Selected Research Dealing with Attitudinal Studies in Science Education

Dünyada fen bilgisi eğitimine önem verme eğilimi artmaktadır. Fen bilgisi eğitiminin başlıca önceliklerinden birisi de fen bilgisi açısından okuryazar öğrenciler veya vatandaşlar yetiştirmektir, ama bilim adamı değil. Bunun yanında okullarda fen bilgisi dersine karşı öğrencilerin ilgisi azalmaktadır. Birçok çalışma, öğrencilerin fen bilimlerine karşı olumlu veya olumsuz tepkilerinin nedeninin, bu derse karşı tutumlarıyla ilgili olduğunu göstermiştir. Onların tutumlarını biçimlendiren birçok faktör vardır. Fen bilimlerine yönelik, bazı durumlarda fen bilgisi öğretmeye karşı tutumları anlamak ve ölçmek için araştırmacılar değişik araçlar geliştirmişlerdir. Öğrencilerin fen bilimlerine yönelik tutumlarının beşinci sınıftan itibaren azalmaya başladığı ve bu durumun öğrencilerin fen bilgisi dersindeki başarılarını ve bilimsel kavramları anlamalarını etkilediği, çalışmalar ile ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu bağlamda, sınıf, fen bilgisi ve diğer branş öğretmenleri, okul programları ve çevresi, öğrencilerin fen bilimlerine karşı tutumlarını etkilemede büyük bir rol oynamaktadır.

Fen Bilgisi Eğitiminde Tutumla İlgili Çalışmalardan Seçilmiş Araştırmalar

The importance of science education is increasing all over the world. One of the main objectives of science education is to make scientifically literate students or citizens rather than scientists. Despite this, science courses in schools tend to lose the students' interest. Many studies reveal that students' negative or positive feelings about science are related to their attitudes toward science. There are different factors shaping their attitudes. To understand and measure students' attitudes toward science, and in some cases, toward science teaching, researchers have so far developed numerous instruments. Studies have revealed that students' positive attitudes toward science begin to decrease from 5th grade to the upper grades, and this situation affects their achievements in science and their understanding of scientific concepts. In this context, elementary science, the other subject teachers, the school curriculum and environment play majör roles in influencing students' attitudes toward science.

___

  • Ateaq, O. A. (1995). The attitudes of pre-service, male, elementary, science teachers in Riyadh Teachers College, Saudi Arabia, toward science and teaching science. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
  • Aiken, L. R. & Aiken, D., R. (1969). Recent research attitudes concerning science. Science Education, 53, 295-305.
  • Baumel, H. B. & Berger, J. J. (1965). An attempt to measure scientific attitudes. Science Education, 49, 267-268.
  • Baykul, Y. (1990). İlkokul beşinci sınıftan lise ve dengi okulların son sınıflarına kadar matematik ve fen derslerine karşı tutumda görülen değişmeler ve öğrencilerin seçme sınavındaki başarı ile ilişkili olduğu düşünülen bazı faktörler. Ankara: ÖSYM Yayınları.
  • Berberoğlu, G. & Tosunoğlu, C. (1995). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of an environmental attitude scale (EAS) for Turkish university students. Journal of Environmental Education, 26, 40-43.
  • Billey, V. Y. & Zakhariades, G. A. (1975). The development and application of a scale for measuring scientific attitudes. Science Education, 59, 155-165.
  • Bonnstetter, R. J. (1984). Characteristics of teachers associated with an exemplary program compared with science teachers in general. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Iowa, Iowa.
  • Cannon, K. R. & Simpson, R. D. (1985). Relationship among attitude, motivation, and achievement of ability grouped, seventh-grade, life science students. Science Education, 69, 121-138.
  • Cooley, W. W. & Kloper, L. E. (1961). TOUS, Test on understanding science: Manual for administering , scoring and interpreting scores. Princeton: Educational Testing Service.
  • Davis, I. C. (1935). The measurement of scientific attitudes. Science Education, 19, 117-122.
  • Dutton, W. H. & Stephens, L. (1963). Measuring attitudes toward science. School Science and Mathematics, 63, 43-49.
  • Earl, R. D. & Winkeljohn, D. R. (1977). Attitudes of elementary teachers toward science and science teaching. Science Education, 6, 41-45.
  • Ebel, R. L. (1938). What is the scientifîc attitude? Science Education, 22,1-5.
  • Ebenezer, J. V. & Zoller, U. (1993). Grade 10 students' perceptions of and attitudes toward science teaching and school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 175-186.
  • Eichinger, J. (1992). College science majors' perceptions of secondary school science: An exploratory investigation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 601-610.
  • Finson, K. D. & Enochs, L. (1987). Student attitudes toward science-technology-society resulting from visitation to a science-technology museum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24, 593-609.
  • Fraser, B. J. (1978). Development of a test of science-related attitudes. Science Education, 62, 509-515.
  • Gabel, D. (1980). Attitudes toward science and science teaching of undergraduates according to major and number of science courses taken and the effect of two courses. School Science and Mathematics, 80, 70-76.
  • Gardener, P. L. (1975). Attitudes to science: A review. Studies in Science Education, 2, 1-41.
  • Gauld, C. (1982). The scientific attitude and science education: A critical reappraisal. Science Education, 66, 109-121.
  • Gauld, C. F. & Hukins, A. A. (1980). Scientific attitudes: A review. Studies in Science Education, 7, 129-161.
  • Geban, Ö., Aşkar, P. & Özkan, İ. (1992). Effects of computer simulations and problem-solving approaches on high school students. Journals of Educational Research, 86, 5-10.
  • Germann, P. J. (1988). Development of the attitude toward science in school assessment and its use to investigate the relationship between science achievement and attitude tovvard science in School. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 689-703
  • Gieger, M. M. (1973). A study of scientifîc attitudes among junior college students in Mississippi. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Southern Mississippi, Mississippi.
  • Hoff, A. G. (1933). A test for scientifîc attitude. School Science and Mathematics, 33, 763-770.
  • Holden, C. (1988). Japanese views on science compared to U.S. attitudes. Science, 34, 277.
  • Hough, L. W. & Piper, M. K. (1982). The relationship betvveen attitudes toward Science and science achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19, 33-88.
  • Hughes, E. F. (1971). Role playing as a technique for developing a scientific attitude in elementary teacher trainees. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, S, 113-122.
  • Kahn, P. (1962). An experimental study to determine the effect of a selected procedure for teaching the scientific attitudes to seventh and eight grade boys through the use of current events in science. Science Education, 46, 115-120.
  • Kaptan, F. (1995). Öğretmen adaylarının öğretmenlik mesleğiyle ile ilgili tutumları, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Araştırma Fonu (95.01.140.001), Ankara.
  • Kimball, M. E. (1968). Understanding the nature of science: A comparison of scientists and science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 3, 110-120.
  • Koballa, T. R. (1988). Attitude and related concepts in science education. Science Education, 72, 115-126.
  • Koballa, T. R. & Crawley, F. E. (1985). The influence of attitude on science teaching and learning. School Science and Mathematics, 85, 222-232.
  • Kozlow, M. J. & Nay, M. A. (1976). An approach to measuring scientific attitudes. Science Education, 60, 147-172.
  • Kuhn, D. (1973). Value systems in life science instruction. Science Education, 56, 343-351.
  • Lawrenz, F. (1975). The relationship between science teacher characteristics and student achievement and attitude. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 12, 433-437.
  • Lowery, L. (1966). Development of an attitude measuring instrument for science education. School Science and Mathematics, 66, 494-502.
  • Mason, J. M. (1952). An experimental study in the teaching of scientific thinking in biological science at the college level. Science Education, 36, 270-284.
  • Moore, R. W. (1969). The development field test and validation of the scientific attitude inventory. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Temple University, Ohio.
  • Moore, R. W. (1973). The development, fıeld test, and validation of scales to assess teachers' attitudes toward teaching elementary school science. Science Education, 57, 271-278.
  • Moore, R. W. (1971). A profile of the scientific attitudes of 672 ninth-grade students. School Science and Mathematics, 71, 229-232.
  • Moore, R. W. (1975). A two-year study of a CCSS group's attitudes toward science and science teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 75, 288-299.
  • Moore, R. W. & Sutman, F. Y. (1970). The development, fıeld test and validation of an inventory of scientific attitudes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 7,95-102.
  • Moore, R. W. & Foy, H. L. R. (1997). The scientific attitude inventory: A revision (SAI-II). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 327-336.
  • Munby, H. (1983). Thirty studies involving the Scientific Attitude inventory: What confidence can we have in this instrument? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 141-162,
  • Munby, H. (1997). Issues of validity in science attitude measurement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 337-341.
  • Myers, R. E. & Fouts, J. T. (1992). A cluster analysis of high school science classroom environments and attitude toward science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 929-937.
  • Noll, V. H. (1935). Measuring the scientific attitude. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 30, 145-154.
  • Oliver, S. & Simpson, R. D. (1988). influence of attitude toward science, achievement motivation, and science şelf concept on achievement in science: A longitudinal study. Science Education, 72, 143-155.
  • Oppenheim, A. N. (1992). Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement. London: Pinter Publishers.
  • Sadava, D. (1976). Attitudes toward science of nonscience major undergraduates: Comparison with the general public and effect of a science course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 13, 79-84.
  • Schwirian, P. N. (1968). On measuring attitudes toward science. Science Education, 52, 172-179.
  • Schwirian, P. M. & Thomson, B. (1972). Changing attitudes toward Science: Undergraduates in 1967 and 1971. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 9, 253-259.
  • Shrigley, R. L., Koballa, T. R. & Simpson, R. D. (1988). Defıning attitude for science educators. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 659-687.
  • Skewes, G. (1933). What is a scientific attitude? School Science and Mathematics, 33, 964-968.
  • Smith, W. S. & Erb, T. O. (1986). Effect of women science career role models on early adolescents' attitudes toward scientists and women in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23, 667-676.
  • Tamir, P. & Amir, R. (1987). The relationship between instructional strategies, study practices, and attitudes toward biology. Journal of Biological Education, 21, 291-295.
  • Tamir, P. (1994). Israeli students' conceptions of science and views about the scientific enterprise. Research in Science and Technological Education, 12, 99-116.
  • Türkmen, L. & Bonnstetter, R. J. (1997). Science education developments in Turkey. Science Education International, 8, 12-16.
  • Türkmen, L. & Bonnstetter, R. J. (1998). Inclusion of the nature of science in Turkish science education curriculum (K-11): As a different approach. Science Education International, 9, 15-19.
  • Vitrogen, D. (1967). A method for determining a generalized attitude of high school students toward science. Science Education, 51,170-175.
  • Welch, W. W. & Pella, M. O. (1968). The development of an instrument for inventorying knowledge of the process of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 5, 64-68.
  • Yalçınalp, S., Geban, Ö. & Özkan, 1. (1995). Effectiveness of using computer-assisted supplementary instruction for teaching the mole concept. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 1083-1094.