference, September 6-8, Ankara, Turkey.
• Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., Rodriguez, A. B., & Duschl, R. (2000). “Doing the lesson” or “doing science”: Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84, 757-792.
• Kabapınar, F. (2003). Kavram yanılgılarının ölçülmesinde kullanılabilecek bir ölçeğin bilgi-kavrama düzeyini ölçmeyi amaçlayan ölçekten farklılıkları. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 35, 398-417.
• Kabapınar, F. (2005). Yapılandırmacı Öğrenme Sürecine Katkıları Açısından Fen Derslerinde Kullanılabilecek Bir Öğretim Yöntemi Olarak Kavram Karikatürleri”, Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 5(1), 101-146.
• Keogh, B., & Naylor, S. (1993). Learning in science: Another way in, Primary Science Review, 26, 22-23.
• Keogh, B., & Naylor, S. (1997a). Starting points for science. Sandbach: Millgate House.
• Keogh, B., & Naylor, S. (1997b). Making sense of constructivism in the classroom, Science Teacher Education, 20, 12-14.
• Keogh, B., & Naylor, S. (1998). Teaching and Learning in Science using Concept Cartoons, Primary Science Review, 51, 14-16.
• Keogh, B., & Naylor, S. (1999). Concept cartoons, teaching and learning in science: an evaluation, International Journal of Science Education, 21(4), 431-446.
• Keogh, B., & Naylor, S. (2000a). Concept Cartoons in Science Education. Cheshire, UK: Millgate House Publishers.
• Keogh, B., & Naylor, S (2000b). Teaching and learning in science using Concept Cartoons: Why Dennis wants to stay in at playtime, Investigating, 16 (3), 10-14.
• Keogh, B., Naylor, S., & Downing, B. (2003). Children’s interactions in the classroom: Argumentation in primary science. Paper presented at 4th European Science Education Research Association Conference, Noordwijkerhout, Netherlands.
• Keogh, B., Naylor, S., & Wilson, C. (1998). Concept cartoons: a new perspective on physics education, Physics Education, 33(4), 219-224.
• LeCompte, M. D., & Goetz, J.P. (1982). Problems of Reliability and Validity in Ethnographic Research, Review of Educational Research, 52, 31-60.
• Long, S., & Marson, K. (2003). Concept cartoons. Hands on Science, 19 (3), 22-23.
• Martinez, Y. M. (2004). Does the K-W-L reading strategy enhance student understanding in an honors high school science classroom? Unpublished Master Thesis, California State University: Fullerten.
• Morris, M., Merritt, M., Fairchough, S., Birrell, N., & Howitt, C. (2007). Trialling concept cartoons in early childhood teaching and learning of science. Teaching Science, 53 (2), 42-45.
• Naylor S., Downing, B., & Keogh B. (2001). An empirical study of argumentation in primary science, using Concept Cartoons as the stimulus, Third International Conference of the European Science Education Research Association. Thessaloniki, Greece.
• Naylor, S., & McMurdo, A. (1990). Supporting science in schools. Timperley.
• Naylor, S., & Keogh, B. (1999a). Constructivism in the Classroom: Theory into Practice, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10(2) 93-106.
• Naylor, S., & Keogh, B. (1999b). Science on the Underground: An initial evaluation. Public Understanding of Science, 8, 1-18.
• Naylor, S., & Keogh, B. (2000a). The snowman’s coat and other science questions. London: Hodder children’s book.
• Naylor, S., & Keogh, B. (2000b). The seesaw and other science questions. London: Hodder children’s book.
• Naylor, S., & Keogh, B. (2000c). The Bungee jumpers and other science questions. London: Hodder children’s book.
• Naylor, S., & Keogh, B. (2000d). The upside down seeds and other science questions. London: Hodder children’s book.
• Naylor, S. & Keogh, B. (2000e). Concept Cartoons in Science Education. Sandback: Millgate House Publishers.
• Naylor, S., & Keogh, B. (2002). Starting Points For Science. Cheshire, UK: Millgate House Publishers.
• Naylor, S., Keogh, B. & Goldsworthy, A. (2004). Active assessment: Thinking, learning and assessment in science. London & Sandbach, UK: David Fulton & Millgate House. Argumentation and primary science. Research in Science Education, 37, 17–39.
• Naylor, S., Keogh, B., & Downing, B. (2007). Argumentation and primary science. Research in Science Education, 37, 17–39.
• Naylor, S., Keogh, B., de Boo, M., & Feasey, R. (2001). Formative assessment using Concept Cartoons: Initial Teacher Training in the UK. In R. Duit (Ed.) Research in Science Education: Past, Present and Future, pp.137-142. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
• Oluk, S., & Özalp, I. (2007). The teaching of global environmental problems according to the constructivist approach: As a focal point of the problem and the availability of concept cartoons. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 7 (2), 881-896.
• Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Ideas, Evidence and Argument in Science Project. London: King’s College London.
• Osborne, R., & Freyberg, P. (1985). Learning in Science: The Implications of Children’s Science. Auckland, NZ: Heinemann.
• Pelaez, N.J., Hoover, M. A., & Treagust, D.F. (2004). Concept cartoons reveal differences when HS students study blood circulation using live organism versus video. Paper presented in American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Diego, April 12-16.
• Silverman, D. (1993). Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction. London: Sage.
• Stephenson, P., & Warwick, P. (2002). Using concept cartoons to support progressin in students’ understanding of light, Physics Education, 37, 135-141.
• Wittrock, M. C. (1974). Learning as a generative process. Educational Psychology, 11, 87-95.
• Wellington, J., & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literary in science education. Buckingham: Open University.
• Warwick, P., & Stephenson, P. (2002). Editorial article reconstructing science in education: insights and strategies for making it more meaningful. Cambridge Journal of Education, 32 (2), 143-151.